dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to >> whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as [#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = #21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark, give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach,
instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA: #113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to >>>>> whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the >>>>> course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition >>>>> control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>> appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the >>>>> need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic.
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to >>> whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be
considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as >> [#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach,
instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA: >> #113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to >>>>>> whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the >>>>>> course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition >>>>>> control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the >>>>>> need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic.
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to >>>> whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could
appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be
considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as >>> [#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = >>> #21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark, >>> give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have >>> understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach,
instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA: >>> #113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to >>>>>>> whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the >>>>>>> need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic.
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery which is a later text.
one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
dolf wrote, in part:
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
When one does not know a language
inside-out and outside-in one can be
reminded by reading a language.
https://baopu81.wordpress.com/2021/11/19/classical-daoism-is-there-really-such-a-thing-part-5-3/#_ftn2
Reading words at the above link
reminded one, me being one, of
three words which may relate.
wuyiwei
Then again, at the link above
three words could as well.
youyiwei
Two of the three are the same.
Two that are different might be telling.
Whether this tri-part category is indicative of
any other use of three words to mean what is,
how to be, why and sew froth could be a kind
of a mystery, a project ion, a charged particle.
- of speech and speaking, writing and rites ... Cheers!
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mysterywhich > is a later text.
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could
appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be
considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same >>> way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of
VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation, etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can
postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = >>>> #21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, >>>> discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark, >>>> give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, >>>> understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have >>>> understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself >>>> discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach,
instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to >>>>>>>> whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic.
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mysterywhich > is a later text.
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could
appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be
considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same >>> way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of
VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation, etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can
postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = >>>> #21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, >>>> discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark, >>>> give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, >>>> understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have >>>> understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself >>>> discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach,
instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to >>>>>>>> whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic.
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery
which is a later text.
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could
appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be
considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same >>> way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of
VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation, etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can
postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = >>>> #21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, >>>> discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark, >>>> give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, >>>> understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have >>>> understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself >>>> discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach,
instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to >>>>>>>> whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic.
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means
Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and
Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars.
Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and
Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could
appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be
considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same >>>> way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of
VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation, >> etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492 >> = #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and >>> alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can
postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = >>>>> #21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, >>>>> discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark, >>>>> give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, >>>>> understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have >>>>> understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself >>>>> discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach,
instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something >>>>> prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to >>>>>>>>> whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>>>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery
which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 - number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means
Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and
Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how >> Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars.
Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and
Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could >>>>> appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be
considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same >>>>> way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of
VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation, >>> etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492 >>> = #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and >>>> alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can
postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = >>>>>> #21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, >>>>>> discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, >>>>>> understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself >>>>>> discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something >>>>>> prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>>>>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery
which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 - number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means
Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and
Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how >> Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars.
Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and
Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could >>>>> appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be
considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same >>>>> way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of
VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation, >>> etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492 >>> = #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and >>>> alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can
postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 = >>>>>> #21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, >>>>>> discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, >>>>>> understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to
understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself >>>>>> discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something >>>>>> prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an >>>>>>>>>> adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily
human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number
nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes
by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive
in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL HIERARCHY
#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
#1 47 58 69 80 1 12 23 34 45
#2 57 68 79 9 11 22 33 44 46
#3 67 78 8 10 21 32 43 54 56
#4 77 7 18 20 31 42 53 55 66
#5 6 17 19 30 41 52 63 65 76
#6 16 27 29 40 51 62 64 75 5
#7 26 28 39 50 61 72 74 4 15
#8 36 38 49 60 71 73 3 14 25
#9 37 48 59 70 81 2 13 24 35
@8 vCo vCy vBr vPu vRe vBl vOr vGr vYe
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO
BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1,
@5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid
dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised
to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 - COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg: derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical
calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
• Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
• Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the
Jews in Alexandria.
• An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38
as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS / DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 - >> number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means
Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and
Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how >>> Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars.
Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and
Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could >>>>>> appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of
VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation, >>>> etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492 >>>> = #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and >>>>> alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can >>>>> postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive, >>>>>>> discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight, >>>>>>> understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself >>>>>>> discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] /
#554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something >>>>>>> prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
Note that the #81 elements as #369 magic square keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL HEIRARCHY for the TUESDAY column includes all the number entries for the course of nature:#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
Thus we conclude that the ternary notion of number is intrinsic to the DAO
TE CHING and its primordial order can be determined by an appraisal of the 3x3 centre.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility of the one, two or three.
And in that regard the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY is associated to the TAO TE CHING.
And if you are going to reply speak specifically to the points raised and don’t engage in gibberish.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily
human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number
nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes
by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive
in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL
HIERARCHY
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO
BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying
associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1,
@5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid
dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised
to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 -
COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to
onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical
calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
• Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
• Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the
Jews in Alexandria.
• An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King
Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38
as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS /
DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 - >>> number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means
Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and >>>> Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how >>>> Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars. >>>> Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and >>>> Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution >>>>
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could >>>>>>> appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of >>>>>> VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation,
etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold,
destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and >>>>>> alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can >>>>>> postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself >>>>>>>> discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] / >>>>>>>> #554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something >>>>>>>> prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
Thusly
One produces the circle
Two produces yang / yin
Three produces the segmentation
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Note that the #81 elements as #369 magic square keyed to the DOMINION plane >> of the CELESTIAL HEIRARCHY for the TUESDAY column includes all the number#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
entries for the course of nature:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
Thus we conclude that the ternary notion of number is intrinsic to the DAO >> TE CHING and its primordial order can be determined by an appraisal of the >> 3x3 centre.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility >> of the one, two or three.
And in that regard the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY is associated to the TAO TE >> CHING.
And if you are going to reply speak specifically to the points raised and
don’t engage in gibberish.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily
human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number >>> nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes >>> by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive
in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL
HIERARCHY
#1 47 58 69 80 1 12 23 34 45
#2 57 68 79 9 11 22 33 44 46
#3 67 78 8 10 21 32 43 54 56
#4 77 7 18 20 31 42 53 55 66
#5 6 17 19 30 41 52 63 65 76
#6 16 27 29 40 51 62 64 75 5
#7 26 28 39 50 61 72 74 4 15
#8 36 38 49 60 71 73 3 14 25
#9 37 48 59 70 81 2 13 24 35
@8 vCo vCy vBr vPu vRe vBl vOr vGr vYe
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO >>> BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying
associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1,
@5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid
dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised
to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 - >>> COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to
onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical
calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
• Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
• Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the
Jews in Alexandria.
• An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King >>> Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38
as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS / >>> DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 - >>>> number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>>>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means >>>>> Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and >>>>> Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how
Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars. >>>>> Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and >>>>> Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution >>>>>
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could >>>>>>>> appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of >>>>>>> VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation,
etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, >>>>>> destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can >>>>>>> postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>>>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] / >>>>>>>>> #554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something >>>>>>>>> prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thusly
One produces the circle
Two produces yang / yin
Three produces the segmentation
“And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind,
and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
And the evening and the morning were the third day.” [Genesis 1:11-13]
Language and linguistics
Segment (handwriting), the pen-tip trajectory between two defined points
Segment (linguistics), a discrete unit of speech
Speech segmentation, identifying the boundaries between words in spoken languages
Text segmentation, dividing written text into meaningful units
Thus the question is whether the Chinese language rudiments are derived segmentation since the strokes are discrete elements
So I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as
to whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the appraisals paradigm …
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Note that the #81 elements as #369 magic square keyed to the DOMINION plane >>> of the CELESTIAL HEIRARCHY for the TUESDAY column includes all the number >>> entries for the course of nature:#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
Thus we conclude that the ternary notion of number is intrinsic to the DAO >>> TE CHING and its primordial order can be determined by an appraisal of the >>> 3x3 centre.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility >>> of the one, two or three.
And in that regard the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY is associated to the TAO TE >>> CHING.
And if you are going to reply speak specifically to the points raised and >>> don’t engage in gibberish.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily >>>> human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number >>>> nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes >>>> by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive >>>> in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL
HIERARCHY
#1 47 58 69 80 1 12 23 34 45
#2 57 68 79 9 11 22 33 44 46
#3 67 78 8 10 21 32 43 54 56
#4 77 7 18 20 31 42 53 55 66
#5 6 17 19 30 41 52 63 65 76
#6 16 27 29 40 51 62 64 75 5
#7 26 28 39 50 61 72 74 4 15
#8 36 38 49 60 71 73 3 14 25
#9 37 48 59 70 81 2 13 24 35
@8 vCo vCy vBr vPu vRe vBl vOr vGr vYe >>>>
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO >>>> BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying
associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, >>>> @5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid
dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised >>>> to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 - >>>> COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to >>>> onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical
calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
• Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
• Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the >>>> Jews in Alexandria.
• An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King >>>> Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38 >>>> as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS / >>>> DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 -
number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>>>>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means >>>>>> Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and >>>>>> Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how
Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars. >>>>>> Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and >>>>>> Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution >>>>>>
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could >>>>>>>>> appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of >>>>>>>> VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation,
etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, >>>>>>> destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can >>>>>>>> postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>>>>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] / >>>>>>>>>> #554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thusly
One produces the circle
Two produces yang / yin
Three produces the segmentation
“And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind,
and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
And the evening and the morning were the third day.” [Genesis 1:11-13]
Language and linguistics
Segment (handwriting), the pen-tip trajectory between two defined points
Segment (linguistics), a discrete unit of speech
Speech segmentation, identifying the boundaries between words in spoken languages
Text segmentation, dividing written text into meaningful units
Thus the question is whether the Chinese language rudiments are derived segmentation since the strokes are discrete elements
So I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as
to whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the appraisals paradigm …
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Note that the #81 elements as #369 magic square keyed to the DOMINION plane >>> of the CELESTIAL HEIRARCHY for the TUESDAY column includes all the number >>> entries for the course of nature:#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
Thus we conclude that the ternary notion of number is intrinsic to the DAO >>> TE CHING and its primordial order can be determined by an appraisal of the >>> 3x3 centre.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility >>> of the one, two or three.
And in that regard the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY is associated to the TAO TE >>> CHING.
And if you are going to reply speak specifically to the points raised and >>> don’t engage in gibberish.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily >>>> human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number >>>> nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes >>>> by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive >>>> in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL
HIERARCHY
#1 47 58 69 80 1 12 23 34 45
#2 57 68 79 9 11 22 33 44 46
#3 67 78 8 10 21 32 43 54 56
#4 77 7 18 20 31 42 53 55 66
#5 6 17 19 30 41 52 63 65 76
#6 16 27 29 40 51 62 64 75 5
#7 26 28 39 50 61 72 74 4 15
#8 36 38 49 60 71 73 3 14 25
#9 37 48 59 70 81 2 13 24 35
@8 vCo vCy vBr vPu vRe vBl vOr vGr vYe >>>>
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO >>>> BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying
associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, >>>> @5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid
dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised >>>> to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 - >>>> COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to >>>> onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical
calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
• Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
• Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the >>>> Jews in Alexandria.
• An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King >>>> Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38 >>>> as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS / >>>> DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 -
number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>>>>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means >>>>>> Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and >>>>>> Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how
Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars. >>>>>> Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and >>>>>> Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution >>>>>>
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could >>>>>>>>> appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of >>>>>>>> VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation,
etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, >>>>>>> destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can >>>>>>>> postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>>>>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] / >>>>>>>>>> #554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
One wonders if dolf could have asked the question
as if talking with a five year old.
We have concluded our discussion on this topic and reassert our earliest postulation:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
We could have used the terms ternary <-> binary however since the system relates to nomenclature we then deploy trinomial <-> binomial as an inclusive term.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thusly
One produces the circle
Two produces yang / yin
Three produces the segmentation
“And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and
the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon >> the earth: and it was so.
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind,
and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and >> God saw that it was good.
And the evening and the morning were the third day.” [Genesis 1:11-13]
Language and linguistics
Segment (handwriting), the pen-tip trajectory between two defined points
Segment (linguistics), a discrete unit of speech
Speech segmentation, identifying the boundaries between words in spoken
languages
Text segmentation, dividing written text into meaningful units
Thus the question is whether the Chinese language rudiments are derived
segmentation since the strokes are discrete elements
So I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as >> to whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Note that the #81 elements as #369 magic square keyed to the DOMINION plane#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
of the CELESTIAL HEIRARCHY for the TUESDAY column includes all the number >>>> entries for the course of nature:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
Thus we conclude that the ternary notion of number is intrinsic to the DAO >>>> TE CHING and its primordial order can be determined by an appraisal of the >>>> 3x3 centre.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility
of the one, two or three.
And in that regard the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY is associated to the TAO TE
CHING.
And if you are going to reply speak specifically to the points raised and >>>> don’t engage in gibberish.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily >>>>> human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number >>>>> nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes >>>>> by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive >>>>> in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL >>>>> HIERARCHY
#1 47 58 69 80 1 12 23 34 45
#2 57 68 79 9 11 22 33 44 46
#3 67 78 8 10 21 32 43 54 56
#4 77 7 18 20 31 42 53 55 66
#5 6 17 19 30 41 52 63 65 76
#6 16 27 29 40 51 62 64 75 5
#7 26 28 39 50 61 72 74 4 15
#8 36 38 49 60 71 73 3 14 25
#9 37 48 59 70 81 2 13 24 35
@8 vCo vCy vBr vPu vRe vBl vOr vGr vYe >>>>>
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO >>>>> BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying
associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, >>>>> @5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid
dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised >>>>> to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 - >>>>> COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to >>>>> onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical >>>>> calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg: >>>>> nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
• Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
• Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the >>>>> Jews in Alexandria.
• An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King >>>>> Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38 >>>>> as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS / >>>>> DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 -
number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means >>>>>>> Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and >>>>>>> Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how
Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars. >>>>>>> Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and >>>>>>> Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution >>>>>>>
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could
appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of >>>>>>>>> VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation,
etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, >>>>>>>> destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can >>>>>>>>> postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>>>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] / >>>>>>>>>>> #554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
Paradigm and not program…
one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
a.finder wrote:
dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm
I still don't know anything about the appraisals program.
Could have to do with indigenous people.
My rudimentary understanding of the written language
dates back to when a king of Qin managed to win
wars with other countries and establish it.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinese-languages/Qin-dynasty-standardization
Other forms of writing, e.g. Seal Script, Oracle Bone, etc. existed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_script
<< evolved organically out of the Zhou dynasty bronze script. The Qin
variant of seal script eventually became the standard, and was adopted
as the formal script for all of China during the Qin dynasty. >>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_bronze_inscriptions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_bone_script
Pinyin became official Romanization recently.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinyin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Chinese
If the question pertains to the Uighur people being, educated,
and other more or less so-called indigenous people being mandated
to learn standard forms it reminds me of European history globally
when First Nations were eradicated if they didn't care to assimilate.
- hm6of1
And finally you have provided useful information on language
standardisation but I am desirous to know whether the language was devised
as a process of segmentation against the DAOist paradigm as that which was understood?
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Paradigm and not program…
one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
a.finder wrote:
dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>> appraisals paradigm
I still don't know anything about the appraisals program.
Could have to do with indigenous people.
My rudimentary understanding of the written language
dates back to when a king of Qin managed to win
wars with other countries and establish it.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/Chinese-languages/Qin-dynasty-standardization
Other forms of writing, e.g. Seal Script, Oracle Bone, etc. existed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seal_script
<< evolved organically out of the Zhou dynasty bronze script. The Qin
variant of seal script eventually became the standard, and was adopted
as the formal script for all of China during the Qin dynasty. >>
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_bronze_inscriptions
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oracle_bone_script
Pinyin became official Romanization recently.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_characters
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinyin
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Chinese
If the question pertains to the Uighur people being, educated,
and other more or less so-called indigenous people being mandated
to learn standard forms it reminds me of European history globally
when First Nations were eradicated if they didn't care to assimilate.
- hm6of1
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thusly
One produces the circle
Two produces yang / yin
Three produces the segmentation
“And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind,
and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
And the evening and the morning were the third day.” [Genesis 1:11-13]
Language and linguistics
Segment (handwriting), the pen-tip trajectory between two defined points
Segment (linguistics), a discrete unit of speech
Speech segmentation, identifying the boundaries between words in spoken languages
Text segmentation, dividing written text into meaningful units
Thus the question is whether the Chinese language rudiments are derived segmentation since the strokes are discrete elements
So I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as
to whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the appraisals paradigm …
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Note that the #81 elements as #369 magic square keyed to the DOMINION plane >>> of the CELESTIAL HEIRARCHY for the TUESDAY column includes all the number >>> entries for the course of nature:#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
Thus we conclude that the ternary notion of number is intrinsic to the DAO >>> TE CHING and its primordial order can be determined by an appraisal of the >>> 3x3 centre.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility >>> of the one, two or three.
And in that regard the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY is associated to the TAO TE >>> CHING.
And if you are going to reply speak specifically to the points raised and >>> don’t engage in gibberish.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily >>>> human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number >>>> nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes >>>> by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive >>>> in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL
HIERARCHY
#1 47 58 69 80 1 12 23 34 45
#2 57 68 79 9 11 22 33 44 46
#3 67 78 8 10 21 32 43 54 56
#4 77 7 18 20 31 42 53 55 66
#5 6 17 19 30 41 52 63 65 76
#6 16 27 29 40 51 62 64 75 5
#7 26 28 39 50 61 72 74 4 15
#8 36 38 49 60 71 73 3 14 25
#9 37 48 59 70 81 2 13 24 35
@8 vCo vCy vBr vPu vRe vBl vOr vGr vYe >>>>
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO >>>> BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying
associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, >>>> @5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid
dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised >>>> to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 - >>>> COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to >>>> onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical
calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
• Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
• Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the >>>> Jews in Alexandria.
• An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King >>>> Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38 >>>> as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS / >>>> DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 -
number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>>>>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means >>>>>> Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and >>>>>> Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how
Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars. >>>>>> Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and >>>>>> Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution >>>>>>
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could >>>>>>>>> appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of >>>>>>>> VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation,
etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, >>>>>>> destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can >>>>>>>> postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education.
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] / >>>>>>>>>> #153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] / >>>>>>>>>> #554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial.
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Thusly
One produces the circle
Two produces yang / yin
Three produces the segmentation
There are three elements grass, herb and tree to this Genesis narrative
which conveys a segmentation “after his kind”
“And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and
the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon >> the earth: and it was so.
THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; I
trouble myself only with my own affairs.
#VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
#TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters.
#POSITION: As to Release (no. #21), it is softness, but
#TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness.
#CANON: #169
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@{
@1: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#18); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#18),
@2: Sup: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#94); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#76),
@3: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#110); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#97),
@4: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#117); Ego: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18}),
Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169
THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.
#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire.
#POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3),
@2: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#49); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#46),
@3: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#51); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#83),
@4: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#100); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I
am not one of loud voice.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk.
#CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#37); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#37),
@2: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#70); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#114),
@3: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#117); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#128),
@4: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#151); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#196 - I
AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}),
Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
TOTAL CONCEPT @495
#495 as [#60, #2, #10, #2, #6, #400, #10, #5] = çâbîyb (H5439): {UMBRA: #74
% #41 = #33} 1) places round about, circuit, round about; 2) in a circuit,
a circuit, round about; 3) in the circuit, from every side;
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind,
and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and >> God saw that it was good.
And the evening and the morning were the third day.” [Genesis 1:11-13]
Language and linguistics
Segment (handwriting), the pen-tip trajectory between two defined points
Segment (linguistics), a discrete unit of speech
Speech segmentation, identifying the boundaries between words in spoken
languages
Text segmentation, dividing written text into meaningful units
Thus the question is whether the Chinese language rudiments are derived
segmentation since the strokes are discrete elements
So I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as >> to whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm …
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Note that the #81 elements as #369 magic square keyed to the DOMINION plane#D Sup Ego Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
of the CELESTIAL HEIRARCHY for the TUESDAY column includes all the number >>>> entries for the course of nature:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
Thus we conclude that the ternary notion of number is intrinsic to the DAO >>>> TE CHING and its primordial order can be determined by an appraisal of the >>>> 3x3 centre.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced >>>> One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility
of the one, two or three.
And in that regard the CANON OF SUPREME MYSTERY is associated to the TAO TE
CHING.
And if you are going to reply speak specifically to the points raised and >>>> don’t engage in gibberish.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
I don't think that these alt.philosophy.taoism entities are necessarily >>>>> human since they have difficulty parsing the logic of a trinomial number >>>>> nor to consider that we have derived the #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE prototypes >>>>> by an algorithm applied to their text.
Once again they don't have any contextual relevance and are dismissive >>>>> in applying a disassembly of only text they cohere as gibberish.
Me thinks they are software bots--not worth engaging in dialog.
- dolf
On 21/11/21 11:46, aye wrote:
one wrote:
dolf wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of supreme mystery >>>>>>>>>> which is a later text.
Is the canon of supreme mystery a Tao Chia text?
I have the #81 elements keyed to the DOMINION plane of the CELESTIAL >>>>> HIERARCHY
#1 47 58 69 80 1 12 23 34 45
#2 57 68 79 9 11 22 33 44 46
#3 67 78 8 10 21 32 43 54 56
#4 77 7 18 20 31 42 53 55 66
#5 6 17 19 30 41 52 63 65 76
#6 16 27 29 40 51 62 64 75 5
#7 26 28 39 50 61 72 74 4 15
#8 36 38 49 60 71 73 3 14 25
#9 37 48 59 70 81 2 13 24 35
@8 vCo vCy vBr vPu vRe vBl vOr vGr vYe >>>>>
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES AS CELESTIAL HIERARCHY APPEAR TO >>>>> BE A NOUMENON FORMULATION DEVISED FOR #75 - FAILURE (SHIH) assaying
associated to the #6 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, >>>>> @5) onomantic #8 - conception of #number as #1080 - HETEROS and
stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid
dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was devised >>>>> to RESOLVE THE ISSUE OF HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4TH PLANE) AS #77 - >>>>> COMPLIANCE (HSUN) PROTOTYPE:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to >>>>> onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical >>>>> calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI: 17 AD --> 2017
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg: >>>>> nature rejoices in its nature)
YEAR #38 AD - ROMAN EMPIRE
• Claudius and Messalina are probably married this year.
• Apion heads a deputation to Emperor Caligula, to complain about the >>>>> Jews in Alexandria.
• An anti-Jewish riot breaks out in Alexandria, during a visit by King >>>>> Herod Agrippa I; the mob wants to place statues of Caligula @ LOCUS #38 >>>>> as [#40 - LAW / MODEL (FA), #8 - OPPOSITION (KAN), #10 - DEFECTIVENESS / >>>>> DISTORTION (HSIEN)] in every synagogue.
On 21/11/21 09:25, dolf wrote:
I made a further correction of the one, two, three being relevant to #81 -
number and #369 - everything
My apologies for multiple posts.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sadly your response doesn’t address the canon of
supreme mystery
which is a later text.
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things." >>>>>>>
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 <— following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
It is generally agreed by Taoist scholars that Tao produced One means >>>>>>> Wuji produced Taiji, and One produced Two means Taiji produced Yin and >>>>>>> Yang [or Liangyi (兩儀) in scholastic term]. However, the subject of how
Two produced Three has remained a popular debate among Taoist Scholars. >>>>>>> Most scholars believe that it refers to the Interaction between Yin and >>>>>>> Yang, with the presence of Chi, or life force.
Thusly every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the
possibility of the one, two or three.
For instance #30 - Bold Resolution is comprised:
+ 27 - once broken (#2)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 0 - none broken (#1)
+ 3 - twice broken (#3) <-- *correction*
3 - Nature surmounts nature / #0 - totality of nature = Bold Resolution >>>>>>>
On 20/11/21 20:09, dolf wrote:
I would like to know the answer to the epistemological consideration as to
whether the Chinese language rudiments were conceived against the >>>>>>>>>>>> appraisals paradigm …
<https://www.grapple369.com>
Fortunately there is an inclusion of Arabic script and thusly I could
appraise such as I have with Locutus’ narrative below.
The question is whether the tri-part #THREE, #FOUR, #FIVE might be >>>>>>>>>> considered a linguistic category within the nomenclature in much the same
way that a tri-part name defines the anthropology:
Xi
Jin
Ping
Could the use of a tri-part name then be viewed as the exercise of >>>>>>>>> VOLUNTĀTIS as will:
voluntās f (genitive voluntātis);
will, free will, choice
desire, inclination
disposition towards (something or someone)
favor, affection
last will, testament
goal, object, purpose, intention
signification, import
#THREE - judgement sensibility (#123)
#FOUR - principle of materiality (#164)
#FIVE - principle of persistence (#205)
= #492 - VOLUNTĀTIS
#123 + #369 - WAN WU / discriminating norm
The English word volunty is YANG
(obsolete) The positive aspect of God, encompassing light, love, creation,
etc.
And if we consider that there are 9x9x9 = #729 appraisals then #729 - #492
= #237 - use of force as ONTIC deme extent…
nolunty is YIN
(obsolete) The negative aspect of God, encompassing darkness, cold, >>>>>>>> destruction, etc.
Just pondering …
It would simply take many years of education to resolve the question and
alas I am not at an age where I can do so, but be that as it is I can >>>>>>>>> postulate a question…
Locutus <dr.inker@many.worlds> wrote:
dolf wrote:
The question then is whether the education is effective or just reinforcing
a trinomial <-> binomial adverse consequence
Some people refuse to be assimilated.
Their resistance is not futile.
Extremists may disrupt a government
bringing a reign of terror to a land
and help induce cheap labor.
Birthing processes vary.
Trying to rule the world by force
is seen by Taoist texts as not the Way.
A global village has its people.
Transcending nationalism, tribalism, extremism
and culturalism may be a key to effective education. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
The pale blue dot is one world.
#THREE: #103 as #22 - RESISTANCE (KE)
#FOUR: #155 as #74 - CLOSURE (CHIH)
#FIVE: #258 as #15 - REACH (TA)
#97 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 20 NOVEMBER 2021 as
[#30, #5, #2, #10, #700] /
#114 as [#6, #50, #2, #6, #700] /
#127 as [#5, #2, #10, #50, #50, #10] /
#152 as [#40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] / [#50, #2, #50, #10, #600] /
#153 as [#5, #40, #2, #6, #50, #10, #600] /
#163 as [#6, #5, #40, #2, #10, #50, #10, #600] /
#474 as [#6, #400, #2, #10, #50, #6] = bîyn (H995): {UMBRA: #62 % #41 =
#21}} 1) to discern, understand, consider; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to perceive,
discern; 1a2) to understand, know (with the mind); 1a3) to observe, mark,
give heed to, distinguish, consider; 1a4) to have discernment, insight,
understanding; 1b) (Niphal) to be discerning, intelligent, discreet, have
understanding; 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to understand; 1c2) to cause to >>>>>>>>>>> understand, give understanding, teach; 1d) (Hithpolel) to show oneself
discerning or attentive, consider diligently; 1e) (Polel) to teach, >>>>>>>>>>> instruct; 2) (TWOT) prudent, regard;
#508 as [#8, #100, #400] /
#518 as [#8, #100, #400, #10] /
#524 as [#8, #100, #6, #400, #10] / [#8, #100, #400, #10, #6] / >>>>>>>>>>> #554 as [#40, #8, #100, #6, #400] /
#571 as [#6, #2, #8, #100, #400, #10, #5, #600] = chuqqâh (H2708): {UMBRA:
#113 % #41 = #31}} 1) statute, ordinance, limit, enactment, something
prescribed; 1a) statute;
Governed by many groups of people
who people the planet as the planet peoples
its land areas on the surface, nation states
of mind, mind as super-organisms grow.
Beneath a surface of the waters,
beneath what waves as waves,
the blue dot world spins a round.
- a weigh Ting, beer o'clock ... Cheers!
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The consideration is firstly how the notion of State is defined as to
whether trinomial or binomial.
And secondly the relationship between the two which may result in an
adversarial consequence whereto use the trinomial consideration of the
course of naturethe binomial apparatus (ie. TÉCHN?: G5078) seeks to place
a binomial clamp upon intrinsic nature as means to exert a juxtaposition
control.
The UIGHURs belief system is binomial and ought to give precedence to the
Chinese notion (eg: whether language rudiments were conceived against the
appraisals paradigm) of state which is trinomial. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So one must object to the notion of genocide or forced labour given the
need for education about the binomial <-> trinomial dynamic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
- dolf
Jedi Master <cybernetic4456@gmail.com> wrote:
China is carrying out the largest genocide since the Holocaust. The world
is joining hands to punish China.
WION Gravitas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYAsoQv6n70&t=302s
You engaged in the slander that I was engaged in numerology and had an
oracle machine…
I merely replied that I’m given to use of ONTIC premise as number and am able to redact a number of languages to a numerical sequence as unity of apperception.
For instance I demonstrated the truth of the following by an ONTIC
grounding relative to the canon of supreme mystery 4 BCE interpretation
(ie. it also had a family structure construct):
From the Taoist classic Tao Te Ching, it was held that "The Tao produced
One; One produced Two; Two produced Three; Three produced All things."
0, 27, 54 <-- unity of apperception
0, 9, 18
0, 3, 6 < following numbers are all divisions of three
1, 2, 3
That every number #81 and everything #369 is made up from the possibility
of the one, two or three.
Thusly
One produces the circle
Two produces yang / yin
Three produces the segmentation: @169 + @130 + @196
There are three elements grass, herb and tree to this Genesis narrative
which conveys a segmentation “after his kind”
סָבִיב çâbîyb, saw-beeb'; or (feminine) סְבִיבָה çᵉbîybâh; from H5437; (as
noun) a *circle*, neighbour, or environs; but chiefly (as adverb, with or without preposition) around:—(place, round) about, circuit, compass, on every side.
“And God said, Let the earth bring forth grass, the herb yielding seed, and the fruit tree yielding fruit after his kind, whose seed is in itself, upon the earth: and it was so.
THOTH MEASURE: #18 - Oh Tutuf, who makest thine appearance in Ati; I
trouble myself only with my own affairs.
#VIRTUE: As to Waiting (no. #18), it exits.
#TOOLS: As to Closing in (no. #58), it enters. #POSITION: As to Release
(no. #21), it is softness, but #TIME: As to Hardness (no. #72), it is leathery toughness. #CANON: #169
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_169@{
@1: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#18); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#18), @2: Sup: 76
- AGGRAVATION: CHU (#94); Ego: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#76), @3: Sup: 16 - CONTACT: CHIAO (#110); Ego: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#97), @4: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#117); Ego: 72 - HARDNESS: CHIEN (#169 - I TROUBLE MYSELF ONLY WITH
MY OWN AFFAIRS {%18}), Male: #117; Feme: #169
} // #169
THOTH MEASURE: #3 - Oh thou of the Nose, who makest thine appearance at Chemunnu; I am not evil minded.
#VIRTUE: With Mired (no. #3), great woe.
#TOOLS: With Encounters (no. #43), small desire. #POSITION: The ways of Purity (no. #37) and ...
#TIME: Pattern (no. #47) where some are simple and some are complex?
#CANON: #130
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_130@{
@1: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#3), @2: Sup: 46 - ENLARGEMENT: K'UO (#49); Ego: 43 - ENCOUNTERS: YU (#46), @3: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#51); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#83), @4: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT:
T'AO (#100); Ego: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#130 - I AM NOT EVIL MINDED {%3}),
Male: #100; Feme: #130
} // #130
THOTH MEASURE: #37 - Oh Striker, who makest thine appearance in Heaven; I
am not one of loud voice.
#VIRTUE: Purity (no. #37) means the Way of the ruler.
#TOOLS: Compliance (no. #77) means the subject’s preservation.
#POSITION: With Penetration (no. #14), a sharp advance.
#TIME: With Dimming (no. #68), an impeded walk. #CANON: #196
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_196@{
@1: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#37); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#37), @2: Sup:
33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#70); Ego: 77 - COMPLIANCE: HSUN (#114), @3: Sup: 47 - PATTERN: WEN (#117); Ego: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#128), @4: Sup: 34 - KINSHIP: CH'IN (#151); Ego: 68 - DIMMING: MENG (#196 - I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}), Male: #151; Feme: #196
} // #196
TOTAL CONCEPT @495
#495 as [#60, #2, #10, #2, #6, #400, #10, #5] = çâbîyb (H5439): {UMBRA: #74
% #41 = #33} 1) places round about, circuit, round about; 2) in a circuit,
a circuit, round about; 3) in the circuit, from every side;
And the earth brought forth grass, and herb yielding seed after his kind,
and the tree yielding fruit, whose seed was in itself, after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
And the evening and the morning were the third day.” [Genesis 1:11-13]
That text is from 1350 BCE and is an ONTIC consideration of 4 BCE
If you are not familiar of such proof examples to interpretation of the TAO TE CHING then don’t reply because I don’t need your permission and I am not interested
in your ego.
Your method of disassembly is tedious.
one <being@apolka.sign> wrote:
dolf wrote:
I am into ONTIC premise
Redacting language: romanised, Hebrew, Greek, Arabic and Russian to a
common number form
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontic
<< physical, real, or factual existence >>
Language is physical, in some ways.
Real, apparently. Factual, sometimes.
So, you want to take four languages,
not including English, and somehow associate
various words in those languages with numbers?
If you arent equipped for the discussion then dont reply
I have no idea if it's possible for me to equipped
for the discussion. I don't know any of the four
languages you care to discuss. If one needs to
be familiar with all four or any of the four, then
I am totally not equipped to discuss them.
English is fun for me.
Chinese is curious, especially given Taoist texts
and possible interpretations of what words are able to mean.
Why would you suppose some body in a Taoist philosophy group
would be capable or equipped in some fashion to discuss the four
languages you are interested in?
- thanks! Cheers!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 242:24:04 |
| Calls: | 6,624 |
| Files: | 12,175 |
| Messages: | 5,320,202 |