In the UK, if John lends his car to Barry, and Barry breaks the speed
limit (fixed camera, not a policeman), John gets the ticket as it's
his car reg, and says Barry was driving, but Barry denies it, and the
camera does not take a photo of the driver, who gets fined?
In the UK, if John lends his car to Barry, and Barry breaks the speed
limit (fixed camera, not a policeman), John gets the ticket as it's his
car reg, and says Barry was driving, but Barry denies it, and the camera
does not take a photo of the driver, who gets fined?
Best you take the hit and be a man, for once.
On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 00:31:07 +0100, Fredxx, the notorious, troll-feeding, senile smartass, blathered again:
Best you take the hit and be a man, for once.
Best you learn to resist the unwashed Scottish wanker's absolutely idiotic baits he sets out for senile assholes like you, you notorious smartass!
Commander Kinsey pretended :
In the UK, if John lends his car to Barry, and Barry breaks the speed
limit (fixed camera, not a policeman), John gets the ticket as it's
his car reg, and says Barry was driving, but Barry denies it, and the
camera does not take a photo of the driver, who gets fined?
Yeah as if someone was driving *YOUR* car Peter. Pay up dickhead. LOL
On 22/07/2021 15:36, Commander Kinsey wrote:
In the UK, if John lends his car to Barry, and Barry breaks the speed
limit (fixed camera, not a policeman), John gets the ticket as it's his
car reg, and says Barry was driving, but Barry denies it, and the camera
does not take a photo of the driver, who gets fined?
Barry provides evidence he wasn't driving.
John gets asked if Barry is insured to drive his car.
John likely gets the points, and a chance of a prosecution for perjury.
8 months?
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/mar/11/chris-huhne-vicky-pryce
Best you take the hit and be a man, for once.
Wasn't there talk about the last census in England being the last one?
Depending where 'here' is, it could be that the only vehicle with even a chance of getting through might be a snowcat.
"Where is a whip there is a jurisdiction"
-- Legal realpolitik wisdom
On Tue, 19 Sep 2023 10:57:52 +0200, A. Filip, another mentally deficient, troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE, blathered:
"Where is a whip there is a jurisdiction"
-- Legal realpolitik wisdom
Where there's a troll, there's his corresponding troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE! Inevitably! <BG>
Why on earth would anyone award anything to a spammer? They should be jailed for spamming.
US courts _finally_ awarded 3 USD to e360. It took mere 5 years.
US jurisdiction had been confirmed by all US courts involved.
What happened during the switch from coal gas to natural gas, must have
been something similar?
They do have a door-knocker.
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 07:25:25 +0200, A. Filip, another troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE, blathered:
Why on earth would anyone award anything to a spammer? They should be jailed for spamming.
US courts _finally_ awarded 3 USD to e360. It took mere 5 years.
US jurisdiction had been confirmed by all US courts involved.
The attention-starved trolling Scottish wanker's congenital idiocy simply seems to be irresistible to all the assorted miserable troll-feeding senile wankers on Usenet! LOL
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 55:21:03 |
| Calls: | 6,650 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,200 |
| Messages: | 5,330,753 |