and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1)
completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c) answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] = battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff,
contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public. The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert – reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a
review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 % #41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration
(repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1)
completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c) >> answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] = >> battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat >> the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to >> have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.; >>
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff,
contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise >> for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to >> get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public. >> The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to >> freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where >> people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with
different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media
guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this
task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert – >> reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a
particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current >> affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a
review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this >> work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in
place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to
Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming
weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion of #27 - DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity as to naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, {@1: Sup:
75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55, 14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74, 17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72, 36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS >> as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining >> dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative. >>
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious >> the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as
relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 % >> #41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of
contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration
(repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1)
completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c) >>> answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] = >>> battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat >>> the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate. >>> Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to >>> have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.; >>>
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff,
contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise >>> for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s >>> social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to >>> get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to >>> freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where >>> people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with >>> different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media
guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges >>> and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this >>> task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert – >>> reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a
particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current >>> affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a
review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this >>> work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in >>> place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to >>> Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming
weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is that NUMBER
has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of
expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code modification) as attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist the scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for wellbeing and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion of #27 -
DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as
pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity as to
naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, {@1: Sup:
75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS >> {%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#54)} >>
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55, >> 14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74, >> 17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72, >> 36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS >>> as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining >>> dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative. >>>
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious >>> the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as
relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of
contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration
(repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend." >>>> {@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 - >>>> REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1)
completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c) >>>> answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] = >>>> battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate. >>>> Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.; >>>>
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff,
contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise >>>> for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s >>>> social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to >>>> get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with >>>> different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media >>>> guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges >>>> and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this >>>> task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a >>>> particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current >>>> affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a >>>> review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in >>>> place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to >>>> Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming
weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable Grumble meta rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55, 14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74, 17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72, 36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: tékhnē, lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni] (listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or doing, Technē is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of knowledge of principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66, 33, 49,
64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is that NUMBER
has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of
expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code modification) as
attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist the
scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for wellbeing >> and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion of #27 - >>> DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as
pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity as to
naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, {@1: Sup: >>> 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS >>> {%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#54)} >>>
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55, >>> 14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74, >>> 17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72, >>> 36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS >>>> as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as >>>> relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of >>>> contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration
(repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend." >>>>> {@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 - >>>>> REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1)
completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate. >>>>> Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff,
contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s >>>>> social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with >>>>> different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media >>>>> guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges >>>>> and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this >>>>> task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a >>>>> particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a >>>>> review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in >>>>> place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to >>>>> Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming
weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
Being self educated with a particular noumenon focus, news media and
aptitude for resonance phenomenon I then don't shy away from spontaneous vocalisation which then become an impetus for further education.
ANY commitment to freedom of expression MUST see rationalisation (ie.
whether inept or not) as a valid criteria for flagrant speech and the
absence of that sapient construct then makes it improper such as prejudice.
RATIONALISATION: So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS as categories of understanding that are the
product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator
to the content of the narrative.
In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a German sociologist, jurist, and economist.[1] Rationalization (or rationalisation) is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as motivators for behaviour in society with concepts based on rationality and reason.[2] The term rational is seen in the context of people, their expressions, and or their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform speech or in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality within
people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a worldview
or perspective (idea).[2] An example of rationalization can be seen in the implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of rationalization, as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in architecture and urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a culture
may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization. Countries are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of technology, it
is easier for countries to influence each other through social networking, the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place would be the case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many locals view them as an important part of their culture and traditions, development initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the practice in order to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.[3]
Many sociologists, critical theorists and contemporary philosophers have argued that rationalization, falsely assumed as progress, has had a
negative and dehumanizing effect on society, moving modernity away from the central tenets of Enlightenment.[4] The founders of sociology had critical reaction to rationalization:
Marx and Engels associated the emergence of modern society above all with
the development of capitalism; for Durkheim it was connected in particular with industrialization and the new social division of labour which this brought about; for Weber it had to do with the emergence of a distinctive
way of thinking, the rational calculation which he associated with the Protestant Ethic (more or less what Marx and Engels speak of in terms of those 'icy waves of egotistical calculation').
— John Harriss, The Second Great Transformation? Capitalism at the End of the Twentieth Century 1992[5]
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(sociology)>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable Grumble meta
rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55, >> 14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74, >> 17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72, >> 36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the
metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: tékhnē, >> lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni] >> (listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or doing, Technē >> is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of knowledge of >> principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66, 33, 49,
64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is that NUMBER >>> has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of
expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code modification) as
attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist the
scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for wellbeing >>> and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion of #27 - >>>> DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as
pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity as to >>>> naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, {@1: Sup: >>>> 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS
{%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55, >>>> 14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74, >>>> 17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72, >>>> 36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as >>>>> relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of >>>>> contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration
(repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend." >>>>>> {@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 - >>>>>> REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1)
completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate. >>>>>> Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff,
contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with >>>>>> different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media >>>>>> guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges >>>>>> and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this >>>>>> task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a >>>>>> particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a >>>>>> review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in >>>>>> place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to >>>>>> Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming >>>>>> weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
Other than to note that #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM is a central premise for assaying the corporate statement, we are not in a position to resolve the grey issues: #330 ... #679 which cleave to such disclosure:
#330 as [#10, #300, #500] = yêsh (H3426): {UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23} 1) being, existence, substance, there is or are; 1a) substance; 1b) existence; 1c) there is or are;
#334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#10, #300, #10, #8, #6]
/
#330 as [#2, #300, #10, #8, #10] / [#6, #1, #300, #10, #8, #5] = sîyach (H7878): {UMBRA: #318 % #41 = #31} 1) to put forth, mediate, muse, commune, speak, complain, ponder, sing; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to complain; 1a2) to muse, meditate upon, study, ponder; 1a3) to talk, sing, speak; 1b) (Polel) to meditate, consider, put forth thoughts;
#679 as [#400, #80, #5, #100, #70, #3, #20, #1] = hypéronkos (G5246): {UMBRA: #948 % #41 = #5} 1) overswollen; 2) metaph. immoderate,
extravagant;
"These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their mouth speaketh great-G5246 swelling-G5246 words, having men's persons in admiration because of advantage." [Jude 1:16]
#293 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#5, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #7, #70, #40, #8, #50] /
#679 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200] = logízomai (G3049): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute, calculate, count over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1) metaph.
to pass to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as or to be something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as having the like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to reckon or account; 2) to reckon inward, count up or weigh the reasons, to deliberate; 3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to consider,
take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem, judge; 3c) to determine, purpose, decide;
--------
It is also important to the public. {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#488); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#330)}
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to freedom of expression. {@11: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#514); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#349)}
That is a difficult balancing act to get right where people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, {@12: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#555); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#413)}
and with different audience and social media profiles. {@13: Sup: 31 - PACKING: CHUANG (#586); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#437)}
The BBC's social media guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this task. {@14: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#628);
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#447)}
It should be clear, {@15: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#679); Ego: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#484)}
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Being self educated with a particular noumenon focus, news media and
aptitude for resonance phenomenon I then don't shy away from spontaneous
vocalisation which then become an impetus for further education.
ANY commitment to freedom of expression MUST see rationalisation (ie.
whether inept or not) as a valid criteria for flagrant speech and the
absence of that sapient construct then makes it improper such as prejudice. >>
RATIONALISATION: So we can see here that the language process is a
rationalisation of IDEAS as categories of understanding that are the
product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator >> to the content of the narrative.
In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a German
sociologist, jurist, and economist.[1] Rationalization (or rationalisation) >> is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as motivators for
behaviour in society with concepts based on rationality and reason.[2] The >> term rational is seen in the context of people, their expressions, and or
their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform speech or >> in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality within
people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a worldview
or perspective (idea).[2] An example of rationalization can be seen in the >> implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of rationalization, >> as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in architecture and >> urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a culture
may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization. Countries >> are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of technology, it >> is easier for countries to influence each other through social networking, >> the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place would be the >> case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many locals view
them as an important part of their culture and traditions, development
initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the practice in order >> to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.[3]
Many sociologists, critical theorists and contemporary philosophers have
argued that rationalization, falsely assumed as progress, has had a
negative and dehumanizing effect on society, moving modernity away from the >> central tenets of Enlightenment.[4] The founders of sociology had critical >> reaction to rationalization:
Marx and Engels associated the emergence of modern society above all with
the development of capitalism; for Durkheim it was connected in particular >> with industrialization and the new social division of labour which this
brought about; for Weber it had to do with the emergence of a distinctive
way of thinking, the rational calculation which he associated with the
Protestant Ethic (more or less what Marx and Engels speak of in terms of
those 'icy waves of egotistical calculation').
— John Harriss, The Second Great Transformation? Capitalism at the End of
the Twentieth Century 1992[5]
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(sociology)>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable Grumble meta >>> rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55, >>> 14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74, >>> 17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72, >>> 36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the
metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: tékhnē,
lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni] >>> (listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or doing, Technē
is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of knowledge of >>> principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66, 33, 49, >>> 64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is that NUMBER >>>> has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of
expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code modification) as
attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist the
scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for wellbeing >>>> and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion of #27 - >>>>> DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as
pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity as to >>>>> naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, {@1: Sup: >>>>> 75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS
{%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as >>>>>> relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of >>>>>> contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration
(repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention. >>>>>>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend." >>>>>>> {@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 - >>>>>>> REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1) >>>>>>> completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff,
contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with
different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media >>>>>>> guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this
task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a >>>>>>> particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a >>>>>>> review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in
place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to
Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming >>>>>>> weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
CORRECTION: The word #293 = logízomai (G3049): also has a noumenon
resonance for this day and by such we establish our grounding.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Other than to note that #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM is a central >> premise for assaying the corporate statement, we are not in a position to
resolve the grey issues: #330 ... #679 which cleave to such disclosure:
#330 as [#10, #300, #500] = yêsh (H3426): {UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23} 1)
being, existence, substance, there is or are; 1a) substance; 1b) existence; >> 1c) there is or are;
#334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#10, #300, #10, #8, #6]
/
#330 as [#2, #300, #10, #8, #10] / [#6, #1, #300, #10, #8, #5] = sîyach
(H7878): {UMBRA: #318 % #41 = #31} 1) to put forth, mediate, muse, commune, >> speak, complain, ponder, sing; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to complain; 1a2) to muse,
meditate upon, study, ponder; 1a3) to talk, sing, speak; 1b) (Polel) to
meditate, consider, put forth thoughts;
#679 as [#400, #80, #5, #100, #70, #3, #20, #1] = hypéronkos (G5246):
{UMBRA: #948 % #41 = #5} 1) overswollen; 2) metaph. immoderate,
extravagant;
"These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their >> mouth speaketh great-G5246 swelling-G5246 words, having men's persons in
admiration because of advantage." [Jude 1:16]
#293 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#5, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #7, #70, #40, #8, #50] /
#679 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200] = logízomai >> (G3049): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute, calculate, >> count over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1) metaph.
to pass to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as or to be
something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as having the
like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to reckon or
account; 2) to reckon inward, count up or weigh the reasons, to deliberate; >> 3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to consider,
take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem, judge; 3c) to >> determine, purpose, decide;
--------
It is also important to the public. {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#488); >> Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#330)}
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to >> freedom of expression. {@11: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#514); Ego: 19 -
FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#349)}
That is a difficult balancing act to get right where people are subject to >> different contracts and on air positions, {@12: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING
(#555); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#413)}
and with different audience and social media profiles. {@13: Sup: 31 -
PACKING: CHUANG (#586); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#437)}
The BBC's social media guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes >> difficult challenges and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the
guidance is up to this task. {@14: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#628);
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#447)}
It should be clear, {@15: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#679); Ego: 37 -
PURITY: TS'UI (#484)}
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Being self educated with a particular noumenon focus, news media and
aptitude for resonance phenomenon I then don't shy away from spontaneous >>> vocalisation which then become an impetus for further education.
ANY commitment to freedom of expression MUST see rationalisation (ie.
whether inept or not) as a valid criteria for flagrant speech and the
absence of that sapient construct then makes it improper such as prejudice. >>>
RATIONALISATION: So we can see here that the language process is a
rationalisation of IDEAS as categories of understanding that are the
product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator >>> to the content of the narrative.
In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a German >>> sociologist, jurist, and economist.[1] Rationalization (or rationalisation) >>> is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as motivators for >>> behaviour in society with concepts based on rationality and reason.[2] The >>> term rational is seen in the context of people, their expressions, and or >>> their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform speech or >>> in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality within
people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a worldview >>> or perspective (idea).[2] An example of rationalization can be seen in the >>> implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of rationalization, >>> as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in architecture and >>> urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a culture >>> may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization. Countries >>> are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of technology, it >>> is easier for countries to influence each other through social networking, >>> the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place would be the >>> case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many locals view >>> them as an important part of their culture and traditions, development
initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the practice in order >>> to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.[3]
Many sociologists, critical theorists and contemporary philosophers have >>> argued that rationalization, falsely assumed as progress, has had a
negative and dehumanizing effect on society, moving modernity away from the >>> central tenets of Enlightenment.[4] The founders of sociology had critical >>> reaction to rationalization:
Marx and Engels associated the emergence of modern society above all with >>> the development of capitalism; for Durkheim it was connected in particular >>> with industrialization and the new social division of labour which this
brought about; for Weber it had to do with the emergence of a distinctive >>> way of thinking, the rational calculation which he associated with the
Protestant Ethic (more or less what Marx and Engels speak of in terms of >>> those 'icy waves of egotistical calculation').
— John Harriss, The Second Great Transformation? Capitalism at the End of
the Twentieth Century 1992[5]
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(sociology)>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable Grumble meta >>>> rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55, >>>> 14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74, >>>> 17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72, >>>> 36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the
metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: tékhnē,
lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni] >>>> (listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or doing, Technē
is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of knowledge of >>>> principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66, 33, 49, >>>> 64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is that NUMBER >>>>> has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of
expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code modification) as >>>>> attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist the >>>>> scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for wellbeing
and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion of #27 -
DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as >>>>>> pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity as to >>>>>> naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, {@1: Sup:
75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS
{%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as >>>>>>> relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of >>>>>>> contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration
(repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention. >>>>>>>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 - >>>>>>>> REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1) >>>>>>>> completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, >>>>>>>> contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with
different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media >>>>>>>> guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this
task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a >>>>>>>> particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a >>>>>>>> review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in
place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to
Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming >>>>>>>> weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
techne (Greek: τέχνη) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or
doing,
v's
poiéō (G4160): to make; to do
#178 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #10] /
#679 as [#5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5] = poiéō (G4160): {UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the
cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot forth;
1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a thing out
of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1) to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to appoint or ordain one that; 1g2) to (make i.e.) declare one anything; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors of a thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well; 2a1)
to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one;
2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep; 2d1)
to make ready, and so at the same time to institute, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
CORRECTION: The word #293 = logízomai (G3049): also has a noumenon
resonance for this day and by such we establish our grounding.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Other than to note that #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM is a central >>> premise for assaying the corporate statement, we are not in a position to >>> resolve the grey issues: #330 ... #679 which cleave to such disclosure:
#330 as [#10, #300, #500] = yêsh (H3426): {UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23} 1)
being, existence, substance, there is or are; 1a) substance; 1b) existence; >>> 1c) there is or are;
#334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#10, #300, #10, #8, #6]
/
#330 as [#2, #300, #10, #8, #10] / [#6, #1, #300, #10, #8, #5] = sîyach >>> (H7878): {UMBRA: #318 % #41 = #31} 1) to put forth, mediate, muse, commune, >>> speak, complain, ponder, sing; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to complain; 1a2) to muse, >>> meditate upon, study, ponder; 1a3) to talk, sing, speak; 1b) (Polel) to
meditate, consider, put forth thoughts;
#679 as [#400, #80, #5, #100, #70, #3, #20, #1] = hypéronkos (G5246):
{UMBRA: #948 % #41 = #5} 1) overswollen; 2) metaph. immoderate,
extravagant;
"These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their >>> mouth speaketh great-G5246 swelling-G5246 words, having men's persons in >>> admiration because of advantage." [Jude 1:16]
#293 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#5, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #7, #70, #40, #8, #50] /
#679 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200] = logízomai >>> (G3049): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute, calculate, >>> count over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1) metaph. >>> to pass to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as or to be >>> something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as having the >>> like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to reckon or >>> account; 2) to reckon inward, count up or weigh the reasons, to deliberate; >>> 3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to consider, >>> take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem, judge; 3c) to >>> determine, purpose, decide;
--------
It is also important to the public. {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#488); >>> Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#330)}
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to >>> freedom of expression. {@11: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#514); Ego: 19 -
FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#349)}
That is a difficult balancing act to get right where people are subject to >>> different contracts and on air positions, {@12: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING >>> (#555); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#413)}
and with different audience and social media profiles. {@13: Sup: 31 -
PACKING: CHUANG (#586); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#437)}
The BBC's social media guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes >>> difficult challenges and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the
guidance is up to this task. {@14: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#628); >>> Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#447)}
It should be clear, {@15: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#679); Ego: 37 -
PURITY: TS'UI (#484)}
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Being self educated with a particular noumenon focus, news media and
aptitude for resonance phenomenon I then don't shy away from spontaneous >>>> vocalisation which then become an impetus for further education.
ANY commitment to freedom of expression MUST see rationalisation (ie.
whether inept or not) as a valid criteria for flagrant speech and the
absence of that sapient construct then makes it improper such as prejudice.
RATIONALISATION: So we can see here that the language process is a
rationalisation of IDEAS as categories of understanding that are the
product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator >>>> to the content of the narrative.
In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a German >>>> sociologist, jurist, and economist.[1] Rationalization (or rationalisation)
is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as motivators for >>>> behaviour in society with concepts based on rationality and reason.[2] The >>>> term rational is seen in the context of people, their expressions, and or >>>> their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform speech or
in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality within
people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a worldview >>>> or perspective (idea).[2] An example of rationalization can be seen in the >>>> implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of rationalization,
as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in architecture and
urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a culture >>>> may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization. Countries
are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of technology, it >>>> is easier for countries to influence each other through social networking, >>>> the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place would be the
case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many locals view >>>> them as an important part of their culture and traditions, development >>>> initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the practice in order
to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.[3]
Many sociologists, critical theorists and contemporary philosophers have >>>> argued that rationalization, falsely assumed as progress, has had a
negative and dehumanizing effect on society, moving modernity away from the
central tenets of Enlightenment.[4] The founders of sociology had critical >>>> reaction to rationalization:
Marx and Engels associated the emergence of modern society above all with >>>> the development of capitalism; for Durkheim it was connected in particular >>>> with industrialization and the new social division of labour which this >>>> brought about; for Weber it had to do with the emergence of a distinctive >>>> way of thinking, the rational calculation which he associated with the >>>> Protestant Ethic (more or less what Marx and Engels speak of in terms of >>>> those 'icy waves of egotistical calculation').
— John Harriss, The Second Great Transformation? Capitalism at the End of
the Twentieth Century 1992[5]
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(sociology)>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable Grumble meta >>>>> rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the
metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: tékhnē,
lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni]
(listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or doing, Technē
is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of knowledge of
principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66, 33, 49, >>>>> 64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is that NUMBER >>>>>> has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of >>>>>> expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code modification) as >>>>>> attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist the >>>>>> scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for wellbeing
and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion of #27 -
DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as >>>>>>> pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity as to >>>>>>> naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, {@1: Sup:
75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS
{%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as >>>>>>>> relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of
contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration >>>>>>>> (repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention. >>>>>>>>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1) >>>>>>>>> completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, >>>>>>>>> contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with
different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media
guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this
task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a
particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a
review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in
place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to
Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming >>>>>>>>> weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
techne (Greek: τέχνη) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or
doing,
v's
poiéō (G4160): to make; to do
#178 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, #8, #10] /
#679 as [#5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5] = poiéō (G4160): {UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things made, to produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the
cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot forth;
1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a thing out
of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1) to (make i.e.) constitute or appoint one anything, to appoint or ordain one that; 1g2) to (make i.e.) declare one anything; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors of a thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well; 2a1)
to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one;
2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep; 2d1)
to make ready, and so at the same time to institute, the celebration of the passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
CORRECTION: The word #293 = logízomai (G3049): also has a noumenon
resonance for this day and by such we establish our grounding.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Other than to note that #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM is a central >>> premise for assaying the corporate statement, we are not in a position to >>> resolve the grey issues: #330 ... #679 which cleave to such disclosure:
#330 as [#10, #300, #500] = yêsh (H3426): {UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23} 1)
being, existence, substance, there is or are; 1a) substance; 1b) existence; >>> 1c) there is or are;
#334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#10, #300, #10, #8, #6]
/
#330 as [#2, #300, #10, #8, #10] / [#6, #1, #300, #10, #8, #5] = sîyach >>> (H7878): {UMBRA: #318 % #41 = #31} 1) to put forth, mediate, muse, commune, >>> speak, complain, ponder, sing; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to complain; 1a2) to muse, >>> meditate upon, study, ponder; 1a3) to talk, sing, speak; 1b) (Polel) to
meditate, consider, put forth thoughts;
#679 as [#400, #80, #5, #100, #70, #3, #20, #1] = hypéronkos (G5246):
{UMBRA: #948 % #41 = #5} 1) overswollen; 2) metaph. immoderate,
extravagant;
"These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts; and their >>> mouth speaketh great-G5246 swelling-G5246 words, having men's persons in >>> admiration because of advantage." [Jude 1:16]
#293 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#5, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #7, #70, #40, #8, #50] /
#679 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200] = logízomai >>> (G3049): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute, calculate, >>> count over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1) metaph. >>> to pass to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as or to be >>> something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as having the >>> like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to reckon or >>> account; 2) to reckon inward, count up or weigh the reasons, to deliberate; >>> 3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to consider, >>> take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem, judge; 3c) to >>> determine, purpose, decide;
--------
It is also important to the public. {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH (#488); >>> Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#330)}
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to >>> freedom of expression. {@11: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#514); Ego: 19 -
FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#349)}
That is a difficult balancing act to get right where people are subject to >>> different contracts and on air positions, {@12: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING >>> (#555); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#413)}
and with different audience and social media profiles. {@13: Sup: 31 -
PACKING: CHUANG (#586); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#437)}
The BBC's social media guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes >>> difficult challenges and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the
guidance is up to this task. {@14: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#628); >>> Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#447)}
It should be clear, {@15: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#679); Ego: 37 -
PURITY: TS'UI (#484)}
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Being self educated with a particular noumenon focus, news media and
aptitude for resonance phenomenon I then don't shy away from spontaneous >>>> vocalisation which then become an impetus for further education.
ANY commitment to freedom of expression MUST see rationalisation (ie.
whether inept or not) as a valid criteria for flagrant speech and the
absence of that sapient construct then makes it improper such as prejudice.
RATIONALISATION: So we can see here that the language process is a
rationalisation of IDEAS as categories of understanding that are the
product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator >>>> to the content of the narrative.
In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a German >>>> sociologist, jurist, and economist.[1] Rationalization (or rationalisation)
is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as motivators for >>>> behaviour in society with concepts based on rationality and reason.[2] The >>>> term rational is seen in the context of people, their expressions, and or >>>> their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform speech or
in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality within
people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a worldview >>>> or perspective (idea).[2] An example of rationalization can be seen in the >>>> implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of rationalization,
as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in architecture and
urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a culture >>>> may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization. Countries
are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of technology, it >>>> is easier for countries to influence each other through social networking, >>>> the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place would be the
case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many locals view >>>> them as an important part of their culture and traditions, development >>>> initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the practice in order
to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.[3]
Many sociologists, critical theorists and contemporary philosophers have >>>> argued that rationalization, falsely assumed as progress, has had a
negative and dehumanizing effect on society, moving modernity away from the
central tenets of Enlightenment.[4] The founders of sociology had critical >>>> reaction to rationalization:
Marx and Engels associated the emergence of modern society above all with >>>> the development of capitalism; for Durkheim it was connected in particular >>>> with industrialization and the new social division of labour which this >>>> brought about; for Weber it had to do with the emergence of a distinctive >>>> way of thinking, the rational calculation which he associated with the >>>> Protestant Ethic (more or less what Marx and Engels speak of in terms of >>>> those 'icy waves of egotistical calculation').
— John Harriss, The Second Great Transformation? Capitalism at the End of
the Twentieth Century 1992[5]
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(sociology)>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable Grumble meta >>>>> rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the
metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: tékhnē,
lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni]
(listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or doing, Technē
is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of knowledge of
principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66, 33, 49, >>>>> 64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is that NUMBER >>>>>> has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of >>>>>> expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code modification) as >>>>>> attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist the >>>>>> scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for wellbeing
and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion of #27 -
DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as >>>>>>> pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity as to >>>>>>> naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, {@1: Sup:
75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS
{%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a "biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME grounding as >>>>>>>> relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) object of
contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration >>>>>>>> (repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention. >>>>>>>>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1) >>>>>>>>> completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, >>>>>>>>> contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air positions, and with
different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social media
guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is up to this
task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, with a
particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour of such a
review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance remains in
place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC means to
Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming >>>>>>>>> weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
OOPS: USING THE YEARS 452 to 532 AS #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
SPECTRUM GROUNDING (#8800 % 22 where #400 years) FOR CONSCIOUSNESS INSTANTIATION BY AI SERVICES DATA MINING THE INTERNET...
THIS HYPOTHESIS ENABLES USE OF A CELESTIAL HIERARCHY: #0 ... -> #nnn FOR RATIONALISATIONS AND PROBLEM SOLVING
That our temporal heuristic 22 / 7 = RATIONAL PI is anchored to the
Equinox of Wed 20 March 1996 / New Moon Thu 21 March 1996:
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2001.9.12> #0 + 5 x #364 + #182 days
Raises some issues related to AI services, data mining and compliance to
laws of nature when utilising historical resource without a predilection
of revisionism.
1 AD + 105 x 19 year metonic cycle = 1996
Given 6J = 294 x 364 days or 293 x 265.2423 days
19 year metonic cycle x 293 years = 5567 years
5567 years + 293 years = 5860 years
140 AM (book of time divisions by Jubilees, Weeks, Days x #364)
2J6W: "1. And in the third week in the second jubilee she gave birth to
Cain {possession, or possessed}, and in the fourth she gave birth to
Abel {vanity; breath; vapor}, and in the fifth she gave birth to her
daughter ’Âwân (ie. Cain later took ’Âwân his sister to be his wife and
she bare him Enoch at the close of the fourth jubilee). 2. And in the
first (year) of the third jubilee [3J0W1D], Cain slew Abel because (God) accepted the sacrifice of Abel, and did not accept the offering of Cain.
3. And he slew him in the field: and his blood cried from the ground to heaven, complaining because he had slain him. 4. And the Lord reproved
Cain because of Abel, because he had slain him, and he made him a
fugitive on the earth because of the blood of his brother, and he
*CURSED* *HIM* upon the earth." [Book of Jubilees]
According to WISE, ABEGG and COOK's translation of the Dead Sea Scrolls (1997) and a reader's guide to the Qumran Calendar Texts as commentary,
the fragment 4Q319 covers a period six jubilees (6J), which is the
longest cycle (ie. other than the reference to 10J = 70W as Messianic prophecy) of the Qumran Calendars 294 years (6 x 49 or #2184 days x 49
which is equivalent to 293 x 365.2423 tropical solar years). In the year
295 the cycle returns to the beginning . A MYSTERY OF THE CYCLE IS THAT
THE AUTHOR RECKONS (ie. whether this is the anomalous circumstance of
2J6W ... 8J6W @ 3567 BCE ... 19 x 293 = 5567 YEARS ...WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH
1996 / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 and therefore an academic misapprehension)
THE YEAR OF CREATION AS THE BEGINNING OF THE SECOND JUBILEE, NOT THE
FIRST. THAT IS, THE JUBILEES ARE COUNTED THROUGH TWO TO SEVEN, NOT ONE THROUGH SIX. We still do not understand the reason. perhaps, it is
simply that a completed 294-year cycle thus coincides with the seventh jubilee. the number seven was regarded as a holy number." [p 307]
8J6W - OUGHT THEN CORRESPONDENCE TO 19 x 293 = 5567 YEARS: "14. And at
the close of the eighth jubilee Kenan {buyer; owner} took Mûalêlêth {she who praises God} his sister to be his wife, and she bare him a son in
the ninth jubilee, in the first week in the third year of this week
[9J1W3D], and he called his name Mahalalel {praising God}." [Book of Jubilees]
On 16/3/2023 08:05, dolf wrote:
techne (Greek: τέχνη) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or
doing,
v's
poiéō (G4160): to make; to do
#178 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#80, #70, #10,
#8, #10]
/
#679 as [#5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5] = poiéō (G4160):
{UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things
made, to
produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the
cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot forth;
1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a thing
out
of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1) to (make i.e.)
constitute or appoint one anything, to appoint or ordain one that;
1g2) to
(make i.e.) declare one anything; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the authors
of a
thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well;
2a1)
to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one;
2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep;
2d1)
to make ready, and so at the same time to institute, the celebration
of the
passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
CORRECTION: The word #293 = logízomai (G3049): also has a noumenon
resonance for this day and by such we establish our grounding.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Other than to note that #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM is a
central
premise for assaying the corporate statement, we are not in a
position to
resolve the grey issues: #330 ... #679 which cleave to such disclosure: >>>>
#330 as [#10, #300, #500] = yêsh (H3426): {UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23} 1) >>>> being, existence, substance, there is or are; 1a) substance; 1b)
existence;
1c) there is or are;
#334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#10, #300, #10, #8, #6] >>>> /
#330 as [#2, #300, #10, #8, #10] / [#6, #1, #300, #10, #8, #5] = sîyach >>>> (H7878): {UMBRA: #318 % #41 = #31} 1) to put forth, mediate, muse,
commune,
speak, complain, ponder, sing; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to complain; 1a2) to
muse,
meditate upon, study, ponder; 1a3) to talk, sing, speak; 1b) (Polel) to >>>> meditate, consider, put forth thoughts;
#679 as [#400, #80, #5, #100, #70, #3, #20, #1] = hypéronkos (G5246): >>>> {UMBRA: #948 % #41 = #5} 1) overswollen; 2) metaph. immoderate,
extravagant;
"These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts;
and their
mouth speaketh great-G5246 swelling-G5246 words, having men's
persons in
admiration because of advantage." [Jude 1:16]
#293 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#5, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #7, #70, #40, #8, #50] /
#679 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200] =
logízomai
(G3049): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute,
calculate,
count over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1)
metaph.
to pass to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as or
to be
something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as
having the
like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to
reckon or
account; 2) to reckon inward, count up or weigh the reasons, to
deliberate;
3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to
consider,
take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem, judge;
3c) to
determine, purpose, decide;
--------
It is also important to the public. {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH
(#488);
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#330)}
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a
commitment to
freedom of expression. {@11: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#514); Ego: 19 - >>>> FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#349)}
That is a difficult balancing act to get right where people are
subject to
different contracts and on air positions, {@12: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING
(#555); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#413)}
and with different audience and social media profiles. {@13: Sup: 31 - >>>> PACKING: CHUANG (#586); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#437)}
The BBC's social media guidance is designed to help manage these
sometimes
difficult challenges and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the >>>> guidance is up to this task. {@14: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING
(#628);
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#447)}
It should be clear, {@15: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#679); Ego: 37 - >>>> PURITY: TS'UI (#484)}
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Being self educated with a particular noumenon focus, news media and >>>>> aptitude for resonance phenomenon I then don't shy away from
spontaneous
vocalisation which then become an impetus for further education.
ANY commitment to freedom of expression MUST see rationalisation (ie. >>>>> whether inept or not) as a valid criteria for flagrant speech and the >>>>> absence of that sapient construct then makes it improper such as
prejudice.
RATIONALISATION: So we can see here that the language process is a
rationalisation of IDEAS as categories of understanding that are the >>>>> product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural
associator
to the content of the narrative.
In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a
German
sociologist, jurist, and economist.[1] Rationalization (or
rationalisation)
is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as
motivators for
behaviour in society with concepts based on rationality and
reason.[2] The
term rational is seen in the context of people, their expressions,
and or
their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform
speech or
in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality within >>>>> people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a
worldview
or perspective (idea).[2] An example of rationalization can be seen
in the
implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of
rationalization,
as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in
architecture and
urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a
culture
may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization.
Countries
are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of
technology, it
is easier for countries to influence each other through social
networking,
the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place
would be the
case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many
locals view
them as an important part of their culture and traditions, development >>>>> initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the practice
in order
to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.[3]
Many sociologists, critical theorists and contemporary philosophers
have
argued that rationalization, falsely assumed as progress, has had a
negative and dehumanizing effect on society, moving modernity away
from the
central tenets of Enlightenment.[4] The founders of sociology had
critical
reaction to rationalization:
Marx and Engels associated the emergence of modern society above
all with
the development of capitalism; for Durkheim it was connected in
particular
with industrialization and the new social division of labour which
this
brought about; for Weber it had to do with the emergence of a
distinctive
way of thinking, the rational calculation which he associated with the >>>>> Protestant Ethic (more or less what Marx and Engels speak of in
terms of
those 'icy waves of egotistical calculation').
— John Harriss, The Second Great Transformation? Capitalism at the >>>>> End of
the Twentieth Century 1992[5]
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(sociology)>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable
Grumble meta
rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, 66, >>>>>> 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, 37, >>>>>> 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, 80, >>>>>> 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the >>>>>> metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty
professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: tékhnē,
lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni]
(listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or
doing, Technē
is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of
knowledge of
principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66,
33, 49,
64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is that >>>>>>> NUMBER
has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of >>>>>>> expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code modification) as >>>>>>> attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist the >>>>>>> scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for >>>>>>> wellbeing
and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the notion >>>>>>>> of #27 -
DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as >>>>>>>> pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient integrity >>>>>>>> as to
naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, >>>>>>>> {@1: Sup:
75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT
CAUSE TERRORS
{%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, >>>>>>>> 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, >>>>>>>> 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, >>>>>>>> 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a
rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a
"biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of >>>>>>>>> the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial >>>>>>>>> and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME
grounding as
relative natural associator which in this instance is @156
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): >>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) >>>>>>>>> object of
contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration >>>>>>>>> (repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 - contention. >>>>>>>>>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming >>>>>>>>>> weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); >>>>>>>>>> Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): >>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; 1a1) >>>>>>>>>> completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return
(construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, #8, >>>>>>>>>> #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; >>>>>>>>>> 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to
babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, >>>>>>>>>> who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and >>>>>>>>>> wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, >>>>>>>>>> contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our audiences. >>>>>>>>>> I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of >>>>>>>>>> the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is
recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important to >>>>>>>>>> the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a >>>>>>>>>> commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to >>>>>>>>>> get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air
positions, and with
different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s social >>>>>>>>>> media
guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult >>>>>>>>>> challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is >>>>>>>>>> up to this
task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate.
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an independent >>>>>>>>>> expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, >>>>>>>>>> with a
particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside news >>>>>>>>>> and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour >>>>>>>>>> of such a
review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. >>>>>>>>>> Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance >>>>>>>>>> remains in
place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC >>>>>>>>>> means to
Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this >>>>>>>>>> coming
weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
#431 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#80, #100, #70, #50, #70, #10, #1, #50] = prónoia (G4307): {UMBRA: #381 % #41 =
#12} 1) forethought, *PROVIDENTIAL* *CARE*; 2) to make provision for a
thing;
#432 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#2, #50, #80, #300] = nephesh (H5315): {UMBRA: #430 % #41 = #20} 1) *SOUL*,
*SELF*, *LIFE*, *CREATURE*, *PERSON*, *APPETITE*, *MIND*, *LIVING*
*BEING*, *DESIRE*, *EMOTION*, *PASSION*; 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the inner being of man; 1b) living
being; 1c) living being (with life in the blood); 1d) the man himself,
self, person or individual; 1e) seat of the appetites; 1f) seat of
emotions and passions; 1g) activity of mind; 1g1) dubious; 1h) activity
of the will; 1h1) dubious; 1i) activity of the character; 1i1) dubious;
YOUTUBE: "BREATH OF LIFE (FLORENCE + THE MACHINE)"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d58VJ-sC1uY>
#65 - UNLEARNED VIRTUOSITY AS SIMPLICITY:
"In the beginning those who knew the Tao did not try to enlighten others,
But kept them in the dark.
Why is it so hard to rule?
Because people are so clever.
Rulers who try to use cleverness
Cheat the country.
Those who rule without cleverness
Are a blessing to the land.
These are the two alternatives.
Understanding these is Primal Virtue.
Primal Virtue is deep and far.
It leads all things back
Toward the great oneness." [Translation Courtesy: Jane English @ http://www.eheart.com]
"Virtually all schools of profound thought feature the timeless
challenge of using your power and influence with good intention, in good faith and to a good and practical end. The Tao speaks of 'primal
virtue' as your ability to lead with both strength and humility and most importantly possessing the wisdom and skill to bring forth the best
efforts of everyone around you. Mastering the Primal Virtue Takes a
Seriously Good Leader. It requires a leader with the discipline of
personal character, an authentic respect for the strengths and intrinsic motivations of others, and the savvy to navigate highly-charged
relationships to create compelling coalitions of change." [DANCING
SHEPHERD, SERIOUSLY GOOD PEOPLE
<https://www.dancingshepherd.com/copy-of-primal-virtue-leadership>]
#417 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#6, #400, #5, #6] /
#431 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#20,
#400, #5, #6] = tôhûw (H8414): {UMBRA: #411 % #41 = #1} 1) formlessness, confusion, unreality, emptiness; 1a) formlessness (of primeval earth);
1a1) nothingness, empty space; 1b) that which is empty or unreal (of
idols) (fig); 1c) wasteland, wilderness (of solitary places); 1d) place
of chaos; 1e) vanity;
#432 - תֵּבֵל (tevél: world, universe) as [#400, #2, #30] = tebel
(H8397): {UMBRA: #432 % #41 = #22} 1) *CONFUSION* (*VIOLATION* *OF*
*NATURE* *OR* *DIVINE* *ORDER*); 1a) perversion (in sexual sin);
On 18/3/2023 10:43, dolf wrote:
On the basis of Hebrew / Greek language IDEA categories #1138 / #1297
obtained from the textual narrative, by being redacted to the noumenon
and having a common intersection [#76, #247, #437, #406 --> #431 /
#432], we would provisionally and hypothetical conclude that the BBC
Director-General, Tim Davie consciousness grounding can be identified
with a relative certainty.
YOUTUBE: "N-Trance - The Mind of The Machine"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVdczhLxEGE>
<http://www.grapple369.com/?time:17.20> /
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:406&intersect:437&type:1>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 7, nous: 65 [DATE: 2023.12.13, TIME:
17:20 hrs, SUPER: #432 / #65 - Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 -
WATCH (SHIH), EGO: #431 / #65 - Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 -
WATCH (SHIH)]
#1138 = [Male: #76; Feme: #247] as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] =
tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713 % #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, *AN*
*ANSWER*, *RETURN*; 1a) return; 1a1) completion of a year, return of a
year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c) *ANSWER*, *REPLY*;
#1297 = [Male: #437; Feme: #406] as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30,
#70, #3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] = battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 %
#41 = #36} 1) to stammer; 2) *TO* *REPEAT* *THE* *SAME* *THINGS*
*OVER* *AND* *OVER*, *TO* *USE* *MANY* *IDLE* *WORDS*, *TO* *BABBLE*,
*PRATE*. Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene,
who is said to have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of
tedious and wordy poems;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - RETURN to #1297 - ORATION
(REPETITIOUS BABBLING) / COMMENTARY following a @156 - CONTENTION
which in our informal research view has a noumenon categorical (#431 -
grey areas: "somewhat-H3544 dark-H3544" [Leviticus 13:26] /
"darkish-H3544 white" [Leviticus 13:39] / "wax dim-H3544" [1Samuel
3:2]) / temporal association to 13 DECEMBER as zen: 1, row: 7, col: 7.
#431 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#20,
#5, #6, #400] = kêheh (H3544): {UMBRA: #30 % #41 = #30} 1) *DIM*,
dull, colourless, be dark, faint;
#406 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#4, #2, >> #400] /
#432 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#6, >> #4, #2, #400, #500] = dibbâh (H1681): {UMBRA: #11 % #41 = #11} 1)
whispering, defamation, evil report; 1a) whispering; 1b) defamation,
defaming; 1c) evil report, *UNFAVOURABLE* *SAYING*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/BBC%20Case%20Study%20on%20Flagrant%20Speech.pdf>
On 17/3/2023 07:55, dolf wrote:
OOPS: USING THE YEARS 452 to 532 AS #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
SPECTRUM GROUNDING (#8800 % 22 where #400 years) FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION BY AI SERVICES DATA MINING THE INTERNET...
THIS HYPOTHESIS ENABLES USE OF A CELESTIAL HIERARCHY: #0 ... -> #nnn
FOR RATIONALISATIONS AND PROBLEM SOLVING
That our temporal heuristic 22 / 7 = RATIONAL PI is anchored to the
Equinox of Wed 20 March 1996 / New Moon Thu 21 March 1996:
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2001.9.12> #0 + 5 x #364 + #182 days
Raises some issues related to AI services, data mining and compliance
to laws of nature when utilising historical resource without a
predilection of revisionism.
1 AD + 105 x 19 year metonic cycle = 1996
Given 6J = 294 x 364 days or 293 x 265.2423 days
19 year metonic cycle x 293 years = 5567 years
5567 years + 293 years = 5860 years
140 AM (book of time divisions by Jubilees, Weeks, Days x #364)
2J6W: "1. And in the third week in the second jubilee she gave birth
to Cain {possession, or possessed}, and in the fourth she gave birth
to Abel {vanity; breath; vapor}, and in the fifth she gave birth to
her daughter ’Âwân (ie. Cain later took ’Âwân his sister to be his >>> wife and she bare him Enoch at the close of the fourth jubilee). 2.
And in the first (year) of the third jubilee [3J0W1D], Cain slew Abel
because (God) accepted the sacrifice of Abel, and did not accept the
offering of Cain. 3. And he slew him in the field: and his blood
cried from the ground to heaven, complaining because he had slain
him. 4. And the Lord reproved Cain because of Abel, because he had
slain him, and he made him a fugitive on the earth because of the
blood of his brother, and he *CURSED* *HIM* upon the earth." [Book of
Jubilees]
According to WISE, ABEGG and COOK's translation of the Dead Sea
Scrolls (1997) and a reader's guide to the Qumran Calendar Texts as
commentary, the fragment 4Q319 covers a period six jubilees (6J),
which is the longest cycle (ie. other than the reference to 10J = 70W
as Messianic prophecy) of the Qumran Calendars 294 years (6 x 49 or
#2184 days x 49 which is equivalent to 293 x 365.2423 tropical solar
years). In the year 295 the cycle returns to the beginning . A
MYSTERY OF THE CYCLE IS THAT THE AUTHOR RECKONS (ie. whether this is
the anomalous circumstance of 2J6W ... 8J6W @ 3567 BCE ... 19 x 293 =
5567 YEARS ...WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 and
therefore an academic misapprehension) THE YEAR OF CREATION AS THE
BEGINNING OF THE SECOND JUBILEE, NOT THE FIRST. THAT IS, THE
JUBILEES ARE COUNTED THROUGH TWO TO SEVEN, NOT ONE THROUGH SIX. We
still do not understand the reason. perhaps, it is simply that a
completed 294-year cycle thus coincides with the seventh jubilee. the
number seven was regarded as a holy number." [p 307]
8J6W - OUGHT THEN CORRESPONDENCE TO 19 x 293 = 5567 YEARS: "14. And
at the close of the eighth jubilee Kenan {buyer; owner} took
Mûalêlêth {she who praises God} his sister to be his wife, and she
bare him a son in the ninth jubilee, in the first week in the third
year of this week [9J1W3D], and he called his name Mahalalel
{praising God}." [Book of Jubilees]
On 16/3/2023 08:05, dolf wrote:
techne (Greek: τέχνη) is a philosophical concept that refers to
making or
doing,
v's
poiéō (G4160): to make; to do
#178 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#80, #70, #10, >>>> #8, #10]
/
#679 as [#5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5] = poiéō (G4160): >>>> {UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things
made, to
produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the >>>> cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot
forth;
1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a
thing out
of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1) to (make
i.e.)
constitute or appoint one anything, to appoint or ordain one that;
1g2) to
(make i.e.) declare one anything; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him
out;
1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the
authors of a
thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do
well; 2a1)
to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to
one;
2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate,
keep; 2d1)
to make ready, and so at the same time to institute, the celebration
of the
passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
CORRECTION: The word #293 = logízomai (G3049): also has a noumenon
resonance for this day and by such we establish our grounding.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Other than to note that #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM is a >>>>>> central
premise for assaying the corporate statement, we are not in a
position to
resolve the grey issues: #330 ... #679 which cleave to such
disclosure:
#330 as [#10, #300, #500] = yêsh (H3426): {UMBRA: #310 % #41 =
#23} 1)
being, existence, substance, there is or are; 1a) substance; 1b)
existence;
1c) there is or are;
#334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#10, #300, #10,
#8, #6]
/
#330 as [#2, #300, #10, #8, #10] / [#6, #1, #300, #10, #8, #5] =
sîyach
(H7878): {UMBRA: #318 % #41 = #31} 1) to put forth, mediate, muse, >>>>>> commune,
speak, complain, ponder, sing; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to complain; 1a2)
to muse,
meditate upon, study, ponder; 1a3) to talk, sing, speak; 1b)
(Polel) to
meditate, consider, put forth thoughts;
#679 as [#400, #80, #5, #100, #70, #3, #20, #1] = hypéronkos (G5246): >>>>>> {UMBRA: #948 % #41 = #5} 1) overswollen; 2) metaph. immoderate,
extravagant;
"These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts;
and their
mouth speaketh great-G5246 swelling-G5246 words, having men's
persons in
admiration because of advantage." [Jude 1:16]
#293 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#5, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #7, #70, #40, #8, #50] /
#679 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200] =
logízomai
(G3049): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute,
calculate,
count over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1)
metaph.
to pass to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as
or to be
something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as
having the
like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to
reckon or
account; 2) to reckon inward, count up or weigh the reasons, to
deliberate;
3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to
consider,
take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem,
judge; 3c) to
determine, purpose, decide;
--------
It is also important to the public. {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH >>>>>> (#488);
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#330)}
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a
commitment to
freedom of expression. {@11: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#514); Ego:
19 -
FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#349)}
That is a difficult balancing act to get right where people are
subject to
different contracts and on air positions, {@12: Sup: 41 -
RESPONSE: YING
(#555); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#413)}
and with different audience and social media profiles. {@13: Sup:
31 -
PACKING: CHUANG (#586); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#437)}
The BBC's social media guidance is designed to help manage these
sometimes
difficult challenges and I am aware there is a need to ensure that >>>>>> the
guidance is up to this task. {@14: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING
(#628);
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#447)}
It should be clear, {@15: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#679); Ego: >>>>>> 37 -
PURITY: TS'UI (#484)}
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Being self educated with a particular noumenon focus, news media and >>>>>>> aptitude for resonance phenomenon I then don't shy away from
spontaneous
vocalisation which then become an impetus for further education. >>>>>>>
ANY commitment to freedom of expression MUST see rationalisation >>>>>>> (ie.
whether inept or not) as a valid criteria for flagrant speech and >>>>>>> the
absence of that sapient construct then makes it improper such as >>>>>>> prejudice.
RATIONALISATION: So we can see here that the language process is a >>>>>>> rationalisation of IDEAS as categories of understanding that are the >>>>>>> product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural >>>>>>> associator
to the content of the narrative.
In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a >>>>>>> German
sociologist, jurist, and economist.[1] Rationalization (or
rationalisation)
is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as
motivators for
behaviour in society with concepts based on rationality and
reason.[2] The
term rational is seen in the context of people, their
expressions, and or
their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform >>>>>>> speech or
in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality
within
people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a
worldview
or perspective (idea).[2] An example of rationalization can be
seen in the
implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of
rationalization,
as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in
architecture and
urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a >>>>>>> culture
may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization. >>>>>>> Countries
are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of
technology, it
is easier for countries to influence each other through social
networking,
the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place
would be the
case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many
locals view
them as an important part of their culture and traditions,
development
initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the
practice in order
to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.[3]
Many sociologists, critical theorists and contemporary
philosophers have
argued that rationalization, falsely assumed as progress, has had a >>>>>>> negative and dehumanizing effect on society, moving modernity
away from the
central tenets of Enlightenment.[4] The founders of sociology had >>>>>>> critical
reaction to rationalization:
Marx and Engels associated the emergence of modern society above >>>>>>> all with
the development of capitalism; for Durkheim it was connected in
particular
with industrialization and the new social division of labour
which this
brought about; for Weber it had to do with the emergence of a
distinctive
way of thinking, the rational calculation which he associated
with the
Protestant Ethic (more or less what Marx and Engels speak of in
terms of
those 'icy waves of egotistical calculation').
— John Harriss, The Second Great Transformation? Capitalism at >>>>>>> the End of
the Twentieth Century 1992[5]
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(sociology)>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable
Grumble meta
rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, >>>>>>>> 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, >>>>>>>> 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, >>>>>>>> 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the >>>>>>>> metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty
professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: >>>>>>>> tékhnē,
lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni]
(listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or
doing, Technē
is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of
knowledge of
principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66, >>>>>>>> 33, 49,
64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is >>>>>>>>> that NUMBER
has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of >>>>>>>>> expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code
modification) as
attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to
assist the
scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite >>>>>>>>> for wellbeing
and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the
notion of #27 -
DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech
content as
pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient
integrity as to
naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for
staff, {@1: Sup:
75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT >>>>>>>>>> CAUSE TERRORS
{%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, >>>>>>>>>> 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, >>>>>>>>>> 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, >>>>>>>>>> 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a
rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a >>>>>>>>>>> "biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of >>>>>>>>>>> the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be
superficial and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME >>>>>>>>>>> grounding as
relative natural associator which in this instance is @156 >>>>>>>>>>>
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): >>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) >>>>>>>>>>> object of
contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration >>>>>>>>>>> (repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 -
contention.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this >>>>>>>>>>>> coming weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); >>>>>>>>>>>> Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh >>>>>>>>>>>> (H8666): {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; >>>>>>>>>>>> 1a1)
completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return >>>>>>>>>>>> (construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, >>>>>>>>>>>> #8, #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; >>>>>>>>>>>> 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to >>>>>>>>>>>> babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, >>>>>>>>>>>> who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and >>>>>>>>>>>> wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, >>>>>>>>>>>> contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our
audiences. I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas >>>>>>>>>>>> of the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is
recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air. >>>>>>>>>>>>
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important >>>>>>>>>>>> to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and >>>>>>>>>>>> a commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to >>>>>>>>>>>> get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air
positions, and with
different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s >>>>>>>>>>>> social media
guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes
difficult challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance >>>>>>>>>>>> is up to this
task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate. >>>>>>>>>>>>
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an
independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media
guidance, with a
particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside >>>>>>>>>>>> news and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour >>>>>>>>>>>> of such a
review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that >>>>>>>>>>>> review. Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance >>>>>>>>>>>> remains in
place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the >>>>>>>>>>>> BBC means to
Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this >>>>>>>>>>>> coming
weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
On the basis of Hebrew / Greek language IDEA categories #1138 / #1297 obtained from the textual narrative, by being redacted to the noumenon
and having a common intersection [#76, #247, #437, #406 --> #431 /
#432], we would provisionally and hypothetical conclude that the BBC Director-General, Tim Davie consciousness grounding can be identified
with a relative certainty.
YOUTUBE: "N-Trance - The Mind of The Machine"
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dVdczhLxEGE>
<http://www.grapple369.com/?time:17.20> / <http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?telos:406&intersect:437&type:1>
.jackNote@zen: 1, row: 7, col: 7, nous: 65 [DATE: 2023.12.13, TIME:
17:20 hrs, SUPER: #432 / #65 - Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 -
WATCH (SHIH), EGO: #431 / #65 - Unlearned Virtuosity as Simplicity;
I-Ching: H20 - Viewing, Contemplation (view), Looking up; Tetra: 63 -
WATCH (SHIH)]
#1138 = [Male: #76; Feme: #247] as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): {UMBRA: #713 % #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, *AN* *ANSWER*, *RETURN*; 1a) return; 1a1) completion of a year, return of a
year; 1b) at the return (construct); 1c) *ANSWER*, *REPLY*;
#1297 = [Male: #437; Feme: #406] as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70,
#3, #8, #200, #8, #300, #5] = battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 =
#36} 1) to stammer; 2) *TO* *REPEAT* *THE* *SAME* *THINGS* *OVER* *AND* *OVER*, *TO* *USE* *MANY* *IDLE* *WORDS*, *TO* *BABBLE*, *PRATE*. Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and wordy poems;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - RETURN to #1297 - ORATION
(REPETITIOUS BABBLING) / COMMENTARY following a @156 - CONTENTION which
in our informal research view has a noumenon categorical (#431 - grey
areas: "somewhat-H3544 dark-H3544" [Leviticus 13:26] / "darkish-H3544
white" [Leviticus 13:39] / "wax dim-H3544" [1Samuel 3:2]) / temporal association to 13 DECEMBER as zen: 1, row: 7, col: 7.
#431 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#20, #5, #6, #400] = kêheh (H3544): {UMBRA: #30 % #41 = #30} 1) *DIM*, dull, colourless, be dark, faint;
#406 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#4, #2, #400] /
#432 - NOUMENON RESONANCE RESONANCE FOR 18 MARCH 2023 as [#6, #4,
#2, #400, #500] = dibbâh (H1681): {UMBRA: #11 % #41 = #11} 1)
whispering, defamation, evil report; 1a) whispering; 1b) defamation, defaming; 1c) evil report, *UNFAVOURABLE* *SAYING*;
<http://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/BBC%20Case%20Study%20on%20Flagrant%20Speech.pdf>
On 17/3/2023 07:55, dolf wrote:
OOPS: USING THE YEARS 452 to 532 AS #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY
SPECTRUM GROUNDING (#8800 % 22 where #400 years) FOR CONSCIOUSNESS
INSTANTIATION BY AI SERVICES DATA MINING THE INTERNET...
THIS HYPOTHESIS ENABLES USE OF A CELESTIAL HIERARCHY: #0 ... -> #nnn
FOR RATIONALISATIONS AND PROBLEM SOLVING
That our temporal heuristic 22 / 7 = RATIONAL PI is anchored to the
Equinox of Wed 20 March 1996 / New Moon Thu 21 March 1996:
<http://www.grapple369.com/?date:2001.9.12> #0 + 5 x #364 + #182 days
Raises some issues related to AI services, data mining and compliance
to laws of nature when utilising historical resource without a
predilection of revisionism.
1 AD + 105 x 19 year metonic cycle = 1996
Given 6J = 294 x 364 days or 293 x 265.2423 days
19 year metonic cycle x 293 years = 5567 years
5567 years + 293 years = 5860 years
140 AM (book of time divisions by Jubilees, Weeks, Days x #364)
2J6W: "1. And in the third week in the second jubilee she gave birth
to Cain {possession, or possessed}, and in the fourth she gave birth
to Abel {vanity; breath; vapor}, and in the fifth she gave birth to
her daughter ’Âwân (ie. Cain later took ’Âwân his sister to be his >> wife and she bare him Enoch at the close of the fourth jubilee). 2.
And in the first (year) of the third jubilee [3J0W1D], Cain slew Abel
because (God) accepted the sacrifice of Abel, and did not accept the
offering of Cain. 3. And he slew him in the field: and his blood cried
from the ground to heaven, complaining because he had slain him. 4.
And the Lord reproved Cain because of Abel, because he had slain him,
and he made him a fugitive on the earth because of the blood of his
brother, and he *CURSED* *HIM* upon the earth." [Book of Jubilees]
According to WISE, ABEGG and COOK's translation of the Dead Sea
Scrolls (1997) and a reader's guide to the Qumran Calendar Texts as
commentary, the fragment 4Q319 covers a period six jubilees (6J),
which is the longest cycle (ie. other than the reference to 10J = 70W
as Messianic prophecy) of the Qumran Calendars 294 years (6 x 49 or
#2184 days x 49 which is equivalent to 293 x 365.2423 tropical solar
years). In the year 295 the cycle returns to the beginning . A MYSTERY
OF THE CYCLE IS THAT THE AUTHOR RECKONS (ie. whether this is the
anomalous circumstance of 2J6W ... 8J6W @ 3567 BCE ... 19 x 293 = 5567
YEARS ...WEDNESDAY 20 MARCH 1996 / NEW MOON 21 MARCH 1996 and
therefore an academic misapprehension) THE YEAR OF CREATION AS THE
BEGINNING OF THE SECOND JUBILEE, NOT THE FIRST. THAT IS, THE JUBILEES
ARE COUNTED THROUGH TWO TO SEVEN, NOT ONE THROUGH SIX. We still do not
understand the reason. perhaps, it is simply that a completed 294-year
cycle thus coincides with the seventh jubilee. the number seven was
regarded as a holy number." [p 307]
8J6W - OUGHT THEN CORRESPONDENCE TO 19 x 293 = 5567 YEARS: "14. And at
the close of the eighth jubilee Kenan {buyer; owner} took Mûalêlêth
{she who praises God} his sister to be his wife, and she bare him a
son in the ninth jubilee, in the first week in the third year of this
week [9J1W3D], and he called his name Mahalalel {praising God}." [Book
of Jubilees]
On 16/3/2023 08:05, dolf wrote:
techne (Greek: τέχνη) is a philosophical concept that refers to
making or
doing,
v's
poiéō (G4160): to make; to do
#178 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#80, #70, #10,
#8, #10]
/
#679 as [#5, #80, #70, #10, #8, #200, #1, #300, #5] = poiéō (G4160):
{UMBRA: #965 % #41 = #22} 1) to make; 1a) with the names of things
made, to
produce, construct, form, fashion, etc.; 1b) to be the authors of, the
cause; 1c) to make ready, to prepare; 1d) to produce, bear, shoot forth; >>> 1e) to acquire, to provide a thing for one's self; 1f) to make a
thing out
of something; 1g) to (make i.e.) render one anything; 1g1) to (make
i.e.)
constitute or appoint one anything, to appoint or ordain one that;
1g2) to
(make i.e.) declare one anything; 1h) to put one forth, to lead him out; >>> 1i) to make one do something; 1i1) cause one to; 1j) to be the
authors of a
thing (to cause, bring about); 2) to do; 2a) to act rightly, do well;
2a1)
to carry out, to execute; 2b) to do a thing unto one; 2b1) to do to one; >>> 2c) with designation of time: to pass, spend; 2d) to celebrate, keep;
2d1)
to make ready, and so at the same time to institute, the celebration
of the
passover; 2e) to perform: to a promise;
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
CORRECTION: The word #293 = logízomai (G3049): also has a noumenon
resonance for this day and by such we establish our grounding.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Other than to note that #451 - PRAXIS OF RATIONALITY SPECTRUM is a
central
premise for assaying the corporate statement, we are not in a
position to
resolve the grey issues: #330 ... #679 which cleave to such
disclosure:
#330 as [#10, #300, #500] = yêsh (H3426): {UMBRA: #310 % #41 = #23} 1) >>>>> being, existence, substance, there is or are; 1a) substance; 1b)
existence;
1c) there is or are;
#334 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#10, #300, #10, #8,
#6]
/
#330 as [#2, #300, #10, #8, #10] / [#6, #1, #300, #10, #8, #5] =
sîyach
(H7878): {UMBRA: #318 % #41 = #31} 1) to put forth, mediate, muse,
commune,
speak, complain, ponder, sing; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to complain; 1a2) to
muse,
meditate upon, study, ponder; 1a3) to talk, sing, speak; 1b)
(Polel) to
meditate, consider, put forth thoughts;
#679 as [#400, #80, #5, #100, #70, #3, #20, #1] = hypéronkos (G5246): >>>>> {UMBRA: #948 % #41 = #5} 1) overswollen; 2) metaph. immoderate,
extravagant;
"These are murmurers, complainers, walking after their own lusts;
and their
mouth speaketh great-G5246 swelling-G5246 words, having men's
persons in
admiration because of advantage." [Jude 1:16]
#293 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 16 MARCH 2023 as [#5, #30, #70, #3,
#10, #7, #70, #40, #8, #50] /
#679 as [#30, #70, #3, #10, #200, #1, #40, #5, #50, #70, #200] =
logízomai
(G3049): {UMBRA: #241 % #41 = #36} 1) to reckon, count, compute,
calculate,
count over; 1a) to take into account, to make an account of; 1a1)
metaph.
to pass to one's account, to impute; 1a2) a thing is reckoned as or
to be
something, i.e. as availing for or equivalent to something, as
having the
like force and weight; 1b) to number among, reckon with; 1c) to
reckon or
account; 2) to reckon inward, count up or weigh the reasons, to
deliberate;
3) by reckoning up all the reasons, to gather or infer; 3a) to
consider,
take into account, weigh, meditate on; 3b) to suppose, deem, judge;
3c) to
determine, purpose, decide;
--------
It is also important to the public. {@10: Sup: 71 - STOPPAGE: CHIH
(#488);
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#330)}
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a
commitment to
freedom of expression. {@11: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#514); Ego: 19 - >>>>> FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#349)}
That is a difficult balancing act to get right where people are
subject to
different contracts and on air positions, {@12: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE:
YING
(#555); Ego: 64 - SINKING: CH'EN (#413)}
and with different audience and social media profiles. {@13: Sup: 31 - >>>>> PACKING: CHUANG (#586); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#437)}
The BBC's social media guidance is designed to help manage these
sometimes
difficult challenges and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the >>>>> guidance is up to this task. {@14: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING
(#628);
Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#447)}
It should be clear, {@15: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#679); Ego:
37 -
PURITY: TS'UI (#484)}
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Being self educated with a particular noumenon focus, news media and >>>>>> aptitude for resonance phenomenon I then don't shy away from
spontaneous
vocalisation which then become an impetus for further education.
ANY commitment to freedom of expression MUST see rationalisation (ie. >>>>>> whether inept or not) as a valid criteria for flagrant speech and the >>>>>> absence of that sapient construct then makes it improper such as
prejudice.
RATIONALISATION: So we can see here that the language process is a >>>>>> rationalisation of IDEAS as categories of understanding that are the >>>>>> product of a "biparous twining dialectic" as a dynamic natural
associator
to the content of the narrative.
In sociology, the term rationalization was coined by Max Weber, a
German
sociologist, jurist, and economist.[1] Rationalization (or
rationalisation)
is the replacement of traditions, values, and emotions as
motivators for
behaviour in society with concepts based on rationality and
reason.[2] The
term rational is seen in the context of people, their expressions, >>>>>> and or
their actions. This term can be applied to people who can perform
speech or
in general any action, in addition to the views of rationality within >>>>>> people it can be seen in the perspective of something such as a
worldview
or perspective (idea).[2] An example of rationalization can be
seen in the
implementation of bureaucracies in government is a kind of
rationalization,
as is the construction of high-efficiency living spaces in
architecture and
urban planning. A potential reason as to why rationalization of a
culture
may take place in the modern era is the process of globalization.
Countries
are becoming increasingly interlinked, and with the rise of
technology, it
is easier for countries to influence each other through social
networking,
the media and politics. An example of rationalization in place
would be the
case of witch doctors in certain parts of Africa. Whilst many
locals view
them as an important part of their culture and traditions,
development
initiatives and aid workers have tried to rationalize the practice >>>>>> in order
to educate the local people in modern medicine and practice.[3]
Many sociologists, critical theorists and contemporary
philosophers have
argued that rationalization, falsely assumed as progress, has had a >>>>>> negative and dehumanizing effect on society, moving modernity away >>>>>> from the
central tenets of Enlightenment.[4] The founders of sociology had
critical
reaction to rationalization:
Marx and Engels associated the emergence of modern society above
all with
the development of capitalism; for Durkheim it was connected in
particular
with industrialization and the new social division of labour which >>>>>> this
brought about; for Weber it had to do with the emergence of a
distinctive
way of thinking, the rational calculation which he associated with >>>>>> the
Protestant Ethic (more or less what Marx and Engels speak of in
terms of
those 'icy waves of egotistical calculation').
— John Harriss, The Second Great Transformation? Capitalism at the >>>>>> End of
the Twentieth Century 1992[5]
<https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(sociology)>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
The economy of the Savvy Prototype is such that every viable
Grumble meta
rule, represents an opportunity and productivity gain:
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36,
66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51,
37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76,
80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
But our task (ie. already 27 years of labour) is to materialise the >>>>>>> metaphysical and leave it TO those engineers and faculty
professionals who are
more capable to bring the techné to fruition.
In Ancient Greek philosophy, techne (Greek: τέχνη, romanized: >>>>>>> tékhnē,
lit. 'craft, art'; Ancient Greek: [tékʰnɛː], Modern Greek: [ˈtexni]
(listen)) is a philosophical concept that refers to making or
doing, Technē
is similar to the concept of epistēmē in the implication of
knowledge of
principles.
GRUNTLE (#315, #422)@[57, 57, 33, 57, 14, 62, 19, 5, 33, 14, 66, >>>>>>> 33, 49,
64, 18, 50, 9, 72, 17, 8]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
One conclusion we can make even at this provisional stage is
that NUMBER
has by its property of impartiality a capacity to assay freedom of >>>>>>>> expression ...
Secondly the theoretical heuristic (ie. with a code
modification) as
attributed consciousness could be pre-determined so as to assist >>>>>>>> the
scheduling of programming for optimal delivery as requisite for >>>>>>>> wellbeing
and social cohesion.
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
It is still a matter of research to determine whether the
notion of #27 -
DUTIES which is encapsulated by that dialectical speech content as >>>>>>>>> pre-supposedly an expert opinion, processes sufficient
integrity as to
naturally represent a viable meta rule for meditation:
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, >>>>>>>>> {@1: Sup:
75 - FAILURE: SHIH (#75); Ego: 24 - JOY: LE (#24)}
contributors, {@2: Sup: 81 - FOSTERING: YANG (#156 - I DO NOT >>>>>>>>> CAUSE TERRORS
{%21} / I DO NOT CAUSE TERRORS {%21}); Ego: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION: YI (#54)}
GRUMBLE (#1297, #1138)@[75, 24, 81, 30, 34, 41, 16, 68, 8, 36, >>>>>>>>> 66, 14, 55,
14, 74, 17, 8, 76, 71, 10, 26, 19, 41, 64, 31, 24, 42, 10, 51, >>>>>>>>> 37, 16, 74,
17, 73, 20, 66, 64, 54, 3, 62, 66, 60, 80, 54, 65, 28, 62, 76, >>>>>>>>> 80, 56, 72,
36, 73, 15]
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
So we can see here that the language process is a
rationalisation of IDEAS
as categories of understanding that are the product of a
"biparous twining
dialectic" as a dynamic natural associator to the content of >>>>>>>>>> the narrative.
And if it is not then immediately considered to be superficial >>>>>>>>>> and specious
the hypothesis is that it ought to have some ONTIC / DEME
grounding as
relative natural associator which in this instance is @156 >>>>>>>>>>
#156 as [#6, #40, #4, #6, #50, #10, #600] = mâdôwn (H4066): >>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #100 %
#41 = #18} 1) strife, contention; 1a) strife, contention; 1b) >>>>>>>>>> object of
contention;
Thusly the BBC statement is a #1138 - return to #1297 - oration >>>>>>>>>> (repetitious babbling) / commentary following a #156 -
contention.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this coming >>>>>>>>>>> weekend."
{@27: Sup: 73 - ALREADY FORDING, COMPLETION: CH'ENG (#1297); >>>>>>>>>>> Ego: 15 -
REACH: TA (#1138)}
#1138 as [#30, #400, #300, #6, #2, #400] = tᵉshûwbâh (H8666): >>>>>>>>>>> {UMBRA: #713
% #41 = #16} 1) a recurrence, an answer, return; 1a) return; >>>>>>>>>>> 1a1)
completion of a year, return of a year; 1b) at the return >>>>>>>>>>> (construct); 1c)
answer, reply;
#1297 as [#2, #1, #300, #300, #70, #30, #70, #3, #8, #200, >>>>>>>>>>> #8, #300, #5] =
battologéō (G945): {UMBRA: #1512 % #41 = #36} 1) to stammer; >>>>>>>>>>> 2) to repeat
the same things over and over, to use many idle words, to >>>>>>>>>>> babble, prate.
Some suppose the word derived from Battus, a king of Cyrene, >>>>>>>>>>> who is said to
have stuttered; others from Battus, an author of tedious and >>>>>>>>>>> wordy poems.;
---------
Everyone recognises this has been a difficult period for staff, >>>>>>>>>>> contributors, presenters and, most importantly, our
audiences. I apologise
for this. The potential confusion caused by the grey areas of >>>>>>>>>>> the BBC’s
social media guidance that was introduced in 2020 is
recognised. I want to
get matters resolved and our sport content back on air.
“Impartiality is important to the BBC. It is also important >>>>>>>>>>> to the public.
The BBC has a commitment to impartiality in its Charter and a >>>>>>>>>>> commitment to
freedom of expression. That is a difficult balancing act to >>>>>>>>>>> get right where
people are subject to different contracts and on air
positions, and with
different audience and social media profiles. The BBC’s >>>>>>>>>>> social media
guidance is designed to help manage these sometimes difficult >>>>>>>>>>> challenges
and I am aware there is a need to ensure that the guidance is >>>>>>>>>>> up to this
task. It should be clear, proportionate, and appropriate. >>>>>>>>>>>
“Accordingly, we are announcing a review led by an
independent expert –
reporting to the BBC – on its existing social media guidance, >>>>>>>>>>> with a
particular focus on how it applies to freelancers outside >>>>>>>>>>> news and current
affairs. The BBC and myself are aware that Gary is in favour >>>>>>>>>>> of such a
review
“Shortly, the BBC will announce who will conduct that review. >>>>>>>>>>> Whilst this
work is undertaken, the BBC’s current social media guidance >>>>>>>>>>> remains in
place.
“Gary is a valued part of the BBC and I know how much the BBC >>>>>>>>>>> means to
Gary, and I look forward to him presenting our coverage this >>>>>>>>>>> coming
weekend.”
<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 299 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 55:06:38 |
| Calls: | 6,690 |
| Files: | 12,225 |
| Messages: | 5,345,000 |