• Happy Catholic New Year!

    From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 30 16:42:56 2023
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Sat Dec 30 16:53:27 2023
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    You're two days early. You, or the world, might not make it.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Bignell@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Sat Dec 30 17:18:56 2023
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.


    --
    Colin Bignell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Lamb@21:1/5 to Bignell on Sat Dec 30 18:59:02 2023
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
    You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion should
    have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the week!

    --
    Tim Lamb

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Sat Dec 30 19:16:09 2023
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Bignell@21:1/5 to Tim Lamb on Sat Dec 30 20:44:52 2023
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
     You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere.

    April 6th


    I don't really see why religion should > have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the week!


    --
    Colin Bignell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to SteveW on Sat Dec 30 21:00:09 2023
    In article <umpq9s$1ccjg$1@dont-email.me>,
    SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    Possibly, but it was really because Henry VIII could not get a divorce, the
    RC church did not allow it.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4t
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan J. Wylie@21:1/5 to Colin Bignell on Sat Dec 30 20:49:33 2023
    Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes:


    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:

    You have to count from somewhere.

    April 6th

    Give us back our 11 days!

    Lady Day: 25th March

    --
    Alan J. Wylie https://www.wylie.me.uk/

    Dance like no-one's watching. / Encrypt like everyone is.
    Security is inversely proportional to convenience

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From maus@21:1/5 to SteveW on Sat Dec 30 20:45:58 2023
    On 2023-12-30, SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)


    Peace to you all. Afaik, the christians of the East celebrate Xhimas on
    7th january. Not sure of the Ethiopian Church, who surely have the
    closest line of descent from Jesus. Anyone know.?

    --
    greymausg@mail.com
    Are there no jails, no lockdowns?
    Not even an .Influencer?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Sat Dec 30 22:11:36 2023
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans?

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to SteveW on Sat Dec 30 22:33:38 2023
    On 30/12/2023 07:16 pm, SteveW wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII

    Is that a positive?

    and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    You could.

    But you'd be deceiving yourself and no-one else.

    And you know it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Dec 30 22:34:26 2023
    On 30/12/2023 09:00 pm, charles wrote:
    In article <umpq9s$1ccjg$1@dont-email.me>,
    SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    Possibly, but it was really because Henry VIII could not get a divorce, the RC church did not allow it.

    +1.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to SteveW on Sat Dec 30 22:38:04 2023
    On 30 Dec 2023 at 19:16:09 GMT, "SteveW" <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    It was an early example of Brexit. For a suggested view of what would have happened had Henry VIII not become king, see "The Alteration", by Kingsley Amis.

    The Catholics could be better Catholics if they sacked all the Cardinals, and the Curia (the Catholic equivalent of the EU Commission), and scrapped the Papacy, none of which are in any way necessary, and are just another example
    of the snouters we see and love in Brussels. Then you break up the Catholic church and thus have a national church in each country. Here, f'rinstance,
    they could merge with the Anglicans, and in eastern Europe, with the
    respective Orthodox arrangement.

    --
    The reason you think government is the solution is because you think freedom is the problem. But the truth is that government ensures that the most evil, ruthless people end up in control, because the state is a single point of failure, and a high-value
    target of corruption.

    Alan Lovejoy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Alan J. Wylie on Sat Dec 30 22:38:46 2023
    On 30 Dec 2023 at 20:49:33 GMT, ""Alan J. Wylie"" <alan@wylie.me.uk> wrote:

    Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes:


    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:

    You have to count from somewhere.

    April 6th

    Give us back our 11 days!

    Apparently, no one ever actually said that.

    --
    Bessie Braddock: "Winston, you are drunk!"
    Churchill: "And you, madam, are ugly. But I shall be sober in the morning."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Bignell@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Dec 30 23:13:08 2023
    On 30/12/2023 21:00, charles wrote:
    In article <umpq9s$1ccjg$1@dont-email.me>,
    SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    Possibly, but it was really because Henry VIII could not get a divorce, the RC church did not allow it.


    The head of the Church didn't allow it, which is why he made himself the
    head of the Catholic Church in England. It was his children who broke
    the Church of England away from Catholicism.

    --
    Colin Bignell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Bignell@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 30 23:16:53 2023
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans?


    Saturnalia became Christmas.

    --
    Colin Bignell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Bignell@21:1/5 to Rod Speed on Sat Dec 30 23:45:46 2023
    On 30/12/2023 23:23, Rod Speed wrote:
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 10:13:08 +1100, Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellremovethis.me.uk> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 21:00, charles wrote:
    In article <umpq9s$1ccjg$1@dont-email.me>,
        SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)
     Possibly, but it was really because Henry VIII could not get a
    divorce, the
    RC church did not allow it.


    The head of the Church didn't allow it, which is why he made himself
    the head of the Catholic Church in England.

    It was his children who broke  the Church of England away from
    Catholicism.

    That's not accurate with the dissolution of the monasterys.

    That was about money, not religion.

    --
    Colin Bignell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SteveW@21:1/5 to charles on Sun Dec 31 00:52:30 2023
    On 30/12/2023 21:00, charles wrote:
    In article <umpq9s$1ccjg$1@dont-email.me>,
    SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    Possibly, but it was really because Henry VIII could not get a divorce, the RC church did not allow it.

    That was Henry's reason, but the movement to protestantism, based around Luther, was much more about reform. Henry vacillated between reform and
    return to Catholism.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Tim Lamb on Sun Dec 31 09:04:31 2023
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
     You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion should
    have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the week!

    And why not? All part of life's rich tapestry of utter nonsense, that we
    have simply got used to. Like the Labour party.


    --
    A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on
    its shoes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Sun Dec 31 09:06:12 2023
    On 30/12/2023 22:38, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 30 Dec 2023 at 20:49:33 GMT, ""Alan J. Wylie"" <alan@wylie.me.uk> wrote:

    Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes:


    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:

    You have to count from somewhere.

    April 6th

    Give us back our 11 days!

    Apparently, no one ever actually said that.

    "Claims of civil unrest and rioters demanding “Give us our eleven days”
    may have arisen through a misinterpretation of a contemporary painting
    by William Hogarth. His 1755 painting entitled: “An Election
    Entertainment” refers to the elections of 1754 and depicts a tavern
    dinner organised by Whig candidates. A stolen Tory campaign banner with
    the slogan, “Give us our Eleven Days” can be seen lower right (on the
    black banner on the floor under the seated gentleman’s foot). The Tories
    can be seen outside the window, demonstrating."

    --
    A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on
    its shoes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to charles on Sun Dec 31 09:12:40 2023
    On 30/12/2023 21:00, charles wrote:
    In article <umpq9s$1ccjg$1@dont-email.me>,
    SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    Possibly, but it was really because Henry VIII could not get a divorce, the RC church did not allow it.

    Yup. Like Thatcher seized on Climate change to piss on the miners, Henry
    seized on protestantism to shag Ann Boleyn.

    Whatever gets you where you want to be...

    --
    Future generations will wonder in bemused amazement that the early
    twenty-first century’s developed world went into hysterical panic over a globally average temperature increase of a few tenths of a degree, and,
    on the basis of gross exaggerations of highly uncertain computer
    projections combined into implausible chains of inference, proceeded to contemplate a rollback of the industrial age.

    Richard Lindzen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to maus on Sun Dec 31 09:10:46 2023
    On 30/12/2023 20:45, maus wrote:
    On 2023-12-30, SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)


    Peace to you all. Afaik, the christians of the East celebrate Xhimas on
    7th january. Not sure of the Ethiopian Church, who surely have the
    closest line of descent from Jesus. Anyone know.?

    Well its all bollocks anyway. Shepherds do not graze their flocks by
    night at midwinter.

    the European Christmas is merely Christianization of the pagan midwinter festival of Yule, which features the death of the old year and the birth
    of the new. And celebrates evergreens and winter birds because they
    represent life in darkness and death.

    I had an excellent christmas this year, that managed to avoid a single
    carol service and the kings speech altogether.

    I am at heart a Pagan I fear.
    --
    A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on
    its shoes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Colin Bignell on Sun Dec 31 09:23:21 2023
    On 30/12/2023 23:16, Colin Bignell wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans?


    Saturnalia became Christmas.

    Nope. Saturnalia was Roman. Not Pagan. Yule was the pagan midwinter
    festival that became Christmas

    Most Europeans did not honour Roman gods post the fall of the Empire.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and
    wrong.

    H.L.Mencken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 31 09:20:46 2023
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    I think there are more.
    Many early churches were build on pagan sacred spots. St Catherines
    Mount, near Guildford is one such and st Marthas, nearby, are examples...

    --
    If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will
    eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such
    time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic
    and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally
    important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for
    the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the
    truth is the greatest enemy of the State.

    Joseph Goebbels

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sun Dec 31 10:08:21 2023
    In article <umrbu9$1m0cb$12@dont-email.me>,
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 23:16, Colin Bignell wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the
    pagans?


    Saturnalia became Christmas.

    Nope. Saturnalia was Roman. Not Pagan. Yule was the pagan midwinter
    festival that became Christmas

    Depends on your definition of pagan. I believe it means non-Christian, so
    the Roman gods were pagan gods, too.


    Most Europeans did not honour Roman gods post the fall of the Empire.

    and so?

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4t
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Lamb@21:1/5 to Bignell on Sun Dec 31 09:54:15 2023
    In message <mE6dnSK3iN0jHQ34nZ2dnZeNn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
    You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.
    You have to count from somewhere.

    April 6th

    Ok. After you:-)


    I don't really see why religion should > have any more input. We
    already have gods in the days of the week!

    --
    Tim Lamb

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Sun Dec 31 09:50:26 2023
    On 31 Dec 2023 at 09:06:12 GMT, "The Natural Philosopher"
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 22:38, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 30 Dec 2023 at 20:49:33 GMT, ""Alan J. Wylie"" <alan@wylie.me.uk> wrote: >>
    Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes:

    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:

    You have to count from somewhere.

    April 6th

    Give us back our 11 days!

    Apparently, no one ever actually said that.

    "Claims of civil unrest and rioters demanding “Give us our eleven days” may have arisen through a misinterpretation of a contemporary painting
    by William Hogarth. His 1755 painting entitled: “An Election Entertainment” refers to the elections of 1754 and depicts a tavern
    dinner organised by Whig candidates. A stolen Tory campaign banner with
    the slogan, “Give us our Eleven Days” can be seen lower right (on the black banner on the floor under the seated gentleman’s foot). The Tories can be seen outside the window, demonstrating."

    Yes. This picture was called "An Election Entertainment".

    I read in a book entitled "Humble Pi" (a Christmas present, thus, timely), the following:

    "Despite what you may read online, no one complained about losing eleven days of their life, and no one carried a placard demanding 'Give us back our 11 days'."

    (the author checked comtemporary accounts at the British Library).

    --
    "A committee is a cul-de-sac down which ideas are lured and then quietly strangled." - Sir Barnett Cocks (1907-1989)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sun Dec 31 09:38:08 2023
    On 31/12/2023 09:10, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    the European Christmas is merely Christianization of the pagan midwinter festival of Yule, which features the death of the old year and the birth
    of the new. And celebrates evergreens and winter birds because they
    represent life in darkness and death.

    We will soon be celebrating Easter with the Christian symbols of a
    chocolate egg or chocolate bunny.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Sun Dec 31 11:11:42 2023
    On 30/12/2023 10:38 pm, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 30 Dec 2023 at 19:16:09 GMT, "SteveW" <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    It was an early example of Brexit. For a suggested view of what would have happened had Henry VIII not become king, see "The Alteration", by Kingsley Amis.

    The Catholics could be better Catholics if they sacked all the Cardinals, and the Curia (the Catholic equivalent of the EU Commission), and scrapped the Papacy, none of which are in any way necessary, and are just another example of the snouters we see and love in Brussels. Then you break up the Catholic church and thus have a national church in each country. Here, f'rinstance, they could merge with the Anglicans, and in eastern Europe, with the respective Orthodox arrangement.

    Or: "How to justify the totally self-centred actions of Henry VIII and
    the opportunism of the Lutherans in just a few random words".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Bignell@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sun Dec 31 10:20:00 2023
    On 31/12/2023 09:23, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 23:16, Colin Bignell wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the
    pagans?


    Saturnalia became Christmas.

    Nope. Saturnalia was Roman. Not Pagan. Yule was the pagan midwinter
    festival that became Christmas

    The date was set around 400CE, when a Christian Roman Empire was still struggling on. However, I did get the feast wrong. While Saturnalia was
    in late December, 25th December was the date of the Sol Invictus, a much
    less well known Roman feast.


    Most Europeans did not honour Roman gods post the fall of the Empire.


    --
    Colin Bignell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Dec 31 11:59:06 2023
    On 31 Dec 2023 at 11:11:42 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 10:38 pm, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 30 Dec 2023 at 19:16:09 GMT, "SteveW" <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote: >>
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    It was an early example of Brexit. For a suggested view of what would have >> happened had Henry VIII not become king, see "The Alteration", by Kingsley >> Amis.

    The Catholics could be better Catholics if they sacked all the Cardinals, and
    the Curia (the Catholic equivalent of the EU Commission), and scrapped the >> Papacy, none of which are in any way necessary, and are just another example >> of the snouters we see and love in Brussels. Then you break up the Catholic >> church and thus have a national church in each country. Here, f'rinstance, >> they could merge with the Anglicans, and in eastern Europe, with the
    respective Orthodox arrangement.

    Or: "How to justify the totally self-centred actions of Henry VIII and
    the opportunism of the Lutherans in just a few random words".

    Sure Henry VIII was self-centred. But perhaps you imagine that the sale of indulgences and all the other iniquities of the Roman Church at the time
    should just have been put up with, and that Luther should have toed the line. Otherwise - off to the gulag with him!

    My readings of books on the early Church paint a picture of disagreement (sometimes violent), conflict, and internecine hatred. I'm inclined to think that the Church was past its sell-by date even then.

    --
    The EU Parliament. The only parliament in the world that can neither initiate nor repeal legislation.

    Robert Kimbell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Sun Dec 31 12:01:49 2023
    On 31 Dec 2023 at 09:10:46 GMT, "The Natural Philosopher"
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I had an excellent christmas this year, that managed to avoid a single
    carol service and the kings speech altogether.

    I though it was a good speech on the whole, quite positive with no hand-wringing or agonising of the sort that the Eye would have us imagining.

    --
    “It is not the truth of Marxism that explains the willingness of intellectuals to believe it, but the power that it confers on intellectuals, in their attempts to control the world. And since ... it is futile to reason someone out of a thing that he
    was not reasoned into, we can conclude that Marxism owes its remarkable power to survive every criticism to the fact that it is not a truth-directed but a power-directed system of thought.”

    Sir Roger Scruton

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sun Dec 31 11:16:34 2023
    On 31/12/2023 09:10 am, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 20:45, maus wrote:
    On 2023-12-30, SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.
    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    Peace to you all. Afaik, the christians of the East celebrate Xhimas on
    7th january. Not sure of the Ethiopian Church, who surely have the
    closest line of descent from Jesus. Anyone know.?

    Well its all bollocks anyway. Shepherds do not graze their flocks by
    night at midwinter.

    The sheep still need to be watched, though... yes?

    the European Christmas is merely Christianization of the pagan midwinter festival of Yule, which features the death of the old year and the birth
    of the new. And celebrates evergreens and winter birds because they
    represent life in darkness and death.

    If the pagans (never really sure what that word means, and whether/how
    it's different from "heathen") hadn't adopted the Roman calendar, what
    was it that defined midwinter as the end/start of two consecutive years?

    What did humans do in the southern hemisphere? Start the year in what we
    would call July?

    I had an excellent christmas this year, that managed to avoid a single
    carol service and the kings speech altogether.

    I am at heart a Pagan I fear.

    I saw the King's Speech on YouTube, listening on 'phones so as not to
    disturb others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 31 12:15:31 2023
    On 31/12/2023 09:38, alan_m wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:10, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    the European Christmas is merely Christianization of the pagan
    midwinter festival of Yule, which features the death of the old year
    and the birth of the new. And celebrates evergreens and winter birds
    because they represent life in darkness and death.

    We will soon be celebrating Easter with the Christian symbols of a
    chocolate egg or chocolate bunny.


    Easter is even named after a pagan fertility goddess. Eostre I think she
    was called.

    Got duck all to do with the crucifixion..

    --
    “Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,”

    – Ludwig von Mises

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to charles on Sun Dec 31 12:18:57 2023
    On 31/12/2023 10:08, charles wrote:
    In article <umrbu9$1m0cb$12@dont-email.me>,
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 23:16, Colin Bignell wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the
    pagans?


    Saturnalia became Christmas.

    Nope. Saturnalia was Roman. Not Pagan. Yule was the pagan midwinter
    festival that became Christmas

    Depends on your definition of pagan. I believe it means non-Christian, so
    the Roman gods were pagan gods, too.

    Different pagans.

    N European tribes were primarily Celtic style, but then overrun by
    Dane/Dutch etc who brought Norse/Germanic gods along.


    Most Europeans did not honour Roman gods post the fall of the Empire.

    and so?


    --
    There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do
    that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon
    emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent renewable energy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Dec 31 12:17:09 2023
    On 31/12/2023 11:16, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:10 am, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 20:45, maus wrote:
    On 2023-12-30, SteveW <steve@walker-family.me.uk> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.
    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)

    Peace to you all. Afaik, the christians of the East celebrate Xhimas on
    7th january. Not sure of the Ethiopian Church, who surely have the
    closest line of descent from Jesus. Anyone know.?

    Well its all bollocks anyway. Shepherds do not graze their flocks by
    night at midwinter.

    The sheep still need to be watched, though... yes?

    the European Christmas is merely Christianization of the pagan
    midwinter festival of Yule, which features the death of the old year
    and the birth of the new. And celebrates evergreens and winter birds
    because they represent life in darkness and death.

    If the pagans (never really sure what that word means, and whether/how
    it's different from "heathen") hadn't adopted the Roman calendar, what
    was it that defined midwinter as the end/start of two consecutive years?

    The sun?
    WTF was stonehenge FOR after all?


    What did humans do in the southern hemisphere? Start the year in what we would call July?

    Fuknose. Ask them

    I had an excellent christmas this year, that managed to avoid a single
    carol service and the kings speech altogether.

    I am at heart a Pagan I fear.

    I saw the King's Speech on YouTube, listening on 'phones so as not to
    disturb others.

    I am very happy for you both.

    --
    “Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,”

    – Ludwig von Mises

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Sun Dec 31 12:19:42 2023
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:20:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)


    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.

    I think there are more.
    Many early churches were build on pagan sacred spots. St Catherines
    Mount, near Guildford is one such and st Marthas, nearby, are examples...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sun Dec 31 13:23:23 2023
    On 31/12/2023 09:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
     You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion
    should have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the week!

    And why not? All part of life's rich tapestry of utter nonsense, that we
    have simply got used to. Like the Labour party.



    And 'reform'/UKIP never electing any MP's

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun Dec 31 13:56:43 2023
    On 31/12/2023 13:23, Andrew wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
     You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion
    should have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the
    week!

    And why not? All part of life's rich tapestry of utter nonsense, that
    we have simply got used to. Like the Labour party.



    And 'reform'/UKIP never electing any MP's

    UKIP elected a LOT of MEPS though.
    More than any other party.

    Reform is not Ukip.

    Ukip is now a spent force.



    --
    I was brought up to believe that you should never give offence if you
    can avoid it; the new culture tells us you should always take offence if
    you can. There are now experts in the art of taking offence, indeed
    whole academic subjects, such as 'gender studies', devoted to it.

    Sir Roger Scruton

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Custos Custodum on Sun Dec 31 13:55:25 2023
    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:20:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans? >>>
    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)


    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.


    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre


    I think there are more.
    Many early churches were build on pagan sacred spots. St Catherines
    Mount, near Guildford is one such and st Marthas, nearby, are examples...

    --
    "Fanaticism consists in redoubling your effort when you have
    forgotten your aim."

    George Santayana

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun Dec 31 14:11:53 2023
    On 31/12/2023 13:23, Andrew wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
     You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion
    should have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the
    week!

    And why not? All part of life's rich tapestry of utter nonsense, that
    we have simply got used to. Like the Labour party.



    And 'reform'/UKIP never electing any MP's

    UKIP is dead. Long live Brexit.

    Their purpose has passed. Live with it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sun Dec 31 17:25:53 2023
    On 31/12/2023 12:15 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 09:38, alan_m wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:10, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    the European Christmas is merely Christianization of the pagan
    midwinter festival of Yule, which features the death of the old year
    and the birth of the new. And celebrates evergreens and winter birds
    because they represent life in darkness and death.

    We will soon be celebrating Easter with the Christian symbols of a
    chocolate egg or chocolate bunny.

    Easter is even named after a pagan fertility goddess. Eostre I think she
    was called.

    Got duck all to do with the crucifixion..

    Certainly the English language *name* hasn't.

    In Romance languages, the name is derived from "Passover", of course.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Sun Dec 31 17:24:44 2023
    On 31/12/2023 11:59 am, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 31 Dec 2023 at 11:11:42 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 10:38 pm, Tim Streater wrote:

    [ ... ]

    The Catholics could be better Catholics if they sacked all the Cardinals, and
    the Curia (the Catholic equivalent of the EU Commission), and scrapped the >>> Papacy, none of which are in any way necessary, and are just another example
    of the snouters we see and love in Brussels. Then you break up the Catholic >>> church and thus have a national church in each country. Here, f'rinstance, >>> they could merge with the Anglicans, and in eastern Europe, with the
    respective Orthodox arrangement.

    Or: "How to justify the totally self-centred actions of Henry VIII and
    the opportunism of the Lutherans in just a few random words".

    Sure Henry VIII was self-centred. But perhaps you imagine that the sale of indulgences and all the other iniquities of the Roman Church at the time should just have been put up with, and that Luther should have toed the line. Otherwise - off to the gulag with him!

    Or the stake, perhaps.

    My readings of books on the early Church paint a picture of disagreement (sometimes violent), conflict, and internecine hatred. I'm inclined to think that the Church was past its sell-by date even then.

    It's amazing that it has managed to survive the intervening nearly five centuries.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sun Dec 31 17:32:40 2023
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the
    pagans?

    Yes.

         Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
         Imbolc (Candlemas)
         Spring Equinox (Ostara)
         Beltane (May Eve)
         Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
         Lughnasadh (Lammas)
         Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.

    But in French (le Pâques), Italian (Pasqua), Spanish (Pascua de Resurrección), Portuguese (Páscoa), Romanian (Paști), Greek (Πάσχα) and even Russian (Пасха)...?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Tim Lamb on Sun Dec 31 17:40:14 2023
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
     You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion should
    have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the week!

    The beginning of the year could have been aligned with the shortest day
    (which is the 21st or 22nd of December) when the Gregorian calendar was introduced.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Dec 31 18:37:28 2023
    On 31 Dec 2023 at 17:24:44 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 11:59 am, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 31 Dec 2023 at 11:11:42 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 10:38 pm, Tim Streater wrote:

    [ ... ]

    The Catholics could be better Catholics if they sacked all the Cardinals, and
    the Curia (the Catholic equivalent of the EU Commission), and scrapped the >>>> Papacy, none of which are in any way necessary, and are just another example
    of the snouters we see and love in Brussels. Then you break up the Catholic
    church and thus have a national church in each country. Here, f'rinstance, >>>> they could merge with the Anglicans, and in eastern Europe, with the
    respective Orthodox arrangement.

    Or: "How to justify the totally self-centred actions of Henry VIII and
    the opportunism of the Lutherans in just a few random words".

    Sure Henry VIII was self-centred. But perhaps you imagine that the sale of >> indulgences and all the other iniquities of the Roman Church at the time
    should just have been put up with, and that Luther should have toed the line.
    Otherwise - off to the gulag with him!

    Or the stake, perhaps.

    Catholic Church plus Inquisition, plus auto da fe, not much different from Stalin.

    My readings of books on the early Church paint a picture of disagreement
    (sometimes violent), conflict, and internecine hatred. I'm inclined to think >> that the Church was past its sell-by date even then.

    It's amazing that it has managed to survive the intervening nearly five centuries.

    ITYM 15 centuries. By "early church", I meant the church in the first 500
    years or so AD. That is what any book about "the early Christian church" will be talking about.

    --
    "The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their
    pockets for new vocabulary."

    James Nicoll, rasfw

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Dec 31 19:23:27 2023
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 17:32:40 +0000, JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the
    pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.

    But in French (le Pques), Italian (Pasqua), Spanish (Pascua de >Resurreccin), Portuguese (Pscoa), Romanian (Pa?ti), Greek (?????) and
    even Russian (?????)...?

    https://uklp.com/how-to-say-easter-in-european-languages/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Sun Dec 31 19:18:06 2023
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 13:55:25 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:20:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans? >>>>
    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)


    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.


    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    Indubitably. But we were talking about the dates of the celebrations,
    not the names. LRN2RD.




    I think there are more.
    Many early churches were build on pagan sacred spots. St Catherines
    Mount, near Guildford is one such and st Marthas, nearby, are examples...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Sun Dec 31 19:17:16 2023
    On 31/12/2023 06:37 pm, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 31 Dec 2023 at 17:24:44 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 11:59 am, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2023 at 11:11:42 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 10:38 pm, Tim Streater wrote:

    [ ... ]

    The Catholics could be better Catholics if they sacked all the Cardinals, and
    the Curia (the Catholic equivalent of the EU Commission), and scrapped the
    Papacy, none of which are in any way necessary, and are just another example
    of the snouters we see and love in Brussels. Then you break up the Catholic
    church and thus have a national church in each country. Here, f'rinstance,
    they could merge with the Anglicans, and in eastern Europe, with the >>>>> respective Orthodox arrangement.

    Or: "How to justify the totally self-centred actions of Henry VIII and >>>> the opportunism of the Lutherans in just a few random words".

    Sure Henry VIII was self-centred. But perhaps you imagine that the sale of >>> indulgences and all the other iniquities of the Roman Church at the time >>> should just have been put up with, and that Luther should have toed the line.
    Otherwise - off to the gulag with him!

    Or the stake, perhaps.

    Catholic Church plus Inquisition, plus auto da fe, not much different from Stalin.

    The punishment for heresy was well-known. Ignorance would have been no
    defence. One has to remember that in a devout society, the threat of
    damnation for one's loved ones if infected by perceived heresy was taken extremely seriously. This was the major reason for the militant
    opposition to heresy and heretics.

    Stalin certainly shared the militancy, if not the devoutness.

    My readings of books on the early Church paint a picture of disagreement >>> (sometimes violent), conflict, and internecine hatred. I'm inclined to think
    that the Church was past its sell-by date even then.

    It's amazing that it has managed to survive the intervening nearly five
    centuries.

    ITYM 15 centuries.

    It isn't five centuries since the English "Reformation".

    By "early church", I meant the church in the first 500
    years or so AD. That is what any book about "the early Christian church" will be talking about.

    The thread was centred upon Henry VIII and his kleptomania.

    In any case, whilst there has been an identifiable Pope ever since
    Apostolic times, had the Church evolved by 533 AD (just a century after
    the fall of Imperial Rome) to include a college of Cardinals, the Curia,
    etc? I suggest not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to JNugent on Sun Dec 31 19:42:24 2023
    On 31 Dec 2023 at 19:17:16 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 06:37 pm, Tim Streater wrote:

    On 31 Dec 2023 at 17:24:44 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 11:59 am, Tim Streater wrote:
    On 31 Dec 2023 at 11:11:42 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 10:38 pm, Tim Streater wrote:

    [ ... ]

    The Catholics could be better Catholics if they sacked all the Cardinals, and
    the Curia (the Catholic equivalent of the EU Commission), and scrapped the
    Papacy, none of which are in any way necessary, and are just another example
    of the snouters we see and love in Brussels. Then you break up the Catholic
    church and thus have a national church in each country. Here, f'rinstance,
    they could merge with the Anglicans, and in eastern Europe, with the >>>>>> respective Orthodox arrangement.

    Or: "How to justify the totally self-centred actions of Henry VIII and >>>>> the opportunism of the Lutherans in just a few random words".

    Sure Henry VIII was self-centred. But perhaps you imagine that the sale of >>>> indulgences and all the other iniquities of the Roman Church at the time >>>> should just have been put up with, and that Luther should have toed the line.
    Otherwise - off to the gulag with him!

    Or the stake, perhaps.

    Catholic Church plus Inquisition, plus auto da fe, not much different from >> Stalin.

    The punishment for heresy was well-known. Ignorance would have been no defence. One has to remember that in a devout society, the threat of damnation for one's loved ones if infected by perceived heresy was taken extremely seriously. This was the major reason for the militant
    opposition to heresy and heretics.

    Stalin certainly shared the militancy, if not the devoutness.

    My readings of books on the early Church paint a picture of disagreement >>>> (sometimes violent), conflict, and internecine hatred. I'm inclined to think
    that the Church was past its sell-by date even then.

    It's amazing that it has managed to survive the intervening nearly five
    centuries.

    ITYM 15 centuries.

    It isn't five centuries since the English "Reformation".

    By "early church", I meant the church in the first 500
    years or so AD. That is what any book about "the early Christian church" will
    be talking about.

    The thread was centred upon Henry VIII and his kleptomania.

    No. I made certain assertions regarding how I thought the Catholics could improve. I then expressed doubt about that, based on the state of the early Church - that the early church was perhaps already of no value and that this 'perhaps' became a certainty later on with the indulgences and general corruption.

    In any case, whilst there has been an identifiable Pope ever since
    Apostolic times, had the Church evolved by 533 AD (just a century after
    the fall of Imperial Rome) to include a college of Cardinals, the Curia,
    etc? I suggest not.

    No, but once Rome shook the church by the scruff of the neck, the growth of that sort of bureaucracy was guaranteed. In fact, given the paucity of references in the New Testament by Jesus to a future church, it's unclear to
    me that he ever had any intention of establishing one, given that as the Son
    of God (who had already thrown the moneychangers out of the temple), he would know full well what mere humans would make of it. And they did, as documented in the tomes I referred to upthread.


    --
    HAL 9000: Dave. Put down those Windows disks. Dave. DAVE!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Jackson@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jan 1 11:29:04 2024
    On 2023-12-31, JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    In any case, whilst there has been an identifiable Pope ever since
    Apostolic times,

    Indeed - sometimes more than one at the same time!

    https://www.christian-history.org/western-great-schism.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jan 1 12:52:46 2024
    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the
    pagans?

    Yes.

         Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
         Imbolc (Candlemas)
         Spring Equinox (Ostara)
         Beltane (May Eve)
         Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
         Lughnasadh (Lammas)
         Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.
    This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people


    --
    "I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah
    puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Custos Custodum on Mon Jan 1 12:53:58 2024
    On 31/12/2023 19:18, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 13:55:25 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:20:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans? >>>>>
    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)


    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.


    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    Indubitably. But we were talking about the dates of the celebrations,
    not the names. LRN2RD.

    No, we were not.
    the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.




    I think there are more.
    Many early churches were build on pagan sacred spots. St Catherines
    Mount, near Guildford is one such and st Marthas, nearby, are examples...

    --
    "I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah
    puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jan 1 13:45:10 2024
    In article <umuciu$277ko$3@dont-email.me>,
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the
    pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.
    This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    the .uk would imply Scots, Welsh & N Irish as well.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4t
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Mon Jan 1 14:24:38 2024
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 12:53:58 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 19:18, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 13:55:25 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 09:20:46 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).


    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)


    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.


    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    Indubitably. But we were talking about the dates of the celebrations,
    not the names. LRN2RD.

    No, we were not.

    Actually, we were.

    alan_m> The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from
    the pagans?
    Yes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to charles on Mon Jan 1 14:42:34 2024
    On 01/01/2024 13:45, charles wrote:
    In article <umuciu$277ko$3@dont-email.me>,
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the >>>>>>> pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.
    This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    the .uk would imply Scots, Welsh & N Irish as well.

    Well they are just English people with chips on their shoulders

    --
    "Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and
    higher education positively fortifies it."

    - Stephen Vizinczey

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Mon Jan 1 16:29:22 2024
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:42:34 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 13:45, charles wrote:
    In article <umuciu$277ko$3@dont-email.me>,
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the >>>>>>>> pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are >>>>>> the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.
    This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    the .uk would imply Scots, Welsh & N Irish as well.

    Well they are just English people with chips on their shoulders

    Pg mo thin. Some of our ancestors were here long before the Saxon Johnny-come-latelys arrived.

    Bliadhna mhath r. (HNY)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Jim Jackson on Mon Jan 1 16:41:18 2024
    On 01/01/2024 11:29 am, Jim Jackson wrote:

    On 2023-12-31, JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    In any case, whilst there has been an identifiable Pope ever since
    Apostolic times,

    Indeed - sometimes more than one at the same time!

    https://www.christian-history.org/western-great-schism.html

    True enough.

    We humans are full of faults. Religion is one of the ways in which we
    try to overcome that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jan 1 16:43:22 2024
    On 01/01/2024 12:52 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the
    pagans?

    Yes.

         Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
         Imbolc (Candlemas)
         Spring Equinox (Ostara)
         Beltane (May Eve)
         Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
         Lughnasadh (Lammas)
         Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.

    This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    True (but did you mean "British"?).

    But treating the English word for the feast of the Resurrection as a
    global phenomenon is an error.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jan 1 17:46:50 2024
    On 31/12/2023 13:56, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 13:23, Andrew wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
     You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion
    should have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the
    week!

    And why not? All part of life's rich tapestry of utter nonsense, that
    we have simply got used to. Like the Labour party.



    And 'reform'/UKIP never electing any MP's

    UKIP elected a LOT of MEPS though.
    More than any other party.

    With turnouts down to and sometimes less than 15%. Only
    the UKIP planks bothered to vote in the EU elections,
    most people simply couldn't be arsed.

    Reform is not Ukip.

    Oh yes it is !. The *same* bunch of geriatric losers
    are the only people who support them.

    Ukip is now a spent force.

    And all the people behind UKIP are now in 'reform'.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Mon Jan 1 17:48:06 2024
    On 31/12/2023 14:11, Fredxx wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 13:23, Andrew wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).
     You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion
    should have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the
    week!

    And why not? All part of life's rich tapestry of utter nonsense, that
    we have simply got used to. Like the Labour party.



    And 'reform'/UKIP never electing any MP's

    UKIP is dead. Long live Brexit.

    Huge numbers of UKIP supporters or who voted Brexit *are* now dead
    since 2016 !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jan 1 18:46:41 2024
    On 01/01/2024 16:43, JNugent wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 12:52 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the >>>>>>> pagans?

    Yes.

         Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
         Imbolc (Candlemas)
         Spring Equinox (Ostara)
         Beltane (May Eve)
         Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
         Lughnasadh (Lammas)
         Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are
    the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.

    This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    True (but did you mean "British"?).

    But treating the English word for the feast of the Resurrection as a
    global phenomenon is an error.

    Then why did you do it?

    --
    Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead
    to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Custos Custodum on Mon Jan 1 18:46:15 2024
    On 01/01/2024 16:29, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:42:34 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 13:45, charles wrote:
    In article <umuciu$277ko$3@dont-email.me>,
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics). >>>>>>
    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the >>>>>>>>> pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are >>>>>>> the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.
    This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    the .uk would imply Scots, Welsh & N Irish as well.

    Well they are just English people with chips on their shoulders

    Pòg mo thòin. Some of our ancestors were here long before the Saxon Johnny-come-latelys arrived.

    Bliadhna mhath ùr. (HNY)

    Indeed. Queen Boudicca. Still English


    --
    Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead
    to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Andrew on Mon Jan 1 18:47:15 2024
    On 01/01/2024 17:46, Andrew wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 13:56, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 13:23, Andrew wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics). >>>>>>>  You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion
    should have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the
    week!

    And why not? All part of life's rich tapestry of utter nonsense,
    that we have simply got used to. Like the Labour party.



    And 'reform'/UKIP never electing any MP's

    UKIP elected a LOT of MEPS though.
    More than any other party.

    With turnouts down to and sometimes less than 15%. Only
    the UKIP planks bothered to vote in the EU elections,
    most people simply couldn't be arsed.

    Reform is not Ukip.

    Oh yes it is !. The *same* bunch of geriatric losers
    are the only people who support them.

    No, they all support rejoin.



    --
    Truth welcomes investigation because truth knows investigation will lead
    to converts. It is deception that uses all the other techniques.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Mon Jan 1 19:29:02 2024
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 18:46:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 16:29, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:42:34 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 13:45, charles wrote:
    In article <umuciu$277ko$3@dont-email.me>,
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics). >>>>>>>
    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the >>>>>>>>>> pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish >>>>>>>> Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is >>>>>>>> cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are >>>>>>>> the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so. >>>>> This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    the .uk would imply Scots, Welsh & N Irish as well.

    Well they are just English people with chips on their shoulders

    Pg mo thin. Some of our ancestors were here long before the Saxon
    Johnny-come-latelys arrived.

    Bliadhna mhath r. (HNY)

    Indeed. Queen Boudicca. Still English

    Boudicca was a Brythonic (i.e., Celtic) queen of the 1st century AD.
    The Angles and Saxons didn't arrive in numbers until the Romans left
    in the 5th century. Please stop digging - it's embarrassing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jan 1 19:51:22 2024
    On 01/01/2024 06:46 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 16:43, JNugent wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 12:52 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from
    the pagans?

    Yes.

         Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
         Imbolc (Candlemas)
         Spring Equinox (Ostara)
         Beltane (May Eve)
         Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
         Lughnasadh (Lammas)
         Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish
    Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is
    cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are >>>>>> the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so.

    This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    True (but did you mean "British"?).

    But treating the English word for the feast of the Resurrection as a
    global phenomenon is an error.

    Then why did you do it?

    I didn't. Someone else did and I was one of those pointing out that
    treating the English word for the feast of the Resurrection as a global phenomenon is an error.

    But you already knew that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to soup on Mon Jan 1 19:52:20 2024
    On 01/01/2024 07:49 pm, soup wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 11:16, JNugent wrote:

    The sheep still need to be watched, though... yes?

    Not really, unless the sheep are lambing or being moved to a different pasture they are pretty much left to themselves (with the possible
    addition of some sheep dogs [those that protect the flock from wolves
    rather than those used to herd them]).

    But 2,000 years ago...?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From soup@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jan 1 19:53:55 2024
    On 01/01/2024 19:52, JNugent wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 07:49 pm, soup wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 11:16, JNugent wrote:

    The sheep still need to be watched, though... yes?

    Not really, unless the sheep are lambing or being moved to a different
    pasture they are pretty much left to themselves (with the possible
    addition of some sheep dogs [those that protect the flock from wolves
    rather than those used to herd them]).

    But 2,000 years ago...?
    Why would that matter?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to soup on Mon Jan 1 20:09:53 2024
    On 01/01/2024 07:53 pm, soup wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 19:52, JNugent wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 07:49 pm, soup wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 11:16, JNugent wrote:

    The sheep still need to be watched, though... yes?

    Not really, unless the sheep are lambing or being moved to a
    different pasture they are pretty much left to themselves (with the
    possible addition of some sheep dogs [those that protect the flock
    from wolves rather than those used to herd them]).

    But 2,000 years ago...?
     Why would that matter?

    Building, even of mere dry-stone walls, would have been a high order
    expense. Whether sheep-herders could afford all of the wall mileage
    required for the various pens required from time to time in order to be
    able to leave a flock unattended is an imponderable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From soup@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Mon Jan 1 19:51:42 2024
    On 31/12/2023 12:17, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    WTF was stonehenge FOR after all?

    Answer that (provably) and there is a Nobel prize waiting for you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From soup@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jan 1 19:49:23 2024
    On 31/12/2023 11:16, JNugent wrote:

    The sheep still need to be watched, though... yes?

    Not really, unless the sheep are lambing or being moved to a different
    pasture they are pretty much left to themselves (with the possible
    addition of some sheep dogs [those that protect the flock from wolves
    rather than those used to herd them]).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 1 20:26:16 2024
    On Mon, 01 Jan 2024 19:29:02 +0000, Custos Custodum <me@privacy.net>
    wrote:


    Indeed. Queen Boudicca. Still English

    Boudicca was a Brythonic (i.e., Celtic) queen of the 1st century AD.
    The Angles and Saxons didn't arrive in numbers until the Romans left
    in the 5th century. Please stop digging - it's embarrassing.

    Just realised who you remind me of:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TqqWL1NowyE

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan J. Wylie@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jan 1 20:40:49 2024
    JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> writes:

    Building, even of mere dry-stone walls, would have been a high order
    expense. Whether sheep-herders could afford all of the wall mileage
    required for the various pens required from time to time in order to
    be able to leave a flock unattended is an imponderable.

    http://lakesworldheritage.co.uk/blog/2020/april/02/what-is-hefting/

    "Hefting is the basis for shepherding on unenclosed mountain and
    moorland in the British Isles. This uses the homing and herding
    instincts of hill sheep making it possible for individual flocks owned
    by different farmers to graze ‘open’ fells with no physical barriers between them"

    --
    Alan J. Wylie https://www.wylie.me.uk/

    Dance like no-one's watching. / Encrypt like everyone is.
    Security is inversely proportional to convenience

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Custos Custodum@21:1/5 to JNugent on Mon Jan 1 20:38:49 2024
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 20:09:53 +0000, JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 07:53 pm, soup wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 19:52, JNugent wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 07:49 pm, soup wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 11:16, JNugent wrote:

    The sheep still need to be watched, though... yes?

    Not really, unless the sheep are lambing or being moved to a
    different pasture they are pretty much left to themselves (with the
    possible addition of some sheep dogs [those that protect the flock
    from wolves rather than those used to herd them]).

    But 2,000 years ago...?
    Why would that matter?

    Building, even of mere dry-stone walls, would have been a high order
    expense. Whether sheep-herders could afford all of the wall mileage
    required for the various pens required from time to time in order to be
    able to leave a flock unattended is an imponderable.

    In the north of Scotland, and probably in places like Yorkshire, etc.,
    sheep are free to roam the hills unsupervised. They are gathered and
    brought in for activities such as dosing, dipping and clipping. They
    are only kept in fields at lambing time, when they might need
    assistance and new lambs will need protection from predators, or prior
    to being shipped off to market.
    .

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Custos Custodum on Mon Jan 1 21:48:26 2024
    On 01/01/2024 08:38 pm, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 20:09:53 +0000, JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 07:53 pm, soup wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 19:52, JNugent wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 07:49 pm, soup wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 11:16, JNugent wrote:

    The sheep still need to be watched, though... yes?

    Not really, unless the sheep are lambing or being moved to a
    different pasture they are pretty much left to themselves (with the
    possible addition of some sheep dogs [those that protect the flock
    from wolves rather than those used to herd them]).

    But 2,000 years ago...?
     Why would that matter?

    Building, even of mere dry-stone walls, would have been a high order
    expense. Whether sheep-herders could afford all of the wall mileage
    required for the various pens required from time to time in order to be
    able to leave a flock unattended is an imponderable.

    In the north of Scotland, and probably in places like Yorkshire, etc.,
    sheep are free to roam the hills unsupervised. They are gathered and
    brought in for activities such as dosing, dipping and clipping. They
    are only kept in fields at lambing time, when they might need
    assistance and new lambs will need protection from predators, or prior
    to being shipped off to market.

    That's pretty much how one thinks of the middle east two thousand years
    ago, too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Alan J. Wylie on Mon Jan 1 21:49:44 2024
    On 01/01/2024 08:40 pm, Alan J. Wylie wrote:
    JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> writes:

    Building, even of mere dry-stone walls, would have been a high order
    expense. Whether sheep-herders could afford all of the wall mileage
    required for the various pens required from time to time in order to
    be able to leave a flock unattended is an imponderable.

    http://lakesworldheritage.co.uk/blog/2020/april/02/what-is-hefting/

    "Hefting is the basis for shepherding on unenclosed mountain and
    moorland in the British Isles. This uses the homing and herding
    instincts of hill sheep making it possible for individual flocks owned
    by different farmers to graze ‘open’ fells with no physical barriers between them"

    OK, it's fiction, but even in "Far From The Madding Crowd", Oakes' sheep
    are not penned (which leads to disaster at the cliff's edge.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Custos Custodum on Mon Jan 1 23:30:26 2024
    On 01/01/2024 19:29, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 18:46:15 +0000, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 16:29, Custos Custodum wrote:
    On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 14:42:34 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 01/01/2024 13:45, charles wrote:
    In article <umuciu$277ko$3@dont-email.me>,
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 17:32, JNugent wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 01:55 pm, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 31/12/2023 12:19, Custos Custodum wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 22:11, alan_m wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics). >>>>>>>>
    The modern churches just pinched the dates for festivals from the >>>>>>>>>>> pagans?

    Yes.

    Winter Solstice (Midwinter / Yule)
    Imbolc (Candlemas)
    Spring Equinox (Ostara)
    Beltane (May Eve)
    Summer Solstice (Midsummer / Litha)
    Lughnasadh (Lammas)
    Autumn Equinox (Mabon)

    Not Easter, the timing of which is closely linked to the Jewish >>>>>>>>> Passover. In most European languages, the word for "Easter " is >>>>>>>>> cognate with the Hebrew "Pesach" (Passover). English and German are >>>>>>>>> the main exceptions.

    Bullshit. Easter is from Eostre

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eostre

    In *English* (basically a germanic language), that is certainly so. >>>>>> This is an English newsgroup dedicated to English people

    the .uk would imply Scots, Welsh & N Irish as well.

    Well they are just English people with chips on their shoulders

    Pòg mo thòin. Some of our ancestors were here long before the Saxon
    Johnny-come-latelys arrived.

    Bliadhna mhath ùr. (HNY)

    Indeed. Queen Boudicca. Still English

    Boudicca was a Brythonic (i.e., Celtic) queen of the 1st century AD.
    The Angles and Saxons didn't arrive in numbers until the Romans left
    in the 5th century. Please stop digging - it's embarrassing.

    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we are
    called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    --
    “The urge to save humanity is almost always only a false face for the
    urge to rule it.”
    – H. L. Mencken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to JNugent on Tue Jan 2 07:45:39 2024
    On 01/01/2024 16:41, JNugent wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 11:29 am, Jim Jackson wrote:

    On 2023-12-31, JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    In any case, whilst there has been an identifiable Pope ever since
    Apostolic times,

    Indeed - sometimes more than one at the same time!

       https://www.christian-history.org/western-great-schism.html

    True enough.

    We humans are full of faults. Religion is one of the ways in which we
    try to overcome that.

    Religion has always been a way to influence the masses by the ruling
    classes (or those who think they should be the ruling class).

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 2 09:42:09 2024
    Am 30/12/2023 um 19:16 schrieb SteveW:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics).

    Too early.

    As for Anglicans being bad Catholics - they followed the reforms of
    Henry VIII and a big part of the reformation was to get rid of the
    excesses, the indulgences and the misused power of the Roman Catholic
    church. So you could perhaps say that Anglicans are the "better"
    Catholics :)


    You are confusing Anglicans with Protestants. Are you a Yank?

    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Andrew on Tue Jan 2 10:26:48 2024
    On 01/01/2024 17:48, Andrew wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 14:11, Fredxx wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 13:23, Andrew wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 09:04, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 18:59, Tim Lamb wrote:
    In message <jWGdnRWv7ubmzQ34nZ2dnZeNn_Vi4p2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> writes
    On 30/12/2023 16:53, Max Demian wrote:
    On 30/12/2023 16:42, Ottavio Caruso wrote:

    (That includes Anglicans, because they are just bad Catholics). >>>>>>>  You're two days early.

    27 days late, if following the liturgical year.

    You, or the world, might not make it.

    You have to count from somewhere. I don't really see why religion
    should have any more input. We already have gods in the days of the
    week!

    And why not? All part of life's rich tapestry of utter nonsense,
    that we have simply got used to. Like the Labour party.



    And 'reform'/UKIP never electing any MP's

    UKIP is dead. Long live Brexit.

    Huge numbers of UKIP supporters or who voted Brexit *are* now dead
    since 2016 !

    So? In much the same way Labour voters mature and become Tory voters in
    later life. They die too, to be replaced by enlightened Labour voters.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to soup on Tue Jan 2 17:44:40 2024
    On 01/01/2024 19:51, soup wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 12:17, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    WTF was stonehenge FOR after all?

    Answer that (provably) and there is a Nobel prize waiting for you.

    No as there isn't one for archaeology (or anything similar).

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From soup@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Wed Jan 3 11:42:24 2024
    On 02/01/2024 17:44, Max Demian wrote:
    On 01/01/2024 19:51, soup wrote:
    On 31/12/2023 12:17, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    WTF was stonehenge FOR after all?

    Answer that (provably) and there is a Nobel prize waiting for you.

    No as there isn't one for archaeology (or anything similar).

    I was going to type 'note the emoticon', but I forgot to put one in, so
    here it is :- ;O)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From brian@21:1/5 to tnp@invalid.invalid on Thu Jan 4 10:41:26 2024
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we are
    called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle ,
    it's not that bit.

    Brian
    --
    Brian Howie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to brian on Thu Jan 4 11:24:46 2024
    On 04/01/2024 10:41, brian wrote:
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we are
    called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle ,
    it's not that bit.

    Brian

    Well there you go then. According to DNA homo sap. was down to a few
    hundred people once, and we are all descended from them.


    --
    "The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll
    look exactly the same afterwards."

    Billy Connolly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jan 4 13:49:35 2024
    On 04/01/2024 11:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 10:41, brian wrote:
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle
    , it's not that bit.

    Brian

    Well there you go then.  According to DNA homo sap. was down to a few hundred people once, and we are all descended from them.

    The scientific community suggest 1,280, so only an order of magnitude out.
    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487

    Caused by climate change. Perhaps we should take this more seriously
    rather than placing our head in the sand singing La La La.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Thu Jan 4 14:06:17 2024
    On 04/01/2024 01:49 pm, Fredxx wrote:

    On 04/01/2024 11:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 10:41, brian wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes

    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English
    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle
    , it's not that bit.
    Brian

    Well there you go then.  According to DNA homo sap. was down to a few
    hundred people once, and we are all descended from them.

    The scientific community suggest 1,280, so only an order of magnitude out.
      https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487

    Thinking back, I'm reasonably sure that I never encountered the term
    "order of magnitude" in education, whether primary, secondary or higher
    (I was an arts person). But in recent decades, I have seen it used many
    times in discussion and argument.

    Today, I decided to ascertain the correct meaning of the phrase (which
    is clearly a term of art with a specific definition).

    It seems that item B is an order of magnitude larger then item B if and
    only if item B is at least ten times the value / size / measurement of
    item A.

    So... what does "a few hundred" mean?

    Obviously, "a few" has to be greater in value than "a couple". In this
    context, it is used of discrete, countable items (people). Its value
    therefore has to be expressed as a whole number. So... it has to be at
    least three, yes?

    What is 300 (minimum value for "a few hundred people") multiplied by 10?
    Is it greater or smaller than 1,280?

    If greater, then the necessary characteristic for the numbers to be
    described as being an order of magnitude apart is not present.

    I am grateful to you for prompting me (at last) to check the meaning of
    that phrase. We all can learn something every day.

    Caused by climate change. Perhaps we should take this more seriously
    rather than placing our head in the sand singing La La La.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ottavio Caruso@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 4 14:11:42 2024
    Am 04/01/2024 um 10:41 schrieb brian:
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we are
    called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle ,
    it's not that bit.

    Brian

    I did a DNA test and apparently I'm related to God from my mother's side.

    --
    Ottavio Caruso

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to JNugent on Thu Jan 4 14:24:29 2024
    On 04/01/2024 14:06, JNugent wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 01:49 pm, Fredxx wrote:

    On 04/01/2024 11:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 10:41, brian wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes

    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English
    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my
    schmeckle , it's not that bit.
    Brian

    Well there you go then.  According to DNA homo sap. was down to a few
    hundred people once, and we are all descended from them.

    The scientific community suggest 1,280, so only an order of magnitude
    out.
       https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487

    Thinking back, I'm reasonably sure that I never encountered the term
    "order of magnitude" in education, whether primary, secondary or higher
    (I was an arts person). But in recent decades, I have seen it used many
    times in discussion and argument.

    Today, I decided to ascertain the correct meaning of the phrase (which
    is clearly a term of art with a specific definition).

    It seems that item B is an order of magnitude larger then item B if and
    only if item B is at least ten times the value / size / measurement of
    item A.

    So... what does "a few hundred" mean?

    Obviously, "a few" has to be greater in value than "a couple". In this context, it is used of discrete, countable items (people). Its value therefore has to be expressed as a whole number. So... it has to be at
    least three, yes?

    What is 300 (minimum value for "a few hundred people") multiplied by 10?
    Is it greater or smaller than 1,280?

    If greater, then the necessary characteristic for the numbers to be
    described as being an order of magnitude apart is not present.

    I am grateful to you for prompting me (at last) to check the meaning of
    that phrase. We all can learn something every day.

    Pleasure, I admit I was stretching the definition, but the need to add
    an extra nought was sufficient.

    It's shameful that TNP can never back up his claims by citing an
    independent source.

    Caused by climate change. Perhaps we should take this more seriously
    rather than placing our head in the sand singing La La La.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Thu Jan 4 14:29:58 2024
    On 04/01/2024 14:11, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    Am 04/01/2024 um 10:41 schrieb brian:
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle
    , it's not that bit.

    Brian

    I did a DNA test and apparently I'm related to God from my mother's side.

    Are you now claiming Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had
    children? I suppose that's more likely that your claim that bendy
    bananas are banned in the EU.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Thu Jan 4 14:39:11 2024
    On 04/01/2024 02:24 pm, Fredxx wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 14:06, JNugent wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 01:49 pm, Fredxx wrote:

    On 04/01/2024 11:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 10:41, brian wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes

    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we >>>>>> are called today is English
    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my
    schmeckle , it's not that bit.
    Brian

    Well there you go then.  According to DNA homo sap. was down to a
    few hundred people once, and we are all descended from them.

    The scientific community suggest 1,280, so only an order of magnitude
    out.
       https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487

    Thinking back, I'm reasonably sure that I never encountered the term
    "order of magnitude" in education, whether primary, secondary or
    higher (I was an arts person). But in recent decades, I have seen it
    used many times in discussion and argument.

    Today, I decided to ascertain the correct meaning of the phrase (which
    is clearly a term of art with a specific definition).

    It seems that item B is an order of magnitude larger then item B if
    and only if item B is at least ten times the value / size /
    measurement of item A.

    So... what does "a few hundred" mean?

    Obviously, "a few" has to be greater in value than "a couple". In this
    context, it is used of discrete, countable items (people). Its value
    therefore has to be expressed as a whole number. So... it has to be at
    least three, yes?

    What is 300 (minimum value for "a few hundred people") multiplied by
    10? Is it greater or smaller than 1,280?

    If greater, then the necessary characteristic for the numbers to be
    described as being an order of magnitude apart is not present.

    I am grateful to you for prompting me (at last) to check the meaning
    of that phrase. We all can learn something every day.

    Pleasure, I admit I was stretching the definition, but the need to add
    an extra nought was sufficient.

    :-)

    It's shameful that TNP can never back up his claims by citing an
    independent source.

    Caused by climate change. Perhaps we should take this more seriously
    rather than placing our head in the sand singing La La La.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to JNugent on Thu Jan 4 14:44:59 2024
    On 04/01/2024 14:06, JNugent wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 01:49 pm, Fredxx wrote:

    On 04/01/2024 11:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 10:41, brian wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes

    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English
    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my
    schmeckle , it's not that bit.
    Brian

    Well there you go then.  According to DNA homo sap. was down to a few
    hundred people once, and we are all descended from them.

    The scientific community suggest 1,280, so only an order of magnitude
    out.
       https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487

    Er no. a few hundred peole is fairly close to 1280. It is in fact 12.8
    hundred people. Covered well by 'a few'


    Thinking back, I'm reasonably sure that I never encountered the term
    "order of magnitude" in education, whether primary, secondary or higher
    (I was an arts person). But in recent decades, I have seen it used many
    times in discussion and argument.

    I think I heard it the moment I started doing any science at all.

    Today, I decided to ascertain the correct meaning of the phrase (which
    is clearly a term of art with a specific definition).

    It seems that item B is an order of magnitude larger then item B if and
    only if item B is at least ten times the value / size / measurement of
    item A.

    So... what does "a few hundred" mean?

    Well exactly.

    Certainly more than one hundred, certainly less than one hundred hundred.


    Obviously, "a few" has to be greater in value than "a couple". In this context, it is used of discrete, countable items (people). Its value therefore has to be expressed as a whole number. So... it has to be at
    least three, yes?

    What is 300 (minimum value for "a few hundred people") multiplied by 10?
    Is it greater or smaller than 1,280?

    If greater, then the necessary characteristic for the numbers to be
    described as being an order of magnitude apart is not present.

    I am grateful to you for prompting me (at last) to check the meaning of
    that phrase. We all can learn something every day.

    Caused by climate change. Perhaps we should take this more seriously
    rather than placing our head in the sand singing La La La.

    Well lookee here. it's all 'caused bu climate change' for him!.
    Strangely however, not by human induced climate change. Which rather
    gives the lie to 'its all man made' ...

    Never let facts get in the way of a good bit of ad hominen attack.


    --
    “The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to
    fill the world with fools.”

    Herbert Spencer

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Thu Jan 4 14:58:05 2024
    On 04/01/2024 14:44, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 14:06, JNugent wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 01:49 pm, Fredxx wrote:

    On 04/01/2024 11:24, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 10:41, brian wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes

    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we >>>>>> are called today is English
    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my
    schmeckle , it's not that bit.
    Brian

    Well there you go then.  According to DNA homo sap. was down to a
    few hundred people once, and we are all descended from them.

    The scientific community suggest 1,280, so only an order of magnitude
    out.
       https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abq7487

    Er no. a few hundred peole is fairly close to 1280. It is in fact 12.8 hundred people. Covered well by 'a few'


    Thinking back, I'm reasonably sure that I never encountered the term
    "order of magnitude" in education, whether primary, secondary or
    higher (I was an arts person). But in recent decades, I have seen it
    used many times in discussion and argument.

    I think I heard it the moment I started doing any science at all.

    Today, I decided to ascertain the correct meaning of the phrase (which
    is clearly a term of art with a specific definition).

    It seems that item B is an order of magnitude larger then item B if
    and only if item B is at least ten times the value / size /
    measurement of item A.

    So... what does "a few hundred" mean?

    Well exactly.

    Certainly more than one hundred, certainly less than one hundred hundred.


    Obviously, "a few" has to be greater in value than "a couple". In this
    context, it is used of discrete, countable items (people). Its value
    therefore has to be expressed as a whole number. So... it has to be at
    least three, yes?

    What is 300 (minimum value for "a few hundred people") multiplied by
    10? Is it greater or smaller than 1,280?

    If greater, then the necessary characteristic for the numbers to be
    described as being an order of magnitude apart is not present.

    I am grateful to you for prompting me (at last) to check the meaning
    of that phrase. We all can learn something every day.

    Caused by climate change. Perhaps we should take this more seriously
    rather than placing our head in the sand singing La La La.

    Well lookee here. it's all 'caused bu climate change'  for him!.
    Strangely however, not by human induced climate change.  Which rather
    gives the lie to  'its all man made' ...

    Quite, so we should be more concerned, not less.

    Never let facts get in the way of a good bit of ad hominen attack.

    Facts? I've never seen you cite a single fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to JNugent on Thu Jan 4 15:04:57 2024
    On 04 Jan 2024 at 14:06:17 GMT, "JNugent" <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:

    Today, I decided to ascertain the correct meaning of the phrase (which
    is clearly a term of art with a specific definition).

    It seems that item B is an order of magnitude larger than item A if and
    only if item B is at least ten times the value / size / measurement of
    item A.

    So... what does "a few hundred" mean?

    Obviously, "a few" has to be greater in value than "a couple". In this context, it is used of discrete, countable items (people). Its value therefore has to be expressed as a whole number. So... it has to be at
    least three, yes?

    What is 300 (minimum value for "a few hundred people") multiplied by 10?
    Is it greater or smaller than 1,280?

    If greater, then the necessary characteristic for the numbers to be
    described as being an order of magnitude apart is not present.

    The phrase is used when comparing two values. An order of magnitude will be roughly a factor of 10, but only roughly. So f'rinstance we have the moon at a distance of 250,000 miles from the Earth, and the Sun at 93 million miles from the Earth. That's between two and three orders of magnitude further. If I'm
    six times as old as you, then I'm roughly an order of magnitude older.

    It tends to get used when dealing with comparing large numbers. The Milky Way is estimated to contain between 400 thousand million stars (that's 4 x 10
    power 11), and 1000 thousand million stars (10 power 12). A fucking great
    large number, either way, but we can say that the number of stars is known to within an O of M.

    In the instance you were replying to, a few hundred is going to be 300 to 400 or so. The difference between that and 1300 is 3 or 4, so really speaking rather less than an O of M.

    OTOH, for some purposes that doesn't matter.

    --
    "... you must remember that if you're trying to propagate a creed of poverty, gentleness and tolerance, you need a very rich, powerful, authoritarian organisation to do it." - Vice-Pope Eric

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Thu Jan 4 15:12:36 2024
    On 04 Jan 2024 at 14:58:05 GMT, "Fredxx" <fredxx@spam.invalid> wrote:

    Caused by climate change. Perhaps we should take this more seriously
    rather than placing our head in the sand singing La La La.

    Well lookee here. it's all 'caused by climate change' for him!.
    Strangely however, not by human induced climate change. Which rather
    gives the lie to 'its all man made' ...

    Quite, so we should be more concerned, not less.

    Er, no we shouldn't. That the tiny remnant human population from which we all sprang, *was* tiny, was down to disease and the ice age (or perhaps the end of an inter-glacial which itself had allowed humans to spread). If that happened today, there'd be nothing anyone could do about it (not the ice-age part, I mean) even if they wanted to or thought it would be useful to try.

    Climate change, IOW, is going to happen whether there are humans about or not. And the glaciers will be back soon.

    --
    "I love the way that Microsoft follows standards. In much the same manner as fish follow migrating caribou."
    - Paul Tomblin, ASR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Tim Streater on Thu Jan 4 16:00:10 2024
    On 04/01/2024 15:12, Tim Streater wrote:
    Climate change, IOW, is going to happen whether there are humans about or not.
    And the glaciers will be back soon.
    This is the real issue we *ought* to be addressing. We are not
    powerful enough to change climate one way or the other. Ergo we should
    be prepared for anything it throws at us.
    Not waste money on mediaeval wind power technology that does nothing


    --
    The New Left are the people they warned you about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Ottavio Caruso on Thu Jan 4 20:55:10 2024
    On 04/01/2024 14:11, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    Am 04/01/2024 um 10:41 schrieb brian:
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle
    , it's not that bit.

    Brian

    I did a DNA test and apparently I'm related to God from my mother's side.


    There is growing evidence that if you take multi DNA tests carried out
    by the companies that advertise the service to the public for a fee then
    you are likely to get multiple different results.

    Take another test and you may find that you are related to Satan, or a
    fruit fly.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Thu Jan 4 20:57:06 2024
    On 04/01/2024 14:29, Fredxx wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 14:11, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    Am 04/01/2024 um 10:41 schrieb brian:
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle
    , it's not that bit.

    Brian

    I did a DNA test and apparently I'm related to God from my mother's side.

    Are you now claiming Jesus was married to Mary Magdalene and had
    children? I suppose that's more likely that your claim that bendy
    bananas are banned in the EU.



    Did god only have one child?

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Streater@21:1/5 to junk@admac.myzen.co.uk on Thu Jan 4 22:25:40 2024
    On 04 Jan 2024 at 20:55:10 GMT, "alan_m" <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On 04/01/2024 14:11, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    Am 04/01/2024 um 10:41 schrieb brian:
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle
    , it's not that bit.

    Brian

    I did a DNA test and apparently I'm related to God from my mother's side.


    There is growing evidence that if you take multi DNA tests carried out
    by the companies that advertise the service to the public for a fee then
    you are likely to get multiple different results.

    Take another test and you may find that you are related to Satan, or a
    fruit fly.

    He is related to a fruit fly.

    --
    "What causes poverty?" Wrong question. Poverty is our primordial state. The real question is, "What causes wealth?"

    Hint: it ain't Socialism.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From maus@21:1/5 to junk@admac.myzen.co.uk on Fri Jan 5 10:26:34 2024
    On 2024-01-04, alan_m <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On 04/01/2024 14:11, Ottavio Caruso wrote:
    Am 04/01/2024 um 10:41 schrieb brian:
    In message <umvhui$2c854$2@dont-email.me>, The Natural Philosopher
    <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes
    Don't be silly. We are all descended from the same people. What we
    are called today is English

    Unless you are some kind of racist

    According to my DNA, I'm 1% Ashkenazi Jewish . I checked my schmeckle
    , it's not that bit.

    Brian

    I did a DNA test and apparently I'm related to God from my mother's side.


    There is growing evidence that if you take multi DNA tests carried out
    by the companies that advertise the service to the public for a fee then
    you are likely to get multiple different results.

    Take another test and you may find that you are related to Satan, or a
    fruit fly.


    All Bu****it, then, as usual.

    --
    greymausg@mail.com
    Are there no jails, no lockdowns?
    Not even an .Influencer?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)