• External wall insulation systems

    From John Rumm@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 00:33:59 2024
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.


    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Mar 6 09:16:59 2024
    On 06/03/2024 00:33, John Rumm wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.



    Someone just down the road has had some put in.
    The builders are never there when I walk past and I want to ask what the
    fire suppression character of the large foam blocks are, under that
    light skim of render. Wellat a distance it looked like foam rather than rockwool. Perhaps someone in this thread will know.
    I imagine birds, mice,rats etc will chew out nice homes for themselves
    in the foam.

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Mar 6 09:53:38 2024
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 00:33:59 GMT, John Rumm wrote:

    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.

    FWIW, just had a rough estimate for an 8m x 7m wall, about £11,500, using brick slips to keep the appearance of the original. Apparently one of the big things to think about is extending the overhang of the roof 6" or so.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Wed Mar 6 10:14:37 2024
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.

    Not personally. AIUI insurers can be fussy about what the outside cladding
    is. If it's a timber frame construction they're happier if the cladding is mineral (brick, tile, etc) rather than wood or plastic. If the structural element is brick then I don't think they are so bothered.

    Cedral (fibre cement weatherboard) looks interesting as a mineral
    wood-effect cladding, although it would need some calculation as to how
    heavy it is (probably heavier than wood)

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 11:55:11 2024
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 11:21:59 GMT, alan_m wrote:

    On 06/03/2024 09:53, RJH wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 00:33:59 GMT, John Rumm wrote:

    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.

    FWIW, just had a rough estimate for an 8m x 7m wall, about £11,500, using >> brick slips to keep the appearance of the original. Apparently one of the big
    things to think about is extending the overhang of the roof 6" or so.


    What about the overhang of window sills?

    I'm not sure how they do openings - they only mentioned the roof as an issue.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to RJH on Wed Mar 6 11:21:59 2024
    On 06/03/2024 09:53, RJH wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 00:33:59 GMT, John Rumm wrote:

    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.

    FWIW, just had a rough estimate for an 8m x 7m wall, about £11,500, using brick slips to keep the appearance of the original. Apparently one of the big things to think about is extending the overhang of the roof 6" or so.


    What about the overhang of window sills?

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Colin Bignell@21:1/5 to RJH on Wed Mar 6 13:00:17 2024
    On 06/03/2024 11:55, RJH wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 11:21:59 GMT, alan_m wrote:

    On 06/03/2024 09:53, RJH wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 00:33:59 GMT, John Rumm wrote:

    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the >>>> wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding >>>> on that.

    FWIW, just had a rough estimate for an 8m x 7m wall, about £11,500, using >>> brick slips to keep the appearance of the original. Apparently one of the big
    things to think about is extending the overhang of the roof 6" or so.


    What about the overhang of window sills?

    I'm not sure how they do openings - they only mentioned the roof as an issue.


    Board them over - much more energy efficient :-)

    --
    Colin Bignell

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 13:16:50 2024
    On 06/03/2024 09:16, N_Cook wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 00:33, John Rumm wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.



    Someone just down the road has had some put in.
    The builders are never there when I walk past and I want to ask what the
    fire suppression character of the large foam blocks are, under that
    light skim of render. Wellat a distance it looked like foam rather than rockwool. Perhaps someone in this thread will know.
    I imagine birds, mice,rats etc will chew out nice homes for themselves
    in the foam.


    Another observation of this local clad.
    No obvious keying, like expanded metal, to the surface of the foam
    panels prior to the thin skim render so presumably liable to spalling
    from thermal movements or wind cavitation at edges

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 14:19:36 2024
    In article <mJWdnf4MC62S9XX4nZ2dnZeNn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>, Colin
    Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> scribeth thus
    On 06/03/2024 11:55, RJH wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 11:21:59 GMT, alan_m wrote:

    On 06/03/2024 09:53, RJH wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 00:33:59 GMT, John Rumm wrote:

    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished >>>>> with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the >>>>> wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding >>>>> on that.

    FWIW, just had a rough estimate for an 8m x 7m wall, about £11,500, using >>>> brick slips to keep the appearance of the original. Apparently one of the >big
    things to think about is extending the overhang of the roof 6" or so.


    What about the overhang of window sills?

    I'm not sure how they do openings - they only mentioned the roof as an issue.


    Board them over - much more energy efficient :-)



    This estate here had this external cladding s done a few years ago tho
    some houses privately owned either didn't want it done or couldn't
    afford it. Most that were done were still owned by the local council.

    Estate was built around 1952 out of concrete 8 to 10 inch thick panels
    bolted together..

    Places were bloody cold, in the 63 winter a glass of water by your bed
    would be frozen over!..

    https://maps.app.goo.gl/51YjoXiv8jwsb8WF9

    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 16:08:00 2024
    On 06/03/2024 13:16, N_Cook wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 09:16, N_Cook wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 00:33, John Rumm wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.



    Someone just down the road has had some put in.
    The builders are never there when I walk past and I want to ask what the
    fire suppression character of the large foam blocks are, under that
    light skim of render. Wellat a distance it looked like foam rather than
    rockwool. Perhaps someone in this thread will know.
    I imagine birds, mice,rats etc will chew out nice homes for themselves
    in the foam.


    Another observation of this local clad.
    No obvious keying, like expanded metal, to the surface of the foam
    panels prior to the thin skim render so presumably liable to spalling
    from thermal movements or wind cavitation at edges


    The window reveals here have just been thin skim rendered over.
    No eavesdrop created prior to the cladding so the months worth of rain
    in the last week must have gone down between the cladding and the
    original brickwork, clever eh.

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to RJH on Wed Mar 6 17:20:53 2024
    On 06/03/2024 09:53, RJH wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 00:33:59 GMT, John Rumm wrote:

    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.

    FWIW, just had a rough estimate for an 8m x 7m wall, about £11,500, using brick slips to keep the appearance of the original. Apparently one of the big things to think about is extending the overhang of the roof 6" or so.

    Yup, I will probably need to do that... there is only 6" to play with at
    the moment.


    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 17:22:06 2024
    On 06/03/2024 13:16, N_Cook wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 09:16, N_Cook wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 00:33, John Rumm wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.



    Someone just down the road has had some put in.
    The builders are never there when I walk past and I want to ask what the
    fire suppression character of the large foam blocks are, under that

    Like most board insulations, they will burn if held in a flame, but not actually sustain a flame...

    light skim of render. Wellat a distance it looked like foam rather than
    rockwool. Perhaps someone in this thread will know.

    I have seen systems with both. The PU / PIR foam or EPS make for an
    impermeable coating. The Rockwool based ones are breathable.

    I imagine birds, mice,rats etc will chew out nice homes for themselves
    in the foam.

    I get the impression the render is pretty hard when set (although fairly
    thin).

    Another observation of this local clad.
    No obvious keying, like expanded metal, to the surface of the foam
    panels prior to the thin skim render so presumably liable to spalling
    from thermal movements or wind cavitation at edges



    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Wed Mar 6 19:17:41 2024
    On 06/03/2024 10:14, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.

    Not personally. AIUI insurers can be fussy about what the outside cladding is. If it's a timber frame construction they're happier if the cladding is mineral (brick, tile, etc) rather than wood or plastic. If the structural element is brick then I don't think they are so bothered.

    Cedral (fibre cement weatherboard) looks interesting as a mineral
    wood-effect cladding, although it would need some calculation as to how
    heavy it is (probably heavier than wood)

    Yup that was one of the options... a bit of searching has turned up
    Hardi plank and Cembrit plank as other (slightly thinner) options.

    You need 1.75 boards per sq m, and each board is 11.2kg, so ~20kg/m^2




    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Thu Mar 7 18:16:10 2024
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 10:14, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.

    Not personally. AIUI insurers can be fussy about what the outside cladding is. If it's a timber frame construction they're happier if the cladding is mineral (brick, tile, etc) rather than wood or plastic. If the structural element is brick then I don't think they are so bothered.

    Cedral (fibre cement weatherboard) looks interesting as a mineral wood-effect cladding, although it would need some calculation as to how heavy it is (probably heavier than wood)

    Yup that was one of the options... a bit of searching has turned up
    Hardi plank and Cembrit plank as other (slightly thinner) options.

    Interesting... the Cembrit plank appears to now be SwissPearl plank: https://www.swisspearl.com/en-uk/products/facade/swisspearl-plank-original

    Cedral and SwissPearl have free sample ordering. James Hardie is £5.47 for
    3:
    https://www.jameshardie.co.uk/en/cladding/hardieplank

    I notice the SwissPearl is not coloured through, it's painted. So perhaps could be in need of touch up in future years (but much less than wood). Not sure about the others.

    You need 1.75 boards per sq m, and each board is 11.2kg, so ~20kg/m^2

    Not too bad... Suppose it depends on how well attached your battens are.
    (if replacing existing timber)

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu Mar 7 18:37:14 2024
    On 07/03/2024 18:16, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 10:14, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the >>>> wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding >>>> on that.

    Not personally. AIUI insurers can be fussy about what the outside cladding >>> is. If it's a timber frame construction they're happier if the cladding is >>> mineral (brick, tile, etc) rather than wood or plastic. If the structural >>> element is brick then I don't think they are so bothered.

    Cedral (fibre cement weatherboard) looks interesting as a mineral
    wood-effect cladding, although it would need some calculation as to how
    heavy it is (probably heavier than wood)

    Yup that was one of the options... a bit of searching has turned up
    Hardi plank and Cembrit plank as other (slightly thinner) options.

    Interesting... the Cembrit plank appears to now be SwissPearl plank: https://www.swisspearl.com/en-uk/products/facade/swisspearl-plank-original

    Cedral and SwissPearl have free sample ordering. James Hardie is £5.47 for 3:
    https://www.jameshardie.co.uk/en/cladding/hardieplank

    Yup might be worth getting some to have a look...

    I notice the SwissPearl is not coloured through, it's painted. So perhaps could be in need of touch up in future years (but much less than wood). Not sure about the others.

    You need 1.75 boards per sq m, and each board is 11.2kg, so ~20kg/m^2

    Not too bad... Suppose it depends on how well attached your battens are.
    (if replacing existing timber)

    I will probably be starting with a recently de-rendered brick wall[1],
    so the plan was a rigid PIR/PU foil faced foam board, then 50x38
    tanalised battens on 600 centres on top of that. Planks fitted to the
    battens. So it should be fairly sturdy.

    Ironically, I was expecting the insulation to be the expensive bit - but
    in reality that is not too bad bought in bulk. Covering it with
    something however seems quite pricey!


    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to RJH on Thu Mar 7 20:47:18 2024
    On 06/03/2024 09:53, RJH wrote:
    On 6 Mar 2024 at 00:33:59 GMT, John Rumm wrote:

    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding
    on that.

    FWIW, just had a rough estimate for an 8m x 7m wall, about £11,500, using brick slips to keep the appearance of the original. Apparently one of the big things to think about is extending the overhang of the roof 6" or so.


    And repositioning the external FS stack, plus downpipes for rainwater.
    Not an insignificant amount of work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nothanks@aolbin.com@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Thu Mar 7 23:41:28 2024
    On 07/03/2024 18:37, John Rumm wrote:
    On 07/03/2024 18:16, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 10:14, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished >>>>> with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the >>>>> wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge
    cladding
    on that.

    Not personally.  AIUI insurers can be fussy about what the outside
    cladding
    is.  If it's a timber frame construction they're happier if the
    cladding is
    mineral (brick, tile, etc) rather than wood or plastic.  If the
    structural
    element is brick then I don't think they are so bothered.

    Cedral (fibre cement weatherboard) looks interesting as a mineral
    wood-effect cladding, although it would need some calculation as to how >>>> heavy it is (probably heavier than wood)

    Yup that was one of the options... a bit of searching has turned up
    Hardi plank and Cembrit plank as other (slightly thinner) options.

    Interesting... the Cembrit plank appears to now be SwissPearl plank:
    https://www.swisspearl.com/en-uk/products/facade/swisspearl-plank-original >>
    Cedral and SwissPearl have free sample ordering. James Hardie is £5.47
    for
    3:
    https://www.jameshardie.co.uk/en/cladding/hardieplank

    Yup might be worth getting some to have a look...

    I notice the SwissPearl is not coloured through, it's painted.  So
    perhaps
    could be in need of touch up in future years (but much less than
    wood).  Not
    sure about the others.

    You need 1.75 boards per sq m, and each board is 11.2kg, so ~20kg/m^2

    Not too bad...  Suppose it depends on how well attached your battens are. >> (if replacing existing timber)

    I will probably be starting with a recently de-rendered brick wall[1],
    so the plan was a rigid PIR/PU foil faced foam board, then 50x38
    tanalised battens on 600 centres on top of that. Planks fitted to the battens. So it should be fairly sturdy.

    Ironically, I was expecting the insulation to be the expensive bit - but
    in reality that is not too bad bought in bulk. Covering it with
    something however seems quite pricey!


    FYI the cheapest place I know of for insulation is https://www.secondsandco.co.uk/ - I have no connection, except as a
    satisfied customer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to nothanks@aolbin.com on Fri Mar 8 01:44:55 2024
    On 07/03/2024 23:41, nothanks@aolbin.com wrote:
    On 07/03/2024 18:37, John Rumm wrote:
    On 07/03/2024 18:16, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 10:14, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished >>>>>> with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on >>>>>> the
    wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge
    cladding
    on that.

    Not personally.  AIUI insurers can be fussy about what the outside
    cladding
    is.  If it's a timber frame construction they're happier if the
    cladding is
    mineral (brick, tile, etc) rather than wood or plastic.  If the
    structural
    element is brick then I don't think they are so bothered.

    Cedral (fibre cement weatherboard) looks interesting as a mineral
    wood-effect cladding, although it would need some calculation as to
    how
    heavy it is (probably heavier than wood)

    Yup that was one of the options... a bit of searching has turned up
    Hardi plank and Cembrit plank as other (slightly thinner) options.

    Interesting... the Cembrit plank appears to now be SwissPearl plank:
    https://www.swisspearl.com/en-uk/products/facade/swisspearl-plank-original >>>
    Cedral and SwissPearl have free sample ordering. James Hardie is
    £5.47 for
    3:
    https://www.jameshardie.co.uk/en/cladding/hardieplank

    Yup might be worth getting some to have a look...

    I notice the SwissPearl is not coloured through, it's painted.  So
    perhaps
    could be in need of touch up in future years (but much less than
    wood).  Not
    sure about the others.

    You need 1.75 boards per sq m, and each board is 11.2kg, so ~20kg/m^2

    Not too bad...  Suppose it depends on how well attached your battens
    are.
    (if replacing existing timber)

    I will probably be starting with a recently de-rendered brick wall[1],
    so the plan was a rigid PIR/PU foil faced foam board, then 50x38
    tanalised battens on 600 centres on top of that. Planks fitted to the
    battens. So it should be fairly sturdy.

    Ironically, I was expecting the insulation to be the expensive bit -
    but in reality that is not too bad bought in bulk. Covering it with
    something however seems quite pricey!


    FYI the cheapest place I know of for insulation is https://www.secondsandco.co.uk/ - I have no connection, except as a
    satisfied customer.

    We used to have a very good discount place locally, Last time I used
    them they did me a van load of 50mm boards for about £350. Enough to do
    4 walls and the vaulted ceiling of my workshop. Alas they closed a few
    years ago...

    As it happens I did look at Seconds and Co earlier, their "bulk pack"
    deal for fifty 60mm boards was just under £1k, which is significantly
    better than the normal "retail" prices (which would be 2.5 to 3 times
    more).



    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Fri Mar 8 12:39:53 2024
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 07/03/2024 23:41, nothanks@aolbin.com wrote:
    FYI the cheapest place I know of for insulation is https://www.secondsandco.co.uk/ - I have no connection, except as a satisfied customer.

    We used to have a very good discount place locally, Last time I used
    them they did me a van load of 50mm boards for about £350. Enough to do
    4 walls and the vaulted ceiling of my workshop. Alas they closed a few
    years ago...

    As it happens I did look at Seconds and Co earlier, their "bulk pack"
    deal for fifty 60mm boards was just under £1k, which is significantly
    better than the normal "retail" prices (which would be 2.5 to 3 times
    more).

    There's a few of them about - CBA to dig up the details but search 'insulation seconds'. There's one in somewhere like Colchester and one in Yorkshire,
    and I think one of them has a branch in Scotland.

    Given insulation's bulk the usual issue is transport costs - Seconds&Co are
    in Wales, so if you're in East Anglia or Scotland it gets pricey.

    I believe some of them are nearby the factories where the make the
    insulation - I think it's Kingspan in Wales and Celotex in Colchester - so makes sense to get it from your local factory.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From nothanks@aolbin.com@21:1/5 to Theo on Fri Mar 8 20:11:25 2024
    On 08/03/2024 12:39, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 07/03/2024 23:41, nothanks@aolbin.com wrote:
    FYI the cheapest place I know of for insulation is
    https://www.secondsandco.co.uk/ - I have no connection, except as a
    satisfied customer.

    We used to have a very good discount place locally, Last time I used
    them they did me a van load of 50mm boards for about £350. Enough to do
    4 walls and the vaulted ceiling of my workshop. Alas they closed a few
    years ago...

    As it happens I did look at Seconds and Co earlier, their "bulk pack"
    deal for fifty 60mm boards was just under £1k, which is significantly
    better than the normal "retail" prices (which would be 2.5 to 3 times
    more).

    There's a few of them about - CBA to dig up the details but search 'insulation
    seconds'. There's one in somewhere like Colchester and one in Yorkshire,
    and I think one of them has a branch in Scotland.

    Given insulation's bulk the usual issue is transport costs - Seconds&Co are in Wales, so if you're in East Anglia or Scotland it gets pricey.
    Presteigne is only "just" in Wales ;-)

    I believe some of them are nearby the factories where the make the
    insulation - I think it's Kingspan in Wales and Celotex in Colchester - so makes sense to get it from your local factory.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to nothanks@aolbin.com on Sun Mar 10 16:43:13 2024
    nothanks@aolbin.com wrote:
    On 08/03/2024 12:39, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 07/03/2024 23:41, nothanks@aolbin.com wrote:
    FYI the cheapest place I know of for insulation is
    https://www.secondsandco.co.uk/ - I have no connection, except as a
    satisfied customer.

    We used to have a very good discount place locally, Last time I used
    them they did me a van load of 50mm boards for about £350. Enough to do >> 4 walls and the vaulted ceiling of my workshop. Alas they closed a few
    years ago...

    As it happens I did look at Seconds and Co earlier, their "bulk pack"
    deal for fifty 60mm boards was just under £1k, which is significantly
    better than the normal "retail" prices (which would be 2.5 to 3 times
    more).

    There's a few of them about - CBA to dig up the details but search 'insulation
    seconds'. There's one in somewhere like Colchester and one in Yorkshire, and I think one of them has a branch in Scotland.

    Given insulation's bulk the usual issue is transport costs - Seconds&Co are in Wales, so if you're in East Anglia or Scotland it gets pricey.
    Presteigne is only "just" in Wales ;-)

    You're right, I hadn't realised how 'just' it is :-)

    I believe some of them are nearby the factories where the make the insulation - I think it's Kingspan in Wales and Celotex in Colchester - so makes sense to get it from your local factory.

    This is the Colchester one:
    https://economicinsulation.com/

    also:
    https://www.insulationsouthwales.com/

    and it's Seconds who have a branch in Scotland: https://www.secondsandcoscotland.co.uk/
    and Yorkshire (both look a bit defunct?): https://www.facebook.com/secondsandconorthern/

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Theo on Sun Mar 10 17:26:31 2024
    On 10 Mar 2024 at 16:43:13 GMT, Theo wrote:

    I believe some of them are nearby the factories where the make the
    insulation - I think it's Kingspan in Wales and Celotex in Colchester - so >>> makes sense to get it from your local factory.

    This is the Colchester one:
    https://economicinsulation.com/

    also:
    https://www.insulationsouthwales.com/

    and it's Seconds who have a branch in Scotland: https://www.secondsandcoscotland.co.uk/
    and Yorkshire (both look a bit defunct?): https://www.facebook.com/secondsandconorthern/

    For Sheffield/surrounding just got some from:

    https://www.icbpltd.com/seconds-pir-insulation-doncaster

    Worked out about half-shed price.

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Sun Mar 10 20:26:31 2024
    John Rumm wrote:

    I was expecting the insulation to be the expensive bit - but in reality
    that is not too bad bought in bulk.

    Anyone know if Knauf has split into two companies/divisions, e.g. one
    doing PIR the other doing rockwool?

    I thought I'd previously used their U-value calculator for a new flat
    roof, but now it only seems to offer rockwool, rather than PIR, which
    results in an insulation depth of 220mm vs 140mm for PIR to achieve 0.16U

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Sun Mar 10 23:07:22 2024
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    I was expecting the insulation to be the expensive bit - but in reality that is not too bad bought in bulk.

    Anyone know if Knauf has split into two companies/divisions, e.g. one
    doing PIR the other doing rockwool?

    No idea, but often those kind of websites aren't very good at telling you
    the full range.

    I thought I'd previously used their U-value calculator for a new flat
    roof, but now it only seems to offer rockwool, rather than PIR, which
    results in an insulation depth of 220mm vs 140mm for PIR to achieve 0.16U

    I'd use https://www.ubakus.de/ in demo mode for a stackup calculator. PIR is in as there as 'PUR' which I think is the same, and they have rockwool.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Mar 11 07:18:46 2024
    Theo wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    Anyone know if Knauf has split into two companies/divisions, e.g. one
    doing PIR the other doing rockwool?

    No idea, but often those kind of websites aren't very good at telling you
    the full range.

    Not just the U calculator, the whole Knauf website has no PIR listed
    under products (except for plasterboard/PIR sandwich)

    I thought I'd previously used their U-value calculator for a new flat
    roof, but now it only seems to offer rockwool, rather than PIR, which
    results in an insulation depth of 220mm vs 140mm for PIR to achieve 0.16U

    I'd use https://www.ubakus.de/ in demo mode for a stackup calculator. PIR is in as there as 'PUR' which I think is the same, and they have rockwool.

    That's pretty good, shame my German isn't (yes firefox tranlate helps)
    I'm surprised the various single-ply membranes are there, but disabled,
    you'd think he could persuade (at least some of) the manufacturers to
    pay in order to have their products promoted?

    Maybe worth paying for a couple of months ...

    Thanks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Mar 11 09:07:20 2024
    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    Theo wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    Anyone know if Knauf has split into two companies/divisions, e.g. one
    doing PIR the other doing rockwool?

    No idea, but often those kind of websites aren't very good at telling you the full range.

    Not just the U calculator, the whole Knauf website has no PIR listed
    under products (except for plasterboard/PIR sandwich)

    Hmm, did Knauf sell straight PIR? Rockwool and plasterboard, but I don't remember Knauf branded PIR unless it was one of the minor brands like EcoTherm/Isotherm.

    I thought I'd previously used their U-value calculator for a new flat
    roof, but now it only seems to offer rockwool, rather than PIR, which
    results in an insulation depth of 220mm vs 140mm for PIR to achieve 0.16U

    I'd use https://www.ubakus.de/ in demo mode for a stackup calculator. PIR is
    in as there as 'PUR' which I think is the same, and they have rockwool.

    That's pretty good, shame my German isn't (yes firefox tranlate helps)

    You can set the UI to English, it's just a few of the materials that aren't translated.

    I'm surprised the various single-ply membranes are there, but disabled,
    you'd think he could persuade (at least some of) the manufacturers to
    pay in order to have their products promoted?

    I think all the generic materials are available on the demo version, it's
    only the proprietary ones that are on the subscription version. eg 'PUR,
    foil faced' is free but 'Kingspan' is subscription.

    If you want to produce drawings for building regs/etc approval you probably want the right material on them. If you're a DIYer who is just sticking a finger in the air then you don't care about that, you just want to know the difference between PIR and mineral wool.

    If it really annoys you you can make a custom material from the numbers on
    the Kingspan datasheet.

    Maybe worth paying for a couple of months ...

    Probably worth doing if you have a project on the go, rather than just
    kicking tyres on newsgroups.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Mar 11 08:28:08 2024
    Andy Burns wrote:

    Theo wrote:

    I'd use <https://www.ubakus.de> in demo mode for a stackup calculator.

    Maybe worth paying for a couple of months ...

    If you sign-up for a demo account, you get a month free, and after that
    you can continue to use it evenings/weekends, so he's quite DIYer friendly.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Mar 12 00:22:22 2024
    On 11/03/2024 09:07, Theo wrote:

    Probably worth doing if you have a project on the go, rather than just kicking tyres on newsgroups.

    I would have though that a spreadsheet and a bit of DIY would be
    adequate in most cases:

    https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/Heat_loss

    Most PIR board are very similar to the "standard" numbers IME, and you
    can usually get specific ones from the manufacturers site if needs be.

    (and installation details will matter far more than a 0.02 u value
    difference)


    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to John Rumm on Tue Mar 12 12:07:40 2024
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 11/03/2024 09:07, Theo wrote:

    Probably worth doing if you have a project on the go, rather than just kicking tyres on newsgroups.

    I would have though that a spreadsheet and a bit of DIY would be
    adequate in most cases:

    https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/Heat_loss

    Most PIR board are very similar to the "standard" numbers IME, and you
    can usually get specific ones from the manufacturers site if needs be.

    (and installation details will matter far more than a 0.02 u value difference)

    U-value calcs are easy, but moisture calcs less so. ubakus will tell you if you're going to have condensation buildup in the middle of your stackup,
    which is something good to know when selecting materials. It's not just the permeability of the materials but the temperature at that point in the
    stack, which is a function of the outside temps, airflow and the U value -
    ie which of condensation and drying processes will win.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Mar 12 21:07:54 2024
    On 10 Mar 2024 at 23:07:22 GMT, Theo wrote:

    Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote:
    John Rumm wrote:

    I was expecting the insulation to be the expensive bit - but in reality
    that is not too bad bought in bulk.

    Anyone know if Knauf has split into two companies/divisions, e.g. one
    doing PIR the other doing rockwool?

    No idea, but often those kind of websites aren't very good at telling you
    the full range.

    I thought I'd previously used their U-value calculator for a new flat
    roof, but now it only seems to offer rockwool, rather than PIR, which
    results in an insulation depth of 220mm vs 140mm for PIR to achieve 0.16U

    I'd use https://www.ubakus.de/ in demo mode for a stackup calculator. PIR is in as there as 'PUR' which I think is the same, and they have rockwool.


    OOI, do you know how to input an air cavity?

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Rumm@21:1/5 to Theo on Tue Mar 12 21:51:45 2024
    On 12/03/2024 12:07, Theo wrote:
    John Rumm <see.my.signature@nowhere.null> wrote:
    On 11/03/2024 09:07, Theo wrote:

    Probably worth doing if you have a project on the go, rather than just
    kicking tyres on newsgroups.

    I would have though that a spreadsheet and a bit of DIY would be
    adequate in most cases:

    https://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/Heat_loss

    Most PIR board are very similar to the "standard" numbers IME, and you
    can usually get specific ones from the manufacturers site if needs be.

    (and installation details will matter far more than a 0.02 u value
    difference)

    U-value calcs are easy, but moisture calcs less so. ubakus will tell you if you're going to have condensation buildup in the middle of your stackup, which is something good to know when selecting materials. It's not just the permeability of the materials but the temperature at that point in the
    stack, which is a function of the outside temps, airflow and the U value -
    ie which of condensation and drying processes will win.

    Yup fair points...

    Although if you stick to the principle of making sure you have a vapour
    barrier on the warm wet side, that will help greatly in most cases.

    --
    Cheers,

    John.

    /=================================================================\
    | Internode Ltd - http://www.internode.co.uk | |-----------------------------------------------------------------|
    | John Rumm - john(at)internode(dot)co(dot)uk | \=================================================================/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Mar 12 22:03:11 2024
    On 12 Mar 2024 at 21:27:28 GMT, Andy Burns wrote:

    RJH wrote:

    OOI, do you know how to input an air cavity?

    various, stationary air (unventilated)
    or other materials with the same "wind" icon.

    Thanks!
    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to RJH on Tue Mar 12 21:27:28 2024
    RJH wrote:

    OOI, do you know how to input an air cavity?

    various, stationary air (unventilated)
    or other materials with the same "wind" icon.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From N_Cook@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 19 11:52:05 2024
    On 06/03/2024 16:08, N_Cook wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 13:16, N_Cook wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 09:16, N_Cook wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 00:33, John Rumm wrote:
    Has anyone had any experience with EWI systems?

    In particular, systems designed to be over clad rather than finished
    with a light weight render. I quite like the idea of insulation on the >>>> wall, then battens, and something that looks like feather edge cladding >>>> on that.



    Someone just down the road has had some put in.
    The builders are never there when I walk past and I want to ask what the >>> fire suppression character of the large foam blocks are, under that
    light skim of render. Wellat a distance it looked like foam rather than
    rockwool. Perhaps someone in this thread will know.
    I imagine birds, mice,rats etc will chew out nice homes for themselves
    in the foam.


    Another observation of this local clad.
    No obvious keying, like expanded metal, to the surface of the foam
    panels prior to the thin skim render so presumably liable to spalling
    from thermal movements or wind cavitation at edges


    The window reveals here have just been thin skim rendered over.
    No eavesdrop created prior to the cladding so the months worth of rain
    in the last week must have gone down between the cladding and the
    original brickwork, clever eh.


    The scaffolding is still up, so blocking the view.
    Front elevation looks like awkward sloping facia fixed over the
    protruding edge of the panels, then guttering fixed to that at an angle
    so much less than half round if full of rain water and excess will tip
    over the inside edge. I'd have fitted plastic wedges under the brackets
    so canted to the outside edge .
    The end elevation gabling, looks like an extra run of cement tiles with currently an awkward 1 to 2 inch wind-catcher overhang. Presumably a
    barge board going there later. The new tiling run is a perfect colour
    match but some upsetting in the layup, presumably slightly different profile/dimensions of tile. Without binocular viewing, not too obvious
    what has gone on there,
    I assume Clipper sawn at ground level rather than disc cutter at roof level.

    --
    Global sea level rise to 2100 from curve-fitted existing altimetry data <http://diverse.4mg.com/slr.htm>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)