[....]On 2022-04-03, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
When you load EtreCheck onto YOUR computer, does it create a JavaScript >>>> file?
I don't "load" it and I have no plans to ever do so. The way it's
written, Etrecheck can't do its job *without* JavaScript.
Why is that?
Because it's not a native app, it's a hybrid and the way it communicates
is via 'webkit.messageHandlers.', as shown in the code example that
started this thread.
His choice was a WebKit view versus what he would have to do in a
traditional Cocoa app and the former was "relatively easy and straightforward" (his words). I think, in part, his choice was also
based on his being more of a web dev back when he started this project
(or, at the least, he was doing more web dev back then). He mentioned something that I'm not able to check because I've never loaded the app
but it had to do with "Review" buttons on the "Security" page and how
they aren't lined up well... the best he could do in a native view, is
the way he put it.
On 04/04/2022 03:08, Steve Carroll replied to a question posed.
[....]On 2022-04-03, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
When you load EtreCheck onto YOUR computer, does it create a JavaScript >>>>> file?
I don't "load" it and I have no plans to ever do so. The way it's
written, Etrecheck can't do its job *without* JavaScript.
Why is that?
Because it's not a native app, it's a hybrid and the way it communicates
is via 'webkit.messageHandlers.', as shown in the code example that
started this thread.
His choice was a WebKit view versus what he would have to do in a
traditional Cocoa app and the former was "relatively easy and
straightforward" (his words). I think, in part, his choice was also
based on his being more of a web dev back when he started this project
(or, at the least, he was doing more web dev back then). He mentioned
something that I'm not able to check because I've never loaded the app
but it had to do with "Review" buttons on the "Security" page and how
they aren't lined up well... the best he could do in a native view, is
the way he put it.
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
Accordingly, I've opened up the discussion here:-
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/when-you-load-etrecheck-onto-your-computer-does-it-create-a-javascript-file.2340558/
I look forward to an interesting discussion.
I have a copy of the JavaScript which I found on my machine if anyone
wishes to review it.
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
- and would like YOU to help.
Accordingly, I've opened up the discussion here:-
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/when-you-load-etrecheck-onto-your-computer-does-it-create-a-javascript-file.2340558/
I look forward to an interesting discussion.
I'm guessing you won't quote what I just wrote above over in that forum,
in fact, "I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!"
What you wrote above is /exactly/ what I posted on the forum.
It has now been removed. :-(
I'm 'sensing' this won't make it over to that forum, either ;)
No, it won't
- but I have another question!
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 03:08, Steve Carroll replied to a question posed.
[....]On 2022-04-03, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
When you load EtreCheck onto YOUR computer, does it create a JavaScript >>>>>> file?
I don't "load" it and I have no plans to ever do so. The way it's
written, Etrecheck can't do its job *without* JavaScript.
Why is that?
Because it's not a native app, it's a hybrid and the way it communicates >>> is via 'webkit.messageHandlers.', as shown in the code example that
started this thread.
His choice was a WebKit view versus what he would have to do in a
traditional Cocoa app and the former was "relatively easy and
straightforward" (his words). I think, in part, his choice was also
based on his being more of a web dev back when he started this project
(or, at the least, he was doing more web dev back then). He mentioned
something that I'm not able to check because I've never loaded the app
but it had to do with "Review" buttons on the "Security" page and how
they aren't lined up well... the best he could do in a native view, is
the way he put it.
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
Accordingly, I've opened up the discussion here:-
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/when-you-load-etrecheck-onto-your-computer-does-it-create-a-javascript-file.2340558/
I look forward to an interesting discussion.
I'm guessing you won't quote what I just wrote above over in that forum,
in fact, "I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!"
I have a copy of the JavaScript which I found on my machine if anyone
wishes to review it.
Well, your 'friend' did a little 'review', the gist of it was:
"It looks like it modifies the copy behavior for apps, though, and on
Apple devices." Michael Glasser (aka "Snit")
Then, when I asked him about it, he responded:
"t likely only does that for itself... cannot likely do it for apps that
do not allow it."
I then asked:
-- "How would it work if "apps" did allow it? Strip the users "apps"
(that allowed changing of their code, what app does that?) from his/her "device", hunt down the project files (which aren't likely readily
available) and alter them WRT to the app's "copy behavior", build them
and finally load them back onto the "device"?
Providing this magical feat could be accomplished, how long do you think
all this would take? And would it all happen again next time the user
ran EtreCheck? More to the point: Providing it could be done, why do
this, what is the legitimate reason for it (IOW, do you think this is
legal)? If there is none, why stop there? If you're going this route,
why not go the 'Full Monte' and just take over all the apps you want in any/every way you want?
But the granddaddy of them all is: Why is no one talking about an app
that "modifies" other apps?! That file isn't new, in fact, it's one of
his oldest so if he's doing this he's been at it awhile. How would you explain it? Luck?" --
Notably, Glasser snipped after the first word, "How", replying with:
"By being a part of other apps."
(this is the same guy 'judging' people's 'coding' abilities in ACW)
I'm 'sensing' this won't make it over to that forum, either ;)
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>> dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help...
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on yourI 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>> dev who created this product.
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Accordingly, I've opened up the discussion here:-
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/when-you-load-etrecheck-onto-your-computer-does-it-create-a-javascript-file.2340558/
I look forward to an interesting discussion.
I'm guessing you won't quote what I just wrote above over in that forum, >>>> in fact, "I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!"
What you wrote above is /exactly/ what I posted on the forum.
It has now been removed. :-(
Aw, why didn't you add the "other" stuff I wrote to it?
Simply because my post had been removed.
(snip)
I'm 'sensing' this won't make it over to that forum, either ;)
No, it won't
Why not?
The post has been removed.
- but I have another question!
I'm shocked ;)
I determined the reason. Simple - when you know!
As far as I'm aware it's the first time I've noticed this in all the
time I've used a Mac.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 9:40:41 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2f729$fi1$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on yourI 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>> dev who created this product.
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
Nowhere in his comment does he suggest the way to uncover truth is to ignore it.
I *did* help...
You might have had bits of help
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 9:40:41 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2f729$fi1$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on yourI 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>>> dev who created this product.
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
Nowhere in his comment does he suggest the way to uncover truth is to ignore >> it.
Why
are you making that irrelevant statement? Do you believe it will
hide the fact that he's not remotely interested in the truth? It
doesn't.
I *did* help...
You might have had bits of help
How would YOU know,
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on yourI 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>> dev who created this product.
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on yourI 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>>> dev who created this product.
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how others can have different areas of knowledge.
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>>>> dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
I gave him and
it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
it, troll.
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on yourI 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>>> dev who created this product.
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
is pretty silly, isn't it?
You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered.
Then you 'rattled cages'. Why
should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>.
I *did* help...
You might have had bits of help
How would YOU know,
I read your comments.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:43:14 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fe82$42s$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>>>> dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
is pretty silly, isn't it?
You think people owe you
You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered.
He never said that.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote <t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are not. You show no sign of self awareness.
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on yourI 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>>> dev who created this product.
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
is pretty silly, isn't it? You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered. Then you 'rattled cages'. Why should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not.
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>>>> dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
it, troll.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote <t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are not. You show no sign of self awareness.
On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
IAWTP
On 04/04/2022 19:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the >>>>>> dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
is pretty silly, isn't it? You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered. Then you 'rattled cages'. Why
should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>.
I take these things very seriously. It's not a game.
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:43, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
is pretty silly, isn't it? You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered. Then you 'rattled cages'. Why
should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>.
I take these things very seriously. It's not a game.
Your problem is no one who is actually knowledgable believes you take it seriously due to how your conduct yourself along the way and you put it there.
On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
You are 'spot on', Snit.
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you failing to run EtreCheck.
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
IAWTP
LOL! Drugs and alcohol, folks... beware!
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
I use the terminal for things of that nature that I'm interested in. BTW, your question has shifted again, you realize that, right? Isn't this
supposed to be a "Question "about JavaScript"? So why aren't you talking "about JavaScript"? Did you think no one would notice what you're doing?
Do you think your 'friend' will agree with me on this point being that
he states things like:
"I do not focus on personalities - I focus on the content of your posts" - Snit
and
"I encourage people to act as I do" - Snit
"I am, of course, honest and honorable... something which some people appreciate but others fear. Â And loath" - Snit
Were he as "honest and honorable" as he's tried to sell himself, it's
only logical to assume that he should be along 'any minute now' to "encourage" one of his 'friends' to "act as" he does, right? Maybe he
doesn't have enough energy left over after his 'pile on' attempts ;)
On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and >>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so >>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you >>> failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
OK - we'll set that aside.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
me in that endeavour.
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and >>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so >>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at >>>>> it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you >>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
OK - we'll set that aside.
You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to
download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
me in that endeavour.
No, you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting"
how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people. What's up with
that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser
has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and >>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so >>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at >>>>> it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you >>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
OK - we'll set that aside.
You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do,
My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to
download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
me in that endeavour.
No,
you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting"
how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people.
What's up with
that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser
has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
Of course I do, I've given him examples of it and he's done so.
Stop lying... and sober up.
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:43:14 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fe82$42s$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
is pretty silly, isn't it?
You think people owe you for your pushing of games and drama. It is a part of
your entitlement worldview.
You have it backwards,
he's the one who asked me for help
You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered.
He never said that. If you answered the question it was buried in your
nonsense about giving him assignments and speaking for him.
He proved it
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
You are 'spot on', Snit.
He's overmedicated ;)
You know I've given you example HTML that you have turned into a page
and run (you've even written some of your own so stop lying).
LOL! Drugs and alcohol, folks... beware!
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so,
according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
Why would I entertain your faulty logic?
On 04/04/2022 19:50, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:43:14 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fe82$42s$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do! >>>>>>>I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after
is pretty silly, isn't it?
You think people owe you for your pushing of games and drama. It is a part of
your entitlement worldview.
You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered.
He never said that. If you answered the question it was buried in your
nonsense about giving him assignments and speaking for him.
Then you 'rattled cages'. Why
should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>.
You play games and when you are called out you play victim.
IAWTP
All true.
On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
You are 'spot on', Snit. You help me, and I much appreciate that. :-)
I'm not playing games. https://jumpshare.com/v/WT3YiIJ24vE8nmkaJcS2
On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that... >>>>>> anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
IAWTP
On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and >>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so >>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at >>>>>> it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you >>>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
OK - we'll set that aside.
You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
I've not argued the toss.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck,
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
It's taken you a very long time to identify the REAL target!
https://jmp.sh/iecrmhJ
Working out to be a pretty good scam, eh?!!
My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to >>> download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help
me in that endeavour.
No, you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting"
how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people. What's up with
that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the
world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser
has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?
I've had a good life thanks. I reflect on the time when HRH Prince
Andrew had to address ME as 'Sir' when he was undergoing his helicopter flying training. I was the ATC training officer at the time, teaching
him The Rules Of The Air before he was let loose to fly solo! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Andrew,_Duke_of_York
On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:25:43 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <X7L2K.394158$F_q1.350248@fx01.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:OK - we'll set that aside.
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and >>>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so >>>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at >>>>>>> it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you >>>>>> failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside... >>>>
You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
I've not argued the toss.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck, >>>>I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them. Carroll now denies it but I have shown you posts where he directly talks about contacting one of my employers.
It's taken you a very long time to identify the REAL target!
https://jmp.sh/iecrmhJ
Working out to be a pretty good scam, eh?!!
My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to >>>> download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help >>>> me in that endeavour.
No, you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting" >>> how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people. What's up with
that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the >>> world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser >>> has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?
I've had a good life thanks. I reflect on the time when HRH Prince
Andrew had to address ME as 'Sir' when he was undergoing his helicopter
flying training. I was the ATC training officer at the time, teaching
him The Rules Of The Air before he was let loose to fly solo!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Andrew,_Duke_of_York
You focus on good things, and on your own life. Not putting others down. That is commendable.
I wish Carroll felt better about himself.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:34:48 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <sLH2K.41421$Xa1.30458@fx10.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 19:50, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:43:14 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fe82$42s$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after >>>> is pretty silly, isn't it?
You think people owe you for your pushing of games and drama. It is a part of
your entitlement worldview.
You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered.
He never said that. If you answered the question it was buried in your
nonsense about giving him assignments and speaking for him.
Then you 'rattled cages'. WhyYou play games and when you are called out you play victim.
should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>. >>>
IAWTP
All true.
It is likely a waste of time, but when I spent a few days calling out as many of his lies as I reasonably could his lying did, for a while, reduce. I figure
I might try to the same with his drama and victim games.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping >>>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
You are 'spot on', Snit.
He's overmedicated ;)
More of your focus on medications.
You know I've given you example HTML that you have turned into a page
and run (you've even written some of your own so stop lying).
I doubt even you have any idea what your are talking about.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:49:49 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fi4t$imf$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
LOL! Drugs and alcohol, folks... beware!
Why not seek help for your problem?
On Apr 4, 2022 at 1:02:50 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fita$imf$4@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and >>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so >>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at
it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you >>> failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so,
Just today you were mocking me for typos.
Here you are making one.
But you have double standards.
according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside...
Here you are speaking FOR me.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic?
Here you are dodging questions.
On 05/04/2022 01:02, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:25:43 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<X7L2K.394158$F_q1.350248@fx01.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:OK - we'll set that aside.
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and >>>>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so >>>>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at >>>>>>>> it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside... >>>>>
You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
I've not argued the toss.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck, >>>>>I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them. Carroll
now denies it but I have shown you posts where he directly talks about
contacting one of my employers.
Perhaps he - mistakenly - thought you were a 'bad guy'?!!!
You have proved to me that you are not! :-D
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them.
On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:25:08 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote <oCH2K.25058$sMg.22678@fx06.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 19:49, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:46:10 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fedi$42s$6@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Baby-step instructions.- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what? >>>>>>
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping
through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
IAWTP
I am hoping Carroll will reduce this nonsense of his, as he did reduce his lying, even if just for a bit, when I called that out.
It is a likely impossible task, but might as well try it.
On 2022-04-05, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them.
And you'll 'prove' that 'any minute now' <eyeroll>. DB should know
where I got that from.
On 2022-04-05, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them.
And you'll 'prove' that 'any minute now' <eyeroll>. DB should know
where I got that from.
On 2022-04-05, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 05/04/2022 01:02, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:25:43 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<X7L2K.394158$F_q1.350248@fx01.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:OK - we'll set that aside.
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and
it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so
worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at >>>>>>>>> it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your >>>>>>> 'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside... >>>>>>
You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
I've not argued the toss.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck, >>>>>>I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them. Carroll
now denies it but I have shown you posts where he directly talks about
contacting one of my employers.
Perhaps he - mistakenly - thought you were a 'bad guy'?!!!
Right, me and virtually everyone he's ever come into contact with on
usenet. Pull the other one.
You have proved to me that you are not! :-D
Total bull.
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:49:49 PM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fi4t$imf$2@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
LOL! Drugs and alcohol, folks... beware!
Why not seek help for your problem?
Because, unlike you,
I don't rat people out to their ISP,
I actually
believe in free speech.
Besides, you're not that much of a problem,
neither is DB. If you two want to imbibe while posting that's your
business but it does explain a lot <shrug>.
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example
No, you do not. You THINK he could have based on your knowledge and
experience, not his. But more than that, you think he should be jumping >>>>> through hoops instead of you just answering a question. You play games instead
of just talking tech. Then you pretend your tech games are the same. They are
not. You show no sign of self awareness.
You are 'spot on', Snit.
You say that, yet, you're tacitly admitting you could run the example
(and what choice do you have when you know that the usenet archive is
sitting there, waiting to demolish any lie you try to tell on this?).
He's overmedicated ;)
More of your focus on medications.
Well, I was discussin YOU, so...
You know I've given you example HTML that you have turned into a page
and run (you've even written some of your own so stop lying).
I doubt even you have any idea what your are talking about. Whatever it is it
surely is not relevant to anything happening now. You live in the past and >> make up stories about it to try to defend your poor behavior.
Reality, nothing for you to worry your pointy, overmedicated little head
over ;)
"I've not argued the toss." - DB
Translation:
He *can't* 'argue the toss.
Unlike you, there are still some pieces of reality he won't swim
upstream against.
On 05/04/2022 00:57, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 12:34:48 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<sLH2K.41421$Xa1.30458@fx10.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 19:50, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 11:43:14 AM MST, "Steve Carroll" wrote
<t2fe82$42s$5@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------hPGBiKiJm6N0YXDy4fOvy2YV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your >>>>>>>>>> personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
Annoying people after they've given you the info you're actually after >>>>> is pretty silly, isn't it?
You think people owe you for your pushing of games and drama. It is a part of
your entitlement worldview.
You began the other thread by asking a
question you didn't really want answered.
He never said that. If you answered the question it was buried in your >>>> nonsense about giving him assignments and speaking for him.
Then you 'rattled cages'. WhyYou play games and when you are called out you play victim.
should anyone ever follow your BS? Work to make it less obvious <shrug>. >>>>
IAWTP
All true.
It is likely a waste of time, but when I spent a few days calling out as many
of his lies as I reasonably could his lying did, for a while, reduce. I figure
I might try to the same with his drama and victim games.
Please ..... only do so if you feel strong enough to cope with the
battle. Good luck if you do! :-D
On 05/04/2022 01:02, Snit wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 4:25:43 PM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<X7L2K.394158$F_q1.350248@fx01.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 23:48, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 04/04/2022 21:02, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:OK - we'll set that aside.
On 04/04/2022 19:46, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
On Apr 4, 2022 at 10:38:40 AM MST, "David Brooks" wrote
<A2G2K.11698$4c1.9375@fx13.ams1>:
On 04/04/2022 17:40, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-04, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
(snip)
I'm really curious as to why you haven't 'used' EtreCheck on your
personal Apple computer. I sense you are afraid of what it 'might' do!
I 'sense' you're trying to cause more trouble by continuing to stalk the
dev who created this product.
What I'm TRYING to do is uncover the truth
By ignoring it? How does that work?
A bit like rattling a cage.
- and would like YOU to help.
I *did* help... and you're still ignoring it but it's worse than that...
anyone who has bothered to look has seen you ignore it. So now what?
Baby-step instructions.
Carroll has a lot of tech knowledge but he shows no sign of understanding how
others can have different areas of knowledge.
I know for a fact that he could've run the HTML example I gave him and >>>>>>>> it would have shown him, first hand, why what he's pretending to be so >>>>>>>> worried about wasn't anything to worry about. Stop lying, you suck at >>>>>>>> it, troll.
If there really is "nothing to worry about", state the reason(s) for you
failing to run EtreCheck.
First off, you didn't demny it so, according to the 'logic' your
'friend' uses, I must be telling the truth above, right? That aside... >>>>>
You've already settled it, what I said is a fact.
I've not argued the toss.
Why would I entertain your faulty logic? I have no need for Etrecheck, >>>>>I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them. Carroll
now denies it but I have shown you posts where he directly talks about
contacting one of my employers.
Perhaps he - mistakenly - thought you were a 'bad guy'?!!!
You have proved to me that you are not! :-D
It's taken you a very long time to identify the REAL target!
https://jmp.sh/iecrmhJ
Working out to be a pretty good scam, eh?!!
My desire was/is to ensure that it is 'safe' for naive computer users to >>>>> download it onto their Apple computers. I had hoped that you would help >>>>> me in that endeavour.
No, you want me to help you stalk an innocent person. It's "interesting" >>>> how both you and Glasser like to target innocent people. What's up with >>>> that? Have you been so powerless in your life that you believe doing
such a thing makes up for it? Or do you feel you've been 'wronged by the >>>> world' and this is your way of compensating? It's pretty obvious Glasser >>>> has both of those things going on (and much more). How about you?
I've had a good life thanks. I reflect on the time when HRH Prince
Andrew had to address ME as 'Sir' when he was undergoing his helicopter
flying training. I was the ATC training officer at the time, teaching
him The Rules Of The Air before he was let loose to fly solo!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Andrew,_Duke_of_York
You focus on good things, and on your own life. Not putting others down. That
is commendable.
I do. Thank you.
I wish Carroll felt better about himself.
Indeed. Who will look after him in his dotage?
On 05/04/2022 15:03, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-05, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda:
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them.
And you'll 'prove' that 'any minute now' <eyeroll>. DB should know
where I got that from.
Yes - I *DO* know!
I did NOT know you participated in the ASC forums though.
On 2022-04-05, David Brooks <david@blocknews.invalid> wrote:
On 05/04/2022 15:03, Steve Carroll wrote:
On 2022-04-05, Snit <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:
(snip)
I have no NEED for EtreCheck either.
Of course you do, without it you can't pursue your stalking agenda: >>>>>>
<https://i.ibb.co/5Y1vmHr/stop-just-stop.png>
Yay! A pretty good stalker yourself, Steve Carroll!
He and his ex tracked down MANY people in my life and contacted them.
And you'll 'prove' that 'any minute now' <eyeroll>. DB should know
where I got that from.
Yes - I *DO* know!
It doesn't seem like it.
I did NOT know you participated in the ASC forums though.
You clearly don't know.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 339 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 01:58:17 |
| Calls: | 7,467 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,691 |
| Messages: | 5,628,009 |
