• any opinion on Fujitsu Primergy servers?

    From jkn@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 20 02:02:29 2023
    Hi all
    Pretty general question: I am considering downgrading my Supermicro 'home' server for a Fujitsu Primergy one. Mainly this is to reduce energy costs, the Supermicro is a bit of a beast even having taken a fair few steps to reduce the bill.

    I'm just interested in any general experiences with this make; any opinions? I have a mildy fondness for the make after having put linux on a little Fujitsu Scenic '386 box twenty years of more ago. it was a lovely little machine...

    Cheers, J^n

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to jkn on Sat Jan 21 02:19:47 2023
    On 20 Jan 2023 at 10:02:29 GMT, "jkn" <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi all
    Pretty general question: I am considering downgrading my Supermicro 'home' server for a Fujitsu Primergy one. Mainly this is to reduce energy costs, the Supermicro is a bit of a beast even having taken a fair few steps to reduce the bill.

    I get the nostalgia, but wouldn't you be better of describing what you
    do with your server? It might be something a 5W Raspberry can handle, if
    the aim is to reduce energy bills.

    I turned off two NASes and their associated bits'n'bobs about a year ago
    saving about 150W continuous. I power one up on demand now, which
    basically costs nothing.

    Cheers - Jaimie
    --
    Imagine there were no hypothetical situations.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SH@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 21 08:48:03 2023
    On 21/01/2023 08:45, SH wrote:
    On 21/01/2023 02:19, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
    On 20 Jan 2023 at 10:02:29 GMT, "jkn" <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi all
         Pretty general question: I am considering downgrading my
    Supermicro 'home' server for a Fujitsu Primergy one. Mainly this is
    to reduce energy costs, the Supermicro is a bit of a beast even
    having taken a fair few steps to reduce the bill.

    I get the nostalgia, but wouldn't you be better of describing what you
    do with your server? It might be something a 5W Raspberry can handle, if
    the aim is to reduce energy bills.

    I turned off two NASes and their associated bits'n'bobs about a year ago
    saving about 150W continuous. I power one up on demand now, which
    basically costs nothing.

         Cheers - Jaimie


    One option could be a "cloud server" from the likes of AWS or Azure and transfer everything from the home server to that cloud server?



    and in the case of NASes, could switch to dropbox, or OneDrive from MS?
    I pay £60 all in a year for 5 Office accounts, each of which have 1TB
    storage space.

    Running 5TB NAS would certainly cost more than £60 a year in electric
    plus the cost of the HAS hardware and your time in setting it all up.

    Obviously this would not work or wouldf require extra effort/equipment
    if you were doing media (Twony/Plex/MythTV/BeyondPVR etc or networked CCTV.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SH@21:1/5 to Jaimie Vandenbergh on Sat Jan 21 08:45:01 2023
    On 21/01/2023 02:19, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
    On 20 Jan 2023 at 10:02:29 GMT, "jkn" <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi all
    Pretty general question: I am considering downgrading my Supermicro 'home' server for a Fujitsu Primergy one. Mainly this is to reduce energy costs, the Supermicro is a bit of a beast even having taken a fair few steps to reduce the bill.

    I get the nostalgia, but wouldn't you be better of describing what you
    do with your server? It might be something a 5W Raspberry can handle, if
    the aim is to reduce energy bills.

    I turned off two NASes and their associated bits'n'bobs about a year ago saving about 150W continuous. I power one up on demand now, which
    basically costs nothing.

    Cheers - Jaimie


    One option could be a "cloud server" from the likes of AWS or Azure and transfer everything from the home server to that cloud server?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jkn@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 22 01:24:18 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 8:48:06 AM UTC, SH wrote:
    On 21/01/2023 08:45, SH wrote:
    On 21/01/2023 02:19, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
    On 20 Jan 2023 at 10:02:29 GMT, "jkn" <jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi all
    Pretty general question: I am considering downgrading my
    Supermicro 'home' server for a Fujitsu Primergy one. Mainly this is
    to reduce energy costs, the Supermicro is a bit of a beast even
    having taken a fair few steps to reduce the bill.

    I get the nostalgia, but wouldn't you be better of describing what you
    do with your server? It might be something a 5W Raspberry can handle, if >> the aim is to reduce energy bills.

    I turned off two NASes and their associated bits'n'bobs about a year ago >> saving about 150W continuous. I power one up on demand now, which
    basically costs nothing.

    Cheers - Jaimie


    One option could be a "cloud server" from the likes of AWS or Azure and transfer everything from the home server to that cloud server?
    and in the case of NASes, could switch to dropbox, or OneDrive from MS?
    I pay £60 all in a year for 5 Office accounts, each of which have 1TB storage space.

    Running 5TB NAS would certainly cost more than £60 a year in electric
    plus the cost of the HAS hardware and your time in setting it all up.

    Obviously this would not work or wouldf require extra effort/equipment
    if you were doing media (Twony/Plex/MythTV/BeyondPVR etc or networked CCTV.

    Thanks and all that guys, but I really was after what the subject line says, not:
    "do I really need a server", etc. But that's OK, this is Usenet after all...

    Cheers, Jon N

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to jkn on Sun Jan 22 10:26:23 2023
    On 22 Jan 2023 at 09:24:18 GMT, "jkn" <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:

    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 8:48:06 AM UTC, SH wrote:
    On 21/01/2023 08:45, SH wrote:
    On 21/01/2023 02:19, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
    On 20 Jan 2023 at 10:02:29 GMT, "jkn" <jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:

    Hi all
    Pretty general question: I am considering downgrading my
    Supermicro 'home' server for a Fujitsu Primergy one. Mainly this is
    to reduce energy costs, the Supermicro is a bit of a beast even
    having taken a fair few steps to reduce the bill.

    I get the nostalgia, but wouldn't you be better of describing what you >>>> do with your server? It might be something a 5W Raspberry can handle, if >>>> the aim is to reduce energy bills.

    I turned off two NASes and their associated bits'n'bobs about a year ago >>>> saving about 150W continuous. I power one up on demand now, which
    basically costs nothing.

    Cheers - Jaimie


    One option could be a "cloud server" from the likes of AWS or Azure and
    transfer everything from the home server to that cloud server?
    and in the case of NASes, could switch to dropbox, or OneDrive from MS?
    I pay £60 all in a year for 5 Office accounts, each of which have 1TB
    storage space.

    Running 5TB NAS would certainly cost more than £60 a year in electric
    plus the cost of the HAS hardware and your time in setting it all up.

    Obviously this would not work or wouldf require extra effort/equipment
    if you were doing media (Twony/Plex/MythTV/BeyondPVR etc or networked CCTV.

    Thanks and all that guys, but I really was after what the subject line says, not:
    "do I really need a server", etc. But that's OK, this is Usenet after all...

    Wasn't what I was asking. I've done the 'save electricity' thing and
    gone from near 500W base load to 90W, and part of that was judicious
    upgrading.

    Cheers - Jaimie
    --
    'I use a heap based stack storage system with a sorting
    algorithm which has a major sort key being chronologically
    determined, and heap hash key being a combination of
    gravity influenced kinetic displacement with frictive and
    annoyance dispersive elements.'
    -- krin_o_o_'s book filing method

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to jkn on Sun Jan 22 12:36:44 2023
    jkn <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:
    Pretty general question: I am considering downgrading my Supermicro 'home' server for a Fujitsu Primergy one. Mainly this is to reduce energy costs, the Supermicro is a bit of a beast even having taken a fair few
    steps to reduce the bill.

    I'm just interested in any general experiences with this make; any
    opinions? I have a mildy fondness for the make after having put linux on
    a little Fujitsu Scenic '386 box twenty years of more ago. it was a
    lovely little machine...

    While I've worked with quite a variety of server vendors (Supermicro, Dell,
    HP, Lenovo, Asus, Gigabyte, Chenbro, Intel) I've never seen a Fujitsu, so am completely off the map with this one.

    Is it one of the desktop-class servers or do you mean a rack thing?
    What model is it?

    I suppose things to look for:
    - are the power supply arrangements weird? Sometimes Dell and Lenovo use
    odd connectors so you have to use a special PSU, not just any ATX one (or an all-12V PSU)

    - any special cages or cabling for drives / bays / PCIe risers?
    (it may be hard to find these aftermarket if you need extra)

    - fan control - is noise an issue, can you make it quieter?

    - what's the BIOS and BMC situation?

    Apart from those, once the thing is on the software experience is typically much of a muchness.

    Some of their desktop 'micro servers' look interesting, although the ones on ebay look fairly old and uncompetitive price wise.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jkn@21:1/5 to Theo on Sun Jan 22 05:37:51 2023
    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 12:36:47 PM UTC, Theo wrote:
    jkn <jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:
    Pretty general question: I am considering downgrading my Supermicro
    'home' server for a Fujitsu Primergy one. Mainly this is to reduce energy costs, the Supermicro is a bit of a beast even having taken a fair few steps to reduce the bill.

    I'm just interested in any general experiences with this make; any opinions? I have a mildy fondness for the make after having put linux on
    a little Fujitsu Scenic '386 box twenty years of more ago. it was a
    lovely little machine...
    While I've worked with quite a variety of server vendors (Supermicro, Dell, HP, Lenovo, Asus, Gigabyte, Chenbro, Intel) I've never seen a Fujitsu, so am completely off the map with this one.

    Is it one of the desktop-class servers or do you mean a rack thing?
    What model is it?

    I suppose things to look for:
    - are the power supply arrangements weird? Sometimes Dell and Lenovo use
    odd connectors so you have to use a special PSU, not just any ATX one (or an all-12V PSU)

    - any special cages or cabling for drives / bays / PCIe risers?
    (it may be hard to find these aftermarket if you need extra)

    - fan control - is noise an issue, can you make it quieter?

    - what's the BIOS and BMC situation?

    Apart from those, once the thing is on the software experience is typically much of a muchness.

    Some of their desktop 'micro servers' look interesting, although the ones on ebay look fairly old and uncompetitive price wise.

    Theo

    Hi Theo
    yes, those are the sort of things I was interested in experience with ;-). I've done some research but there's always room for more...


    Cheers, J^n

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to jkn on Sun Jan 22 22:19:25 2023
    jkn <jkn_gg@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:
    Hi Theo
    yes, those are the sort of things I was interested in experience with ;-).
    I've done some research but there's always room for more...

    TBH I wouldn't really bother with obscure run-of-the-mill servers. The
    pricing often isn't anything good (they aren't as common as Dells or HPs),
    you may have trouble getting spares like replacement PSUs, extra drive bays
    or caddies, and you are less likely to be able to find 'unofficial' info if
    you don't have a support contract (eg BIOS updates if they're paywalled).

    I'd need a good reason to make it attractive. If it was a good price or
    some config I couldn't get elsewhere then maybe.

    They're typically bought on bulk contracts: a business like a retailer buys
    a batch of a few thousand units, which come with a support contract. At
    that level a lot of the obscureness is taken away, and they were just
    whoever bid the lowest price to the tender.

    That's a quite different proposition from a hobbyist buying a single used server.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jkn@21:1/5 to Theo on Sun Jan 22 15:58:34 2023
    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 10:19:29 PM UTC, Theo wrote:
    jkn <jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:
    Hi Theo
    yes, those are the sort of things I was interested in experience with ;-). I've done some research but there's always room for more...
    TBH I wouldn't really bother with obscure run-of-the-mill servers. The pricing often isn't anything good (they aren't as common as Dells or HPs), you may have trouble getting spares like replacement PSUs, extra drive bays or caddies, and you are less likely to be able to find 'unofficial' info if you don't have a support contract (eg BIOS updates if they're paywalled).

    I'd need a good reason to make it attractive. If it was a good price or
    some config I couldn't get elsewhere then maybe.

    They're typically bought on bulk contracts: a business like a retailer buys
    a batch of a few thousand units, which come with a support contract. At
    that level a lot of the obscureness is taken away, and they were just
    whoever bid the lowest price to the tender.

    That's a quite different proposition from a hobbyist buying a single used server.

    Theo

    Hi Theo
    yes, all good points, especially on price and availability of spares.
    Those would be the sort of reasons that would steer me towards
    an ML350 etc.

    Cheers, Jon N

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to jkn on Mon Jan 23 08:02:28 2023
    On 22 Jan 2023 at 23:58:34 GMT, jkn wrote:

    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 10:19:29 PM UTC, Theo wrote:
    jkn <jkn...@nicorp.f9.co.uk> wrote:
    Hi Theo
    yes, those are the sort of things I was interested in experience with ;-). >>> I've done some research but there's always room for more...
    TBH I wouldn't really bother with obscure run-of-the-mill servers. The
    pricing often isn't anything good (they aren't as common as Dells or HPs), >> you may have trouble getting spares like replacement PSUs, extra drive bays >> or caddies, and you are less likely to be able to find 'unofficial' info if >> you don't have a support contract (eg BIOS updates if they're paywalled).

    I'd need a good reason to make it attractive. If it was a good price or
    some config I couldn't get elsewhere then maybe.

    They're typically bought on bulk contracts: a business like a retailer buys >> a batch of a few thousand units, which come with a support contract. At
    that level a lot of the obscureness is taken away, and they were just
    whoever bid the lowest price to the tender.

    That's a quite different proposition from a hobbyist buying a single used
    server.

    Theo

    Hi Theo
    yes, all good points, especially on price and availability of spares. Those would be the sort of reasons that would steer me towards
    an ML350 etc.

    Cheers, Jon N

    Mmmm - have you decided what you'd like to use it for? That'd help inform some more specific comments . . .

    --
    Cheers, Rob, Sheffield UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)