• SSD Failure

    From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 29 13:30:43 2022
    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's
    fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised, perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it up?

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    Every day is a good day for chicken, unless you're a chicken.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk on Fri Jul 29 20:11:27 2022
    On 29 Jul 2022 at 14:30:43 BST, ""Jeff Gaines""
    <jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:


    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's
    fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised, perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it up?

    Yup. Open it up and hammer a punch at the centre of each of the larger
    chips to shatter/bend them. The actual data substrate is very fragile
    once the package is damaged, and the data is interleaved across all the
    flash chips so any one being cracked gives sufficient coverage really.

    Cheers - Jaimie
    --
    "It's made of people?"
    "There's already a drink like that - Soylent Cola."
    "How does it taste?"
    "It varies from person to person." -- Fry and Leela

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Philip Herlihy@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 30 12:37:26 2022
    In article <xn0nkxwpgky9hpc016@news.individual.net>, Jeff Gaines wrote...

    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's
    fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised, perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it up?

    I believe some data recovery services (e.g. Fields) will attempt to recover data from an SSD, if you're concerned there might be something irreplaceable on it. Generally, when SSDs go, they go completely, without the warning you can get from SMART monitors on a spinner, so backup's all the more important!

    --

    Phil, London

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 30 11:58:54 2022
    On 30/07/2022 in message <MPG.3d4e0edb7e5a21f8989a07@news.eternal-september.org> Philip Herlihy
    wrote:

    In article <xn0nkxwpgky9hpc016@news.individual.net>, Jeff Gaines wrote...

    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't >>access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's >>fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised, >>perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it
    up?

    I believe some data recovery services (e.g. Fields) will attempt to recover >data from an SSD, if you're concerned there might be something
    irreplaceable on
    it. Generally, when SSDs go, they go completely, without the warning you
    can
    get from SMART monitors on a spinner, so backup's all the more important!

    Many thanks Jaimie and Phil :-)

    I took the cover off (and kept the screws, they're like gold dust) then
    just snapped each chip in half. All backed up so nothing to worry about
    and, as Phil said, it just went, no warning.

    First one I've had fail, even my original Intel 180 GB are still gong
    strong.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    640k ought to be enough for anyone.
    (Bill Gates, 1981)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Jaimie Vandenbergh on Sat Jul 30 14:10:27 2022
    On 29/07/2022 21:11, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
    On 29 Jul 2022 at 14:30:43 BST, ""Jeff Gaines""
    <jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:


    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't >> access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's
    fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised,
    perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it up?

    Yup. Open it up and hammer a punch at the centre of each of the larger
    chips to shatter/bend them. The actual data substrate is very fragile
    once the package is damaged, and the data is interleaved across all the
    flash chips so any one being cracked gives sufficient coverage really.

    How worthwhile is that for most ordinary people?

    Here's a drive that can't be read simply by plugging it in. Is anyone
    really going to spend a load of money on 'data recovering' this drive,
    assuming they find it somewhere in your bin?






    Cheers - Jaimie

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pancho@21:1/5 to Philip Herlihy on Sat Jul 30 13:38:24 2022
    On 30/07/2022 13:21, Philip Herlihy wrote:
    In article <xn0nkz8t5maf92w018@news.individual.net>, Jeff Gaines wrote...

    On 30/07/2022 in message
    <MPG.3d4e0edb7e5a21f8989a07@news.eternal-september.org> Philip Herlihy
    wrote:

    In article <xn0nkxwpgky9hpc016@news.individual.net>, Jeff Gaines wrote... >>>>
    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't >>>> access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's
    fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised, >>>> perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it >>>> up?

    I believe some data recovery services (e.g. Fields) will attempt to recover >>> data from an SSD, if you're concerned there might be something
    irreplaceable on
    it. Generally, when SSDs go, they go completely, without the warning you >>> can
    get from SMART monitors on a spinner, so backup's all the more important! >>
    Many thanks Jaimie and Phil :-)

    I took the cover off (and kept the screws, they're like gold dust) then
    just snapped each chip in half. All backed up so nothing to worry about
    and, as Phil said, it just went, no warning.

    First one I've had fail, even my original Intel 180 GB are still gong
    strong.

    I chose to increase the cost of a fancy laptop by over £400 in 2010 to have a
    256GB SSD instead of the normal spinner. It lasted just over a year!

    Moral: don't be an early adopter!


    They were much faster, are you sure you wouldn't do exactly the same,
    even if you knew it would only last a year?

    FWIW, My first SSD from 2009 is still working. Apart from numerous OCZs,
    which I started buying in 2011, all my SSDs, still work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Philip Herlihy@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 30 13:21:28 2022
    In article <xn0nkz8t5maf92w018@news.individual.net>, Jeff Gaines wrote...

    On 30/07/2022 in message <MPG.3d4e0edb7e5a21f8989a07@news.eternal-september.org> Philip Herlihy
    wrote:

    In article <xn0nkxwpgky9hpc016@news.individual.net>, Jeff Gaines wrote...

    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't >>access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's >>fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised, >>perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it >>up?

    I believe some data recovery services (e.g. Fields) will attempt to recover >data from an SSD, if you're concerned there might be something >irreplaceable on
    it. Generally, when SSDs go, they go completely, without the warning you >can
    get from SMART monitors on a spinner, so backup's all the more important!

    Many thanks Jaimie and Phil :-)

    I took the cover off (and kept the screws, they're like gold dust) then
    just snapped each chip in half. All backed up so nothing to worry about
    and, as Phil said, it just went, no warning.

    First one I've had fail, even my original Intel 180 GB are still gong
    strong.

    I chose to increase the cost of a fancy laptop by over £400 in 2010 to have a 256GB SSD instead of the normal spinner. It lasted just over a year!

    Moral: don't be an early adopter!

    --

    Phil, London

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RJH@21:1/5 to Pancho on Sat Jul 30 20:17:25 2022
    On 30 Jul 2022 at 13:38:24 BST, Pancho wrote:

    FWIW, My first SSD from 2009 is still working. Apart from numerous OCZs, which I started buying in 2011, all my SSDs, still work.

    Yes same here, an Intel, marvelluoos thing. And my only failure is an OCZ from a while back.

    --
    Cheers, Rob

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jaimie Vandenbergh@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 31 02:28:36 2022
    On 30 Jul 2022 at 14:10:27 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 29/07/2022 21:11, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
    On 29 Jul 2022 at 14:30:43 BST, ""Jeff Gaines""
    <jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:


    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't >>> access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's
    fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised, >>> perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it up? >>
    Yup. Open it up and hammer a punch at the centre of each of the larger
    chips to shatter/bend them. The actual data substrate is very fragile
    once the package is damaged, and the data is interleaved across all the
    flash chips so any one being cracked gives sufficient coverage really.

    How worthwhile is that for most ordinary people?

    Shrug. Jeff wanted to. Only takes a minute or so. Why not?

    Cheers - Jaimie
    --
    "The only way to comprehend what mathematicians mean
    by infinity is to contemplate the extent of human stupidity."
    -- Voltaire

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adrian Caspersz@21:1/5 to RJH on Sun Jul 31 06:54:43 2022
    On 30/07/2022 21:17, RJH wrote:
    On 30 Jul 2022 at 13:38:24 BST, Pancho wrote:

    FWIW, My first SSD from 2009 is still working. Apart from numerous OCZs,
    which I started buying in 2011, all my SSDs, still work.

    Yes same here, an Intel, marvelluoos thing. And my only failure is an OCZ from
    a while back.


    For heavy users, does anyone obey over provisioning recommendations for
    SSD reliability?

    --
    Adrian C

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Adrian Caspersz on Sun Jul 31 16:47:56 2022
    On 31/07/2022 06:54, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 30/07/2022 21:17, RJH wrote:
    On 30 Jul 2022 at 13:38:24 BST, Pancho wrote:

    FWIW, My first SSD from 2009 is still working. Apart from numerous OCZs, >>> which I started buying in 2011, all my SSDs, still work.

    Yes same here, an Intel, marvelluoos thing. And my only failure is an
    OCZ from
    a while back.


    For heavy users, does anyone obey over provisioning recommendations for
    SSD reliability?



    I use RAID1 (aside from backup). However, I'm inclined to think that I'm missing a trick, because I buy my SSDs in pairs from the same
    manufacturer. Should I be buying completely different SSDs? In RAID1,
    that means the speed will be governed by the slower disc. On the other
    hand, they are less likely to both fail at more or less the same time?

    Never had an SSD fail yet, btw.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From GB@21:1/5 to Jaimie Vandenbergh on Sun Jul 31 16:42:33 2022
    On 31/07/2022 03:28, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
    On 30 Jul 2022 at 14:10:27 BST, "GB" <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 29/07/2022 21:11, Jaimie Vandenbergh wrote:
    On 29 Jul 2022 at 14:30:43 BST, ""Jeff Gaines""
    <jgaines_newsid@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:


    I've just had my first SSD fail I think. It's a Crucial M4 512 GB. I can't >>>> access it via any of the cables/connectors/caddies I have nor if it's
    fitted in a PC.

    I have no idea what's on it and I can't format it as it's not recognised, >>>> perhaps best to dismantle it, see what's inside and physically break it up?

    Yup. Open it up and hammer a punch at the centre of each of the larger
    chips to shatter/bend them. The actual data substrate is very fragile
    once the package is damaged, and the data is interleaved across all the
    flash chips so any one being cracked gives sufficient coverage really.

    How worthwhile is that for most ordinary people?

    Shrug. Jeff wanted to. Only takes a minute or so. Why not?

    Cheers - Jaimie

    I just hit old disks (hard!) with a big hammer. Perhaps I'm paranoid,
    but I think that anyone with the resources and inclination to read that maltreated disk probably already knows what's on my PC. :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordon@21:1/5 to NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid on Mon Aug 1 01:19:39 2022
    On 2022-07-31, GB <NOTsomeone@microsoft.invalid> wrote:
    On 31/07/2022 06:54, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    On 30/07/2022 21:17, RJH wrote:
    On 30 Jul 2022 at 13:38:24 BST, Pancho wrote:

    FWIW, My first SSD from 2009 is still working. Apart from numerous OCZs, >>>> which I started buying in 2011, all my SSDs, still work.

    Yes same here, an Intel, marvelluoos thing. And my only failure is an
    OCZ from
    a while back.


    For heavy users, does anyone obey over provisioning recommendations for
    SSD reliability?



    I use RAID1 (aside from backup). However, I'm inclined to think that I'm missing a trick, because I buy my SSDs in pairs from the same
    manufacturer. Should I be buying completely different SSDs? In RAID1,
    that means the speed will be governed by the slower disc. On the other
    hand, they are less likely to both fail at more or less the same time?

    If one disk fails ins a RAID it is important that the remainung disk(s) in
    the raid do not fail before the raid has been rebuilt.

    Two new disks in RAID1 are likely to fail about the same time. Say if one is 20% worn out when inserted into RAID1, when it fails first there will be
    enough life in the second, newer, disk to allow the RAID to be rebuilt.

    Of course a great set of backups, and that there is no problem with down
    time, is the counter arguement.






    Never had an SSD fail yet, btw.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Adrian Caspersz@21:1/5 to Gordon on Wed Aug 3 21:33:39 2022
    On 01/08/2022 02:19, Gordon wrote:
    Two new disks in RAID1 are likely to fail about the same time. Say if one is 20% worn out when inserted into RAID1, when it fails first there will be enough life in the second, newer, disk to allow the RAID to be rebuilt.

    On installation, handle some a bit more roughly than the others, to give
    them a better bit of time spread between dying events.

    Ya know it makes sense ;-)

    --
    Adrian C

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)