The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Many-worlds_interpretation
... fails statistics for it results in above 100% outcome?
Each "World" has a 100% outcome?
The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transactional_interpretation
Relies on General Relativity and The Standard Particle Model of Physics ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_relativity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model
... having congruence, which they don't yet?
This leaves The Copenhagen The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copenhagen_interpretation
... and is the only one which recognizes "The Observer" in its place in science?
The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics ...
Relies on General Relativity and The Standard Particle Model of Physics ...
This leaves The Copenhagen The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics ...
In article <sbvfrs$ac3$1@dont-email.me>,
Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> wrote:
The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics ...
The word here is 'interpretation'. QM is the science; the
interpretations are not science. It's not enough that QM works;
people need a untestable rationalisation of why it works. You can
ignore any interpretation you don't like.
Relies on General Relativity and The Standard Particle Model of Physics ...
Yes, GR and QM are not compatiable. Everyone knows this. Nobody
yet has a good proposal to reconcile them.
Also https://chandra.harvard.edu/blog/node/558 Quantum foam
should a slight effect on photon speed based on wavelength over
billions of light years, but photon speed appears invariant.
Also if spacetime is quantised, or just denumerable, we lose the
intermediate value theorem and calculus. Without calculus the
differential geometry vital to GR disappears.
This leaves The Copenhagen The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics ...
And an interpretation is still not science.
And an interpretation is still not science.
neither of the three are testable yet?
In article <sbvk3l$771$1@dont-email.me>,
Dale <dale@dalekelly.org> wrote:
And an interpretation is still not science.
neither of the three are testable yet?
Not by scientific method. You can do calculation to determine
they might be possible, but you cannot test if they are
impossible. So don't get your knickers in a twist.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 113 |
Nodes: | 8 (1 / 7) |
Uptime: | 161:31:19 |
Calls: | 2,504 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 8,703 |
Messages: | 1,930,675 |