XPost: talk.origins, free.metaphysics

On 2/5/2021 4:58 AM, *Hemidactylus* wrote:

dale <dale@dalekelly.org> wrote:

there is "the theory of anything"?

then there are "theories of everything"?

I have a theory that you are about to get “philosophical” with questions?

"anything" is kind of bleak on hope?

I would hope you started answering your own questions.

an "everything" is the best alternative to "anything" that "the whole"
can make?

Guess not. Too soon? Not sure what scale you are getting at. Organismic wholes? Cosmic wholes?

"the whole" has to get all "parts" into a heaven before another
iteration of "everything" begins?

Some vague eternal recurrence that would make Nietzsche (oh that’s where the “z” goes...thanks again spellchecker) turn in his grave? I guess we are
going with cosmic wholes then. Can universes have theories about anything?

at some point "the whole" lets some "parts" to be conscious?

What say has the universe in the matter? It just happens given sufficient neurality (no not neutrality spellchecker!) though some think fungi can get intersubjectively funky with communal root systems. Dionysian soil orgies? Apollonian noospheres? Zarathustran tightrope walks? They’re not ready.

leaves me with some big words to look up as usual, as usual they are
probably relevant

--
Minister Dale Kelly, Ph.D.
https://www.dalekelly.org/
Board Certified Holistic Health Practitioner
Board Certified Alternative Medical Practitioner

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)