• No, Biden's 2020 win is not "statistically impossible"

    From Lou Bricano@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 18 18:26:35 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/07/no-bidens-win-wasnt-statistically-impossible/

    “We got 74 million plus,” Trump said, “and they’re trying to convince us that
    we lost. We didn’t lose. They found a lot of ballots, let’s be nice about it,
    they got rid of some, too.”

    He cited “the great pollster, John McLaughlin,” who said that “there’s no way
    this could’ve happened other than the obvious cheating or a rigged election.”

    McLaughlin is the pollster who said that then-House Majority Leader Eric
    Cantor had a 34-point lead in his reelection bid in 2014. Cantor lost by 10 points.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 19 09:07:56 2024
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism
    XPost: alt.fun, alt.politics.democrats.d

    In article <u5lqN.231586$c3Ea.173925@fx10.iad>, lb@cap.con says...

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/12/07/no-bidens-win-wasnt-statistically-impossible/

    ?We got 74 million plus,? Trump said, ?and they?re trying to convince us that
    we lost. We didn?t lose. They found a lot of ballots, let?s be nice about it,
    they got rid of some, too.?

    He cited ?the great pollster, John McLaughlin,? who said that ?there?s no way
    this could?ve happened other than the obvious cheating or a rigged election.?

    McLaughlin is the pollster who said that then-House Majority Leader Eric
    Cantor had a 34-point lead in his reelection bid in 2014. Cantor lost by 10
    points.

    Trump ahead of Joe. It's just that simple.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)