XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
XPost: alt.politics.republicans

On Tue, 23 May 2017 20:55:59 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@verizont.net> wrote:

Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote in >news:5re8ictl62fs5ivee0h1ef60pfjcfrls55@4ax.com:

On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:45:42 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote:

On 05/18/2017 10:05 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

#BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote in
news:arkTA.125804$Sb.92825@fx37.iad:

On 05/18/2017 09:51 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

#BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote
in news:o5hTA.110463$se.104087@fx38.iad:

On 05/18/2017 07:07 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:

|
| Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump's campaign >>>>>>>> | were in contact with Russian officials and others with
| Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the
| last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current
| and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told
| Reuters.

How about Hillary

How about sticking to the issue at hand instead of
changing the subject to Obama or Hillary with every
post of yours?

Government crimes.... I can't discuss them rationally without
discussing the criminals.

Obama and Hillary were deeply into Government crimes.

When Trump prosecutes them you will have a
point, until then you don't.

Comey says Hillary committed crimes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=LXs-2RNgBDA#t >>>=137

Why didn't a SPECIAL PROSECUTOR determine the need for indictment?

Hillary is clearly incompetent, and a criminal.

No doubt her campaign was also in contact
with Russian officials. Probably Chinese too.
Was probably hitting them up for pay-2-play
bribes - prices would have gone up once she
was prez. So where's the special prosecutor ?

AG Sessions thinks locking up drug offenders
for maximum sentences is more important.

There are two ways of persuing a 'drug war'. The
one called the "bigger hammer" approach has
always been favored in the USA. It doesn't work
very well - just makes the dopers more violent.
The bleeding-heart approach doesn't work well
either ... the dopelords take immediate advantage.

The 'drug war' should just END ... but that'd be
too sensible. There's money and power to be
made in this 'war', profitible special interests
to grease for cash too - so it'll never end.

But then that is all the fault of Democrats
too, right?

Obama had eight years to end the 'drug war'.
Didn't even try.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics
XPost: alt.politics.republicans

Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote in news:593ficdn7crp82oofc0ni51ambf4c9db9m@4ax.com:

On Tue, 23 May 2017 20:55:59 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@verizont.net> wrote:

Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote in >>news:5re8ictl62fs5ivee0h1ef60pfjcfrls55@4ax.com:

On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:45:42 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote:

On 05/18/2017 10:05 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

#BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote

in

news:arkTA.125804$Sb.92825@fx37.iad:

On 05/18/2017 09:51 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

#BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote >>>>>>> in news:o5hTA.110463$se.104087@fx38.iad:

On 05/18/2017 07:07 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:

|
| Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump's campaign >>>>>>>>> | were in contact with Russian officials and others with
| Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the
| last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current
| and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told >>>>>>>>> | Reuters.

How about Hillary

How about sticking to the issue at hand instead of
changing the subject to Obama or Hillary with every
post of yours?

Government crimes.... I can't discuss them rationally without
discussing the criminals.

Obama and Hillary were deeply into Government crimes.

When Trump prosecutes them you will have a
point, until then you don't.

Comey says Hillary committed crimes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=LXs-

2RNgBDA#t

=137

Why didn't a SPECIAL PROSECUTOR determine the need for indictment?

Hillary is clearly incompetent, and a criminal.

No doubt her campaign was also in contact
with Russian officials. Probably Chinese too.
Was probably hitting them up for pay-2-play
bribes - prices would have gone up once she
was prez. So where's the special prosecutor ?

AG Sessions thinks locking up drug offenders
for maximum sentences is more important.

There are two ways of persuing a 'drug war'. The
one called the "bigger hammer" approach has
always been favored in the USA. It doesn't work
very well - just makes the dopers more violent.
The bleeding-heart approach doesn't work well
either ... the dopelords take immediate advantage.

The 'drug war' should just END ... but that'd be
too sensible. There's money and power to be
made in this 'war', profitible special interests
to grease for cash too - so it'll never end.

With Sessions owning stock in private prisons
that drug offenders will be sent to it will CERTAINLY
never end. He is making money from drug war.

But then that is all the fault of Democrats
too, right?

Obama had eight years to end the 'drug war'.
Didn't even try.

Obama was never given legislation to sign
that would have done that. He DID order his
Justice Dept not to interfere with states that
legalized marijuana even tho it remains a
federal offense to even possess it. Good on him
for doing at least that much.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: talk.politics.misc

On 5/25/2017 8:09 PM, Mr. B1ack wrote:

On Tue, 23 May 2017 20:55:59 -0500, Mitchell Holman
<noemail@verizont.net> wrote:

Mr. B1ack <nowhere@nada.net> wrote in
news:5re8ictl62fs5ivee0h1ef60pfjcfrls55@4ax.com:

On Fri, 19 May 2017 11:45:42 -0400, #BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote:

On 05/18/2017 10:05 PM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

#BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote in >>>>> news:arkTA.125804$Sb.92825@fx37.iad:

On 05/18/2017 09:51 AM, Mitchell Holman wrote:

#BeamMeUpScotty
<CommunityOrganizers&CommunistAgitators@Marxist.Shadow.gov> wrote >>>>>>> in news:o5hTA.110463$se.104087@fx38.iad:

On 05/18/2017 07:07 AM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:

|
| Michael Flynn and other advisers to Donald Trump's campaign >>>>>>>>> | were in contact with Russian officials and others with
| Kremlin ties in at least 18 calls and emails during the
| last seven months of the 2016 presidential race, current >>>>>>>>> | and former U.S. officials familiar with the exchanges told >>>>>>>>> | Reuters.

How about Hillary

How about sticking to the issue at hand instead of
changing the subject to Obama or Hillary with every
post of yours?

Government crimes.... I can't discuss them rationally without
discussing the criminals.

Obama and Hillary were deeply into Government crimes.

When Trump prosecutes them you will have a
point, until then you don't.

Comey says Hillary committed crimes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=LXs-2RNgBDA#t >>>> =137

Why didn't a SPECIAL PROSECUTOR determine the need for indictment?

Hillary is clearly incompetent, and a criminal.

No doubt her campaign was also in contact
with Russian officials. Probably Chinese too.
Was probably hitting them up for pay-2-play
bribes - prices would have gone up once she
was prez. So where's the special prosecutor ?

AG Sessions thinks locking up drug offenders
for maximum sentences is more important.

There are two ways of persuing a 'drug war'. The
one called the "bigger hammer" approach has
always been favored in the USA. It doesn't work
very well - just makes the dopers more violent.
The bleeding-heart approach doesn't work well
either ... the dopelords take immediate advantage.

The 'drug war' should just END ... but that'd be
too sensible. There's money and power to be
made in this 'war', profitible special interests
to grease for cash too - so it'll never end.

But then that is all the fault of Democrats
too, right?

Obama had eight years to end the 'drug war'.
Didn't even try.

He fought that war in his own head and surrendered to cigarettes.

That beats weed and cocaine though...

I guess he knew it was always going to be a lost cause.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)