• 20 of 26 COVID-positive residents in a Kentucky nursing home outbreak w

    From Andrew W@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 30 21:52:45 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, talk.politics.misc, us.politics

    https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/20-of-26-covid-positive-residents-in-a-kentucky-nursing-home-outbreak-were-fully-vaccinated-a-month-earlier


    A CDC report blames an unvaccinated healthcare worker for an outbreak; data compares a population of four unvaccinated elderly residents to the rest of
    the group.

    Nearly half of the 46 people who tested positive for COVID-19 in a Kentucky nursing facility in March had been fully vaccinated against the virus more
    than four weeks earlier, according to a report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released last week.

    Twenty of the 26 COVID-positive residents and four of 18 COVID-positive healthcare personnel had received both doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech two-shot coronavirus vaccine at on-site clinics January 10 and 31, a full month
    before the outbreak on March 1, making them “breakthrough” vaccinated cases of COVID.

    Two additional COVID-positive residents who had been fully vaccinated eight days before the outbreak were excluded from the CDC’s analysis.

    When the outbreak occurred, 79 of 83 nursing home residents had been fully vaccinated, including more than 90 percent who had received both Pfizer
    doses a month earlier. CDC experts insist the vaccine should be fully
    effective two weeks after vaccination.
    Among staff, 61 of 116 (52.6 percent) received both shots a month before the outbreak and another five had received their second injections at a clinic
    in February.

    Data from four unvaccinated residents
    No healthcare workers, vaccinated or unvaccinated, were hospitalized or
    died.

    Three residents died. One was fully vaccinated. Two were not, according to
    the CDC.

    These would have been two of only four residents of 83 in the facility who chose not to be vaccinated and there is no indication from the CDC why they declined to be vaccinated.

    The CDC report acknowledges that “the health status of residents who
    declined vaccination might have differed from those who consented to vaccination.” In other words, they may have been extremely ill or frail or
    in palliative condition near death, although the report does not describe
    their condition.

    Based on the data of four unvaccinated individuals of unknown condition, the researchers led by Alyson Cavanaugh of the CDC’s Epidemic Intelligence Service concluded that unvaccinated residents had three times higher rates
    of infection as those who were vaccinated residents (75 percent vs. 25.4 percent).

    5,800 ‘breakthrough cases’
    The other 22 cases would have been counted among the 5,800 American “breakthrough” cases of coronavirus among fully vaccinated individuals reported to the CDC up until April 13, including 74 deaths.

    The CDC report did not identify the nursing home in the state of Kentucky
    where the outbreak occurred in March. In February, in an apparently separate incident, three nuns at St. Walburg convent in Kentucky died and 28 were infected though they had recently received a first dose of coronavirus
    vaccine.

    Prior infection?
    “It is a good bet that most, if not all, of the sisters of St. Walburg have been naturally infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus — AND that they were infected at around the time of their first vaccination,” Pennsylvania immunologist Hooman Noorchashm wrote in an open letter to the Sisters of St. Walberg after the incident, imploring them to be tested for infection before taking a second dose of the coronavirus vaccine.

    “It is my opinion as a physician and immunologist that persons with recent
    or occult SARS-CoV-2 infections may be at risk of harm from indiscriminate COVID-19 vaccination — especially the elderly and frail with cardiovascular disease,” he said.

    Noorchashm suggested that the sisters first have their blood tested for the presence of IgG antibodies and to perform another PCR assay for the virus immediately before any planned vaccination.

    “If you are positive for either of these tests, it is my recommendation that you delay your second shots for a minimum of 6–8 months,” he said, though the sisters were scheduled to have their second shots in May.

    If blood tests revealed any nuns to have had a recent natural infection,
    then they would already “almost certainly” be immune and vaccinating those with recent or current natural infections would risk reactivating, or activating, a “potentially deadly inflammatory response in their bodies,” he
    said.

    The CDC report did not consider the possibility of the vaccination campaigns having activated a dormant infection.

    Symptomatic index case
    The CDC report blames an unvaccinated, symptomatic healthcare worker at the facility for the outbreak and used the incident to highlight the “imperative” that all healthcare personnel, as well as nursing home residents, receive experimental coronavirus vaccines. The vaccines have only been given Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Some media followed with reports that an unvaccinated worker had set off a coronavirus outbreak, “killing 3 residents.”

    The CDC report did not explain how a symptomatic healthcare worker was on
    duty at the facility where it said personnel were screened daily for the coronavirus beginning a year earlier in March 2020 and have undergone twice-weekly SARS-COV2 testing since November 2020. It also did not explain
    how that person was identified as the “index case” when other vaccinated and
    unvaccinated workers were infected.

    “Despite the overall numbers that occurred during this outbreak, vaccination was associated with a lower risk of being infected, lower risk of developing symptomatic disease, and lower risk of hospitalization and death,” Melissa Brower, a public affairs specialist at the CDC, said in an e-mailed
    statement. “In fact, vaccination was 86.5 percent and 87.1 percent effective against symptomatic COVID-19 in residents and healthcare personnel, respectively.”

    The report estimated vaccine effectiveness against coronavirus infection
    among residents was 66 percent and among healthcare workers, who had a
    larger proportion of unvaccinated individuals, was 75 percent.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 4many <4container9.us@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 30 22:47:13 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, talk.politics.misc, us.politics

    The vaccine may not absolutely PREVENT you from
    having a C19 infection. You really ought to read up
    on this stuff. What the vaccines DO is prevent it from
    being a SERIOUS infection ... and apparently greatly
    reduce the amount of virus you might spread to
    others.

    Well worth it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew W@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 1 15:28:05 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, talk.politics.misc, us.politics

    "4many" wrote in message news:24gp8g1ia9kaihacr185s8lgof096d9i96@4ax.com...

    The vaccine may not absolutely PREVENT you from
    having a C19 infection. You really ought to read up
    on this stuff. What the vaccines DO is prevent it from
    being a SERIOUS infection ... and apparently greatly
    reduce the amount of virus you might spread to
    others.


    Is there some evidence of that or is it just what the drug companies claim? Some people are putting the same amount of faith in drug companies, which
    have been caught lying and doing illegal practices, as theists put in their gods.


    Well worth it.


    Buyer beware. Think. Research.
    This whole killer virus global pandemic really smells like a scam. It's just like what all those killer virus disaster movies depicted.
    The establishments often put these scary ideas in people's minds before carrying out the real thing. That ensures maximum effect.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 4many <4container9.us@21:1/5 to spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au on Mon May 3 22:59:54 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa, talk.politics.misc, us.politics

    On Sat, 1 May 2021 15:28:05 +1000, "Andrew W"
    <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> wrote:

    "4many" wrote in message news:24gp8g1ia9kaihacr185s8lgof096d9i96@4ax.com...

    The vaccine may not absolutely PREVENT you from
    having a C19 infection. You really ought to read up
    on this stuff. What the vaccines DO is prevent it from
    being a SERIOUS infection ... and apparently greatly
    reduce the amount of virus you might spread to
    others.


    Is there some evidence of that or is it just what the drug companies claim? >Some people are putting the same amount of faith in drug companies, which >have been caught lying and doing illegal practices, as theists put in their >gods.


    Well worth it.


    Buyer beware. Think. Research.
    This whole killer virus global pandemic really smells like a scam. It's just >like what all those killer virus disaster movies depicted.
    The establishments often put these scary ideas in people's minds before >carrying out the real thing. That ensures maximum effect.


    PLEASE go visit beautiful India ......

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)