XPost: alt.atheism, alt.politics.usa.misc, talk.politics.medicine
On Tue, 16 Mar 2021 09:02:08 +1100, "Andrew W"
<
spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
"Malte Runz" wrote in message >news:88av4gtejp7h3p97gn3kctcmsb769a630h@4ax.com...
On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 09:22:05 +1100, "Andrew W" >><spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> wrote:
"Andrew" wrote in message news:f%b3I.57959$W%q8.2605@fx36.ams4...
"Andrew W" <spam_ajwerner@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message >>>>news:s2i5hb$4ga$1@dont-email.me...
https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-03-11-europe-pauses-astrazeneca-coronavirus-vaccinations-blood-clots.html
At least eight countries in Europe have suspended all administration of >>>>> Wuhan coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccines from AstraZeneca and
the University of Oxford after dozens of recipients developed “serious” >>>>> blood clots post-injection.
The European Medicines Agency (EMA), Europe’s equivalent of the U.S. >>>>> Food
and Drug Administration (FDA), confirmed that no fewer
than 30 patients who received AstraZeneca’s China virus jab suffered >>>>> this
adverse outcome. At least one of the cases, in Denmark,
resulted in death.
“This AstraZeneca story isn’t getting enough attention,” tweeted
ForexLive. “It’s going to undermine vaccine takeup. If people are
dying it’s a disaster for the company too.”
It is apparent from this tweet that ForexLive is more concerned about >>>>> the
profits of AstraZeneca than it is about people’s lives.
ForexLive is also more worried about other people refusing vaccination >>>>> based on the news than it is about the people who already
did get vaccinated and are now suffering.
Denmark, Norway, Estonia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Latvia, Italy and
Iceland have halted administration of the vaccine due to this
deadly side effect. At least two cases of blood clots were reported in >>>>> Austria as well, however that country is still
administering the vaccine, at least for now.
Do you know of any reports of adverse effects from the Russian, or >>>>Chinese
vaxxes?
I haven't heard much from those two countries but I do believe that the >>>Russian vaccine at least is most likely not from the big drug companies >>>and
is a more natural type of therapy. ...
You have absolutely no information to base your opinion on, other than
your bias against any- and everything coming from "big drug
companies".
And what is "a more natural type of therapy" anyway? Remote healing?
... Some other countries are doing the same
with success and little side effects if any.
When you administer more than 5 million doses of a vaccine you're
bound to have examples of correlation between receiving a vaccine and
a medical incident immediately afterwards.
Doctors have an oath, “first, do no harm”. A properly tested vaccine >shouldn't cause any disabilities or deaths. ...
There is always a risk that individuals will have individual reaction
to having something injected into their system. The only completely
side-effect free product is homeopathic remedies, and we all know why.
... Obviously it wasn't tested. ...
Of course it was. The information is available, and you can "do your
own research".
You could start here:
https://tinyurl.com/8axcfkjd
but then again, I know you'll dismiss it all off-handedly with a 'they
are part of Big They and only the gullible masses will trust anything
they say!'.
... They
lied and you believed them.
Prove that they lied.
Proving a causal relation
is a different thing. Maybe the people died because they were wearing >>leather shoes that day. Ever think of that?
No, you are completely ignorant of the subject, ...
I bet I know more about all this than you do. How many articles and
papers on the subject have you read that didn't claim in the headline
that 'vaccines are evil and kill people!'? You talk about "a more
natural type of therapy" above, but you have no explanation as to what
it is. It's all buzz words, and it's all you have. That and 'Big
Pharma bad!!!!'.
... just listening to the drug
companies, their mouthpiece the MSM, and their pier reviewers and paid >testers.
I don't know how much the volunteers were paid. Do you?
You only question one side. ...
You consistently reject everything coming from one side and accept
everything coming from the other. You're the one who is totally
biased.
... It seems you are prejudiced against the little
people ...
Do you see yourself as one of "the little people"? That could explain
a lot, actually.
... and only want to rely on big name authorities for all convenient
truths.
Boy, do you love to blow your strawman in public!
--
Malte Runz
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)