| "What's the difference between this and Watergate?" Donald
| Trump raged in a statement Monday night after FBI agents.
|
| Well, as a Watergate and FBI historian, four things stand
| out to me:
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| "What's the difference between this and Watergate?" Donald
| Trump raged in a statement Monday night after FBI agents.
|
| Well, as a Watergate and FBI historian, four things stand
| out to me:
|
| 1) The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president
| would have been approved and monitored at the highest level
| of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high
| the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to
| initiate such a politically sensitive search....
|
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| 3) The fact the search apparently didn't leak until
| basically when word came from Donald Trump himself shows
| the FBI and the Justice Department conducted this search by
| the book and a high degree of integrity. No leaks?
| Impressive. Surely only a small team knew inside DOJ....
|
| 4) Taken together, this is one of the most significant,
| sensitive, and politically explosive actions the US Justice
| Department and FBI has ever taken--one of a tiny handful of
| times it's ever investigated a president.
|
| Bottom line: The FBI & DOJ must've known they had the goods.
|
<https://twitter.com/vermontgmg/status/1556788136507805697>
--bks
|
| "What's the difference between this and Watergate?" Donald
| Trump raged in a statement Monday night after FBI agents.
|
| Well, as a Watergate and FBI historian, four things stand
| out to me:
|
| 1) The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president
| would have been approved and monitored at the highest level
| of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high
| the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to
| initiate such a politically sensitive search....
|
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| 3) The fact the search apparently didn't leak until
| basically when word came from Donald Trump himself shows
| the FBI and the Justice Department conducted this search by
| the book and a high degree of integrity. No leaks?
| Impressive. Surely only a small team knew inside DOJ....
|
| 4) Taken together, this is one of the most significant,
| sensitive, and politically explosive actions the US Justice
| Department and FBI has ever taken--one of a tiny handful of
| times it's ever investigated a president.
|
| Bottom line: The FBI & DOJ must've known they had the goods.
|
<https://twitter.com/vermontgmg/status/1556788136507805697>
--bks
| 1) The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president
| would have been approved and monitored at the highest level
| of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high
| the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to
| initiate such a politically sensitive search....
|
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| 3) The fact the search apparently didn't leak until
| basically when word came from Donald Trump himself shows
| the FBI and the Justice Department conducted this search by
| the book and a high degree of integrity. No leaks?
| Impressive. Surely only a small team knew inside DOJ....
|
| 4) Taken together, this is one of the most significant,
| sensitive, and politically explosive actions the US Justice
| Department and FBI has ever taken--one of a tiny handful of
| times it's ever investigated a president.
|
| Bottom line: The FBI & DOJ must've known they had the goods.
n.b. The Director of the FBI was appointed by Trump.
--bks
| 1) The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president
| would have been approved and monitored at the highest level
| of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high
| the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to
| initiate such a politically sensitive search....
|
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| 3) The fact the search apparently didn't leak until
| basically when word came from Donald Trump himself shows
| the FBI and the Justice Department conducted this search by
| the book and a high degree of integrity. No leaks?
| Impressive. Surely only a small team knew inside DOJ....
|
| 4) Taken together, this is one of the most significant,
| sensitive, and politically explosive actions the US Justice
| Department and FBI has ever taken--one of a tiny handful of
| times it's ever investigated a president.
|
| Bottom line: The FBI & DOJ must've known they had the goods.
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:25:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
...| 1) The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president
| would have been approved and monitored at the highest level
| of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high
| the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to
| initiate such a politically sensitive search....
|
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| 3) The fact the search apparently didn't leak until
| basically when word came from Donald Trump himself shows
| the FBI and the Justice Department conducted this search by
| the book and a high degree of integrity. No leaks?
| Impressive. Surely only a small team knew inside DOJ....
|
| 4) Taken together, this is one of the most significant,
| sensitive, and politically explosive actions the US Justice
| Department and FBI has ever taken--one of a tiny handful of
| times it's ever investigated a president.
|
| Bottom line: The FBI & DOJ must've known they had the goods.
n.b. The Director of the FBI was appointed by Trump.Yeah, and?
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:25:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
...| 1) The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president
| would have been approved and monitored at the highest level
| of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high
| the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to
| initiate such a politically sensitive search....
|
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| 3) The fact the search apparently didn't leak until
| basically when word came from Donald Trump himself shows
| the FBI and the Justice Department conducted this search by
| the book and a high degree of integrity. No leaks?
| Impressive. Surely only a small team knew inside DOJ....
|
| 4) Taken together, this is one of the most significant,
| sensitive, and politically explosive actions the US Justice
| Department and FBI has ever taken--one of a tiny handful of
| times it's ever investigated a president.
|
| Bottom line: The FBI & DOJ must've known they had the goods.
n.b. The Director of the FBI was appointed by Trump.Yeah, and?
And Trump said that Wray was "impeccably qualified."
--bks
Well, Trump may have stolen public property, destroyed
documents, and tried to overthrow the government, but at
least he didn't get a blowjob; that would have been serious.
--bks
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:49:01 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.|
Sherman) wrote:
Well, Trump may have stolen public property, destroyed
documents, and tried to overthrow the government, but at
least he didn't get a blowjob; that would have been serious.
The Democrats are scared shitless of Trump and this fiasco will bot
help them.. ^^^
Well, Trump may have stolen public property, destroyed
documents, and tried to overthrow the government, but at
least he didn't get a blowjob; that would have been serious.
--bks
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:37:28 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
Blue Lives Matter <Iron_White@Systemic_Patriotism.KMA> wrote:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2022 13:25:46 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K. >>>Sherman) wrote:
...| 1) The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president
| would have been approved and monitored at the highest level
| of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high
| the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to
| initiate such a politically sensitive search....
|
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| 3) The fact the search apparently didn't leak until
| basically when word came from Donald Trump himself shows
| the FBI and the Justice Department conducted this search by
| the book and a high degree of integrity. No leaks?
| Impressive. Surely only a small team knew inside DOJ....
|
| 4) Taken together, this is one of the most significant,
| sensitive, and politically explosive actions the US Justice
| Department and FBI has ever taken--one of a tiny handful of
| times it's ever investigated a president.
|
| Bottom line: The FBI & DOJ must've known they had the goods.
n.b. The Director of the FBI was appointed by Trump.Yeah, and?
And Trump said that Wray was "impeccably qualified."
--bks
And yet again a Trump ally/appointee has risen above partisanship to
do the right thing.
Swill
On 9 Aug 2022 00:53:53 -0000, bks@panix.com (Bradley K. Sherman)
wrote:
|
| "What's the difference between this and Watergate?" Donald
| Trump raged in a statement Monday night after FBI agents.
|
| Well, as a Watergate and FBI historian, four things stand
| out to me:
|
| 1) The idea the FBI launched a raid on a former president
| would have been approved and monitored at the highest level
| of the Justice Department; hard to even imagine how high
| the bar of probable cause must've been for the Bureau to
| initiate such a politically sensitive search....
|
| 2) A search warrant means an independent federal judge ALSO
| signed off on the probable cause and, independently,
| believes evidence there was likely a crime committed AND
| that more evidence would be found at Mar-a-Lago. That's
| huge too.
|
| 3) The fact the search apparently didn't leak until
| basically when word came from Donald Trump himself shows
| the FBI and the Justice Department conducted this search by
| the book and a high degree of integrity. No leaks?
| Impressive. Surely only a small team knew inside DOJ....
|
| 4) Taken together, this is one of the most significant,
| sensitive, and politically explosive actions the US Justice
| Department and FBI has ever taken--one of a tiny handful of
| times it's ever investigated a president.
|
| Bottom line: The FBI & DOJ must've known they had the goods.
|
<https://twitter.com/vermontgmg/status/1556788136507805697>
--bks
Don't celebrate yet Bradley. This has all the makings of a backfire
against the current administration. Oh, and release the warrant NOW.
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ...
<https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any-temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ...
<https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-national-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ...
<https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any- temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ...
<https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-na tional-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:07:44 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ... >><https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any-temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ... >><https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-national-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
More unamed "sources."
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:07:44 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ...
<https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any-temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ...
<https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-national-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
More unamed "sources."
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:07:44 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ... >><https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any-temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ... >><https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-national-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
More unamed "sources."
On 8/16/2022 6:33 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:07:44 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ...
<https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any-temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ...
<https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-national-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
More unamed "sources."
They are reliable. Your pal Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness even relies on them:
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized boxes containing records covered by
attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during
its raid of former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar
with the investigation told Fox News, adding that the Justice
Department opposed Trump lawyers' request for the appointment of an
independent, special master to review the records.
Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that
the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14,
A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final
page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by
attorney-client privilege.
~ Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness — 14 Aug 2022
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/c/I1-pfGSDN_A/m/PuAUdH51BQAJ
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:42:29 -0700, BeamMeUpScotty <BLUE-GIRL-BLOWS-AND-SUCKS@ideocracy.gov> wrote:
On 8/16/2022 6:33 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:07:44 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ...
<https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any-temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ...
<https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-national-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
More unamed "sources."
They are reliable. Your pal Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness even relies on them:
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized boxes containing records covered by
attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during
its raid of former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar >> with the investigation told Fox News, adding that the Justice
Department opposed Trump lawyers' request for the appointment of an
independent, special master to review the records.
Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that
the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14,
A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final >> page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by >> attorney-client privilege.
~ Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness — 14 Aug 2022
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/c/I1-pfGSDN_A/m/PuAUdH51BQAJ
It's so adorable [sic] that
On 8/17/2022 4:14 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:42:29 -0700, BeamMeUpScotty
<BLUE-GIRL-BLOWS-AND-SUCKS@ideocracy.gov> wrote:
On 8/16/2022 6:33 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:07:44 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ...
<https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any-temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ...
<https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-national-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
More unamed "sources."
They are reliable. Your pal Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness even relies on them:
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized boxes containing records covered by
attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during >>> its raid of former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar >>> with the investigation told Fox News, adding that the Justice
Department opposed Trump lawyers' request for the appointment of an
independent, special master to review the records.
Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that
the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14,
A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final >>> page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by >>> attorney-client privilege.
~ Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness — 14 Aug 2022
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/c/I1-pfGSDN_A/m/PuAUdH51BQAJ
It's so adorable [sic] that
What's pathetic is that you have pissed and moaned literally thousands of times
that "source say = BS," then you post a story based on unnamed sources.
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 07:49:14 -0700, BeamMeUpScotty <HARTUNG-IS-A-FAT-FUCK@ideocracy.gov> wrote:
On 8/17/2022 4:14 AM, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 07:42:29 -0700, BeamMeUpScotty
<BLUE-GIRL-BLOWS-AND-SUCKS@ideocracy.gov> wrote:
On 8/16/2022 6:33 AM, Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 13:07:44 -0000 (UTC), bks@panix.com (Bradley K.
Sherman) wrote:
| ...
| DOJ only needs to identify a single classified document to
| charge the former President under the Espionage Act. And
| given the way that Trump is ginning up outrage and attacks
| on FBI agents (which the government cited in explaining the
| need to keep the affidavit sealed), charging him with a
| single count indictment describing (hypothetically) the
| nuclear codes might be a good way to shut everyone up. They
| could use that to offer Trump a plea deal to lesser charges
| while they catalog other documents that each could bear a
| separate 10-year sentence.
| ...
<https://www.emptywheel.net/2022/08/16/trumps-latest-tirade-proves-any-temporary-restraining-order-may-come-too-late/>
|
| Administration sources familiar with the investigation tell
| ABC News the amount and the sensitivity of confidential,
| secret and top-secret documents allegedly discovered in the
| Mar-a-Lago search raise critical national security
| questions that must be urgently addressed.
|
| Those officials say law enforcement and security officials
| must now try to track the chain of custody of the material
| and try to determine if any of the material was compromised.
| ...
<https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi-search-mar-lago-raises-critical-national-security/story?id=88381428>
--bks
More unamed "sources."
They are reliable. Your pal Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness even relies on them:
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI seized boxes containing records covered by
attorney-client privilege and potentially executive privilege during >>>> its raid of former President Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home, sources familiar
with the investigation told Fox News, adding that the Justice
Department opposed Trump lawyers' request for the appointment of an >>>> independent, special master to review the records.
Sources familiar with the investigation told Fox News Saturday that >>>> the former president’s team was informed that boxes labeled A-14, >>>> A-26, A-43, A-13, A-33, and a set of documents—all seen on the final
page of the FBI’s property receipt —contained information covered by
attorney-client privilege.
~ Kremlin Girl / Bit of Nothingness — 14 Aug 2022
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/c/I1-pfGSDN_A/m/PuAUdH51BQAJ
It's so adorable [sic] that
What's pathetic is that you have pissed and moaned literally thousands of times
that "source say = BS," then you post a story based on unnamed sources.
You know Prof. Canoza that
I am a little nugget of dog shit. Yes, I know that. We all know it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 291 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 141:45:33 |
| Calls: | 6,611 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 12,159 |
| Messages: | 5,310,358 |