XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, or.politics, talk.politics.gun
Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.Zwergentö
ter.@gmail.com> wrote in news:
8jj60jt22lnqbvms9b4sj2s8jco3c5r1di@Rudy.Canoza.is.a.forging.cocksuckin g.dwarf.com:
[Default] Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> typed:
That argument can only be made by slimy sophists. The framers
definitely did not anticipate or want the federal government to be
doing the bulk of what it currently does.
The frimers of the Constitution had no inkling of things to come.
There's this thing called "progress" that you absolutely hate.
They most certainly did, which is why they made it the way they did.
They may have guessed a miniscule few things, and they knew things would
change - but they had no idea how things would change. If they could
forsee as you claim, why can't we look ahead 200 years? Hell, you can't
even accurately predict 20 years from now
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)