Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:15:38 -0400
"68hx.1805" <68hx.1804@g5t7x.net> wrote:
Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
The conservate justices on the Supreme Court know Biden isn't
protecting border, and the liberal justices don't care.
Fortunately there are a majority of conservative justices.
When the president of the US won't protect the states from
invasion by a foreign power ,which is his constitutional duty, the
states have to have the power to protect themselves.
In my opinion Biden is a traitor, and should be impeached and
imprisoned.
Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:15:38 -0400, "68hx.1805" <68hx.1804@g5t7x.net>
wrote:
Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
When the feds don't do their job, the states have to take over.
The states have no right
to usurp federal authority.
We had a war over that and
your side lost, remember?
Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:15:38 -0400, "68hx.1805" <68hx.1804@g5t7x.net>
wrote:
Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
When the feds don't do their job, the states have to take over.
The states have no right
to usurp federal authority.
We had a war over that and
your side lost, remember?
Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:49:12 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter wrote:<68hx.1804@g5t7x.net> >> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:15:38 -0400, "68hx.1805"
Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
When the feds don't do their job, the states have to take over.
The states have no right
to usurp federal authority.
We had a war over that and
your side lost, remember?
I'll take the Scotus's word for it over yours
Scotus didn't rule on the case,
they kicked it back to the appeals
court for reconsideration.
Did you not read it at all?
Blue Lives Matter wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:15:38 -0400, "68hx.1805" <68hx.1804@g5t7x.net>
wrote:
Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
When the feds don't do their job, the states have to take over.
The states have no right
to usurp federal authority.
We had a war over that and
your side lost, remember?
NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:49:12 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter wrote:<68hx.1804@g5t7x.net> >> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:15:38 -0400, "68hx.1805"
Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
When the feds don't do their job, the states have to take over.
The states have no right
to usurp federal authority.
We had a war over that and
your side lost, remember?
What do you expect the states to do when the federal government
refuses to do its job of protecting member states?
States have never had authority
to deport people.
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 15:29:10 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
NoBody wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:49:12 +0000, "Lee" <cleetis@gmail.com> wrote:
Blue Lives Matter wrote:<68hx.1804@g5t7x.net> >> wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2024 17:15:38 -0400, "68hx.1805"
Good for Texas - and several other states will surely
create identical laws.
However, this was a partisan decision.
Also, strictly, the FED has the power over immigration
so individual states really ought not be able to take
such power for themselves. OTOH, states blowing-off
federal laws/regs is nothing new. Hey, reefer legal
in yer state ? It's still severely against federal law.
When the feds don't do their job, the states have to take over.
The states have no right
to usurp federal authority.
We had a war over that and
your side lost, remember?
What do you expect the states to do when the federal government
refuses to do its job of protecting member states?
States have never had authority
to deport people.
You didn't answer my question. Please try again.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
| Uptime: | 117:26:45 |
| Calls: | 6,704 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,235 |
| Messages: | 5,349,329 |