• France : Farmers Paralyze Country - "Wokie/Green" DESTROYING Them

    From 68g.1499@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 24 23:37:29 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.eu, alt.politics.france, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.survival

    https://www.france24.com/en/business/20240124-france-farming-crisis-in-numbers

    The protests sweeping across France have cast a renewed focus
    on the plight of farmers, a shrinking and ageing category at
    the mercy of volatile prices and grappling with a bleak
    economic outlook. FRANCE 24 talks to an economist and a
    unionist about the key figures behind France’s farming crisis.

    . . .

    There's an old American saying - "Don't cuss a farmer
    with your mouth full".

    OK France - where DO you get your next meal without
    French farmers ? At what PRICE ? What VULNERABILITY ?

    Wokie/Green SOUNDS so great - but it has serious
    Real Life implications. Very serious ... like
    "My children have no food !" serious.

    Wokie/Green is mostly an IDEOLOGY, a political POV.
    It's meant to SOUND GREAT - lure you in - but when
    you think it though, what Real Stuff happens ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 11:17:42 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.eu, alt.politics.france, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.survival

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 68g.1499 wrote:

    https://www.france24.com/en/business/20240124-france-farming-crisis-in-numbers

    The protests sweeping across France have cast a renewed focus
    on the plight of farmers, a shrinking and ageing category at
    the mercy of volatile prices and grappling with a bleak
    economic outlook. FRANCE 24 talks to an economist and a
    unionist about the key figures behind France’s farming crisis.

    . . .

    There's an old American saying - "Don't cuss a farmer
    with your mouth full".

    OK France - where DO you get your next meal without
    French farmers ? At what PRICE ? What VULNERABILITY ?

    Wokie/Green SOUNDS so great - but it has serious
    Real Life implications. Very serious ... like
    "My children have no food !" serious.

    Wokie/Green is mostly an IDEOLOGY, a political POV.
    It's meant to SOUND GREAT - lure you in - but when
    you think it though, what Real Stuff happens ?

    Wise words! But hopefully the world will wake up. The problem with wokeism
    is that it destroys things too slowly compared with radical socialism, so people don't wake up until a lot of damage has been done.

    With radical socialism it just takes a few years to destroy a country, so people notice it much quicker.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 68g.1499@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 25 18:55:54 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.eu, alt.politics.france, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.survival

    On 1/25/24 5:17 AM, D wrote:


    On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 68g.1499 wrote:

    https://www.france24.com/en/business/20240124-france-farming-crisis-in-numbers


    The protests sweeping across France have cast a renewed focus
    on the plight of farmers, a shrinking and ageing category at
    the mercy of volatile prices and grappling with a bleak
    economic outlook. FRANCE 24 talks to an economist and a
    unionist about the key figures behind France’s farming crisis.

    . . .

     There's an old American saying - "Don't cuss a farmer
     with your mouth full".

     OK France - where DO you get your next meal without
     French farmers ? At what PRICE ? What VULNERABILITY ?

     Wokie/Green SOUNDS so great - but it has serious
     Real Life implications. Very serious ... like
     "My children have no food !" serious.

     Wokie/Green is mostly an IDEOLOGY, a political POV.
     It's meant to SOUND GREAT - lure you in - but when
     you think it though, what Real Stuff happens ?

    Wise words! But hopefully the world will wake up. The problem with
    wokeism is that it destroys things too slowly compared with radical socialism, so people don't wake up until a lot of damage has been done.

    With radical socialism it just takes a few years to destroy a country,
    so people notice it much quicker.


    Ideologists rarely think things through to the devilish
    little details. "Green" sounds great, so long as you stick
    with the broad picture. Alas, at some point the ideology
    sinks down to those little details and the political folks
    either don't understand what's going on or imagine they
    can warp the laws of physics to force Nature to their model.

    Farming is not "fancy", ain't quantum mechanics. While the
    equipment and techniques have improved somewhat, basically
    it's still jamming seeds into the ground and waiting awhile
    in hope something edible results. It requires space, it
    requires water, it requires fertilizers, it often requires
    some forms of weed/insect control. Then food requires post-
    processing and transport and safe storage.

    With generations of good, and very BAD, results farmers tend
    to "stick with what we know works" - play it safe even if it
    may not seem 101% efficient.

    Sorry, given modern realities, you are NOT gonna recruit
    500 peasants to pick the weeds and bugs out of your fields
    on a daily basis and still sell at reasonable prices. The
    plants require as much water as they require, you cannot
    cut back below a certain threshold. Manure can be fair
    fertilizer, but Greenies also want to cut back on meat-
    based foods so that means less manure. (oh, how to make
    asphalt roads "after oil" ? :-)

    Manure can also contain pollutants - lead, mercury, cadmium,
    benzene, salts and anything else the animals/people were
    exposed to. Those will concentrate in the farming soil over
    time until you're farming in a de-facto toxic waste dump.
    Using sewage-based manure also raises the chances of
    dangerous bacteria/fungi/viruses spreading around.

    "Greener WHERE APPLICABLE" is the correct way of thinking,
    but it's not 'pure'/radical enough for those who often
    work their way into higher positions of power/bureaucracy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 12:06:18 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.eu, alt.politics.france, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.survival

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, 68g.1499 wrote:

    On 1/25/24 5:17 AM, D wrote:


    On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 68g.1499 wrote:

    https://www.france24.com/en/business/20240124-france-farming-crisis-in-numbers

    The protests sweeping across France have cast a renewed focus
    on the plight of farmers, a shrinking and ageing category at
    the mercy of volatile prices and grappling with a bleak
    economic outlook. FRANCE 24 talks to an economist and a
    unionist about the key figures behind France’s farming crisis.

    . . .

     There's an old American saying - "Don't cuss a farmer
     with your mouth full".

     OK France - where DO you get your next meal without
     French farmers ? At what PRICE ? What VULNERABILITY ?

     Wokie/Green SOUNDS so great - but it has serious
     Real Life implications. Very serious ... like
     "My children have no food !" serious.

     Wokie/Green is mostly an IDEOLOGY, a political POV.
     It's meant to SOUND GREAT - lure you in - but when
     you think it though, what Real Stuff happens ?

    Wise words! But hopefully the world will wake up. The problem with wokeism >> is that it destroys things too slowly compared with radical socialism, so >> people don't wake up until a lot of damage has been done.

    With radical socialism it just takes a few years to destroy a country, so >> people notice it much quicker.


    Ideologists rarely think things through to the devilish
    little details. "Green" sounds great, so long as you stick
    with the broad picture. Alas, at some point the ideology
    sinks down to those little details and the political folks
    either don't understand what's going on or imagine they
    can warp the laws of physics to force Nature to their model.

    Farming is not "fancy", ain't quantum mechanics. While the
    equipment and techniques have improved somewhat, basically
    it's still jamming seeds into the ground and waiting awhile
    in hope something edible results. It requires space, it
    requires water, it requires fertilizers, it often requires
    some forms of weed/insect control. Then food requires post-
    processing and transport and safe storage.

    With generations of good, and very BAD, results farmers tend
    to "stick with what we know works" - play it safe even if it
    may not seem 101% efficient.

    Sorry, given modern realities, you are NOT gonna recruit
    500 peasants to pick the weeds and bugs out of your fields
    on a daily basis and still sell at reasonable prices. The
    plants require as much water as they require, you cannot
    cut back below a certain threshold. Manure can be fair
    fertilizer, but Greenies also want to cut back on meat-
    based foods so that means less manure. (oh, how to make
    asphalt roads "after oil" ? :-)

    Manure can also contain pollutants - lead, mercury, cadmium,
    benzene, salts and anything else the animals/people were
    exposed to. Those will concentrate in the farming soil over
    time until you're farming in a de-facto toxic waste dump.
    Using sewage-based manure also raises the chances of
    dangerous bacteria/fungi/viruses spreading around.

    "Greener WHERE APPLICABLE" is the correct way of thinking,
    but it's not 'pure'/radical enough for those who often
    work their way into higher positions of power/bureaucracy.


    I'd like to add that there also are examples of green win/win situations
    where both climate hysterics and "deniers" should be able to agree that
    the solution is both greener, cheaper and more efficient. I mean what's
    not to like?

    But for some strange reason the climate hysterics seem to be very
    anti-science sometimes, and their only solution seem to be sacrifice and
    going back to medieval times.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From 68g.1499@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 11:02:16 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.eu, alt.politics.france, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.survival

    On 1/26/24 6:06 AM, D wrote:


    On Thu, 25 Jan 2024, 68g.1499 wrote:

    On 1/25/24 5:17 AM, D wrote:


    On Wed, 24 Jan 2024, 68g.1499 wrote:

    https://www.france24.com/en/business/20240124-france-farming-crisis-in-numbers

    The protests sweeping across France have cast a renewed focus
    on the plight of farmers, a shrinking and ageing category at
    the mercy of volatile prices and grappling with a bleak
    economic outlook. FRANCE 24 talks to an economist and a
    unionist about the key figures behind France’s farming crisis.

    . . .

     There's an old American saying - "Don't cuss a farmer
     with your mouth full".

     OK France - where DO you get your next meal without
     French farmers ? At what PRICE ? What VULNERABILITY ?

     Wokie/Green SOUNDS so great - but it has serious
     Real Life implications. Very serious ... like
     "My children have no food !" serious.

     Wokie/Green is mostly an IDEOLOGY, a political POV.
     It's meant to SOUND GREAT - lure you in - but when
     you think it though, what Real Stuff happens ?

    Wise words! But hopefully the world will wake up. The problem with
    wokeism is that it destroys things too slowly compared with radical
    socialism, so people don't wake up until a lot of damage has been done.

    With radical socialism it just takes a few years to destroy a
    country, so people notice it much quicker.


     Ideologists rarely think things through to the devilish
     little details. "Green" sounds great, so long as you stick
     with the broad picture. Alas, at some point the ideology
     sinks down to those little details and the political folks
     either don't understand what's going on or imagine they
     can warp the laws of physics to force Nature to their model.

     Farming is not "fancy", ain't quantum mechanics. While the
     equipment and techniques have improved somewhat, basically
     it's still jamming seeds into the ground and waiting awhile
     in hope something edible results. It requires space, it
     requires water, it requires fertilizers, it often requires
     some forms of weed/insect control. Then food requires post-
     processing and transport and safe storage.

     With generations of good, and very BAD, results farmers tend
     to "stick with what we know works" - play it safe even if it
     may not seem 101% efficient.

     Sorry, given modern realities, you are NOT gonna recruit
     500 peasants to pick the weeds and bugs out of your fields
     on a daily basis and still sell at reasonable prices. The
     plants require as much water as they require, you cannot
     cut back below a certain threshold. Manure can be fair
     fertilizer, but Greenies also want to cut back on meat-
     based foods so that means less manure. (oh, how to make
     asphalt roads "after oil" ?  :-)

     Manure can also contain pollutants - lead, mercury, cadmium,
     benzene, salts and anything else the animals/people were
     exposed to. Those will concentrate in the farming soil over
     time until you're farming in a de-facto toxic waste dump.
     Using sewage-based manure also raises the chances of
     dangerous bacteria/fungi/viruses spreading around.

     "Greener WHERE APPLICABLE" is the correct way of thinking,
     but it's not 'pure'/radical enough for those who often
     work their way into higher positions of power/bureaucracy.


    I'd like to add that there also are examples of green win/win situations where both climate hysterics and "deniers" should be able to agree that
    the solution is both greener, cheaper and more efficient. I mean what's
    not to like?

    As said, "where applicable" - and sometimes everybody CAN win.

    But the fanatics don't really WANT that - they want an evil
    enemy they can crush.

    But for some strange reason the climate hysterics seem to be very anti-science sometimes, and their only solution seem to be sacrifice and going back to medieval times.

    Science tells them what they CAN do ... which may not
    be what they WANT to do.

    As for medieval times - the pop would blow through every
    single resource ... things were very inefficient - wood
    fires, no clean water, land-destroying farming methods.
    Of course the ultrahigh death rate would soon get rid of
    95% of the pop ... but because the last of the resources
    will be used, it'd get the other 5% soon enough. Might be
    a few Afghan goatherds left. Humans won't be the only
    thing to die off either ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)