On 29-September-2014 11:03 AM, mur@.not. wrote:There is NO EVIDENCE. So if you are waiting for some evidence from God
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:42:23 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> wrote:
..
"felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen
news:c8l6qoF7l3bU1@mid.individual.net...
On 26-September-2014 8:00 PM, Malte Runz wrote:(snip)
Actually it is you who has to defend the possible existence of
Dog-heads, Aliens and probings, Atlantis, Bigfoot and so on, in order to >>>> being to claim that simple heresay is evidence for the existence of
gods.
http://is.gd/jKsoLtso there's NO evidence for Bigfoot, the Loch Ness Monster, UFO's, etc., >>> etc., ...That's right. There isn't.
http://www.ufoevidence.org/
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
Would they be able to post at all?
What lies?
In article <c9bkp3F1c8qU1@mid.individual.net>,
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
On 29-September-2014 11:03 AM, mur@.not. wrote:There is NO EVIDENCE. So if you are waiting for some evidence from God
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:42:23 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> > wrote:
..
"felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen
news:c8l6qoF7l3bU1@mid.individual.net...
On 26-September-2014 8:00 PM, Malte Runz wrote:(snip)
Actually it is you who has to defend the possible existence of
Dog-heads, Aliens and probings, Atlantis, Bigfoot and so on, in order to
being to claim that simple heresay is evidence for the existence of
gods.
you are making a mistake. ...
... God explained thru his servant Paul ...
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
Would they be able to post at all?
What lies?
GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the
Christ. He is anti-christ that denieth the father and the son" (1 John
2)
In article <c9bkp3F1c8qU1@mid.individual.net>,
felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> wrote:
On 29-September-2014 11:03 AM, mur@.not. wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:42:23 +0200, "Malte Runz" <malte_runz@forgitit.dk> >> > wrote:
..
"felix_unger" skrev i meddelelsen
news:c8l6qoF7l3bU1@mid.individual.net...
On 26-September-2014 8:00 PM, Malte Runz wrote:(snip)
Actually it is you who has to defend the possible existence of
Dog-heads, Aliens and probings, Atlantis, Bigfoot and so on, in order to
being to claim that simple heresay is evidence for the existence of
gods.
There is NO EVIDENCE. So if you are waiting for some evidence from God
you are making a mistake. God explained thru his servant Paul that he >deselected "evidence" and chose another way called TRUST. He chose the >"foolishness of preaching" to save them that believe."
AGAIN "The Jews require a sign and the Greeks seek after wisdom but we
preach Christ crucified, unto the Jews a stumblingblock and unto the
Greeks foolishness but unto them which are called, both Jews and Greeks, >Christ the power of God and the wisdom of God." (1 Cor 1:22 KJV)
Jimbo
They have no need to, so most of them don't!
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:55:14 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote:
They have no need to, so most of them don't!
Well, it is true
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
Would they be able to post at all?
What lies?
GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the
Christ. He is anti-christ that denieth the father and the son" (1 John
2)
Jimbo
Kaptain Krunch wrote:
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
Would they be able to post at all?
What lies?
GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ. He is anti-christ that denieth the father and the son" (1 John
2)
Jimbo
John differs so much from the other gospels some consider it to have
been written by a Gnostic than a Jew, considering that the Gospel of
John has literally hundreds of examples of Gnostic influences on the
writings penned by the author, whom also presumably wrote the Book of Revelations, which is literally a twelve hour acid trip through Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven all at once. No, seriously, the Book of
Revelations is like having a guy translate it from English into Farsi,
then into Hebrew, then into Basque, then to have it translated back into English by a guy who spoke only Chinese.
The author of John presumably had a bias against Jews, considering he
treats the Jews a bit less mercifully than, say, the Synoptic Gospels.
The Synoptic Gospels are so much alike, they had to all be based off of
Mark, which in turn was based off of another, lost gospel called the "Q Gospel", which contained a lot of Jesus's supposed sayings.
Considering that the use of hallucinogens was a common feature of
religious ceremonies, it wouldn't be surprising if the author of
Revelations was seriously dosed up on Acid or something. When Moses saw
the burning bush, don't you think it would've occurred to him to lay off
the ganja?
In article <5m9tgbt92l963a5ujv81tbtj0fg7o6t6tv@4ax.com>,
duke <duck32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:55:14 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote:
They have no need to, so most of them don't!
Well, it is true
As soon as ducksoup says that, I immediately check to be sure he doesn't
have his hand on my wallet.
In article <nemqu8$8kk$1@news.albasani.net>,
Oxyaena <oxyaena@invalid.invalid> wrote:
Kaptain Krunch wrote:DENIED. Actually the above is your business and not mine. If you have
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>John differs so much from the other gospels some consider it to have
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
Would they be able to post at all?
What lies?
GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the
Christ. He is anti-christ that denieth the father and the son" (1 John
2)
Jimbo
been written by a Gnostic than a Jew, considering that the Gospel of
John has literally hundreds of examples of Gnostic influences on the
writings penned by the author, whom also presumably wrote the Book of
Revelations, which is literally a twelve hour acid trip through Hell,
Purgatory, and Heaven all at once. No, seriously, the Book of
Revelations is like having a guy translate it from English into Farsi,
then into Hebrew, then into Basque, then to have it translated back into
English by a guy who spoke only Chinese.
The author of John presumably had a bias against Jews, considering he
treats the Jews a bit less mercifully than, say, the Synoptic Gospels.
The Synoptic Gospels are so much alike, they had to all be based off of
Mark, which in turn was based off of another, lost gospel called the "Q
Gospel", which contained a lot of Jesus's supposed sayings.
Considering that the use of hallucinogens was a common feature of
religious ceremonies, it wouldn't be surprising if the author of
Revelations was seriously dosed up on Acid or something. When Moses saw
the burning bush, don't you think it would've occurred to him to lay off
the ganja?
done your homework who am I to dispute?
Jimbo
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:02:25 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote:
In article <5m9tgbt92l963a5ujv81tbtj0fg7o6t6tv@4ax.com>,
duke <duck32@cox.net> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 09:55:14 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote:
They have no need to, so most of them don't!
Well, it is true
As soon as ducksoup says that, I immediately check to be sure he doesn't >have his hand on my wallet.
What did you find?
the dukester, American-American
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:02:07 -0600, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote:
In article <pilgrim2-89BDB5.02455012042016@news.giganews.com>,
Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> wrote:
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
Would they be able to post at all?
What lies?
GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the
Christ
That assumes without evidence that there is any such thing as a "Christ"
You have no idea if the author had evidence or not. You appear to have strong faith he did not, but your own faith is all you've got and I have no reason to put any faith in your faith being correct.
By the way, just what is "Christ" in your lexicon?
LOL... You claimed there is no evidence for something and then reveal
that
you don't even know what is being referred to by the term.
On 15-April-2016 4:12 AM, Virgil wrote:
In article <d1mvgb15glftr3nu2ohfcjj184l6ohdbi9@4ax.com>, mur@. wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:02:07 -0600, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote: >>Until the author defines or explains what he means by "being the Christ", nobody but that author can know what that author means by it.
In article <pilgrim2-89BDB5.02455012042016@news.giganews.com>,strong faith he did not, but your own faith is all you've got and I have no
Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> wrote:
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>That assumes without evidence that there is any such thing as a "Christ" >> You have no idea if the author had evidence or not. You appear to have
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the >>>> Christ
Would they be able to post at all?What lies?
reason to put any faith in your faith being correct.
Do you know? It is not something in everyone's lexicon. And I strongly suspect that it has many different meanings for those for whom it hasBy the way, just what is "Christ" in your lexicon?LOL... You claimed there is no evidence for something and then reveal >> that
you don't even know what is being referred to by the term.
any meaning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ
In article <d1mvgb15glftr3nu2ohfcjj184l6ohdbi9@4ax.com>, mur@. wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:02:07 -0600, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote: >>Until the author defines or explains what he means by "being the Christ", nobody but that author can know what that author means by it.
In article <pilgrim2-89BDB5.02455012042016@news.giganews.com>,You have no idea if the author had evidence or not. You appear to have >> strong faith he did not, but your own faith is all you've got and I have no >> reason to put any faith in your faith being correct.
Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> wrote:
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>That assumes without evidence that there is any such thing as a "Christ"
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the
Would they be able to post at all?What lies?
Christ
Do you know? It is not something in everyone's lexicon. And I strongly suspect that it has many different meanings for those for whom it hasBy the way, just what is "Christ" in your lexicon?LOL... You claimed there is no evidence for something and then reveal >> that
you don't even know what is being referred to by the term.
any meaning.
In article <d1mvgb15glftr3nu2ohfcjj184l6ohdbi9@4ax.com>, mur@. wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:02:07 -0600, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote: >>
In article <pilgrim2-89BDB5.02455012042016@news.giganews.com>,
Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> wrote:
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
Would they be able to post at all?
What lies?
GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the
Christ
That assumes without evidence that there is any such thing as a "Christ"
You have no idea if the author had evidence or not. You appear to have >> strong faith he did not, but your own faith is all you've got and I have no >> reason to put any faith in your faith being correct.
Until the author defines or explains what he means by "being the Christ", >nobody but that author can know what that author means by it.
By the way, just what is "Christ" in your lexicon?
LOL... You claimed there is no evidence for something and then reveal
that
you don't even know what is being referred to by the term.
Do you know? It is not something in everyone's lexicon. ANd I strongly >suspect that it has many different meanings for those for whom it has
any meaning.
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 12:12:56 -0600, Virgil <VIRGIL@VIRGIL.com> wrote:
In article <d1mvgb15glftr3nu2ohfcjj184l6ohdbi9@4ax.com>, mur@. wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:02:07 -0600, Wisely Non-Theist <aaa@bbb.ccc> wrote: >>
In article <pilgrim2-89BDB5.02455012042016@news.giganews.com>,You have no idea if the author had evidence or not. You appear to have >> strong faith he did not, but your own faith is all you've got and I have >> no
Kaptain Krunch <pilgrim2@polypen.com> wrote:
In article <lur43h$4h6$1@dont-email.me>, Olrik <olrik666@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Le 2014-09-10 14:47, mur@.not. a écrit :
Would they be able to post at all?
What lies?
GREAT QUESTION. "Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the >> >> Christ
That assumes without evidence that there is any such thing as a "Christ" >>
reason to put any faith in your faith being correct.
Until the author defines or explains what he means by "being the Christ", >nobody but that author can know what that author means by it.
Except for you who somehow knows there's no evidence.
By the way, just what is "Christ" in your lexicon?
LOL... You claimed there is no evidence for something and then reveal >> that
you don't even know what is being referred to by the term.
Do you know? It is not something in everyone's lexicon. ANd I strongly >suspect that it has many different meanings for those for whom it has
any meaning.
So you somehow know there's no evidence for any of the meanings, or at
least
you'd like people to think you somehow can know it.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 294 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 245:49:50 |
| Calls: | 6,626 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,175 |
| Messages: | 5,320,569 |