• Sceince and Truth by Coyne

    From Glenn@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 22 14:57:05 2023
    "Let me just say it comes from many various areas of biology: embryology, the fossil record, morphology, genetics, biogeography. All these different areas come together to show that evolution, in fact, is true. As true as anything is in science."

    https://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/28552-evolution-and-atheism-best-friends-forever-jerry-coyne

    And for those here that say atheism comes more from criticism of religion than evolution:

    'Here's my thesis for the evening: The fact of evolution is not only inherently atheistic, it is inherently anti-theistic. It goes against the notion that there is a god.
    Accepting evolution and science tends to promote the acceptance of atheism."

    Coyne isn't just some round about nutjob atheist like most here, so he should be taken seriously. Consider the definition and use of the word 'evolution' and that it is atheistic, even inherently anti-theistic. Why would such an atheist lie?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to Glenn on Sat Jul 22 17:07:21 2023
    On 7/22/23 2:57 PM, Glenn wrote:
    "Let me just say it comes from many various areas of biology: embryology, the fossil record, morphology, genetics, biogeography. All these different areas come together to show that evolution, in fact, is true. As true as anything is in science."

    https://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/28552-evolution-and-atheism-best-friends-forever-jerry-coyne

    And for those here that say atheism comes more from criticism of religion than evolution:

    'Here's my thesis for the evening: The fact of evolution is not only inherently atheistic, it is inherently anti-theistic. It goes against the notion that there is a god.
    Accepting evolution and science tends to promote the acceptance of atheism."

    Coyne isn't just some round about nutjob atheist like most here, so he should be taken seriously. Consider the definition and use of the word 'evolution' and that it is atheistic, even inherently anti-theistic. Why would such an atheist lie?


    What makes you think Coyne isn't a nutjob? Why can't he be mistaken
    rather than lying? You're making a lot of unwarranted assumptions here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Sun Jul 23 02:01:53 2023
    John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 7/22/23 2:57 PM, Glenn wrote:
    "Let me just say it comes from many various areas of biology:
    embryology, the fossil record, morphology, genetics, biogeography. All
    these different areas come together to show that evolution, in fact, is
    true. As true as anything is in science."

    https://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/28552-evolution-and-atheism-best-friends-forever-jerry-coyne

    And for those here that say atheism comes more from criticism of religion than evolution:

    'Here's my thesis for the evening: The fact of evolution is not only
    inherently atheistic, it is inherently anti-theistic. It goes against
    the notion that there is a god.
    Accepting evolution and science tends to promote the acceptance of atheism." >>
    Coyne isn't just some round about nutjob atheist like most here, so he
    should be taken seriously. Consider the definition and use of the word
    'evolution' and that it is atheistic, even inherently anti-theistic. Why
    would such an atheist lie?


    What makes you think Coyne isn't a nutjob? Why can't he be mistaken
    rather than lying? You're making a lot of unwarranted assumptions here.

    Weirdest thing is that truth be told Glenn and Coyne are probably pretty
    close on culture war issues, especially when it comes to how trans people should be regarded.

    As for atheism it was my taking the Judaic and Christian parts of the scriptures seriously that turned me more toward atheism than an
    understanding of evolutionary biology *per se* and I have thought Coyne too harsh on accommodationists and so-called faithiests and had too much a bee
    in his bonnet toward Templeton (they did bankroll interesting stuff like
    free will symposia at FSU).

    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the shark in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Glenn@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 22 20:15:03 2023
    On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 7:05:48 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    John Harshman <john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 7/22/23 2:57 PM, Glenn wrote:
    "Let me just say it comes from many various areas of biology:
    embryology, the fossil record, morphology, genetics, biogeography. All
    these different areas come together to show that evolution, in fact, is >> true. As true as anything is in science."

    https://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/28552-evolution-and-atheism-best-friends-forever-jerry-coyne

    And for those here that say atheism comes more from criticism of religion than evolution:

    'Here's my thesis for the evening: The fact of evolution is not only
    inherently atheistic, it is inherently anti-theistic. It goes against
    the notion that there is a god.
    Accepting evolution and science tends to promote the acceptance of atheism."

    Coyne isn't just some round about nutjob atheist like most here, so he
    should be taken seriously. Consider the definition and use of the word
    'evolution' and that it is atheistic, even inherently anti-theistic. Why >> would such an atheist lie?


    What makes you think Coyne isn't a nutjob? Why can't he be mistaken
    rather than lying? You're making a lot of unwarranted assumptions here.

    Weirdest thing is that truth be told Glenn and Coyne are probably pretty close on culture war issues, especially when it comes to how trans people should be regarded.

    As for atheism it was my taking the Judaic and Christian parts of the scriptures seriously that turned me more toward atheism than an understanding of evolutionary biology *per se* and I have thought Coyne too harsh on accommodationists and so-called faithiests and had too much a bee in his bonnet toward Templeton (they did bankroll interesting stuff like free will symposia at FSU).

    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the shark
    in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.

    Nothing here in response to the OP. Maybe Coyne dislikes hot wings too. Who cares what you claim turned you toward atheism?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Glenn@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Sat Jul 22 20:11:35 2023
    On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 5:10:50 PM UTC-7, John Harshman wrote:
    On 7/22/23 2:57 PM, Glenn wrote:
    "Let me just say it comes from many various areas of biology: embryology, the fossil record, morphology, genetics, biogeography. All these different areas come together to show that evolution, in fact, is true. As true as anything is in science."

    https://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/28552-evolution-and-atheism-best-friends-forever-jerry-coyne

    And for those here that say atheism comes more from criticism of religion than evolution:

    'Here's my thesis for the evening: The fact of evolution is not only inherently atheistic, it is inherently anti-theistic. It goes against the notion that there is a god.
    Accepting evolution and science tends to promote the acceptance of atheism."

    Coyne isn't just some round about nutjob atheist like most here, so he should be taken seriously. Consider the definition and use of the word 'evolution' and that it is atheistic, even inherently anti-theistic. Why would such an atheist lie?

    What makes you think Coyne isn't a nutjob? Why can't he be mistaken
    rather than lying? You're making a lot of unwarranted assumptions here.

    What makes me think you aren't a nutjob? Why would he be lying? Why can't you be mistaken? You're making a lot of unwarranted assumptions here. Coyne is a respected academic and scientist, a professor at a prestigious university. He has written
    extensively on evolution and is well known. Seems you would throw him under the bus because your crackpot ideas conflict with his.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to Glenn on Sun Jul 23 03:23:41 2023
    Glenn <GlennSheldon@msn.com> wrote:
    On Saturday, July 22, 2023 at 7:05:48 PM UTC-7, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    John Harshman <john.h...@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 7/22/23 2:57 PM, Glenn wrote:
    "Let me just say it comes from many various areas of biology:
    embryology, the fossil record, morphology, genetics, biogeography. All >>>> these different areas come together to show that evolution, in fact, is >>>> true. As true as anything is in science."

    https://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/28552-evolution-and-atheism-best-friends-forever-jerry-coyne


    And for those here that say atheism comes more from criticism of
    religion than evolution:

    'Here's my thesis for the evening: The fact of evolution is not only
    inherently atheistic, it is inherently anti-theistic. It goes against
    the notion that there is a god.
    Accepting evolution and science tends to promote the acceptance of atheism."

    Coyne isn't just some round about nutjob atheist like most here, so he >>>> should be taken seriously. Consider the definition and use of the word >>>> 'evolution' and that it is atheistic, even inherently anti-theistic. Why >>>> would such an atheist lie?


    What makes you think Coyne isn't a nutjob? Why can't he be mistaken
    rather than lying? You're making a lot of unwarranted assumptions here.

    Weirdest thing is that truth be told Glenn and Coyne are probably pretty
    close on culture war issues, especially when it comes to how trans people
    should be regarded.

    As for atheism it was my taking the Judaic and Christian parts of the
    scriptures seriously that turned me more toward atheism than an
    understanding of evolutionary biology *per se* and I have thought Coyne too >> harsh on accommodationists and so-called faithiests and had too much a bee >> in his bonnet toward Templeton (they did bankroll interesting stuff like
    free will symposia at FSU).

    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the shark
    in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.

    Nothing here in response to the OP. Maybe Coyne dislikes hot wings too.
    Who cares what you claim turned you toward atheism?

    I love hot wings so not sure what you are getting at. He has posted about favorite BBQ joints in Texas. No expectation of you making a relevant point
    on this thread any time soon as that is definitely not your strong point.
    You suck at follow ups and pretty much anything else you attempt here. You
    are good at sucking at stuff though. Good job.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Athel Cornish-Bowden@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 23 09:51:31 2023
    On 2023-07-23 02:01:53 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:


    [ … ]


    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the shark
    in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.

    I got fed up with Jerry Coyne several years ago when he made it plain
    that he thinks that Palestinians have no right to exist and that
    everything Israel does is good.

    I don't think he's a nutjob, however.

    I liked his book Why Evolution is True more than I liked Richard
    Dawkins's book on the same subject published at about the same time.

    --
    athel cb : Biochemical Evolution, Garland Science, 2016

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Glenn@21:1/5 to Athel Cornish-Bowden on Sun Jul 23 01:25:02 2023
    On Sunday, July 23, 2023 at 12:55:49 AM UTC-7, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2023-07-23 02:01:53 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:


    [ … ]

    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the shark
    in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.
    I got fed up with Jerry Coyne several years ago when he made it plain
    that he thinks that Palestinians have no right to exist and that
    everything Israel does is good.

    Support that, fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Martin Harran@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 23 09:39:23 2023
    On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 14:57:05 -0700 (PDT), Glenn <GlennSheldon@msn.com>
    wrote:

    "Let me just say it comes from many various areas of biology: embryology, the fossil record, morphology, genetics, biogeography. All these different areas come together to show that evolution, in fact, is true. As true as anything is in science."

    https://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/28552-evolution-and-atheism-best-friends-forever-jerry-coyne

    And for those here that say atheism comes more from criticism of religion than evolution:

    'Here's my thesis for the evening: The fact of evolution is not only inherently atheistic, it is inherently anti-theistic. It goes against the notion that there is a god.
    Accepting evolution and science tends to promote the acceptance of atheism."

    Coyne isn't just some round about nutjob atheist like most here, so he should be taken seriously. Consider the definition and use of the word 'evolution' and that it is atheistic, even inherently anti-theistic. Why would such an atheist lie?


    Gerry Coyne and Richard Dawkins have a lot in common - they are both outstandingly good at writing about science but total pricks when it
    comes to religion. Their hatred of people like Ken Ham has turned them
    into the mirror image of those people.

    I seriously doubt, by the way, if either of them has ever converted an
    actual religious believer, the cheers for them seem to all come from
    the already converted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *Hemidactylus*@21:1/5 to John Harshman on Sun Jul 23 13:58:45 2023
    John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 7/23/23 12:51 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2023-07-23 02:01:53 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:


    [ … ]


    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the >>> shark
    in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.

    I got fed up with Jerry Coyne several years ago when he made it plain
    that he thinks that Palestinians have no right to exist and that
    everything Israel does is good.

    I don't think he's a nutjob, however.

    I liked his book Why Evolution is True more than I liked Richard
    Dawkins's book on the same subject published at about the same time.

    Jerry can be a nutjob and still do good science and write good books.
    Think of Linus Pauling and vitamin C. Never read Why Evolution is True,
    but Speciation is brilliant. Still, he has quite a few wacko opinions.

    Why Evolution is True is really good. Faith Versus Fact is a mixed bag and
    more down the new atheist promotional path. Speciation I haven’t read.
    Seems it might be too technical for my taste. Price range doesn’t seem too bad at the moment.

    Yeah Coyne is too one sided on the Palestinian/Israeli issue, is way too
    quick to assume antisemitism, and has been captured by the antiwoke mind
    virus. He also seems to think quality rock music effectively ended in the
    60s with the Beatles or something like that. Boomers! Gen Z had the best
    rock music after glam metal ended.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Harshman@21:1/5 to Athel Cornish-Bowden on Sun Jul 23 06:30:49 2023
    On 7/23/23 12:51 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2023-07-23 02:01:53 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:


    [ … ]


    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the
    shark
    in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.

    I got fed up with Jerry Coyne several years ago when he made it plain
    that he thinks that Palestinians have no right to exist and that
    everything Israel does is good.

    I don't think he's a nutjob, however.

    I liked his book Why Evolution is True more than I liked Richard
    Dawkins's book on the same subject published at about the same time.

    Jerry can be a nutjob and still do good science and write good books.
    Think of Linus Pauling and vitamin C. Never read Why Evolution is True,
    but Speciation is brilliant. Still, he has quite a few wacko opinions.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jillery@21:1/5 to john.harshman@gmail.com on Sun Jul 23 10:25:37 2023
    On Sun, 23 Jul 2023 06:30:49 -0700, John Harshman
    <john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 7/23/23 12:51 AM, Athel Cornish-Bowden wrote:
    On 2023-07-23 02:01:53 +0000, *Hemidactylus* said:


    [ … ]


    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the >>> shark
    in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.

    I got fed up with Jerry Coyne several years ago when he made it plain
    that he thinks that Palestinians have no right to exist and that
    everything Israel does is good.

    I don't think he's a nutjob, however.

    I liked his book Why Evolution is True more than I liked Richard
    Dawkins's book on the same subject published at about the same time.

    Jerry can be a nutjob and still do good science and write good books.
    Think of Linus Pauling and vitamin C. Never read Why Evolution is True,
    but Speciation is brilliant. Still, he has quite a few wacko opinions.


    Even Newton dabbled in alchemy, so Coyne is in good company. Among
    his greater infamies is his consultation to defense team that got OJ a
    "not guilty" verdict.

    --
    You're entitled to your own opinions.
    You're not entitled to your own facts.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RonO@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 23 11:07:31 2023
    On 7/22/2023 9:01 PM, *Hemidactylus* wrote:
    John Harshman <john.harshman@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 7/22/23 2:57 PM, Glenn wrote:
    "Let me just say it comes from many various areas of biology:
    embryology, the fossil record, morphology, genetics, biogeography. All
    these different areas come together to show that evolution, in fact, is
    true. As true as anything is in science."

    https://ffrf.org/publications/freethought-today/item/28552-evolution-and-atheism-best-friends-forever-jerry-coyne

    And for those here that say atheism comes more from criticism of religion than evolution:

    'Here's my thesis for the evening: The fact of evolution is not only
    inherently atheistic, it is inherently anti-theistic. It goes against
    the notion that there is a god.
    Accepting evolution and science tends to promote the acceptance of atheism."

    Coyne isn't just some round about nutjob atheist like most here, so he
    should be taken seriously. Consider the definition and use of the word
    'evolution' and that it is atheistic, even inherently anti-theistic. Why >>> would such an atheist lie?


    What makes you think Coyne isn't a nutjob? Why can't he be mistaken
    rather than lying? You're making a lot of unwarranted assumptions here.

    Weirdest thing is that truth be told Glenn and Coyne are probably pretty close on culture war issues, especially when it comes to how trans people should be regarded.

    As for atheism it was my taking the Judaic and Christian parts of the scriptures seriously that turned me more toward atheism than an
    understanding of evolutionary biology *per se* and I have thought Coyne too harsh on accommodationists and so-called faithiests and had too much a bee
    in his bonnet toward Templeton (they did bankroll interesting stuff like
    free will symposia at FSU).

    But that’s not really my beef with recent Coyne crap. He’s jumped the shark
    in a way that would make Desantis proud as an ally.


    My take is that Coyne is wrong and mixing up Biblical literalistic
    theism with belief in God. He is doing the same thing Glenn is guilty
    of when Glenn claims that "evolutionists" are atheists. Glenn and Coyne
    both likely understand that they are wrong because you have ID perps
    like Behe and Denton that admit that biological evolution is a fact of
    nature, but still support their IDiotic god hypothesis. Many Christian denominations have no issue with biological evolution.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acceptance_of_evolution_by_religious_groups

    https://biologos.org/articles/famous-christians-who-believed-evolution-is-compatible-with-christian-faith

    It appears that Coyne is just as wrong about this as Glenn is.

    Ron Okimoto

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)