• Feelings

    From Glenn@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 21 11:15:14 2023
    "Darwin himself was interested in Eozoön and its promise for his position. He introduced Eozoön into the fourth edition of The Origin of Species: “After reading Dr. Carpenter’s description of this remarkable fossil, it is impossible to feel any
    doubt regarding its organic nature.” Darwin cited Eozoön in his famous tenth chapter, “On the Imperfection of the Geological Record,” as an indication that gaps in the paleontological record were being filled, and that as the origins of life were
    pushed back, natural selection became a more reasonable mechanism of evolution"

    https://evolutionnews.org/2023/07/fossil-friday-eozoon-the-dawn-animal-fallen-from-grace/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From RonO@21:1/5 to Glenn on Fri Jul 21 17:42:57 2023
    On 7/21/2023 1:15 PM, Glenn wrote:
    "Darwin himself was interested in Eozoön and its promise for his position. He introduced Eozoön into the fourth edition of The Origin of Species: “After reading Dr. Carpenter’s description of this remarkable fossil, it is impossible to feel any
    doubt regarding its organic nature.” Darwin cited Eozoön in his famous tenth chapter, “On the Imperfection of the Geological Record,” as an indication that gaps in the paleontological record were being filled, and that as the origins of life were
    pushed back, natural selection became a more reasonable mechanism of evolution"

    https://evolutionnews.org/2023/07/fossil-friday-eozoon-the-dawn-animal-fallen-from-grace/


    More switch scam junk that isn't supposed to have anything to do with
    IDiocy. Why do you think that the ID perps keep feeding you this junk?
    You have to understand that it doesn't make IDiocy any more of a bogus
    scam that you know that it is, so why do this to yourself? The ID perps
    even tell the rubes that this type of switch scam denial doesn't have
    anything to do with the ID science. Sure they lie alot because the
    stupid denial of anything and everything is all they ever had, but they
    do tell IDiot rubes like you that the switch scam junk is not the ID
    science. What does Luskin tell you about ID and how it should be defenced?

    https://evolutionnews.org/2021/12/what-is-intelligent-design-and-how-should-we-defend-it/

    Still recommended at the ID perp scam creationist news site.


    Have you ever gotten anything from the ID perps that you wanted to
    become something that amounted to any postive evidence for IDiocy? Why
    haven't you ever gotten any valid ID science out of the ID perps? Do
    you ever expect to get any?

    PreCambrian fossil evidence of life on this planet has obviously been
    found since this early find, so what is the point of lying to yourself
    about this junk? Just because someone was wrong about something in the
    past doesn't mean that everything that has been discovered since then is
    bogus. Only IDiots have that mentality, mainly because all they have is
    that type of stupidity going for them. The Top Six were used by the
    scientific creationists before they lost in the Supreme Court and the
    junk was found to be no evidence worth calling creation science, and
    what has it amounted to for the ID scam. Kalk and Bill quit the ID scam
    rather than have to deal with the Top Six as the best god-of-the-gaps
    junk they had. They never wanted the ID perps to accomplish any ID
    science. What would you do if Behe ever found his 3 neutral mutations
    in some protein that changed the function so that it would work in the
    evolving flagellum over a billion years ago?

    Ron Okimoto

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)