• Replace Gun Prohibitions With Persecution Of Malintentions

    From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to All on Sun May 23 00:49:36 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans

    All a police officer has to do, is ask do if someone has any malintentions with these weapons? If "no," they are 100% legal.

    It's just simply not wrong to possess a weapon. It's not wrong as a matter of fact and scientific unadulterated truth. Possession of weapons is not wrong. It's
    fact. Those who believe democracy authors the law, don't believe in the law at all, so how can they advocate such law? They believe in democracy, but not in the
    law. And why would one believe in democracy, or the republic, and not science, truth, god and man?

    "Thug life" is what anti-gunners validly have a grievance against. "Thug life" writes songs about blowing each other away, echoing their un-civilization, whilst
    glorifying it. So the valid grievance would be to persecute gangsters who have guns, if malintent is what it is. Then, it's not legal to be in a gang, and you
    could persecute gangsters period for their malintent, but you could persecute gangsters who have guns all the more. But if people don't have malintentions, possession of weapons is not illegal. They can be very upstanding advocates of liberty, respect and justice, and have all the guns in the world - in their car.
    It's like bolt cutters and lock picking sets are 100% legal, unless one's caught
    with them in a "Catsuit" at 1:00am or there's suspicion of malintention. Gainfully
    employed people don't commit petty burglary, and their bolt cutters and lock picking sets are generally not suspicious. Same with terrorists and gasoline. We
    all have gasoline, but terrorists are suspected of malintention, while good people
    drive around with extra gasoline cans on the back of their Jeeps. So if you agree
    with this legal theory of malintention by itself being enough to condemn for crime. Otherwise there's nothing at all, and you'll have to find holistic solutions, - increase the wealth, decrease the population, share the poverty equally.

    Massacres have nothing to do with it, are 100% a red herring, are committed by poor unemployed upset students, and the like, and merely require a crowd. 100% of
    the people who commit massacres have no criminal record and got their guns before
    mal-activity. Once one commits a massacre, there's not a second offense. Guns,
    vehicles, knives will all do the same for massacres. It's crap to say it's okay
    to ban guns for massacres, because that's a non-argument. It's crap to say it's
    okay to ban guns for no reason, as it's crap to say, it's a crime to be Jewish. It
    truly is prejudice and abhorrent. People who enforce such laws are scum. And I
    don't agree to give my name to buy a gun.

    There is not a right to ban guns for no reason, or because people who bear guns are different than you.

    The rules of self-defense and engagement, need to be better identified, but fearing a big man is what fearing a gun is, and anyone can throw rocks at anyone's
    head.

    People do keep and bear guns for sport and hobby. There's nothing wrong with being an aficionado, an enthusiast, or a gun lover. When to use the gun, against
    another person, is the question. Not because they threw popcorn or water on you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to Intelligent Party on Sat Sep 4 12:14:27 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans

    On 5/23/2021 12:49 AM, Intelligent Party wrote:
    All a police officer has to do, is ask do if someone has any malintentions with
    these weapons? If "no," they are 100% legal.

    It's just simply not wrong to possess a weapon. It's not wrong as a matter of
    fact and scientific unadulterated truth. Possession of weapons is not wrong. It's
    fact. Those who believe democracy authors the law, don't believe in the law at
    all, so how can they advocate such law? They believe in democracy, but not in the
    law. And why would one believe in democracy, or the republic, and not science,
    truth, god and man?

    "Thug life" is what anti-gunners validly have a grievance against. "Thug life"
    writes songs about blowing each other away, echoing their un-civilization, whilst
    glorifying it. So the valid grievance would be to persecute gangsters who have
    guns, if malintent is what it is. Then, it's not legal to be in a gang, and you
    could persecute gangsters period for their malintent, but you could persecute gangsters who have guns all the more. But if people don't have malintentions,
    possession of weapons is not illegal. They can be very upstanding advocates of
    liberty, respect and justice, and have all the guns in the world - in their car.
    It's like bolt cutters and lock picking sets are 100% legal, unless one's caught
    with them in a "Catsuit" at 1:00am or there's suspicion of malintention. Gainfully
    employed people don't commit petty burglary, and their bolt cutters and lock picking sets are generally not suspicious. Same with terrorists and gasoline. We
    all have gasoline, but terrorists are suspected of malintention, while good people
    drive around with extra gasoline cans on the back of their Jeeps. So if you agree
    with this legal theory of malintention by itself being enough to condemn for crime. Otherwise there's nothing at all, and you'll have to find holistic solutions, - increase the wealth, decrease the population, share the poverty equally.

    Massacres have nothing to do with it, are 100% a red herring, are committed by
    poor unemployed upset students, and the like, and merely require a crowd. 100% of
    the people who commit massacres have no criminal record and got their guns before
    mal-activity. Once one commits a massacre, there's not a second offense. Guns,
    vehicles, knives will all do the same for massacres. It's crap to say it's okay
    to ban guns for massacres, because that's a non-argument. It's crap to say it's
    okay to ban guns for no reason, as it's crap to say, it's a crime to be Jewish. It
    truly is prejudice and abhorrent. People who enforce such laws are scum. And I
    don't agree to give my name to buy a gun.

    There is not a right to ban guns for no reason, or because people who bear guns
    are different than you.

    The rules of self-defense and engagement, need to be better identified, but fearing a big man is what fearing a gun is, and anyone can throw rocks at anyone's
    head.

    People do keep and bear guns for sport and hobby. There's nothing wrong with being an aficionado, an enthusiast, or a gun lover. When to use the gun, against
    another person, is the question. Not because they threw popcorn or water on you.


    Bump

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to Intelligent Party on Sat Sep 4 12:16:10 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans

    On 6/26/2021 12:16 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:
    $2 BILLION FOR FEDERAL FREE ABORTIONS, EQUALS $200 BILLION SAVINGS ON K-12, PER YEAR.

    90% of abortions take place in the first three months, that is 13 weeks. There are 4.33 weeks in a month.

    Chart: https://i.ibb.co/7rQhqTD/US-abortion-by-gestational-2016.jpg .

    Nearly 100% of abortions take place in the first 20 weeks, or 4.6 months. Abortions after the first 20 weeks are generally not done except in extenuating
    circumstances.

    So 90% of abortions take place in the first trimester, or 13 weeks, and 10% more
    take place in the next 7 weeks, or first half of the second trimester.

    While the first two trimesters accounts for 26 weeks. That is, 6 months. Normal
    gestation is 9 months plus 1 week, that is, 40 weeks.


    If there IS a ghost, in the fetus, after four months; it is like two adults attached.

    If there's NOT a ghost, in the fetus, before the fifth month; it's immoral to NOT
    abort, if you DON'T want a baby!

    There is NOT a ghost in the fetus for the first four months. Technically the ghost enters the fetus at different times, between the beginning of the fifth month, and birth.

    There's life after death, and there's life before life. You didn't come out of a
    zygote. God is light, and within, and One with you. There's ghosts between lifetimes. Most of the time, ghosts don't hang around the living. There's no
    brain in the first three months. The average abortion costs $300-$800. We could
    pay doctors *double*, in order to encourage them to abort. The total cost is less
    than $2 Billion = $1,000 x 2,000,000 abortions. With savings on K-12 of $216 Billion per year =12x$12,000x1.5million unplanned babies. Overpopulation is screwing the planet. We can have a happier world. Stop having unplanned children, for the children. Intelligent rich people, should have children. Only
    crazy people, and rich people, have children. Unplanned childbirth is the scourge
    of nations. Every sane civilization begins with population planning, among these
    several things. Presently there’s 2.5 million planned childbirths, and 1.5 million UNPLANNED childbirths, and 2.5 million deaths, and 1 million immigrants
    PER YEAR. 25 million extra people per decade, 100 million in the past 40 years. A
    50% increase in the population of our society. 1.5 million unplanned babies of 4
    million babies born, total, per year, means 37.5% of our population is unplanned.
    This has got to have, a deleterious effect, upon the socio-economic status, of our
    country.

    Use two or more disparate types of birth control, concurrently, or you will get
    pregnant. You will certainly get pregnant, in ten years, on the pill. You will
    get pregnant tonight, without birth control, it’s literally 50/50; and certainly
    if you have sex without birth control twice, two weeks apart. Hence the “morning
    after pill,” because there’s almost 100% chance, someone who didn’t use
    protection, is pregnant. Insufficient intelligence on safe sexuality, is causing
    sexual repression. If your children are sexually repressed, what makes you think
    they will NOT be sexually repressed the day they turn 18?! No, this may follow
    them harmfully for the rest of their lives!

    We demand parental consent laws be stopped and a minor's right to abortion be 100%
    fully recognized. Parental consent laws place an "undue burden," on a minor's
    ability to get an abortion, as a minor has to inform some people who may be at war
    with her. Guardian-Ward = Warden-Ward = Abuser-Abused. I say we're all fraternal
    twins in my household, and we're all each other's children. Yet we're not children. People are meant to be brought up and not belittled. Subjugation of
    people is hysterical. And there is no punishment. Good kids don't need punishment, and bad kids don't benefit from it. Intelligence and Truth are the
    head of every individual. Didn't you read Isaiah? "A child shall lead them?"
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+11%3A6-10&version=NKJV
    Of course, it would have to be an intelligent child. Those who lack wisdom *are*
    children. Anyone, of any age, who as anything *truthful* to say, is a pastor. We
    *are* all equal, in Spirit.

    Parental consent laws, are pure illegal and pure evil. Every person has an equal
    right to an abortion, regardless of age, on this planet. Ageism is a crime. In
    the case of parental consent laws, abortion Ageism, is a capital crime. This is
    murder. People have rights, and imposing one's subjective values onto others is
    objectively wrong and immoral. Even if they're your "children." This is done by
    the power of the sword, and is crime. Protected by the U.S. Military; thus, the
    Federal Congress is 100% responsible for this abject crime against humanity! And
    "children" *do* have a right to privacy, which ought not be violated!

    Anti-abortion has been winning, and the number of abortions per year, has declined
    by half, from over 1,300,000 per year, to 625,000.

    90% of abortions take place in the first three months - 13 weeks: https://i.ibb.co/7rQhqTD/US-abortion-by-gestational-2016.jpg .

    99.99% of abortions in the first 20 weeks or 4.6 months.
    Abortions after 20 weeks(4.615 months), are generally only done in extenuating
    circumstances.

    So 90% take place in the first trimester or 13 weeks, and 10% more take place in
    the next 7 weeks, or first half of the second trimester.

    Anti-abortion, is thus basically so much malarkey, it is as dumb as the flag burning Amendment. And Marky Mark burned the flag; and it's wasn't hate speech:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed2q_b5rhvo


    DEMAND FREE ABORTIONS NOW! Overpopulation is screwing our country. It’s all
    population vs. property, and capital vs. labor. We need to build the capital into
    more capital, and with a little labor, while still consuming SOME of the fruits of
    our capital and labor. This is a lot easier without a huge population, of uneducated people; adding no innovation and intelligence to our world. Every born
    baby’s life should matter!

    Europe has increased its population at the same speed as the U.S.A., while Latin
    America has increased faster, and Africa has quadrupled its population in the past
    50 years. In Africa the average woman has 5-6 babies each. At least its separated from us, by two oceans and a desert.




    Bump

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to Intelligent Party on Mon Oct 18 01:05:37 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans

    On 10/14/2021 12:40 AM, Intelligent Party wrote:
    https://snowbrains.com/lake-shasta-ca-surpasses-4-million-acre-feet-for-first-time-in-1376-days/


    5 years later, now on verge of drought. The dam could be raised 200 feet, allowing for 10 million more acre feet storage. Or damn the Eel or Klamath rivers, both of which run into the sea. Or revive the potentially polluting peripheral canal. Or all four. The farmers utilize 80% of the State's water capacity, and the consumer utilize 20% of it. The Federal Water project is for
    the farmers, and has runoff for the State consumer water project. The Army Corps
    of Engineers builds the Federal Damns which last, like the Hoover Damn, and hold,
    unlike the State's damns, which though newer, required evacuation of 100,000 residents in recent years.

    Current situation:
    "Shasta Lake is California's largest reservoir, capable of holding 4,552,000 acre
    feet of water. Right now, it has 1,186,057 acre feet of water stored. Breaking
    that down into percentages, the reservoir is at 26% capacity and 42% of average
    for this date."
    September 7, 2021

    https://www.abc10.com/article/weather/california-drought/reservoir-levels-california/103-a3f855d0-98ba-4597-b334-b30086c50cb6#:~:text=Shasta%20Lake%20is%20California's%20largest,of%20average%20for%20this%20date.




    Bump

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to Intelligent Party on Thu Oct 21 14:05:53 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans

    On 6/26/2021 12:58 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:
    Re: COVID - It's Your Right To Congregation Is Preeminent, And That Involves Assembly, Church, The Capitol Demonstration And Public Property


    It's not like you have freedom of Assembly except as prescribed by law.

    It's not like the Constitution is just saying your right to freedom of speech and
    your right to bear arms are just a good idea.

    The Constitution is saying you are right, you are legal, and they are wrong, and
    they are illegal, if they prohibit you.

    Yes, you have a right Thanksgiving Dinner too.

    So you fucking monkeys are just going to commit ridiculous acts, and spread COVID,
    and not be on your own recognizances, like people recycle and stand in line without being controlled and coerced to?

    Regulation of commerce - employee and consumer protections, has merit, and is the
    way to control. This also includes product labeling/marketing/advertising control, quality control, and perhaps product bundling. It doesn't include prohibition when there's not a substitute product.

    So do you think you monkeys would be able to only associate only with intimate,
    repetitive, friends and relatives, during COVID, and not throw the gala wedding
    party even if it wasn't commercially provided.

    The stupidest thing would be to be in a room with someone you're not going to talk
    to, for non-essential activities.

    But isn't all valid work essential!? What are we doing it for otherwise?

    Whenever someone speaks to you, they're spewing tiny specks of spit in your face.


    Who has to perfect the law? The person with the valid social grievance, or the
    person with the valid liberty?


    Bump

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to Intelligent Party on Thu Oct 21 14:03:49 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans

    On 10/12/2021 6:22 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:
    Drugs OUGHT *NOT* be marketed as recreation! Drugs OUGHT *NOT* be marketed as
    party-fun!

    Drugs OUGHT BE marketed as over-the-counter poison, because that's what they are!

    Poison!

    Drugs OUGHT BE marketed as over-the-counter MEDICINE by permission ONLY! Like Advil!

    BUT, ALL DRUGS OUGHT TO BE FOR SALE ON DEMAND, SOMEHOW! THEY OUGHT TO BE, AND
    ANYONE DISAGREEING WITH THIS, IS WRONG!

    WRONG!

    WRONG!

    WRONG!

    GUILTY!

    YOU ARE GUILTY DEA! YOU ARE GUILTY JUDGE! GUILTY! YOU ARE GUILTY POLITICIAN WHO
    DOESN'T AGREE WITH ME! YOU ARE GUILTY VOTER WHO DOESN'T AGREE WITH ME! GUILTY!
    GUILTY LIKE THE PEOPLE WHO MURDER THE JEWS, AND GUILTY LIKE THE PEOPLE WHO ENSLAVE
    THE BLACKS! THE LAW IS REAL. THE LAW IS SCIENCE. THE LAW IS NOT THE MAKE-BELIEVE OF A DICTATOR, BE HE A VOTER OR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE! CHOOSE FREEDOM OR BE GUILTY!

    okay, so back to what I was saying anyway,

    You can't LEGALLY sell snake oil as a cure for cancer. You can only say "snake
    oil is a cure for cancer," if you *don't* sell it; and you can only sell snake oil
    as the useless snake oil it is! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil

    Capitalism wants to sell you NOTHING: - a Star, land on Mars, Hawaiian sea water,
    and Capitalism wants to sell you something, that hurts you - Drugs! Capitalism
    just wants to profit, hence CONSUMER PROTECTIONS, and EMPLOYEE PROTECTIONS - regulation of commerce - have merit!


    But it's my body, my Spraypaint, and my right to huff it! God damn it!

    God damn it!

    It's my glue!

    MY PROPERTY!!!

    You have a right to possess property. You don't have a right to larceny - that
    is, intent to deprive another of stolen property. Hence you do not have a right,
    to knowingly possess stolen property. Current statutes are supposed to be based
    on such common law, legal principles. Not on malarkey.

    Prohibitions of possession, hang on the notion that there is no right to possess
    property, and this is an abject LIE.


    Also, it'd be drugs which are a mental impediment, and likely to be frivolously
    used, that should be sold out of sight, out of mind. All drugs ought to be for
    sale on demand, over the counter, somehow. AS POISON!

    Who passed these drug laws, and infringed upon OUR RIGHT TO SELF-PRESCRIPTION?!
    Both infringements are ABJECT, HORRIBLE, HORRIFYING; CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Our
    right to self-prescribe is legal and just. Our right to own drugs, and use them,
    is a fact. It's my body, and my spray paint, and my right to huff it; though I
    don't.

    Those who passed these drug laws, are mad scientists, crazies and criminals, perhaps the self-condemning. We should not be bound by the idiots of yesterday.
    "The world belongs usufruct to the living." - Thomas Jefferson, 1789


    Drugs with habit potential ought to be distributed in a separate part of the store, BEHIND A CURTAIN, or through a SEPARATE NUMBER-ONLY, MARKED ENTRANCE. DISTRIBUTING HABITUAL USE DRUGS - OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND, will help reduce recidivist use among those willing to stop.

    No one believes that drugs are wrong; because DRUGS ARE NOT WRONG! DRUGS ARE BAD!

    Drugs with potential for recreational use, ought to carry instructions, saying:
    "this is a poisonous drug, not intended for recreational use. However if you use
    recreationally, it is superior to use in this manner:"

    For every day you use a drug, don't use it for three. If you've been using daily,
    quit for two months, and go back to this max use. This is use, rather than abuse.
    Twice per month is better, and is the way most sane people party. If you drink
    liquor merely three nights per week, you will seriously become an alcoholic. 25
    million people are alcoholics in America and drink 10 or more drinks per day. This
    is 1/2 a fifth. 140 million more merely use. More serious alcoholics drink 1 to
    two fifths per day, that's 25-50 drinks! A few, a handle, that's 60!

    Drugs are actually A SOCIAL IMPEDIMENT, and A MENTAL IMPEDIMENT. There's a marginal benefit, such as there is to riding roller coasters. But who rides roller coasters more than four times per year? And who thought roller coasters,
    or a movie, were very social?!

    Additionally, drugs use up all your good feelings at once, or numb your bad feelings!

    Classes of drugs in my mind:

    1.Alcohol - Beer, Wine, Liquor.
    2.Marijuana - like Beer.
    3.Cocaine - like Liquor; Liquor is a dangerous drug.

    For spirituality or meditation, non-addictive:
    4.Psychedelics - Mushrooms, Ayuhauasca, DMT, Salvia, Acid.

    On the line or over:
    5.Ecstasy - Molly.
    6.Amphetamines - Speed, Crystal Meth.

    Batshit crazy:
    7.PCP - Angel Dust.
    8.Opiates - Codeine, Morphine, Oxycontin, Heroin, Fentanyl. 9.Benzodiazapines/Barbituates - Valium - not a party drug.
    10.Huffing - 20 paints and solvents.

    You don't want to inhale nor inject potent drugs. Hence Crack is way worse than
    Cocaine, and belongs in the batshit crazy category.

    Crack, Crystal Meth, Fentanyl, Heroin, are products of the Drug War. Prohibition
    moves potency. Alcohol prohibition moved liqour, not beer and wine. These drugs
    wouldn't be for sale as more than insane novelties, like Everclear, if Cocaine,
    and Speed, and Morphine were available. No one drinks Everclear, nor 151 Rum.

    People know nothing about drugs. About weapons. About sex. About living in a
    vehicle or tent. AND JUDGE. AND HIRE MURDERERS, TO MURDER ALL FOUR!

    THEY ARE WRONG.
    THEY ARE ILLEGAL.
    FUCK THAT.
    FUCK THEM.

    BRING THE USA TO JUSTICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    Bump

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to Intelligent Party on Thu Oct 21 14:06:16 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans

    On 6/26/2021 12:16 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:
    Sanitation - negligible cost $2 Billion
    Abortions - negligible cost $2 Billion

    Transportation - infrastructure
    Water - infrastructure
    Power - infrastructure

    Cash At Bottom - 1/2 Minimum Wage after taxes
    Education - Community College Free, second two years undergrad free
    Housing - 100% Loan-to-value, primary conforming home loans, only present income
    doc., 250 year fixed loans


    We can have social programs, and then raise or lower taxes immediately, to effect
    fiscal stimulus or contraction.



    Bump

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to Intelligent Party on Thu Oct 21 16:05:02 2021
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans

    On 10/17/2021 4:04 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:
    And no two years income doc., just present income doc as for renting.

    On primary conforming loans

    Let's make it so everyone can buy, and lets get rid of all renting, except for
    vacation properties!


    https://www.fhfa.gov/DataTools/Tools/Pages/Conforming-Loan-Limits-Map.aspx

    https://www.fha.com/fha_loan_requirements


    Renters are getting reamed, dude.


    In place of temporary interest only, a 250 year fixed, at least at bottom, so people can still buy at bottom. Here the house doubles in value in thirty years,
    but the loan isn't paid off. 70% of the loan is paid off in years 220-250. You
    just pay interest plus a few pennies. It allows you to buy more house, so possibly should only be for the bottom.


    No adjustable payments should be allowed at all - only fixed teaser to fixed rate.
    Payment calculated on blended rate, of two - more equity paid during lower (teaser) rate period.
    There were no adjustable payments, until 2004, and it caused the mortgage meltdown
    5 years later when the rates adjusted in 2009.
    Quote:"While adjustable rate mortgages first became legal in 1982, they were not
    popular with banks until 2004 'to make monthly payments lower, when rates started
    rising.' The mortgage meltdown will no doubt repeat itself if this fallacious
    type of home lending and speculation at taxpayer expense is not corrected. Historically, property values don't go up forever." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garn%E2%80%93St._Germain_Depository_Institutions_Act
    https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-an-adjustable-rate-mortgage-3305811




    Bump

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)