Maybe Someone Meant "Invasion," And Not "Insurrection."
From
Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to
All on Sun Mar 7 16:06:40 2021
XPost: alt.politics.usa.congress, alt.atheism, talk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.politics.usa.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republicans
Maybe someone meant to say "invasion," and not "insurrection."
According to the dictionary, it looks like the "act" has to be violent. If some
violence occurred, is not an excuse to stereotype the 99% who did not support such
violence. Only that one person, then, would be involved in an "insurrection."
It wasn't an insurrection, whether someone meant to say insurrection or not. If
they did mean to say insurrection, they're a liar, or in grave error. That lie persists in the Media today.
Thought precedes action. Good thought precedes good action. Bad though precedes
bad action. That it was an "insurrection," is a thought; preceding police action.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)