Inputs are based on Yesterday's data (though a weekly or biweekly average would be
more accurate) from
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
Click "Yesterday" button
Spreadsheet: https://docs.zoho.com/embed/cs6eab29f117fec84421c9c13fb84913ab066
INPUTS:
Daily New Infection Rate: (1,127/132,999) = .00847 or .847%
Active Cases: 132,999
Days from Infection to Recovery: 30 - Assumption (Entered)
Response lag time is 4 seconds+ when used as an html.
If you download, you have right click, Properties, Unblock, to open.
Inputs are based on Yesterday's data (though a weekly or biweekly average would be
more accurate), from
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/us/
Click "Yesterday" button
Spreadsheet: https://docs.zoho.com/embed/cs6eab29f117fec84421c9c13fb84913ab066
INPUTS:
Daily New Infection Rate: (1,405/282,046) = .00498 or .498%
Active Cases: 282,046
Days from Infection to Recovery: 30 - Assumption (Entered)
Response lag time is 4 seconds+ when used as an html.
If you download, you have right click, Properties, Unblock, to open.
New debt and rent ought not be subject to such forbearance.
Every man, woman, and child, also deserve, desire, and demand $1,250 per month
during COVID, and for one year after COVID is over.
The above is necessary that the American people, and the U.S. economy survive.
Dependents ought to get their payments directly, akin to child support.
This will be $5 Trillion into the National Debt, yearly. This does not matter. A
Fiscal Expansion is in order. When Congress sells the Bonds to spend, it would be
effecting a countering equal monetary contraction. But the Fed will buy the bonds, and lend to Congress, keeping the interest rate low. The other side of an
expansion (fiscal or monetary), is inflation, which is not the problem/concern
right now. An economic boom, and coincident inflation of the Consumer Price Index
and Stock Market (inflation of Price to Book Values), is not our concern right now.
This ought merely be an "Economic Pause," and not become a Great Depression. It's
not going to be a Recession. It's going to be one of the other two. We want an
Economic Pause. We don't want a Great Depression.
A clear and present danger is obvious. COVID has claimed 100,000 lives in 2 months. This is annualized to 600,000 deaths per year, if not more. This is more
than the 400,000 who die to cigarettes yearly.
A clear and present danger is obvious. Congress cannot buy the Stealth Bomber,
and let they U.S. economy collapse and the American people loose their homes and
livelihoods, and say it has any business protecting America.
COVID may last several more months, or persist into perpetuity until a vaccine or
cure comes to be. This is likely to be 1-2 years. For analysis, it all depends
on how many days it takes to recover and stop being contagious. The quarantine
either reduces the number of cases daily, if the daily infection rate is lower
than the daily recovery rate, or it holds them steady, or merely tempers the spread if the daily infection rate is higher than the daily recovery rate. The
U.S. total daily infection rate is about 2% (% New Cases of Active Cases = 20,000
new cases daily on 1,000,000 active cases). Before the quarantine the daily infection rate was 25%. If it takes 30 days to recover, the recovery rate is 100/30 = 3.33%. Texas' infection rate is currently about 6%. The number of cases
will only grow. New York's infection rate is currently about .60%, the disease
will be beat in several or many months. And California, and the U.S. as a whole's
infection rate are both currently about 2%, - closer to holding the total number
of Active Cases steady, but ultimately declining. If it takes 60 days to recover,
the daily recovery rate is 100/60 = 1.67%, and we're more screwed. If it takes 15
days to recover, the daily recovery rate is 100/15 = 6.67%, and even Texas may
prevail. We haven't seen so many reported recoveries. Greenland was 100% clean
of the virus as 11 cases recovered 6 weeks ago. On Saturday, May 23rd Greenland
just got one new case. Del Norte County, California's most North West County had
all 4 cases recovered one week ago, and in the last week had 15 new cases.
Let me remind everyone, that without the quarantine but everyone just doing their
normal activities, the Daily New Infection Rate was 25%. At 25%, in three days
the total number of cases doubles. In seven days it quintuples. In 10 days it is
times 10. In 20 days, times 100, in 30 days times 1,000, and in two months times
1,000,000, or terminal. 333 cases becomes 333,000,000 cases in 60 days at a 25%
daily infection rate, and this is what was going on before the Quarantine. We
don't want to return to anything like this and overwhelm our hospitals. Even with
more personal protective equipment, testing, and awareness, an increase to 10%-15%
with States supposedly opening would be disastrous. It's time for Congress to
step in.
COVID may last 4 months to over 12 months if we don't do things right. All this
equity should not be destroyed as people continue to earn passive incomes on debt
and rent, while no active revenues are being produced by many companies.
It will not harm the economy any worse to stop all debt and rent payments until
COVID passes, will it? How?
The Republican borrowing and lending to corporations who pay their debts to passive income holders, and could just have a stay, is a curious way to spend the
taxpayer's trillions. Though to the extent those sometimes risky trillions are
coming back, that lending won't increase the National Debt. Easy credit isn't
spending as much as pure spending, but if that's how it is, it sure makes it sound
like a lot more than it is. - Yet why aren't JC Penny and Neiman Marcus borrowing
from the government's $3 trillion credit package?
Yet new borrowing should not be subject to such a stay.
It should be clear, the fact that clothing or any companies were weak before COVID
is not an excuse to let COVID push them over the brink!
Why should people pay their savings, to the rent on their apartments or to their
mortgages, during COVID?
At the least forbearance on some industries like clothing companies - which have
failed and are failing, and Airlines, which are no doubt the brink of bankruptcy.
Medical companies and essential companies may benefit from COVID. Might health
insurance companies fail?
Are there essential industries, that yet aren't being used during COVID, that merit the most protection?
And there is the rent of consuming food without pay, spending down your savings.
It should all be on the government. Not on the economy. The economy crashes because the National Debt is defaulted upon, is not what's going to happen. The
National Debt will not be defaulted upon at $40 Trillion. How high above this it
could go, deserves analysis. You just pay the debt by issuing more debt, that's
the way funny money works. And fiat money is what our basis is.
[Greece doesn't have its own central bank, and is like a State, like if California
kept issuing bonds. Before default became impossible for Congress the inflation
and rates would have gone up, and the Fed and Congress are fully in control of
adjusting the National Debt in any which way they want in such a crisis, such as
moving rates to 0% just on that debt, while rates on everything else may be high
possibly. This is a time of National Security. Of course, if it wasn't a debt
driven society, how would the Fed stop inflation? Like if the Fed has no bonds to
sell, how would the corporate bond rates be higher? Can the Fed create bonds, and
sell them at a high rate, just as it creates money and buys Congress's bonds at a
low rate. Probably theoretically, just like it creates money. However the issue
is what we do today, and default however theoretical, isn't going to happen on $40
Trillion. Okay, so the Fed buys Congress' bonds at a low rate, and high price,
and then raises rates, and sells them at a high rate and a low price. No theoretical crisis possible. The Fed appears all powerful. Anyway, a default if
possible would at worst be something we have to accept to save ourselves from COVID. But, yeah, it's good to know if it is possible.].
Again, a default on the National Debt would be an acceptable way to save ourselves
/ our country, from COVID, but 1) The Response to the Greek Example above, just
proved it's not possible, and 2) we do still want to know it is a possibility if
it is, before going through with it anyway, we should make all decisions knowing
their implications and assessing how likely given the value of them. But, we're
not going anywhere near a default possibility so far, if it was possible, which it
doesn't seem it is.
So inflation would be the issue, but is not the issue here. After COVID, after
the stay is lifted, there may be higher inflation, and resultingly higher rates at
the same Stock Market valuation. This means the economy won't be able to *grow*
as fast in the future. IF we don't want more inflation, we won't be able to issue
as much debt as a society as a whole, after COVID, to spend on purchase of capital
and labor, because we already issued the debt to spend on consumption = sales revenues, during COVID, yet we are concerned with the economy not *shrinking*, and
not having a *meltdown*, and a Great Depression (incidentally, requiring SPENDING
on WAR to get us out of it) right now. It's National Security already.
Tax revenues aren't necessarily going to be very high this year either.
And JC Penny can fail 12 months after COVID-19 is over, and not now.
Evictions stayed for one year after COVID is over, is demanded and imperative.
Except on new borrowing and new lending and new renting.
Allowing businesses to fail, isn't going to help the economy to grow. That is not
free market capitalism. That is madness.
If they're really such poor businesses, they can fail 1 year after COVID-19 is
over I guess. ["I guess," cause don't you think it's better to protect all businesses, than to let potentially productive businesses fail. There could be
another side to this, like ongoing languishing businesses, but if there is productive opportunity, wouldn't they switch into that, rather than letting them
fail beforehand. So that would be like all bonds are unsecured, thus could only
sue for liens, and any new debt issue or sale would have to pay the liens before
the company or owners could receive it, yet bankruptcies generally wouldn't be,
and the company could keep trying. This is just a general contemplation though,
not pertinent to COVID. What other sorts of business debt protection could their
be?].
The economy is not suddenly going to be at full steam, the day business doors open
once again, that they will have any money to pay their rents or their debts.
Then Congress or someone should protect credit reports from bad marks for non-payment. Renters can not just stop paying otherwise, or they will be 100%
unable to get a lease in the future for their bad credit reports. The point of
credit reports all goes to housing, and missed housing payments affect ability to
attain housing the most.
Landlords do not report monthly to credit agencies like bank credit cards. Rather
if there is a missed payment they 1)sue for eviction [-which goes to credit report], 2) could tell a future landlord when a reference is checked, 3) may report nonpayment to a credit agencies without suing? Which probably shouldn't be
allowed anyhow, as many landlords falsely charge tenants who have recently quit
for disputed cleaning charges and the like. 70% of landlords are sphincters. That renters have to be able to sue, if subsequently denied housing, for non-payment during COVID-19.
Lenders should not be protected while paused industrious businesses fail. The
burden should fall upon the lenders who's investments were at risk, and who will
recover their investments to whatever _normal_ degree after COVID-19, upon which
INTENT AND ABILITY to repay will resume, without consequence for non payment during COVID-19 at all, ever.
The lenders/creditors will get a BETTER RETURN on their investments back if they
hold on to them, rather than getting pennies on the dollar if liquidated due to
COVID-19.
Lenders have passive incomes.
This is about 65% Per Capita GDP before taxes.
This should be Federal, and calculated by the 3,000 Counties, not to be lower than
65%/50% of the lowest State's Per Capita GDP, nor higher than the 65%/50% of the
highest State's per capita GDP. That is, if the County's Per Capita GDP is higher
or lower than the highest or lowest State's Per Capita GDP, use the highest or
lowest State's Per Capita GDP, for the 65%/50% calculation.
Then let people not working, consume 50% of THAT, 50% of the minimum wage, which
is 25% Per Capita GDP, by a free cash transfer.
And let people not working, under 18, consume 50% of THAT, 25% the minimum wage,
which is 12.5% Per Capita GDP, by a free cash transfer.
If people work part time, their after tax net, after free cash is added, can't be
more than full time minimum wage, of 50% Per Capita GDP net taxes.
Then we need FREE Community College, and 2nd two years at a 4 year College or University FREE.
Because Nepotism, favoritism to one's relatives, isn't fair.
Then we need 100% Loan to Value primary conforming home loans. No two years income documentation, just present income like for renting.
A 250 year fixed loan is an interest only equivalent which allows people to buy
more house at the bottom. https://www.fhfa.gov/DataTools/Tools/Pages/Conforming-Loan-Limits-Map.aspx
Free Sanitation - Dumpsters and Porta Potties for the homeless - are mandatory,
and of negligible cost.
Free Abortions - in the first trimester /14 weeks; there is no ghost in the fetus,
and with no parental consent - this is mandatory, and of negligible cost. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minors_and_abortion#United_States
If there is a ghost in the fetus after four months, it is like two adults attached.
If there's NOT a ghost in the fetus, it's immoral to NOT abort, if you DON'T want
a baby.
There is no ghost in the fetus for the first four months. So I thought, to be
safe, we'd have free abortions for the first three months, plus one week, or 14
weeks. In Sweden it's 18 weeks, or four months plus 4.7 days (4 months is 17.3
weeks). Technically the ghost enters the fetus at different times, between the
beginning of the fifth month, and birth. In Canada abortion is funded by the government, it's mandatory to have it so, here too.
Implement these 6 things. 1. Minimum Wage, 2. Cash for Consumption, 3. Education,
4. Home Loans, 5. Sanitation, 6. Abortions. These contribute to my 10 point plan
of SAFETHIC, which additionally includes 7. Transportation, 8. Water, 9. Power,
and 10. Capital Savings:
SAFETHIC stands for: Sanitation, Abortions, Food, Education, Transportation, Housing, Incomes, Capital Savings, & Water, Power, & Parks.
Selling Contagious Poison, As Food And Recreation, Is My Big Question To America
Consumers are not even warned?
Employees are not even informed the job is to get COVID?
Waiters don't produce equity. After the service is over there is nothing to show
for it.
Rather than "Non-Essential Services," "Commercial Entertainment Services" should
be eliminated.
People TOIL for others entertainment, and amusement? Work is CREATED this way?
We let people take this big risk for entertainment which doesn't create any equity?
At least people in a movie, create a movie we have for 100 years.
"Commercial Entertainment Services:" I am talking about Broadway, Circuses, Vegas
Shows, The Opera, Waiters, and Whores.
If there is a substitute product, such as take-out for dine-in, then total prohibition may be alright. We should endeavor to not create an illegal market,
but whores don't produce anything. Sex and property are the mountain between us.
So the lack of a substitute product seems to go to just whores, and I'm not saying
we should or shouldn't have them, but I don't agree with punishment.
Health Clubs are not even close to the same basket as "Commercial Entertainment
Services."
Then there's haircuts, pedicures, and gardeners. The work they provide doesn't
last for long.
I think I may never hire another waiter in my life. That's not the sort of job I
like to provide. I understand the Restaurant industry is huge. It is also apparently a huge waste. Do you want to finance more kitchens for quality take-out, or more Restaurants? We can only spend so much, and we don't have property at the bottom. Waiters, rather, should be producing equity, or going to
school for free. Waiters could be allowed to spend the same without working, and
it wouldn't do anything at all to the economy, people would just not 'enjoy' waiters.
The governments would pull poisonous lettuce off the shelves, but there would be
other lettuce for sale. They pulled Tryptophan, which killed several people, off
the shelves for ten years, without a substitute product; do you think that was
wrong? COVID is not just poisonous food for sale at Restaurants; COVID is contagious poisonous food for sale at restaurants. The government prohibits poisonous drugs to be sold as recreational party-fun. COVID is not just poison
sold as recreational party-fun; COVID is contagious poison sold as recreational
party-fun.
Selling contagious poison, as food and recreation, is my big question to America.
And taking such a big health risk, for entertainment, which doesn't produce any
equity. But actually my question is why have such "Commercial Entertainment Services" work, allowed in the first place. That's what we want to trade? So the
waiter can go out to eat, if there ever is a post-COVID? It's not going to make
us rich. Instead he could produce, and buy, a nicer dinning room table. Rather
than endless toil.
(And porn-stars, unlike whores, yet like a table producer, and like a movie star,
produce a product. Still, the general principle of employment law, is the work
ought not be unnecessarily dangerous, unnecessarily unsanitary, unnecessarily injurious, nor unnecessarily painful. So, as to professional sports, they only
sort of produce a product. I doubt they'll start playing flag football in place
of NFL, or get rid of boxing anytime soon, but the purpose of Ultimate Fighting
was supposedly to figure out which martial art works best; and have they figured
that out?, and do we really need Ultimate Fighting? They can keep the bull-fighting in Mexico, or else we'll have dog fighting and cock fighting and
other such stuff soon here. (Animal cruelty, is not a legal persuasion.) And yet
these Sports barely produce a product, too; like you watch reruns of the NFL or
Olympics much. If you want to play High School for free, or intramural, that's
another matter. But the two issues are: employed to commit self-harm; and, working for other's amusement producing no equity.)
Making salaries more equitable, could be another way to address the matter. Based
on the above, you couldn't ever have a servant for a Birthday party, nor a Wedding. Yet still, do you need one? But having to pay more equitably, that is
every person more equal consumption, for an hour worked; could mean not frivolously employing a waiter, vs. not paying an NFL star to risk his life. While
we all need to hold equity and savings, we could all consume the same, but some
person owns the Empire State Building.
But even with slave labor, Waiters don't build the economy, and a lot of what is
going on right now *is* about building the economy. At least slaves would build
real equity. Waiters will not. So while one way of solving the problem could be
paying more equal consumption per hour worked, thus we would not frivolously employ, nor compel risk taking, for pay, nor high pay, we do need, at the same
time, to hold capital savings in private hands.
All the above said; working to commit the self harm of risking COVID, and building
no equity, while doing so, both at the same time, is really the big issue here.
There's no argument in my mind that it's ludicrous. Even so, people need jobs,
but it would be/should be, COVID that put them out of a job, but I guess people
merely take risks for money, which is serious, when they have no other option.
It's more the fruits of our Capital, that produces, than our labor. Maybe ex-waiters, and the like, should just have free cash to spend, to a degree. With
still more incentive than that, to earn, as we need to finance Capital and Intellectual Capital - School, to make the Country yet wealthier.... Perhaps money
if you're trying to get to School, or are going to school. The Macro-Economy is
at stake here.
A movie theater can be run by a few people, serving hundreds. And let's not confuse Commercial Entertainment *Services*, with Commercial Entertainment *Capital*. We do want Big Screen T.V.'s right? For if we went to prohibiting
Capital, it could be anything... from Children's Toys to Christmas Trees. Anything
that you enjoy. Still, jewelry made out of Gold is a colossal waste. People die
mining Gold all day. Costume jewelry may be a sufficient substitute product. (In
Russia, the waste of the likes of the Faberge Eggs - extremely expensive art -
contributed the Russian civil war, and over half a century of Marxist Communism,
which caused the Cold War.)
Selling contagious poison, as food and recreation, while building no equity, is
yet my big question to America. The more we study and think about this issue the
richer we may become. COVID is a new and fairly unstudied topic. As the more you
analyze, the more you know how to allocate, and the richer you become. What do
logic, reason, and intelligence ultimately and further dictate? To know, we have
to think. This is a question so far, if it's not clear.
"Those who remember always that they know nothing, and who have become willing to
learn everything, will learn it.
...Think not you understand anything until you pass the test of perfect peace" - A
Course in Miracles
"My fellow Americans, you're owed nothing less than the truth." - President Joe
Biden, - March 11, 2021
How is there non-essential work being done, ever. While "work from home if you
can" is a great law, and taking all consumer and employee precautions, and protection, is imperative; isn't all work essential?
Rather than "Non-Essential Services," "Commercial Entertainment Services" and perhaps "Commercial Entertainment Real Estate," should be eliminated.
If the movie theater were a "public" structure, that could be reserved to show
your rented movie to hundreds, at least we would be able to use the structure over
and over, vs. building a movie theater or a football stadium instead of housing.
Yet the people providing the "non-essential entertainment service" produce no equity whatsoever, and after the waiter's work is done, he goes home having produced NOTHING. No dinning room table to last years. A mere food store in the
movie theater is notwithstanding.
So "Public" Entertainment Real Estate," is that still bad? So, do we want "Entertainment Real Estate" at all?
1. Real Property, 2. Personal Property, 3. Consumption.
Service is a Consumption, unless it produces Personal Property (or Real Property).
Consumption is all gone once the work's done. A gardener's work lasts a couple
weeks. I guess you have memories of a waiter's service.
Plus, is it really anyone's passion to be a waiter? How about a masseuse, or a
whore, or are those even more important than haircuts as healthcare, but do people
want to do it, how about to be in a show, on Broadway or in a play? It's their
passion? You think it's not work? People should wake up happy every day to work.
Are these people happy? Don't we want to eliminate _work_? Life is about art,
and science, and friends.
Should _art_ be all hobby? You can cook for your friends. Not be enslaved for
other's entertainment and amusement.
"The foundation of empire is art and science. Remove them or degrade them, and
the empire is no more.
Empire follows art and not vice versa as Englishmen suppose." - William Blake
"Sex and art are the same thing." - Pablo Picasso
Left Brain/Right Brain = Science/Art
"The intuitive mind is a sacred gift, and the rational mind is a faithful servant.
We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift."
- Albert Einstein
"Beauty is truth, truth beauty,"—that is all Ye know on earth, and all ye need to
know." - John Keats
... if you have industry and science and you're rich!
Yet,
"Love is your power, which... gives you everything."
- Jesus Christ, A Course in Miracles, Chapter 7, Section 6
https://snowbrains.com/lake-shasta-ca-surpasses-4-million-acre-feet-for-first-time-in-1376-days/
5 years later, now on verge of drought. The dam could be raised 200 feet, allowing for 10 million more acre feet storage. Or damn the Eel or Klamath rivers, both of which run into the sea. Or revive the potentially polluting peripheral canal. Or all four. The farmers utilize 80% of the State's water capacity, and the consumer utilize 20% of it. The Federal Water project is for
the farmers, and has runoff for the State consumer water project. The Army Corps
of Engineers builds the Federal Damns which last, like the Hoover Damn, and hold,
unlike the State's damns, which though newer, required evacuation of 100,000 residents in recent years.
Current situation:
"Shasta Lake is California's largest reservoir, capable of holding 4,552,000 acre
feet of water. Right now, it has 1,186,057 acre feet of water stored. Breaking
that down into percentages, the reservoir is at 26% capacity and 42% of average
for this date."
September 7, 2021
https://www.abc10.com/article/weather/california-drought/reservoir-levels-california/103-a3f855d0-98ba-4597-b334-b30086c50cb6#:~:text=Shasta%20Lake%20is%20California's%20largest,of%20average%20for%20this%20date.
All a police officer has to do, is ask do if someone has any malintentions with
these weapons? If "no," they are 100% legal.
It's just simply not wrong to possess a weapon. It's not wrong as a matter of
fact and scientific unadulterated truth. Possession of weapons is not wrong. It's
fact. Those who believe democracy authors the law, don't believe in the law at
all, so how can they advocate such law? They believe in democracy, but not in the
law. And why would one believe in democracy, or the republic, and not science,
truth, god and man?
"Thug life" is what anti-gunners validly have a grievance against. "Thug life"
writes songs about blowing each other away, echoing their un-civilization, whilst
glorifying it. So the valid grievance would be to persecute gangsters who have
guns, if malintent is what it is. Then, it's not legal to be in a gang, and you
could persecute gangsters period for their malintent, but you could persecute gangsters who have guns all the more. But if people don't have malintentions,
possession of weapons is not illegal. They can be very upstanding advocates of
liberty, respect and justice, and have all the guns in the world - in their car.
It's like bolt cutters and lock picking sets are 100% legal, unless one's caught
with them in a "Catsuit" at 1:00am or there's suspicion of malintention. Gainfully
employed people don't commit petty burglary, and their bolt cutters and lock picking sets are generally not suspicious. Same with terrorists and gasoline. We
all have gasoline, but terrorists are suspected of malintention, while good people
drive around with extra gasoline cans on the back of their Jeeps. So if you agree
with this legal theory of malintention by itself being enough to condemn for crime. Otherwise there's nothing at all, and you'll have to find holistic solutions, - increase the wealth, decrease the population, share the poverty equally.
Massacres have nothing to do with it, are 100% a red herring, are committed by
poor unemployed upset students, and the like, and merely require a crowd. 100% of
the people who commit massacres have no criminal record and got their guns before
mal-activity. Once one commits a massacre, there's not a second offense. Guns,
vehicles, knives will all do the same for massacres. It's crap to say it's okay
to ban guns for massacres, because that's a non-argument. It's crap to say it's
okay to ban guns for no reason, as it's crap to say, it's a crime to be Jewish. It
truly is prejudice and abhorrent. People who enforce such laws are scum. And I
don't agree to give my name to buy a gun.
There is not a right to ban guns for no reason, or because people who bear guns
are different than you.
The rules of self-defense and engagement, need to be better identified, but fearing a big man is what fearing a gun is, and anyone can throw rocks at anyone's
head.
People do keep and bear guns for sport and hobby. There's nothing wrong with being an aficionado, an enthusiast, or a gun lover. When to use the gun, against
another person, is the question. Not because they threw popcorn or water on you.
Drugs OUGHT *NOT* be marketed as recreation! Drugs OUGHT *NOT* be marketed as
party-fun!
Drugs OUGHT BE marketed as over-the-counter poison, because that's what they are!
Poison!
Drugs OUGHT BE marketed as over-the-counter MEDICINE by permission ONLY! Like Advil!
BUT, ALL DRUGS OUGHT TO BE FOR SALE ON DEMAND, SOMEHOW! THEY OUGHT TO BE, AND
ANYONE DISAGREEING WITH THIS, IS WRONG!
WRONG!
WRONG!
WRONG!
GUILTY!
YOU ARE GUILTY DEA! YOU ARE GUILTY JUDGE! GUILTY! YOU ARE GUILTY POLITICIAN WHO
DOESN'T AGREE WITH ME! YOU ARE GUILTY VOTER WHO DOESN'T AGREE WITH ME! GUILTY!
GUILTY LIKE THE PEOPLE WHO MURDER THE JEWS, AND GUILTY LIKE THE PEOPLE WHO ENSLAVE
THE BLACKS! THE LAW IS REAL. THE LAW IS SCIENCE. THE LAW IS NOT THE MAKE-BELIEVE OF A DICTATOR, BE HE A VOTER OR ELECTED REPRESENTATIVE! CHOOSE FREEDOM OR BE GUILTY!
okay, so back to what I was saying anyway,
You can't LEGALLY sell snake oil as a cure for cancer. You can only say "snake
oil is a cure for cancer," if you *don't* sell it; and you can only sell snake oil
as the useless snake oil it is! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_oil
Capitalism wants to sell you NOTHING: - a Star, land on Mars, Hawaiian sea water,
and Capitalism wants to sell you something, that hurts you - Drugs! Capitalism
just wants to profit, hence CONSUMER PROTECTIONS, and EMPLOYEE PROTECTIONS - regulation of commerce - have merit!
But it's my body, my Spraypaint, and my right to huff it! God damn it!
God damn it!
It's my glue!
MY PROPERTY!!!
You have a right to possess property. You don't have a right to larceny - that
is, intent to deprive another of stolen property. Hence you do not have a right,
to knowingly possess stolen property. Current statutes are supposed to be based
on such common law, legal principles. Not on malarkey.
Prohibitions of possession, hang on the notion that there is no right to possess
property, and this is an abject LIE.
Also, it'd be drugs which are a mental impediment, and likely to be frivolously
used, that should be sold out of sight, out of mind. All drugs ought to be for
sale on demand, over the counter, somehow. AS POISON!
Who passed these drug laws, and infringed upon OUR RIGHT TO SELF-PRESCRIPTION?!
Both infringements are ABJECT, HORRIBLE, HORRIFYING; CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Our
right to self-prescribe is legal and just. Our right to own drugs, and use them,
is a fact. It's my body, and my spray paint, and my right to huff it; though I
don't.
Those who passed these drug laws, are mad scientists, crazies and criminals, perhaps the self-condemning. We should not be bound by the idiots of yesterday.
"The world belongs usufruct to the living." - Thomas Jefferson, 1789
Drugs with habit potential ought to be distributed in a separate part of the store, BEHIND A CURTAIN, or through a SEPARATE NUMBER-ONLY, MARKED ENTRANCE. DISTRIBUTING HABITUAL USE DRUGS - OUT OF SIGHT, OUT OF MIND, will help reduce recidivist use among those willing to stop.
No one believes that drugs are wrong; because DRUGS ARE NOT WRONG! DRUGS ARE BAD!
Drugs with potential for recreational use, ought to carry instructions, saying:
"this is a poisonous drug, not intended for recreational use. However if you use
recreationally, it is superior to use in this manner:"
For every day you use a drug, don't use it for three. If you've been using daily,
quit for two months, and go back to this max use. This is use, rather than abuse.
Twice per month is better, and is the way most sane people party. If you drink
liquor merely three nights per week, you will seriously become an alcoholic. 25
million people are alcoholics in America and drink 10 or more drinks per day. This
is 1/2 a fifth. 140 million more merely use. More serious alcoholics drink 1 to
two fifths per day, that's 25-50 drinks! A few, a handle, that's 60!
Drugs are actually A SOCIAL IMPEDIMENT, and A MENTAL IMPEDIMENT. There's a marginal benefit, such as there is to riding roller coasters. But who rides roller coasters more than four times per year? And who thought roller coasters,
or a movie, were very social?!
Additionally, drugs use up all your good feelings at once, or numb your bad feelings!
Classes of drugs in my mind:
1.Alcohol - Beer, Wine, Liquor.
2.Marijuana - like Beer.
3.Cocaine - like Liquor; Liquor is a dangerous drug.
For spirituality or meditation, non-addictive:
4.Psychedelics - Mushrooms, Ayuhauasca, DMT, Salvia, Acid.
On the line or over:
5.Ecstasy - Molly.
6.Amphetamines - Speed, Crystal Meth.
Batshit crazy:
7.PCP - Angel Dust.
8.Opiates - Codeine, Morphine, Oxycontin, Heroin, Fentanyl. 9.Benzodiazapines/Barbituates - Valium - not a party drug.
10.Huffing - 20 paints and solvents.
You don't want to inhale nor inject potent drugs. Hence Crack is way worse than
Cocaine, and belongs in the batshit crazy category.
Crack, Crystal Meth, Fentanyl, Heroin, are products of the Drug War. Prohibition
moves potency. Alcohol prohibition moved liqour, not beer and wine. These drugs
wouldn't be for sale as more than insane novelties, like Everclear, if Cocaine,
and Speed, and Morphine were available. No one drinks Everclear, nor 151 Rum.
People know nothing about drugs. About weapons. About sex. About living in a
vehicle or tent. AND JUDGE. AND HIRE MURDERERS, TO MURDER ALL FOUR!
THEY ARE WRONG.
THEY ARE ILLEGAL.
FUCK THAT.
FUCK THEM.
BRING THE USA TO JUSTICE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
$2 BILLION FOR FEDERAL FREE ABORTIONS, EQUALS $200 BILLION SAVINGS ON K-12, PER YEAR.
90% of abortions take place in the first three months, that is 13 weeks. There are 4.33 weeks in a month.
Chart: https://i.ibb.co/7rQhqTD/US-abortion-by-gestational-2016.jpg .
Nearly 100% of abortions take place in the first 20 weeks, or 4.6 months. Abortions after the first 20 weeks are generally not done except in extenuating
circumstances.
So 90% of abortions take place in the first trimester, or 13 weeks, and 10% more
take place in the next 7 weeks, or first half of the second trimester.
While the first two trimesters accounts for 26 weeks. That is, 6 months. Normal
gestation is 9 months plus 1 week, that is, 40 weeks.
If there IS a ghost, in the fetus, after four months; it is like two adults attached.
If there's NOT a ghost, in the fetus, before the fifth month; it's immoral to NOT
abort, if you DON'T want a baby!
There is NOT a ghost in the fetus for the first four months. Technically the ghost enters the fetus at different times, between the beginning of the fifth month, and birth.
There's life after death, and there's life before life. You didn't come out of a
zygote. God is light, and within, and One with you. There's ghosts between lifetimes. Most of the time, ghosts don't hang around the living. There's no
brain in the first three months. The average abortion costs $300-$800. We could
pay doctors *double*, in order to encourage them to abort. The total cost is less
than $2 Billion = $1,000 x 2,000,000 abortions. With savings on K-12 of $216 Billion per year =12x$12,000x1.5million unplanned babies. Overpopulation is screwing the planet. We can have a happier world. Stop having unplanned children, for the children. Intelligent rich people, should have children. Only
crazy people, and rich people, have children. Unplanned childbirth is the scourge
of nations. Every sane civilization begins with population planning, among these
several things. Presently there’s 2.5 million planned childbirths, and 1.5 million UNPLANNED childbirths, and 2.5 million deaths, and 1 million immigrants
PER YEAR. 25 million extra people per decade, 100 million in the past 40 years. A
50% increase in the population of our society. 1.5 million unplanned babies of 4
million babies born, total, per year, means 37.5% of our population is unplanned.
This has got to have, a deleterious effect, upon the socio-economic status, of our
country.
Use two or more disparate types of birth control, concurrently, or you will get
pregnant. You will certainly get pregnant, in ten years, on the pill. You will
get pregnant tonight, without birth control, it’s literally 50/50; and certainly
if you have sex without birth control twice, two weeks apart. Hence the “morning
after pill,” because there’s almost 100% chance, someone who didn’t use
protection, is pregnant. Insufficient intelligence on safe sexuality, is causing
sexual repression. If your children are sexually repressed, what makes you think
they will NOT be sexually repressed the day they turn 18?! No, this may follow
them harmfully for the rest of their lives!
We demand parental consent laws be stopped and a minor's right to abortion be 100%
fully recognized. Parental consent laws place an "undue burden," on a minor's
ability to get an abortion, as a minor has to inform some people who may be at war
with her. Guardian-Ward = Warden-Ward = Abuser-Abused. I say we're all fraternal
twins in my household, and we're all each other's children. Yet we're not children. People are meant to be brought up and not belittled. Subjugation of
people is hysterical. And there is no punishment. Good kids don't need punishment, and bad kids don't benefit from it. Intelligence and Truth are the
head of every individual. Didn't you read Isaiah? "A child shall lead them?"
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+11%3A6-10&version=NKJV
Of course, it would have to be an intelligent child. Those who lack wisdom *are*
children. Anyone, of any age, who as anything *truthful* to say, is a pastor. We
*are* all equal, in Spirit.
Parental consent laws, are pure illegal and pure evil. Every person has an equal
right to an abortion, regardless of age, on this planet. Ageism is a crime. In
the case of parental consent laws, abortion Ageism, is a capital crime. This is
murder. People have rights, and imposing one's subjective values onto others is
objectively wrong and immoral. Even if they're your "children." This is done by
the power of the sword, and is crime. Protected by the U.S. Military; thus, the
Federal Congress is 100% responsible for this abject crime against humanity! And
"children" *do* have a right to privacy, which ought not be violated!
Anti-abortion has been winning, and the number of abortions per year, has declined
by half, from over 1,300,000 per year, to 625,000.
90% of abortions take place in the first three months - 13 weeks: https://i.ibb.co/7rQhqTD/US-abortion-by-gestational-2016.jpg .
99.99% of abortions in the first 20 weeks or 4.6 months.
Abortions after 20 weeks(4.615 months), are generally only done in extenuating
circumstances.
So 90% take place in the first trimester or 13 weeks, and 10% more take place in
the next 7 weeks, or first half of the second trimester.
Anti-abortion, is thus basically so much malarkey, it is as dumb as the flag burning Amendment. And Marky Mark burned the flag; and it's wasn't hate speech:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ed2q_b5rhvo
DEMAND FREE ABORTIONS NOW! Overpopulation is screwing our country. It’s all
population vs. property, and capital vs. labor. We need to build the capital into
more capital, and with a little labor, while still consuming SOME of the fruits of
our capital and labor. This is a lot easier without a huge population, of uneducated people; adding no innovation and intelligence to our world. Every born
baby’s life should matter!
Europe has increased its population at the same speed as the U.S.A., while Latin
America has increased faster, and Africa has quadrupled its population in the past
50 years. In Africa the average woman has 5-6 babies each. At least its separated from us, by two oceans and a desert.
And no two years income doc., just present income doc as for renting.
On primary conforming loans
Let's make it so everyone can buy, and lets get rid of all renting, except for
vacation properties!
https://www.fhfa.gov/DataTools/Tools/Pages/Conforming-Loan-Limits-Map.aspx
https://www.fha.com/fha_loan_requirements
Renters are getting reamed, dude.
In place of temporary interest only, a 250 year fixed, at least at bottom, so people can still buy at bottom. Here the house doubles in value in thirty years,
but the loan isn't paid off. 70% of the loan is paid off in years 220-250. You
just pay interest plus a few pennies. It allows you to buy more house, so possibly should only be for the bottom.
No adjustable payments should be allowed at all - only fixed teaser to fixed rate.
Payment calculated on blended rate, of two - more equity paid during lower (teaser) rate period.
There were no adjustable payments, until 2004, and it caused the mortgage meltdown
5 years later when the rates adjusted in 2009.
Quote:"While adjustable rate mortgages first became legal in 1982, they were not
popular with banks until 2004 'to make monthly payments lower, when rates started
rising.' The mortgage meltdown will no doubt repeat itself if this fallacious
type of home lending and speculation at taxpayer expense is not corrected. Historically, property values don't go up forever." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garn%E2%80%93St._Germain_Depository_Institutions_Act
https://www.thebalance.com/what-is-an-adjustable-rate-mortgage-3305811
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 35:21:25 |
| Calls: | 6,648 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,193 |
| Messages: | 5,328,921 |
