• EUROPE'S STOPPED CORONAVIRUS, WHY CAN'T WE?

    From Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 4 18:04:26 2020
    XPost: fl.politics, houston.politics, tx.politics
    XPost: az.politics, alt.abortion

    https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
    Click "Yesterday," and "Two Days Ago," and look at the number of U.S. Coronavirus
    New Cases, +54,904 and +57,232, then click "Europe" and do the same: Total for all "Europe" +13,188, and +14,026, and look at the Individual countries, and how
    other than Russia, they're all under 1,000:

    Cases: Yesterday, 2 Days Ago:
    France +582, +659
    U.K. +519, +576
    Germany +283, +393
    Italy +223, +201
    Spain +442, +444

    Total: +2,049, +2,273

    Population:
    France 65,275,320
    U.K. 67,889,941
    Germany 83,787,168
    Italy 60,460,552
    Spain 46,755,021

    Total: 324,168,002


    Cases: Yesterday, 2 Days Ago:
    United States +54,904, +57,232

    Population:
    United States: 331,023,450

    WHAT GIVES?!?!?

    CAN WE HAVE FEDERAL STAY AT HOME WITH BONDS/T-BILLS FROM THE GOVERNMENT OR ARE WE
    ALL GOING TO GET CORONAVIRUS?!?!?

    ... as soon as Europe stops stay-at-home, it will come back. Or else it's we study European methods more.

    As soon as you start stay-at-home, they will be demonstrating and suing if you force it, but you could implore, plead, and advise, rather than threaten. Is Europe threatening? I mean, it's only common sense to follow most intelligent advice, who wants to get coronavirus?


    Record of data: https://web.archive.org/web/20200705000103/https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)