You Have A Right To Congregate - So COVID Prohibitions Should All Be Ba
From
Intelligent Party@21:1/5 to
All on Sat Dec 5 14:38:30 2020
XPost: fl.politics, houston.politics, tx.politics
XPost: az.politics, alt.abortion
You Have A Right To Congregate - So COVID Prohibitions Should All Be Based On Employee And Consumer Protections
There should be advice at the restaurant, like: "If You Dine Here, You Will Likely
Get COVID And Die."
That should be sufficient for Consumer Protections.
But as to Employee Protections, if you're going to prohibit employees from being
criminally exploited to self-harm; then you have to protect employees by giving them an equal income if their job is stolen by your prohibition. And if you do so, then employees can make their own decisions whether to work for the money, or
not work and take a free hand-out. Waiters and busboys don't produce any equity
nor build the economy anyway. Their work is non-essential services for your entertainment. So why doesn't everyone switch to "take-out" anyway. If waiters
and busboys go on spending without working it will not affect the economy.
Employment is a capital issue, and killing someone off, by laying them off, to save someone else's life, is what you're doing.
The Restaurant industry employs 10% of the workforce, and 4% of the U.S. GDP, is
an $899 Billion industry with 15 million workers, including 2.5 million waiters,
and more busboys.
People literally die in the gutter in America. It's a imperfect and criminally negligent civilization.
The United States is a crap civilization because it has not lived up to the American dream.
We're not united when you let people suffer in poverty.
It's a pretty sad state of affairs.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)