• Re: The existential threat

    From Donny Rotten@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 2 07:28:36 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.politics.republicans
    XPost: alt.rush-limbaugh

    In article <rsauvk$2b5a$12@neodome.net>
    forging asshole <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

    Purely Political, By James Buckley

    Hillary Clinton and her devotees love to toss out the idea that
    Donald Trump and the entire Republican Party present an
    “existential threat to our democracy,” but the truth (and they
    know it) is that Hillary and her supporters are the real
    existential threat.

    A Hillary Clinton presidency would have dealt a death blow to
    democracy in this country.

    The federal trial that took place for the most part of the last
    month in Washington, D.C., is the “smoking gun” that proves that
    Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton was the real
    impetus behind all the moves to first thwart and then overturn
    the Trump presidency.

    Justice Department Special Counsel John Durham, heading up the
    prosecution of Hillary campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, is the
    kind of lawman that legends are made of. Mr. Durham, a former
    prosecutor and U.S. attorney for the District of Connecticut,
    has a prosecutorial history that features a stint as special
    investigator on the Whitey Bulger case, as well as the
    successful reversal of murder convictions of four men — Enrico
    Tameleo, Joseph Salvati, Peter J. Limone and Louis Greco — who
    had apparently been framed by the FBI and whose families secured
    a $101.7 million civil judgment against the U.S. government.

    Mr. Durham tore through New England revealing FBI agents’ ties
    to the Mafia and prosecuted Mafioso figures as well as former
    Republican Connecticut Gov. John Rowland. Appointed a special
    prosecutor by Attorney General Janet Reno back in 1999, he put
    together a team of FBI agents from outside the Boston area to
    investigate corruption in the Boston-based FBI office. The
    racketeering conviction of retired FBI agent John Connolly Jr.
    (under the RICO statutes) and indictment of retired FBI agent H.
    Paul Rico (he died before going to trial) followed.

    So it seemed appropriate that Attorney General William Barr — at
    the request of President Trump — would appoint Mr. Durham to
    look into possible Russian interference in the 2016 elections.
    That inquiry turned into a criminal probe that so far has led to
    the conviction of FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith, who admitted
    altering a CIA email to secure a Foreign Intelligence
    Surveillance Act tap of Carter Page, a Trump staffer.

    Mr. Durham’s indictment of former Perkins Coie lawyer/partner
    Michael Sussmann reveals how devious, how utterly corrupt,
    Hillary Clinton and her sycophants and apologists in the press
    really were and continue to be. In collusion with Mr. Sussmann
    and others, the Clinton campaign packaged and paid for the phony
    Steele dossier and both created and perpetuated the “Russia
    Collusion” hoax that the mainstream media relied on to tarnish
    Mr. Trump before and during his entire presidency.

    Just how insidious this plot against the president was is
    outlined in the Sussmann indictment.

    “In or about early August 2016,” it reads, “Tech Executive-1
    called an individual at Internet Company-3. During the call,
    Tech Executive-1 instructed the individual to task Internet
    Company-3 employees to search for any Internet date reflecting
    potential connections or communications between Trump or his
    associates and Russia.

    “In connection with this tasking, and as alleged in further
    detail below, Tech Executive-1’s goal was to support an
    ‘inference’ and ‘narrative’ regarding Trump that would please
    certain ‘VIPs.’

    No connections were found, so they’d need to create one.

    “It would be possible,” Originator-1 explains, “to fill out a
    sales form on two websites, faking the other company’s email
    address in each form” and thereby cause them “to appear to
    communicate with each other.” Originator-1 then concluded: “If
    Tech Executive-1 can take the *inference* we gain through this
    team exercise … then work to develop even an inference may be
    worthwhile.”

    “Let’s for a moment think of the best-case scenario,” he
    continued, “where we are able to show (somehow) that DNS
    [Director of National Security] communication exists between
    Trump and Russia. How do we plan to defend against the criticism
    that this is not spoofed traffic we are observing? There is no
    answer to that. Let’s assume again they (investigative reporters
    and security experts) are not smart enough to refute our ‘best
    case’ scenario.”

    Tech Executive-1 interrupts: “You do realize,” he says, “that we
    will have to expose every trick we have in our bag to even make
    a very weak association? Let’s all reflect upon that for a
    moment … The only thing that drives us at this point is that we
    just do not like Trump. This will not fly in (the) eyes of
    public scrutiny. Folks, I am afraid we have tunnel vision. Time
    to regroup?”

    Mr. Durham’s indictment cites that: “SUSSMANN continued to bill
    time on these matters to the Clinton Campaign.”

    Later, the team leader brags about the white paper having
    “smartly” avoided discussing weaknesses or “holes” in the
    paper’s hypothesis: “A DNS expert would poke several holes to
    this hypothesis (primarily around visibility, about which very
    smartly you do not talk about). That being said, I do not think
    even the top security (non-DNS) researchers can refute your
    statements.”

    “Nice!”

    In other words, no one would be smart enough to realize that the
    entire collusion narrative was fraudulent. Even the most
    hardened of Democrats should be ashamed and unnerved by these
    revelations.

    Former President Trump had no connection with Russian President
    Vladimir Putin. There was no “collusion” between the 2016 Trump
    for President campaign and anyone in Russia, president or
    otherwise. We do know, however, that collusion took place
    between the 2016 Hillary for President campaign and Russian
    interlopers.

    Because President Trump exposed the Russia collusion/Steele
    dossier gambit as the dirty political trick that it was, the
    Democratic Party impeached him for it. “Obstruction of justice”
    charges were leveled against the president for calling a hoax a
    hoax.

    No one should wonder why some of us continue to believe that the
    2020 election was indeed a sham and that President Trump should
    still be President Trump.

    James Buckley is a longtime Montecito resident. He welcomes
    questions or comments at jimb@substack.com. Readers are invited
    to visit jimb.substack.com, where Jim’s Journals are on file. He
    also invites people to subscribe to Jim’s Journal.

    https://newspress.com/the-existential-threat/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)