XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats XPost: talk.politics.guns
In article <t2nmjk$3ogpc$
29@news.freedyn.de>
Siri Cruise <
chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
In article <t5dul8$164$37@dont-email.me>,
"Scout" <me4guns@verizon.removeme.this2.nospam.net> wrote:
Whatever the rationale for or against a rape/abortion argument,
it doesn't apply to the vast majority of pregnancies that are
not the result of rape.
Yep, but it's regularly their excuse for ignoring the normality that
abortion regularly has nothing to do with rape or any sex crime.
Can you give a ballpark estimate on how many women you're okay
with making suffer?
That depends on you.
That's you, sunshine declaring 'it doesn't apply to the vast
majority of pregnancies' you don't care if a woman dies. So is
that it? You're good with killing 49& of women?
Women are useless for anything but sperm receptacles, divorce
lawyers, unwanted pregnancies and slutty social media antics.
Look at that stupid whore Kamala Harris. The only thing she's
good for is a drugged up Friday night fuck. There is no way I'd
want to wake up next to something like that in the morning.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)