• Re: When challenged on her lies, Kamala Harris slinks away

    From Harris Vaginal Sores@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 1 19:30:33 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.liberalism, alt.politics.democrats XPost: talk.politics.guns, sac.politics

    On 01 Sep 2023, Murph <nowomr@protonmail.com> posted some

    Kamala Harris is a stinking whore.

    We already knew Vice President Kamala Harris is a cheap-shot artist.
    Now we also know she’s a coward.

    She is a coward because she refuses to debate an issue that she
    herself, quite dishonestly, turned into a national line of attack.

    It was Harris more than anyone else who catalyzed the most recent
    national media frenzy against Gov. Ron DeSantis (R-FL), alleging
    that educational standards he implemented in Florida taught that
    “enslaved people benefited from slavery.” We have shown multiple
    times in these pages that the claim is a malicious lie. Harris and
    her mendacious chorus took a single sentence completely out of
    context.

    The sentence not only doesn’t say what they claim it does, but it is remarkably similar to sentences used in documents from sources of
    which the Left itself approves, such as the Library of Congress, the
    National Park Service, the National Humanities Center — and, we now
    know, the very Advanced Placement standards for African American
    history that the Left has spent months insisting should be used in
    Florida.

    In context, there is no way anyone could honestly claim that the
    Florida standards are in any way meant to suggest that slavery had
    an even mildly sunny side. Instead, the standards repeatedly
    emphasize the awful legacy of “slavery, racial oppression, racial segregation, and racial discrimination.” That is as to be expected, considering that the parts of the standards at issue were adopted by
    a panel led by black scholars about whom it makes zero sense to make
    the accusation that they somehow believe slavery was beneficial.

    And when black scholars write standards for black history and
    explain exactly why they chose the language they did, with both the
    language itself and their explanation directly rejecting the false interpretation Harris assigned to them, it takes outrageous gall for
    Harris to insist they meant the very opposite of what they said.

    Either way, if Harris really believes the claptrap she continues to
    spew about the standards created by DeSantis’s committee, she should
    have the decency and gumption to make her case when challenged on
    it. DeSantis, who can show by overwhelming evidence that the
    standards neither say nor mean what Harris claims they do,
    challenged Harris to a debate on the topic. Knowing she has no
    honest case, Harris instead scurried into hiding while saying she
    would not debate the topic of slavery with DeSantis or anyone else.

    But DeSantis didn’t say slavery was debatable. He said his state’s curriculum was debatable because Harris herself had smeared it.

    Now we, unlike Harris, can be fair by acknowledging there are shards
    of arguments Harris might justifiably make. If she wants to argue
    that one or two of DeSantis’s committee appointees may not have been superlative, that’s fine. If she wants to question the accuracy of
    some of the board members’ scholarship, that’s fine. If she even
    wants to argue, through otherwise tendentious ideological lenses,
    that “there’s a lot missing” from the standards that should be
    there, well, have at it. Those three arguments at least have
    peripheral bearing on the worthiness of the standards.

    Harris, though, won’t even do that. To make those arguments one-on-
    one with DeSantis would just expose how tangential they are to the
    main subject, which is her demonstrably dishonest claim that the
    standards and the curriculum somehow make excuses for slavery. By
    refusing to debate, Harris essentially acknowledges that her attack
    was a form of political drive-by shooting, not a serious or rational
    engagement in philosophical combat.

    Harris committed calumny against DeSantis here, with no regard for
    truth. Her attacks were catnip for the liberal media but entirely
    meretricious. With this shameful combination of prevarication and pusillanimity, she confirms her reputation as a political figure
    worthy only of disdain.

    https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/editorials/when- challenged-on-her-lies-kamala-harris-slinks-away

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)