• Re: Woman whose rape kit DNA was used to arrest her sues San Francisco

    From jdyoung@21:1/5 to Ed Debevic on Thu Sep 22 06:09:56 2022
    On Wednesday, September 21, 2022 at 10:27:58 PM UTC-5, Ed Debevic wrote:
    On Tue, 20 Sep 2022 18:19:47 -0000 (UTC), "Leroy N. Soetoro" <democrat-...@mail.house.gov> wrote:

    https://abc7.com/rape-kit-dna-san-francisco-victim-lawsuit- >privacy/12226725/

    SAN FRANCISCO -- A rape victim whose DNA from her sexual assault case was >used by San Francisco police to arrest her in an unrelated property crime >on Monday filed a lawsuit against the city.

    During a search of a San Francisco Police Department crime lab database, >the woman's DNA was tied to a burglary in late 2021. Her DNA had been >collected and stored in the system as part of a 2016 domestic violence and >sexual assault case, then-District Attorney Chesa Boudin said in February >in a shocking revelation that raised privacy concerns.

    "This is government overreach of the highest order, using the most unique >and personal thing we have - our genetic code - without our knowledge to >try and connect us to crime," the woman's attorney, Adante Pointer, said
    in a statement.

    The revelation prompted a national outcry from advocates, law enforcement, >legal experts and lawmakers. Advocates said the practice could affect >victims' willingness to come forward to law enforcement authorities.

    Federal law already prohibits the inclusion of victims' DNA in the
    national Combined DNA Index System. There is no corresponding law in >California to prohibit local law enforcement databases from retaining >victims' profiles and searching them years later for entirely different >purposes.

    California lawmakers last month approved a bill that would prohibit using >the DNA profiles collected by police from sexual assault survivors and >other victims for any purpose other than aiding in identifying the >perpetrator. Local law enforcement agencies would also be prohibited from >retaining and then searching victim DNA to incriminate them in unrelated >crimes under the legislation, which is pending before Gov. Gavin Newsom.

    Boudin said the report was found among hundreds of pages of evidence >against a woman who had been recently charged with a felony property
    crime. After learning the source of the DNA evidence, Boudin dropped the >felony property crime charges against the woman.

    The police department's crime lab stopped the practice shortly after >receiving a complaint from the district attorney's office and formally >changed its operating procedure to prevent the misuse of DNA collected
    from sexual assault victims, Police Chief Bill Scott said.

    Scott said at a police commission meeting in March that he had discovered >17 crime victim profiles, 11 of them from rape kits, that were matched as >potential suspects using a crime victims database during unrelated >investigations. Scott said he believes the only person arrested was the >woman who filed the lawsuit Monday.

    The woman filed the lawsuit under the alias of Jane Doe to protect her >privacy, Pointer said The Associated Press generally does not name people >who say they have been sexually assaulted unless they choose to be named.

    California allows local law enforcement crime labs to operate their own >forensic databases that are separate from federal and state databases. The >law also lets municipal labs perform forensic analysis, including DNA >profiling, and use those databases - without regulation by the state or >others.
    "We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking
    bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the
    head Rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by
    Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very
    filthy, came down and met the General (Eisenhower)...The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later
    lost my lunch as the result remembering it."

    ~ General Patton in Germany, diary entry Sept 17, 1945

    Q: What's the difference between a zit and a priest?
    A: A zit waits until you are 13 before coming on your face.

    J Young
    jdyo...@ymail.com
    Follow me on Facebook and PM me for info on my huge collection of gay porn! https://www.facebook.com/jon.young.10420

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)