• Re: As US military files for bankruptcy, the creditors keep calling

    From Secret Papers@21:1/5 to The Starmaker on Fri Jun 16 09:58:56 2023
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, free.biden.sucks, sac.politics
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> wrote in news:sjv7m5$vjk$2@news.dns-netz.com:

    Whitey wrote

    That nigger Obama started it when he let fags into the Army.

    Across the armed forces, service leaders continue to tout a military
    getting smaller and older as necessary to free up funds for other
    priorities. But on their paths to emerging fleets and inventories of 2025
    (one short fiscal year from now, essentially), the military is hitting the iceberg of bankruptcy before the vaunted future ever arrives fielded and
    at scale.

    The Navy is simply too small and unready to meet daily global demands for forces, much less confront challenges posed by China. Air Force leaders
    are telling combatant commanders they need to ask for less air power in
    the “give-and-take” of supply versus worldwide demand. The Marine Corps commandant has stated bluntly that his service is basically out of the
    crisis response business—too small and lacking amphibs to respond to
    allied earthquake victims, train outside of bases in Asia, and help
    evacuate America’s embassy in Sudan.

    So-called divest to invest was always overly risky given the gap in combat power it creates while awaiting replacement or next-generation
    capabilities. When the newer equipment, technology or capability is
    delayed, there is no fallback option to mitigate risk. Pentagon leaders
    are forced to let the calls for help simply go to voicemail.

    But there was never any evidence to support the overly optimistic
    assumption that the Pentagon’s Soviet-style acquisition system was going
    to deliver promised capability on time and in adequate numbers. The list
    of delayed weapons and equipment just keeps piling up.

    While the Air Force struggles with pilot recruiting, training and
    retention, the service just got another dose of bad news. The new trainer aircraft, Boeing’s T-7A, has faced another delay. This will postpone its deployment until 2027, three years later than initially planned. It’s not
    just the trainers either—production of the F-15EX, the next-generation counterpart of the venerable F-15, has also slowed, resulting in uncertain delivery timelines.

    The Air Force’s new intercontinental ballistic missile to replace the
    aging Minuteman III, the LGM-35A Sentinel, has just seen its “initial capability” ready date moved back a year from 2029 to 2030. The program is crucial to modernizing the nuclear triad, but has fallen victim to
    staffing shortfalls, clearance delays, tech challenges, and supply chain disruptions.

    Related video
    A fight in Washington over the national debt could be
    Scripps News
    Military salaries may be skipped or delayed if debt defaults
    0
    View on Watch

    Military salaries may be skipped or delayed if debt defaults
    Scripps News
    Scripps News
    A recently released Government Accountability Office (GAO) report noted
    that the production of the Navy’s block five Virginia-class attack
    submarines has been taking over two years longer than expected. GAO notes
    that shipbuilders are struggling to meet the production goal of two ships
    per year. Explanations for the delay point to shipyard staffing shortages
    and lower work efficiency than estimated. Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Michael Gilday recently asserted “They [submarine builders] are under performing. They are over cost and way over schedule.”

    Wait, there’s more, including:

    Helicopter engines,
    Bomber modernization,
    Air defense radars, and
    The new Air Force One.

    All these necessary Pentagon programs are experiencing a barrage of
    delays.

    That same GAO report on Pentagon procurement highlighted that more than
    half of major programs are experiencing delays, and for many of those
    programs, this is the second or third year in a row of continued
    deferments. While the particular reasons vary, the trend is stark: new
    weapon systems and modernization programs are often not meeting their set delivery schedules.

    As delays ripple across the services, divest to invest has shown it is a
    failed approach. It is past time for leaders to admit the world does not
    take a pause while America attempts to catch up. Nature abhors a vacuum,
    and the U.S. is increasingly falling behind—by choice.

    This article originally appeared in the AEIdeas blog and is reprinted with
    kind permission from the American Enterprise Institute.

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/as-us-military-files-for- bankruptcy-the-creditors-keep-calling/ar- AA1cBlFd?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=279b83157b5940c1a39f3276cdbbd837&ei=38

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)