XPost: aus.politics, alt.sixtyplus, alt.usenet.kooks
XPost: alt.culture.new-zealand

Go back to your kooks swamp...

Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> wrote:

x-no-archive: no

or are there others who are as bad or even worse?

-- HYPOTHESIS ON KANT'S PROLEGOMENA BEING IMPETUS FOR CHRISTCHURCH MASSACRE
(A COMPLETE MATCH AGAINST MY ONTIC DIALECTIC #1292 - DEVIATING FROM THE PRESCRIBED ORDER OR RULE)

(c) 2020 Dolf Leendert Boek, Revision: 22 August, 2020

YOU OUGHT TO THEN NOTE THAT WHITE NATIONALIST BRENTON TARRANT'S BLESSING OBTAINED BEFORE THE CHRISTCHURCH #419 - SLAUGHTER EVENT IS SIMILARLY
ALIGNED WITH A CATHOLIC MILITARY ORDER OF KNIGHTS TEMPLAR AND THEREFORE HAS
A GROUNDING AS UNLAWFUL USE OF MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ASSOCIATED WITH
QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT TO THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA.

THE CONTEXT OF MY APPEALS IS THAT IMPOSTS HAVE BEEN HABITUALLY (INCESSANT
AS OBSESSIVE COMPULSIVE) MADE AS TARGETING UPON MY AUTONOMY AND VOLUNTARY
FREE WILL (NOTE THE EQUIVALENCE OF HAND GESTURES), AND THE POLICE MEMBER I SPOKE TO DIDN'T GRASP THE REALITY THAT THESE PERSONS HAVE STOLEN MY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SO AS TO PERPETUATE MALEFICENCE AND ONE CANNOT EASILY DISMISS THE NEXUS with the *CHRISTCHURCH* event as a "terrorist attack"
*THAT* *ALTHOUGH* *NOT* *ORDERED* *BY* *ANY* *GROUP* *AS* *A* *DECISION* *TARRANT* *MADE* *HIMSELF*, *HE* '*DID* *CONTACT* *THE* *REBORN* *KNIGHTS* *TEMPLAR* *FOR* *A* *BLESSING* *IN* *SUPPORT* *OF* *THE* *ATTACK*, *WHICH* *WAS* *GIVEN*.' [cf: Tarrant's Manifesto emailed to Ardern, page 9 of 73]

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/ProtoHumanHand.jpg>

[IMAGE: "My Hand Upon The Waters" by Aboriginal [I don't remember his name] artist, Kings Cross, Sydney / Aboriginal Reconciliation requires conscious agreeable action / A symptom of diminished association to the circle of consciousness as water of life which leads to a loss of self identity as formula of autonomy]

On Saturday 16 MARCH 2019 the White Nationalist BRENTON TARRANT, 28yo FROM AUSTRALIA appeared within a CHRISTCHURCH COURT charged with an initial
count of murder and was pictured conveying in addition to a conjoined
*FIST* (SEE: *FUSILLADE* on 17 MARCH 2017) whilst handcuffed a purposed as distinctive *HAND* *SIGN* in being equivalent to *MY* *HAND* *WITHIN* *ABORIGINAL* *ART* depicted within my 25 OCTOBER 2017 narrative titled: "RECONCILIATION SUMMARY OF OUR WORLD IS GUIDED BY TWO PRINCIPLES: {@1 - CARDINAL SIN AS WICKEDNESS OF PRELATES / @5 - IMMUTABLE SELF-CENTREDNESS
THAT STANDS IN THE PLACE OF GOD} WHICH NOW HAS NO OPPORTUNITY FOR GOD ALMIGHTY'S GRACE"

<https://metro.co.uk/2019/03/15/new-zealand-terrorist-makes-white-power-hand-symbol-court-8911986/>

[IMAGE: (A SYMBOL OF ABORIGINAL RECONCILIATION BEING DEPLOYED BY WHITE SUPREMACISTS IN *OPERATION* *O-KKK* AS SPECIFIC TARGETING BY DEFECATION / *TOILETING* AGAINST THE DIGNITY OF SACRED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS CAUSE CÉLÈBRE)

YOUTUBE: "Johnny Cash - Ring of Fire"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WyLhwYFgmk>

Beginning in 2017, the gesture was at the center of an online prank in meme culture related to alt-right and white supremacy originating from anonymous message board posts on the website 4chan. The Boston Globe reported that
users on 4chan's "/pol/" (Politically Incorrect) board were instructed in February 2017 to 'flood Twitter and other social media websites...claiming
that the OK hand sign is a symbol of white supremacy,' as part of a
campaign dubbed "*OPERATION* *O-KKK*"]

LET'S GO COMMANDO [OBSERVER17@GMAIL.COM / DRANOD@YAHOO.COM.AU] @ 2150 HOURS [#343 = @168 - I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26} + @175 - I AM NOT
A TRANSGRESSOR {%22}] ON 19 NOVEMBER 2017: "I know this person - and have details.

It is hard to state what I know without violating privacy policy but if you look closely at his posts you will find that:

He is a Telstra customer - account number: 221530570

Numerous people have intervention orders against him, and he has several breaches of said orders.

He operates www.grapple369.com

I have much more - but do not wish to come to his attention or violate any laws."

Prototype: HOMOIOS {#372 as [#40, #1, #30, #1, #20, #70, #10, #200] =
malakós (G3120): {UMBRA: #0 as #362 % #41 = #34} 1) soft, soft to the
touch; 2) metaph. in a bad sense; 2a) effeminate; 2a1) of a catamite; 2a2)
of a boy kept for homosexual relations with a man; 2a3) of a male who
submits his body to unnatural lewdness; 2a4) of a male prostitute; / #343
as [#300, #5, #30, #8] = télos (G5056): {UMBRA: #54 as #605 % #41 = #31} 1) end; 1a) termination, the limit at which a thing ceases to be (always of
the end of some act or state, but not of the end of a period of time); 1b)
the end; 1b1) the last in any succession or series; 1b2) eternal; 1c) that
by which a thing is finished, its close, issue; 1d) the end to which all
things relate, the aim, purpose; 2) toll, custom (i.e. indirect tax on
goods)} / *HETEROS* {#351 as [#10, #1, #300, #600] = ʼâsham (H816): {UMBRA: #9 as #341 % #41 = #13} 1) to offend, be guilty, trespass; 1a) (Qal); 1a1)
to do wrong, offend, trespass, commit an offense, do injury; 1a2) to be or become guilty; 1a3) to be held guilty; 1a4) to be incriminated; 1b)
(Niphal) to suffer punishment; 1c) (Hiphil) to declare guilty; 2) (TWOT) to
be desolate, acknowledge offense; / #373 as [#1, #80, #70, #80, #30, #1,
#50, #1, #10, #50] = apoplanáō (G635): {UMBRA: #24 as #1113 % #41 = #6} 1)
to cause to go astray; 2) to lead away from the truth to error; 3) to go astray, stray away from} / TORAH {#349 as [#300, #9, #40] = sâṭam (H7852): {UMBRA: #21 as #349 % #41 = #21} 1) to hate, oppose oneself to, bear a
grudge, retain animosity against, cherish animosity against; 1a) (Qal) to cherish animosity against / #372 as [#40, #1, #30, #1, #20, #70, #10, #200]
= malakós (G3120): {UMBRA: #0 as #362 % #41 = #34} 1) soft, soft to the
touch; 2) metaph. in a bad sense; 2a) effeminate; 2a1) of a catamite; 2a2)
of a boy kept for homosexual relations with a man; 2a3) of a male who
submits his body to unnatural lewdness; 2a4) of a male prostitute}

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble/?zen:8,row:8,col:2,nous:38&PROTOTYPE:HETEROS>

.jackNote@zen: 8, row: 8, col: 2, nous: 38 [Date: (none), Time: (none),
Super: #351 / #15 - Mastering Guiding Discourse, Revealers of Virtue;
I-Ching: H61 - Inner Trust, Inner Truth, Center Returning; Tetra: 1 -
Centre, Ego: #373 / #38 - Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62
- Minor Superiority, Small Excess, Small Exceeding, Preponderance of the
small, Small surpassing; Tetra: 11 - Divergence]

YOUTUBE: "Annie Lennox - Why (Official Music Video)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HG7I4oniOyA>

LET'S GO COMMANDO [OBSERVER17@GMAIL.COM / DRANOD@YAHOO.COM.AU] @ 1548 HOURS
ON 10 DECEMBER 2017: “Well I won’t make mention of the level of respect I have seen you show to others, but while we are on the topic, I have some genuine questions for you...

“INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀT[I]S”

This phrase seems to be somewhat poor LATIN, and you seem to be the only
person on the entirety of the internet to use it, and as a result, I’m interested to know what you are attempting to say when you use said phrase.

If you have a genuine message to convey - then clarity is #265 - *KEY* to getting it across.

I am actually interested to know about some of the things you make
reference to - so if all you can do is sling insult back at me like you
seem to do with the rest of the world - then this will be the last message
of mine you will read.”

YOUTUBE: “Latin Lessons (Life Of Brian)”

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KAfKFKBlZbM>

INTELLECTUS AS GENITIVE VOLUNTĀTIS(zen: 1, row: 2, col: 4, nous: 79)@{     @1: Sup: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#79); Ego: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#79),
    @2: Sup: 27 - DUTIES: SHIH (#106); Ego: 29 - DECISIVENESS: TUAN (#108),     @3: Sup: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#145); Ego: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#120),
    @4: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#196: I AM NOT ONE OF LOUD VOICE {%37}); Ego: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#132),
    @5: Sup: 54 - UNITY: K'UN (#250); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#135),     @6: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#299: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 19 ON #261 - BINOMIAL CLAIMING AS OBJECTIVE VALIDITY AND NECESSARY UNIVERSAL VALIDITY
(FOR EVERYONE) ARE THEREFORE INTERCHANGEABLE CONCEPTS, AND ALTHOUGH WE DO
NOT KNOW THE OBJECT IN ITSELF); Ego: 76 - AGGRAVATION: CHU (#211),
    @7: Sup: 7 - ASCENT: SHANG (#306: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 23 AS TIME FOR PAYBACK (@172 - GALLOWS) NEWSPAPER OF 5 JANUARY 2017 BEING CONDUCT COMMENCING WITH A MAILBOX #261 - BINOMIAL CLAMPING THREAT MADE UPON 6
JANUARY 2017 AS AN EXACERBATING INTENTION FOR HABITUAL PILLORY); Ego: 39 - RESIDENCE: CHU (#250),
} // Male: #306; Feme: #250

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #19 - ARGUMENT FOR ETHICAL ANARCHISM, RETURNING TO SIMPLICITY; I-CHING: H57 - COMPLIANCE, GENTLE PENETRATION / WIND, GROUND, CALCULATIONS; TETRA: 58 - GATHERING IN (HSI) AS IDEA: @299: "Objective validity and necessary universal validity (for
everyone) are therefore interchangeable concepts, and although we do not
know the object in itself, nonetheless, if we regard a judgment as
universally valid and hence necessary, objective validity is understood to
be included.

#261 as [#1, #60, #200] = ʼĕçâr (H633): {UMBRA: #6 as #261 % #41 = #15} 1) interdict, decree, *DECREE* *OF* *RESTRICTION* (*TIME* FOR PAYBACK);

Through this judgment we cognize the object (even if it otherwise remains unknown as it may be in itself) by means of the universally valid and
necessary connection of the given perceptions; and since this is the case
for all objects of the senses, judgments of experience will not derive
their objective validity from the immediate cognition of the object (for
this is impossible), but merely from the condition for the universal
validity of empirical judgments [IDEA @299], which, as has been said, never rests on empirical, or indeed sensory conditions at all, but on a pure
concept of the understanding. The object always remains unknown in itself;
if, however, through the concept of the understanding the connection of the representations which it provides to our sensibility is determined as universally valid, then the object is determined through this relation, and
the judgment is objective. <http://www.grapple369.com/images/TIME%20FOR%20PAYBACK%2020170105.jpg>

Let us provide examples: that the room is warm, the sugar sweet, the
wormwood repugnant, are merely subjectively valid judgments. I do not at
all require that I should find it so at every *TIME*, or that everyone else should find it just as I do; they express only a relation of two sensations
to the same subject, namely myself, and this only in my present state of perception, and are therefore not expected to be valid for the object:
these I call judgments of perception.

The case is completely different with judgments of experience. What
experience teaches me under certain circumstances, it must teach me at
every *TIME* and teach everyone else as well, and its validity is not
limited to the subject or its state at that *TIME*. Therefore I express all such judgments as objectively valid; as, e.g., if I say: the air is
elastic, then this judgment is to begin with only a judgment of perception;
I relate two sensations in my senses only to one another.

If I want it to be called a judgment of experience, I then require that
this connection be subject to a condition that makes it universally valid.
I want therefore that I, at every *TIME*, and also everyone else, would necessarily have to conjoin the same perceptions under the same
circumstances." [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, IMMANUEL
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783), pages 51-52]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #23 - CONSTANCY OF GUIDING CONCEPTS, EMPTINESS & NON-EXISTENCE; I-CHING: H18 - ILLS TO BE CURED,
ARRESTING DECAY, CORRECTING, WORK ON WHAT HAS BEEN SPOILED (DECAY),
DECAYING, BRANCH; TETRA: 26 - ENDEAVOUR (WU) AS IDEA @306: "Judgments,
insofar as they are regarded merely as the condition for the unification of given representations in a consciousness, are rules. These rules, insofar
as they represent the unification as necessary, are a priori rules, and provided that there are none above them from which they can be derived, are principles. Now since, with respect to the possibility of all experience,
if merely the form of thinking is considered in the experience, no
conditions on judgments of experience are above those that bring the appearances (according to the varying form of their intuition) under pure concepts of the understanding (which make the empirical judgment [IDEA:
@306] objectively valid), these conditions are therefore the a priori principles of possible experience.

Now the principles of possible experience are, at the same time, universal
laws of nature that can be cognized a priori. And so the problem that lies
in our second question, presently before us: How is pure natural science possible? is solved.

For the systematization that is required for the form of a science is here found to perfection, since beyond the aforementioned formal conditions of
all judgments in general, hence of all rules whatsoever furnished by logic,
no others are possible, and these form a logical system; but the concepts
based thereon, which contain the a priori conditions for all synthetic and necessary judgments, for that very reason form a transcendental system; finally, the principles by means of which all appearances are subsumed
under these concepts form a physiological system, i.e., a system of nature, which precedes all empirical cognition of nature and first makes it
possible, and can therefore be called the true universal and pure natural science. [CAMBRIDGE TEXTS IN THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY, IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783), pages 56-58]

HOMOIOS PROTOTYPE@{
    @8: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#326: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA ON THIS VERY SYSTEM, LIKE EVERY TRUE SYSTEM FOUNDED ON A UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE, ALSO
EXHIBITS ITS INESTIMABLE USEFULNESS IN THAT IT *EXPELS* *ALL* *THE* *EXTRANEOUS* *CONCEPTS* THAT MIGHT OTHERWISE CREEP IN); Ego: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#263: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA IDEA ON *MAKING* *PLANS* *IS* *MOST*
*OFTEN* *A* *PRESUMPTUOUS*, *BOASTFUL* *MENTAL* *PREOCCUPATION*),
    @9: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#350: *TO* *THINK*, *PLAN*, *ESTEEM*, *CALCULATE*, *INVENT*, *MAKE* *A* *JUDGMENT*, *IMAGINE*, *COUNT*)); Ego: 4
- BARRIER: HSIEN (#267: KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 2),
} // Male: #350; Feme: #267
 
HETEROS PROTOTYPE@{
    @8: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#311: *CHRISTCHURCH* *MASSACRE* on 15 MARCH 2019 *AGAINST* #71 - WORLDVIEW OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT );
Ego: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#329: 1 JANUARY CONFORMING TO IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and FIDELITY OF OATHS TO
#231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / #541 - *THICK* *CLOUD*),
    @9: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#320: *TO* *VIOLENTLY* *DESTROY*, *DEVASTATE*, *DESPOIL*, *ASSAIL*); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#333),
} // Male: #320; Feme: #333

YOUTUBE: "Shakespears Sister - Stay (Official Video)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YCYaALgW80c>
 
TORAH PROTOTYPE@{
    @8: Sup: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#311 - *CHRISTCHURCH* *MASSACRE* on 15 MARCH 2019 *AGAINST* #71 - WORLDVIEW OF QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT
); Ego: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#329: 1 JANUARY CONFORMING TO IMMANUEL
KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) / #391 - HOMOGENEOUS PRINCIPLE and FIDELITY OF
OATHS TO #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL / #541 - *THICK* *CLOUD*),
    @9: Sup: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#320: *TO* *VIOLENTLY* *DESTROY*, *DEVASTATE*, *DESPOIL*, *ASSAIL*); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#333),
} // Male: #320; Feme: #333
 
RIGHTS PROTOTYPE@{
    @8: Sup: 49 - FLIGHT: T'AO (#355: BIGGEST BLOKES BBQ ON 25 AUGUST 2017 AS FORMULA OF PROGRESSION AGAINST QUEEN VICTORIA'S LETTERS PATENT EIDOMAI: G1492 (@228 - FORCE & DEFINITE MEANING / KANT'S PROLEGOMENA SECTION 57);
Ego: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#292),
    @9: Sup: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#408: *MEAT* *IN* *MAILBOX* on 15 NOVEMBER 2017); Ego: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#296),
} // Male: #408; Feme: #296

#408 as [#5, #2, #1, #400] / [#2, #1, #400, #5] = bôwʼ (H935): {UMBRA: #0
as #9 % #41 = #9} 1) to go in, enter, come, go, come in; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to enter, come in; 1a2) to come; i) to come with; ii) to come upon, fall or
light upon, *ATTACK* (*ENEMY*); iii) to come to pass; 1a3) to attain to;
1a4) to be enumerated; 1a5) to go; 1b) (Hiphil); 1b1) to lead in; 1b2) to
carry in; 1b3) to bring in, cause to come in, gather, cause to come, bring near, bring against, bring upon; 1b4) to bring to pass; 1c) (Hophal); 1c1)
to be brought, brought in; 1c2) to be introduced, be put;

MALE: @196 = #196

ONTIC CHECKSUM: #196 as [#40, #70, #30, #50, #6] = mâʻal (H4603): {UMBRA:
#14 as #140 % #41 = #17} 1) to act unfaithfully, act treacherously,
transgress, commit a trespass; 1a) (Qal) to act unfaithfully or
treacherously; 1a1) against man; 1a2) against God; 1a3) against devoted
thing; 1a4) against husband;

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON SECTION #39 - ACHIEVING ONENESS, ROOT
OF ORDER; I-CHING: H28 - MAJOR SUPERIORITY, EXCESS, GREAT EXCEEDING, PREPONDERANCE OF THE GREAT, GREAT SURPASSING, CRITICAL MASS; TETRA: 76 - AGGRAVATION (CHU) AS IDEA @326 WITHIN PREFACE TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS:
"This very system, like every true system founded on a universal principle, also exhibits its inestimable usefulness in that it expels all the
extraneous concepts that might otherwise creep in among these pure concepts
of the understanding, and it assigns each cognition its place.

Those concepts that, under the name of concepts of reflection, I had also
put into a table under the guidance of the categories mingle in ontology
with the pure concepts of the understanding without privilege and
legitimate claims, although the latter are concepts of connection and
thereby of the object itself, whereas the former are only concepts of the
mere comparison of already given concepts, and therefore have an entirely different nature and use; through my law-governed division (Critique, p.
260) {ie.

Kant provides a fourfold division of “concepts of reflection,” which pertain to judgment itself:

@1 - identity / difference,
@2 - agreement / opposition,
@3 - inner/ outer, and
@4 - determinable / determination or
@5 - matter / form)

} they are extricated from this amalgam.

But the usefulness of this separated table of categories shines forth yet
more brightly if, as will soon be done, we separate from the categories the table of transcendental concepts of reason, which have a completely
different nature and origin than the concepts of the understanding (so that
the table must also have a different form), a separation that, necessary as
it is, has never occurred in any system of metaphysics, as a result of
which these ideas of reason and concepts of the understanding run
confusedly together as if they belonged to one family, like siblings, an intermingling that also could never have been avoided in the absence of a separate system of categories." [Pages 77-78]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) IDEA @263 AS PREFACE TO ANY FUTURE METAPHYSICS: "To make plans is most often a presumptuous, boastful mental preoccupation, through which one presents the appearance of creative
genius, in that one requires what one cannot himself provide, censures what
one cannot do better, and proposes what one does not know how to attain
oneself – though merely for a sound plan for a general critique of reason, somewhat more than might be expected would already have been required if it were not, as is usual, to be merely a recitation of pious wishes.

But pure reason is such an isolated domain, within itself so thoroughly connected, that no part of it can be encroached upon without disturbing all
the rest, nor adjusted without having previously determined for each part
its place and its influence on the others; for, since there is nothing
outside of it that could correct our judgment within it, the validity and
use of each part depends on the relation in which it stands to the others within reason itself, and, as with the structure of an organized body, the purpose of any member can be derived only from the complete concept of the whole. That is why it can be said of such a critique, that it is never trustworthy unless it is entirely complete down to the least elements of
pure reason, and that in the domain of this faculty one must determine and settle either all or nothing.

But although a mere plan that might precede the CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON
would be unintelligible, undependable, and useless, it is by contrast all
the more useful if it comes after. For one will thereby be put in the
position to survey the whole, to test one by one the main points at issue
in this science, and to arrange many things in the exposition better than
could be done in the first execution of the work.

Here then is such a plan subsequent to the completed work, which now can be laid out according to the analytic method, whereas the work itself
absolutely had to be composed according to the synthetic method, so that
the science might present all of its articulations, as the structural organization of a quite peculiar faculty of cognition, in their natural connection." [Pages 12-13]

YOUTUBE: "Hozier - Take Me To Church (Official Video)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVjiKRfKpPI>

EXCERPT FROM RUSSIAN #312 - CONTRADICTION ON NOVICHOK POISONING BY #274 - PERFUME / KANT'S PROLEGOMENA UPON TRINOMIAL NOUMENON (DUTCH BARBARISM:
GEERT BE WILDERS BLAAST CARTOONWEDSTRIJD AF) DATED 2 TO 17 SEPTEMBER 2018:

<http://www.grapple369.com/images/dolf_or_geert_by_kiger8kiger.jpg>

[IMAGE: This CARTOON is supposed to be a characterisation (Dutch Raven /
Hitler / Napoleon Emperor) named dolf as being either the Dutch politician GEERT BE WILDERS or of myself]

IMMANUEL KANT'S PROLEGOMENA (1783) SECTION #2 - CONTRAST OF TERMS, SELF-CULTURE; I-CHING: H11 - PEACE, PERVADING, GREATNESS; TETRA: 16 -
CONTACT (CHIAO) AS CONSIDERATION ON IDEA @267: "ON THE TYPE OF COGNITION
THAT ALONE CAN BE CALLED METAPHYSICAL (SECTION 1 AS PREAMBLE):

If one wishes to present a body of cognition as science, then *ONE* *MUST* *FIRST* *BE* *ABLE* *TO* *DETERMINE* *PRECISELY* *THE* *DIFFERENTIA* it has
in common with no other science, and which is therefore its distinguishing feature; otherwise the boundaries of all the sciences run together, and
none of them can be dealt with thoroughly according to its own nature.

#265 as [#1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #10, #70, #10] = agoraîos (G60): {UMBRA:
#455 % #41 = #4} 1) in, of or belonging to the market place; 2) frequenting
the market place; 2a) *HUCKSTERS*, petty traffickers, retail dealers; 2b) idlers, loungers, *THE* *COMMON* *SORT*, *LOW*, *MEAN* *VULGAR*; 3) *GENERALLY*, *PROPER* *TO* *THE* *ASSEMBLY*, *SUITED* *TO* *FORENSIC* *SPEAKING*, *BUSINESS*-*LIKE* *TRANSACTIONS*;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #455 % #41 = #4 - Using Guidance, Sourceless; I-Ching: H27 - Nourishment, Swallowing, Jaws, Comfort / Security; Tetra: 81 - Fostering;
THOTH MEASURE: #4 - Oh Eater of the Shadow, who makest thine appearance at Elephantine; I am not rapacious.

    #VIRTUE: With Barrier (no. #4), isolation but
    #TOOLS: With Stove (no. #44), neighbours.
    #POSITION:
As to Strength (no. #36), it is the solidly built.
    #TIME: As to Waiting
(no. #18), it is the weak.
    #CANON: #102 ONTIC_OBLIGANS_102@{
   @1: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#4); Ego: 4 - BARRIER:
HSIEN (#4),
   @2: Sup: 48 - RITUAL: LI (#52); Ego: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#48),
   @3: Sup: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#55); Ego: 36 - STRENGTH: CH'IANG (#84
- I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}),
   @4: Sup: 21 - RELEASE: SHIH (#76); Ego: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#102 - I AM NOT RAPACIOUS {%4}),
   Male: #76; Feme: #102
} // #102

G60@{
   @1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),
   @2: Sup: 4 - BARRIER: HSIEN (#5); Ego: 3 - MIRED: HSIEN (#4),
   @3: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#79); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#74),    @4: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#91); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#93),
   @5: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#94),
   @6: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#127); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#104 - I COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   @7: Sup: 12 - YOUTHFULNESS: T'UNG (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#174),
   @8: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#161 - I AM NOT A TELLER OF LIES {%9}); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#184 - I PUT NO CHECK UPON THE WATER IN ITS FLOW {%36}),
   Male: #161; Feme: #184
} // #265

"But the Jews which believed not, moved with envy, took unto them certain
lewd fellows of the baser {#265 as [#1, #3, #70, #100, #1, #10, #70, #10] = agoraios (G60): baser} sort, and gathered a company, and set all the city
on an uproar, and assaulted the house of Jason {he that cures}, and sought
to bring them out to the people." [Acts 17:5 (KJV)]

#265 as [#20, #30, #5, #10, #200] = kleís (G2807): {UMBRA: #265 % #41 =
#19} 1) *A* *KEY*; 1a) since the keeper of the *KEYS* *HAS* *THE* *POWER*
to open and to shut; 1b) metaph. in the NT to denote power and authority of various kinds;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #265 % #41 = #19 - Argument for Ethical Anarchism, Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H57 - Compliance, Gentle Penetration / Wind, Ground, Calculations; Tetra: 58 - Gathering In;
THOTH MEASURE: #19 - Oh Uammetu, who makest thine appearance at the Block;
I commit not adultery with another's wife.

    #VIRTUE: Following (no. #19) means dispersing, but
    #TOOLS: Massing (no. #59) means assembling.
    #POSITION: With Ease (no. #23), the level and smooth, but
    #TIME: With Difficulties (no. #79), the going up and down.
    #CANON: #180
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_180@{
   @1: Sup: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#19); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#19),
   @2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#97); Ego: 59 - MASSING: CHU (#78),
   @3: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#117); Ego: 23 - EASE: YI (#101),
   @4: Sup: 18 - WAITING: HSI (#135); Ego: 79 - DIFFICULTIES: NAN (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}),
   Male: #135; Feme: #180
} // #180

G2807@{
   @1: Sup: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#20); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#20),    @2: Sup: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#70); Ego: 30 - BOLD
RESOLUTION: YI (#50),
   @3: Sup: 55 - DIMINISHMENT: CHIEN (#125); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#55),
   @4: Sup: 65 - INNER: NEI (#190); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#65),
   @5: Sup: 22 - RESISTANCE: KE (#212); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#103),    Male: #212; Feme: #103
} // #265

"And I will give unto thee the keys {#265 as [#20, #30, #5, #10, #200] =
kleis (G2807): key} of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever- thou shalt
bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven." [Matthew 16:19 (KJV)]

YOUTUBE: "Snap! - The Power (Official Video)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j1BNcSBApOU>

"Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key {#265 as [#20, #30,
#5, #10, #200] = kleis (G2807): key} of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered." [Luke 11:52 (KJV)]

Whether this *DISTINGUISHING* *FEATURE* *CONSISTS* *IN* *A* *DIFFERENCE*
*OF* *THE* *OBJECT* *OR* *THE* *SOURCE* *OF* *COGNITION*, or even of the
type of cognition, or some if not all of these things together, the idea of
the possible science and its territory depends first of all upon it.

#266 as [#1, #40, #1, #9, #5, #10, #200] = amathḗs (G261): {UMBRA: #259 %
#41 = #13} 1) *UNLEARNED*, *IGNORANT*;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #259 % #41 = #13 - Status, Loathing Shame; I-Ching: H5 - Waiting,
Delay, Attending, Moistened, Arriving; Tetra: 17 - Holding Back;
THOTH MEASURE: #13 - Oh Eater of Blood, who makest thine appearance at the Block; I have not slaughtered the sacred animals.

    #VIRTUE: With Increase (no. #13), the beginning of florescence, but
    #TOOLS: With Eternal (no. #53), what lasts to the very end.
    #POSITION: With Opposition (no. #8), at court, but
    #TIME: With Inner (no. #65), on the
sleeping mat
    #CANON: #139
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_139@{
   @1: Sup: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#13); Ego: 13 - INCREASE: TSENG (#13),
   @2: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#79); Ego: 53 - ETERNITY: YUNG (#66),
   @3: Sup: 74 - CLOSURE: CHIH (#153); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#74),
   @4: Sup: 58 - GATHERING IN: HSI (#211); Ego: 65 -
INNER: NEI (#139 - I HAVE NOT SLAUGHTERED THE SACRED ANIMALS {%13}),
   Male: #211; Feme: #139
} // #139

G261@{
   @1: Sup: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#1),
   @2: Sup: 41 - RESPONSE: YING (#42); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#41),    @3: Sup: 42 - GOING TO MEET: YING (#84 - I AM NOT A MAN OF VIOLENCE {%2}); Ego: 1 - CENTRE: CHUNG (#42),
   @4: Sup: 51 - CONSTANCY: CH'ANG (#135); Ego: 9 - BRANCHING OUT: SHU (#51),
   @5: Sup: 56 - CLOSED MOUTH: CHIN (#191 - I DO NOT STEAL THE SKINS OF THE SACRED ANIMALS {%32}); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO (#56),
   @6: Sup: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#257); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: HSIEN (#66),
   @7: Sup: 23 - EASE: YI (#280); Ego: 38 - FULLNESS: SHENG (#104 - I
COMMIT NO FRAUD {%7}),
   Male: #280; Feme: #104
} // #266

"As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which
are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned {#266
as [#1, #40, #1, #9, #5, #10, #200] = amathes (G261): unlearned} and
unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction." [2Peter 3:16 (KJV)]

First, concerning the sources of metaphysical cognition, it already lies in
the concept of metaphysics that they cannot be empirical. The principles of such cognition (which include not only its fundamental propositions or
basic principles, but also its fundamental concepts) must therefore never
be taken from experience; for the cognition is supposed to be not physical
but metaphysical, that is, lying beyond experience. Therefore it will be
based upon neither outer experience, which constitutes the source of
physics proper, nor inner, which provides the foundation of empirical psychology. It is therefore cognition a priori, or from pure understanding
and pure reason.

#215 as [#5, #2, #8, #200] <— SELF #312 - *CONTRADICTION* MINUS #81 - *JUXTAPOSED* *PRINCIPLES* *OF* *SOVEREIGN* {6.5.5.41.0} / *AUTONOMY* {3.5.5.41.0}} EQUALS #231 - JUXTAPOSITION CONTROL {MEMORIAL #288 -
REMEMBRANCE {#288 - #215 = #73 - CANNOT BE CHANGED}} {ADOLF HITLER'S TABLE
TALK IDEA: @215 - 12 MAY 1942} /

#266 as [#6, #50, #2, #8, #200] = bâchar (H977): {UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5}
1) *TO* *CHOOSE*, *ELECT*, *DECIDE* *FOR*; 1a) (Qal) to choose; 1b)
(Niphal) to be chosen; 1c) (Pual) to be chosen, selected;

T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

UMBRA: #210 % #41 = #5 - Natural Guidance, Function of Emptiness; I-Ching:
H63 - Ferrying Complete, Completion & After, Already Fording; Tetra: 73 - Already Fording, Completion;
THOTH MEASURE: #5 - Oh thou of Serpent face, who makest thine appearance at Re-Stau; I am not a slayer of men.

    #VIRTUE: Keeping Small (no. #5) means the minute first signs.
    #TOOLS: Greatness (no. #45) means battening.
    #POSITION: As to Accumulation (no. #60), it is the many, but
    #TIME: As to Keeping Small (no. #5), it is the few.
    #CANON:
#115

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)