• The Janitor Who Became A Multi-Millionaire by Retirement

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 2 09:31:39 2020
    XPost: or.politics, seattle.politics, alt.economics

    from https://www.fool.com/retirement/2020/02/02/the-janitor-who-became-a-multi-millionaire-by-reti.aspx

    The Janitor Who Became A Multi-Millionaire by Retirement
    This ordinary guy amassed almost $8 million. Here's how he did it -- and
    how you might follow some of his ways.

    Selena Maranjian (TMFSelena)
    Feb 2, 2020 at 7:18AM

    A community in Vermont was surprised in 2015 when Ronald Read, a retired
    gas station attendant and janitor, turned out to have been worth nearly
    $8 million upon his death -- and left about $5 million to his local
    library and hospital.

    How Read amassed such a vast sum may or may not surprise you, but you
    probably will be surprised that someone of modest means, who didn't have
    a fancy job, could grow so wealthy. You may also be happy to learn that
    the strategies he employed are ones we can use, too.

    A man in blue overall worksuit is holding a bottle of cleaner and a
    sponge and has a red cape, looking like a superhero.
    IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

    Ronald Read's long life -- he lived to 92 -- saw him doing many things
    that many financial experts recommend. Here's a closer look at how he
    got so rich.

    He was patient
    For starters, he was patient. Read's wealth grew over many decades, via
    the power of compounding. Here's a simplified example, to help you
    appreciate the power of time and patience: Imagine that he was earning
    an annual growth rate of 10%. When he had amassed, say, $500,000, 10% of
    that would be a $50,000 gain for the year, taking him to $550,000. When
    he hit $1 million, though, a 10% gain would get him $100,000, taking him
    to $1.1 million. At the $3 million point, a 10% gain would be worth a
    whopping $300,000, and at $5 million, it would generate a whole
    half-million dollars.

    He lived below his means
    Ronald Read lived below his means -- way below them. He drove an old, inexpensive car, and kept his old coat together with safety pins. He
    didn't dine out frequently, except for inexpensive breakfasts at his
    local hospital's café.

    He looked more down-on-his-luck than wealthy, leading one neighbor to
    knit him a hat and another to pay for his meal. When visiting his
    lawyer, it's reported that he would park fairly far away and take a
    longer walk than necessary to avoid having to put change in a parking meter.

    His recreation wasn't costly, either. Instead of paying for time on golf courses or travel, Mr. Read enjoyed chopping wood -- which also saved
    him some money for heating. He also avoided buying too many books by patronizing the local library.

    You don't necessarily have to live as far below your means as Mr. Read
    did. You can simply be frugal and spend a good sum less than you bring
    in -- and in the process, build meaningful wealth. But if you choose to
    employ some extreme frugality, you can really grow your money even more powerfully.

    He invested in stocks
    Next, Mr. Read invested in stocks. That's rather important, because the
    stock market is one of the most powerful ways to build wealth. Check out
    the long-term growth rate for stocks vs. some common alternatives in the
    table below. It reflects returns from 1871 to 2012 compiled by Wharton
    Business School professor Jeremy Siegel:

    Asset Class Annualized Nominal Return

    Stocks 8.1%
    Bonds 5.1%
    Bills 4.2%
    Gold 2.1%
    U.S. Dollar 1.4%

    SOURCE: STOCKS FOR THE LONG RUN BY JEREMY SIEGEL.

    Mr. Read also invested effectively. His portfolio featured many familiar blue-chip names, such as Procter & Gamble, JPMorgan Chase, General
    Electric, and Dow -- companies he'd stayed invested in for many years.

    He also held significant positions in companies such as AT&T, J.M.
    Smucker, CVS Health, Bank of America, General Motors, Deere, and Johnson
    & Johnson.

    You could study and select individual stocks on your own, as Read did,
    but you don't have to go that far. You can do quite well over the long
    haul by just sticking with low-fee, broad-market index funds, such as
    one that tracks the S&P 500 index of 500 of America's biggest companies.
    Index funds are no kind of lame compromise -- they tend to handily
    outperform most mutual funds actively managed by financial
    professionals: As of the middle of 2019, over the past 15 years, the S&P
    500 outperformed fully 90% of large-cap stock mutual funds.

    Good index-fund candidates for your portfolio include the SPDR S&P 500
    ETF (SPY), Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI), and Vanguard Total
    World Stock ETF (VT).

    We see someone in a white shirt sitting at a table on which are piles of
    coins in ascending height, with plants growing on their tops.
    IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

    He invested in dividend-paying stocks
    You may have noticed that the blue-chip companies above generally pay dividends. Keeping a good portion of your assets in dividend-paying
    stocks tends to lead to better results than avoiding dividend payers, as various studies have shown.

    For example, Researchers Eugene Fama and Kenneth French, studying data
    from 1927 to 2014, found that dividend payers outperformed non-payers, averaging 10.4% annual growth vs. 8.5%. That's a meaningful difference.

    Imagine Read's portfolio. If, when it was worth $2 million, its overall
    average dividend yield was 3.5%, he would be collecting $70,000 from
    those holdings in a single year -- that's money he could redeploy into
    more growing shares of stock. When the portfolio was worth $5 million,
    an overall 3.5% yield would deliver $175,000. Better still, that income
    would be on top of stock price appreciation, and dividend payouts tend
    to be increased over time. Dividends are powerful.

    He aimed to buy and hold
    Mr. Read also benefited because he was aiming to buy and hold, for the
    long term. That doesn't necessarily mean that one never sells -- it's
    good to keep up with your holdings and to sell when they are no longer promising. But you should aim to buy and hold, ideally for many years.

    He didn't retire early
    If you're aiming to be a multimillionaire (or just a millionaire), you
    might want to give up dreams of retiring early. Read was able to amass
    nearly $8 million in part by working a lot, even if he didn't earn high salaries.

    That steady income -- he retired at age 76 -- meant that he always had
    extra cash to invest. He actually did retire from his
    gas-station-attendant job at one point, only to go back to work later,
    as a janitor. Many people find that retirement is a bit more boring than expected, and they miss the socializing and structure that a regular job offers.

    He kept learning
    Mr. Read also was a believer in learning. He made good use of his local library, and read the Wall Street Journal regularly. The more you know
    about investing (and beyond), the better investor you'll likely be.

    He didn't do everything perfectly
    Finally, note that just like all of us, Ronald Read didn't do everything perfectly. Some of his investments went south, or even belly up --
    Lehman Brothers is one example. Also, he held about 95 or more stocks
    when he died -- that's a lot to keep up with and is far more than a more manageable 10 to 20 stocks.

    After all, it's generally best to focus your money on your best ideas,
    not spread it far and wide. If you're not going to follow your holdings
    closely and don't have great confidence, holding more can be safer, and favoring index funds can be better still.

    Overall, though, know that Mr. Read's example is one we all can follow
    to some degree, and it can help us amass greater wealth. If you can sock
    away $500 per month for 50 years and you average annual growth of 8%,
    you can amass more than $3.5 million -- which is pretty good!

    The $16,728 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
    If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on
    your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For
    example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $16,728 more... each
    year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we
    think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all
    after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these
    strategies.

    Selena Maranjian owns shares of AT&T, Johnson & Johnson, JPMorgan Chase,
    and Procter & Gamble. The Motley Fool recommends CVS Health and Johnson
    & Johnson. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)