XPost: seattle.politics, alt.economics, or.politics

from https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2023/03/23/sociologist-matthew-desmond-on-why-poverty-persists-in-america

Sociologist Matthew Desmond on why poverty persists in America
47:05
Resume
March 23, 2023
Anthony BrooksDorey Scheimer
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 28: People wait in line to receive food at a
food bank on April 28, 2020 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City.
Food banks around the nation have witnessed a surge in clients as
millions of Americans have either lost jobs or seen a decline in income
due to the continued closure of businesses and economic life because of
the coronavirus pandemic. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
NEW YORK, NEW YORK - APRIL 28: People wait in line to receive food at a
food bank on April 28, 2020 in the Brooklyn borough of New York City.
Food banks around the nation have witnessed a surge in clients as
millions of Americans have either lost jobs or seen a decline in income
due to the continued closure of businesses and economic life because of
the coronavirus pandemic. (Photo by Spencer Platt/Getty Images)
Sign up for the On Point newsletter here.

Why does America – the richest country in the world – have so much poverty?

Matthew Desmond says its because so many of us benefit from it.

“If you really look at the full nature of the welfare state, you learn
just how utterly lopsided it is and how we've chosen this subsidization
of affluence over the alleviation of poverty.”

Desmond’s new book “Poverty, By America” is aimed, not at the poor, but at the rest of America, urging us all to become 'poverty abolitionists.'

"Empowering the poor and expanding their choice is a fundamental
requirement for ending poverty in America.”

Today, On Point: Matthew Desmond on why America has so much poverty and
how we can choose to end it.

Guests
Matthew Desmond, principal investigator, Eviction Lab. Maurice P. During professor of sociology at Princeton University. Author of many books,
including the new book released this week called “Poverty, by America." (@just_shelter)

Interview Highlights
How big is the poverty problem in America?

Matthew Desmond: "Embarrassingly, shamefully big. Just using the
official poverty measure. But one in nine people that live in America
are below the poverty line. That's 38 million of us. So if everyone who
is below the poverty line in America formed their own country, that
country would be bigger than Australia. But there's plenty of economic
hardship above the poverty line, too. One in three people in America
live in a household bringing in $55,000 or less. Many aren't officially, quote-unquote, poor, but what do you call it? You know, raising two kids
in Boston and $55,000. So there's an extreme spread of economic hardship
all across this country."

Around $27,000 at the beginning of 2022 would be considered poor. Is
there a more useful way to define poverty?

"Yes. Well, I mean, it depends. You know, poverty measurement is really contested, and scholars don't agree on what measure is the best. But in
2011, there was a group of academics that put forth a different kind of
poverty line. It was called the Supplemental Poverty Measure. And what
it did is it counted certain kinds of aid like housing assistance and
food stamps that the official poverty measure doesn't. And it also paid attention to living expenses and health care expenses.

"And when that line was introduced, the United States officially gained
3 million more poor people, actually, because gains in poverty that we
saw when we counted government spending were more than offset by rising
costs of living. Another way to measure hardship is just to simply
measure hardship and kind of look at what's happening to things that we
know affect very low income families. So if you look at evictions,
they're up 22% since 2000.

"The number of families who visited food pantries is up almost 19%.
Since that time. The number of homeless kids in our public schools are
up 74%. Since the Great Recession, the number of families receiving food
stamps but reporting no cash income has almost quadrupled since the
1990s. So just measuring these kind of grim indicators of poverty paints
a very troubling picture of the state of America today."

You argue that poverty in America is not in spite of our wealth, but
because of our wealth. Can you explain that?

"I read this line by the novelist Tommy Orange, where he writes, Kids
are jumping out of the windows, of burning buildings, falling to their
deaths. And we think that the problem is that they're jumping. And when
I read that line, I was like, Man, that sounds like the American poverty debate. For years and years when we talked about poverty, we focused on
the poor themselves. But we should have been focusing on the fire. You
know who lit it? Who's warming their hands by it?

"And so let's make that kind of abstract idea really concrete. How do
many of us — and by us, I mean not just the very, very richest
Americans, but many of us who enjoy a level of economic security in
America. How do we contribute to poverty? Well, we contribute to
exploitation in the labor markets and in the housing market. We like
cheap goods and services that the working poor produce. We like when our savings go up, our investments go up, even when those gains require a
kind of human sacrifice. The price of poor, poorly paid workers.

"We protect certain tax breaks like the mortgage interest deduction or
tax breaks for wealth transfers or even college savings. And it starves anti-poverty investments. And if you look at the data, maybe we'll get
into this little later. You see that the country does a lot more to
protect fortunes than it does to fight poverty."

On U.S. anti-poverty programs, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and
housing vouchers

"We need short term and long-term solutions. So things like the earned
income tax credit, which is basically a payment for workers, mainly
working parents who fall below a certain income level. And then there's
housing vouchers, which gives renters a ticket to live anywhere they
want in the private market and pay 30% of their income on rent instead
of 60, 70, 80%. Those two programs absolutely are poverty reduction.
They're effective. They're lifesavers.

"But we also need to stretch and reach for something more permanent.
Those programs stop the bleeding, but they don't affect the cause of the disease. And so what would that be like? Well, in the labor market, we
need to also reach for programs that empower workers, things like making unionizing easy, organize entire sectors of the economy and not just
going one warehouse to another. And then the housing market. It means
things like investing deeper in public housing or giving low-income
families unwraps into homeownership, expanding their choice so they
don't have to accept a bad option because it's the only option available
to them."

Book Excerpt

From the book POVERTY, BY AMERICA by Matthew Desmond. Copyright © 2023
by Matthew Desmond. Published by Crown, an imprint of Random House, a
division of Penguin Random House LLC. All rights reserved.

This program aired on March 23, 2023.

Related:
Sociologist Matthew Desmond on why poverty persists in the U.S.
Private opulence, public squalor: How the U.S. helps the rich and hurts
the poor
'Poverty, By America' shows how the rest of us benefit by keeping others
poor
How one photographer is using his camera as a weapon against poverty and
racism

Anthony Brooks Senior Political Reporter
Anthony Brooks is WBUR's senior political reporter.

More…


Dorey Scheimer Senior Editor, On Point
Dorey Scheimer is a senior editor at On Point.

More…

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)