• Tranny activism's latest trick: vandalizing real women's shelters

    From Barb May@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 29 21:45:10 2019
    XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.transgendered, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh XPost: talk.rape

    What kind of person would threaten and harass a rape crisis center? Here in Vancouver, we have the answer: trans activists. While it might sound odd to
    the uninitiated that those who claim to value ‘inclusivity’ and ‘acceptance’ would also be the same people who nail a dead rat to the door of a
    transition house for battered women, those of us following the gender
    identity debate closely are all too familiar with this type of occurrence.

    On Tuesday, Vancouver Rape Relief & Woman’s Shelter (VRRWS) tweeted images
    of vandalism left on their storefront — a space used for meetings, events,
    and support groups. ‘Kill TERFs,’ ‘Fuck TERFs,’ ‘TERFs go home, you are not welcome,’ ‘Transwomen are women,’ and ‘Trans Power’ had been scrawled across the windows and door in black marker. ‘TERF,’ for the blissfully ignorant,
    is an acronym that stands for ‘trans-exclusionary radical feminist.’ This
    is, of course, a misnomer. Radical feminists are not interested in
    ‘excluding’ trans-identified people from anything. What they are interested
    in is protecting certain spaces designated for women and girls. If anything, they are ‘male-exclusionary,’ though it seems a little silly to frame the women’s changing room as ‘non-inclusive’ just because men aren’t allowed to prance around in there with their dicks out. It would be akin to calling the vet ‘human-exclusionary’ or a baseball game ‘soccer-exclusionary.’ The
    women’s changing room is for women, the men’s is for men, and a baseball
    game is for hitting balls with bats and/or drinking beer and feeling
    confused because you don’t really understand this sport and are only there
    for the drunken yelling and hot dogs.

    The issue at hand and the cause of disagreement between feminists and trans activists is ideological: those who advocate gender identity ideology (trans activists) subscribe to a fringe religion that believes some people are born
    in the wrong body and that it is possible for males to become female by declaring it so, and feminists believe in material reality. Tough call!

    VRRWS has been targeted not only with vandalism, but with dead animals
    nailed to their door and stuffed through their mail slot, on account of
    their women-only policy. They operate a transition house for women and their children, which aims to protect abused women and help them to heal from horrific violence and sexual assault. To most, it makes sense that a space
    for extremely vulnerable women escaping male violence would exclude men. For trans activists, it makes sense to disembowel a skunk and string it up by
    its neck — noose-like — to hang it on the door where victims of rape and domestic abuse will find it and read it as (yet another) violent threat.

    It’s hard to take sides on this one, but local would-be politician, Morgane Oger, managed to, tweeting:

    ‘Regrettably but predictably, VRR choosing to ignore Canada’s
    civil rights laws causes blow-back. I empathize VRR feel
    threatened by the predictable response to their conduct. As
    I have previously offered, I am ready to help VRR get out of
    their mess if they wish to.’

    In other words, those bitches deserved it.

    Many progressives like Oger have accused the women involved in Vancouver
    Rape Relief and their supporters of being ‘hateful’. Oger also led a (successful) campaign to end a $30,000 City grant the organization had been receiving for education purposes, claiming their practice of serving women alone and hiring only female counselors discriminated against men. Well, to
    be specific, men who announce they are women. During a City hearing to determine the continuation of this grant, Oger accused VRRWS of ‘having a history of discrimination against transgender women on the basis of their gender identity or gender expression.’ This is untrue, as services and
    spaces that are women-only don’t care about a person’s gender identity or gender expression. Indeed, feminists in particular are mostly thrilled when individuals choose to reject sexist gender roles. Many of them prefer pants
    to skirts and grow their armpit hair as long as they please. The point is
    that rejecting gender roles does not actually change one’s sex.

    During and after a Vancouver event which took place in May aimed to discuss
    the issue of gender identity and kids, hundreds of protesters accused
    panelists (myself, in particular) of having ‘blood on [my] hands’ and held signs reading, ‘Transphobes Kill’ and ‘Support our Trans Sisters or Fuck
    Off.’ Odd, considering I have never threatened anyone, never mind a trans- identified person, and was simply wanting to discuss the actual or potential harms of attempting to transition children to the opposite sex: preventing
    them from going through puberty, rendering them sterile, subjecting them to numerous unnecessary surgeries, altering the course of their lives in ways a child could not possibly understand. Also odd, considering that it is trans activists who issue direct death threats to those they disagree with.

    Feminists don’t hate trans-identified people and they don’t want them dead. Despite the fact that trans activists are actively working to destroy
    women’s hard-earned rights and spaces. Despite the fact trans activists routinely slander and threaten them, and work to shut down and silence their attempts to speak about their concerns.

    Anybody should be able to say anything at all and not be threatened with
    death. But certainly, of all the people who should be protected from such terrorizing, it should be women who dedicate their lives to helping some of
    the most downtrodden among us — those with few to no resources, who are
    running for their lives, who have suffered immensely, and are simply trying
    to protect themselves and their families.

    Any person who would go so far as to intimidate and threaten women who stand
    up for other women in this particularly disturbing way is on the wrong side
    of politics, never mind history. It is beyond unacceptable that the left is
    not only remaining silent on these kinds of attacks, but is continuing to
    fuel them, by claiming it is feminists who are guilty of ‘hate’ and
    ‘violence,’ not their comrades-in-arms.

    https://spectator.us/trans-activism-vandalizing-womens-shelter-vancouver/

    --
    Barb

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BeamMeUpScotty@21:1/5 to Barb May on Fri Aug 30 02:00:54 2019
    XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.transgendered, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh XPost: talk.rape

    On 8/29/19 9:45 PM, Barb May wrote:
    What kind of person would threaten and harass a rape crisis center? Here in Vancouver, we have the answer: trans activists. While it might sound odd to the uninitiated that those who claim to value ‘inclusivity’ and ‘acceptance’
    would also be the same people who nail a dead rat to the door of a
    transition house for battered women, those of us following the gender identity debate closely are all too familiar with this type of occurrence.

    On Tuesday, Vancouver Rape Relief & Woman’s Shelter (VRRWS) tweeted images of vandalism left on their storefront — a space used for meetings, events, and support groups. ‘Kill TERFs,’ ‘Fuck TERFs,’ ‘TERFs go home, you are not
    welcome,’ ‘Transwomen are women,’ and ‘Trans Power’ had been scrawled across
    the windows and door in black marker. ‘TERF,’ for the blissfully ignorant,
    is an acronym that stands for ‘trans-exclusionary radical feminist.’ This is, of course, a misnomer. Radical feminists are not interested in ‘excluding’ trans-identified people from anything. What they are interested
    in is protecting certain spaces designated for women and girls. If anything, they are ‘male-exclusionary,’ though it seems a little silly to frame the women’s changing room as ‘non-inclusive’ just because men aren’t allowed to
    prance around in there with their dicks out. It would be akin to calling the vet ‘human-exclusionary’ or a baseball game ‘soccer-exclusionary.’ The
    women’s changing room is for women, the men’s is for men, and a baseball game is for hitting balls with bats and/or drinking beer and feeling
    confused because you don’t really understand this sport and are only there for the drunken yelling and hot dogs.

    The issue at hand and the cause of disagreement between feminists and trans activists is ideological: those who advocate gender identity ideology (trans activists) subscribe to a fringe religion that believes some people are born in the wrong body and that it is possible for males to become female by declaring it so, and feminists believe in material reality. Tough call!

    VRRWS has been targeted not only with vandalism, but with dead animals
    nailed to their door and stuffed through their mail slot, on account of
    their women-only policy. They operate a transition house for women and their children, which aims to protect abused women and help them to heal from horrific violence and sexual assault. To most, it makes sense that a space for extremely vulnerable women escaping male violence would exclude men. For trans activists, it makes sense to disembowel a skunk and string it up by
    its neck — noose-like — to hang it on the door where victims of rape and domestic abuse will find it and read it as (yet another) violent threat.

    It’s hard to take sides on this one, but local would-be politician, Morgane Oger, managed to, tweeting:

    ‘Regrettably but predictably, VRR choosing to ignore Canada’s
    civil rights laws causes blow-back. I empathize VRR feel
    threatened by the predictable response to their conduct. As
    I have previously offered, I am ready to help VRR get out of
    their mess if they wish to.’

    In other words, those bitches deserved it.

    Many progressives like Oger have accused the women involved in Vancouver
    Rape Relief and their supporters of being ‘hateful’. Oger also led a (successful) campaign to end a $30,000 City grant the organization had been receiving for education purposes, claiming their practice of serving women alone and hiring only female counselors discriminated against men. Well, to be specific, men who announce they are women. During a City hearing to determine the continuation of this grant, Oger accused VRRWS of ‘having a history of discrimination against transgender women on the basis of their gender identity or gender expression.’ This is untrue, as services and spaces that are women-only don’t care about a person’s gender identity or gender expression. Indeed, feminists in particular are mostly thrilled when individuals choose to reject sexist gender roles. Many of them prefer pants to skirts and grow their armpit hair as long as they please. The point is that rejecting gender roles does not actually change one’s sex.

    During and after a Vancouver event which took place in May aimed to discuss the issue of gender identity and kids, hundreds of protesters accused panelists (myself, in particular) of having ‘blood on [my] hands’ and held
    signs reading, ‘Transphobes Kill’ and ‘Support our Trans Sisters or Fuck
    Off.’ Odd, considering I have never threatened anyone, never mind a trans- identified person, and was simply wanting to discuss the actual or potential harms of attempting to transition children to the opposite sex: preventing them from going through puberty, rendering them sterile, subjecting them to numerous unnecessary surgeries, altering the course of their lives in ways a child could not possibly understand. Also odd, considering that it is trans activists who issue direct death threats to those they disagree with.

    Feminists don’t hate trans-identified people and they don’t want them dead.
    Despite the fact that trans activists are actively working to destroy women’s hard-earned rights and spaces. Despite the fact trans activists routinely slander and threaten them, and work to shut down and silence their attempts to speak about their concerns.

    Anybody should be able to say anything at all and not be threatened with death. But certainly, of all the people who should be protected from such terrorizing, it should be women who dedicate their lives to helping some of the most downtrodden among us — those with few to no resources, who are running for their lives, who have suffered immensely, and are simply trying to protect themselves and their families.

    Any person who would go so far as to intimidate and threaten women who stand up for other women in this particularly disturbing way is on the wrong side of politics, never mind history. It is beyond unacceptable that the left is not only remaining silent on these kinds of attacks, but is continuing to fuel them, by claiming it is feminists who are guilty of ‘hate’ and ‘violence,’ not their comrades-in-arms.

    https://spectator.us/trans-activism-vandalizing-womens-shelter-vancouver/


    Feminism and Transgender violence and hate against real wwomen....

    It's *who the DEMOCRATS REALLY ARE*
    --
    That's Karma


    *Rumination*
    66 - You have to pass the bill to find out what's in the bill.
    --Pelosi--

    Pelosi now wants Republicans to tell her what's in the bill before "she"
    is willing to pass the bill. What happened to change her mind on
    needing to pass it to find out what's in it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mitchell Holman@21:1/5 to BeamMeUpScotty on Fri Aug 30 08:16:18 2019
    XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.transgendered, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh XPost: talk.rape

    BeamMeUpScotty <NOT-SURE@idiocracy.gov> wrote in news:rY2aF.138855$9s4.41119@fx38.iad:

    On 8/29/19 9:45 PM, Barb May wrote:
    What kind of person would threaten and harass a rape crisis center?
    Here in Vancouver, we have the answer: trans activists. While it
    might sound odd to the uninitiated that those who claim to value
    ‘inclusivity’ and ‘acceptance’ would also be the same people
    who nail a dead rat to the door of a transition house for battered
    women, those of us following the gender identity debate closely are
    all too familiar with this type of occurrence.

    On Tuesday, Vancouver Rape Relief & Woman’s Shelter (VRRWS) tweeted
    images of vandalism left on their storefront — a space used for
    meetings, events, and support groups. ‘Kill TERFs,’ ‘Fuck
    TERFs,’ ‘TERFs go home, you are not welcome,’ ‘Transwomen are
    women,’ and ‘Trans Power’ had been scrawled across the windows
    and door in black marker. ‘TERF,’ for the blissfully ignorant,
    is an acronym that stands for ‘trans-exclusionary radical
    feminist.’ This is, of course, a misnomer. Radical feminists are
    not interested in ‘excluding’ trans-identified people from
    anything. What they are interested in is protecting certain spaces
    designated for women and girls. If anything, they are
    ‘male-exclusionary,’ though it seems a little silly to frame the
    women’s changing room as ‘non-inclusive’ just because men
    aren’t allowed to prance around in there with their dicks out. It
    would be akin to calling the vet ‘human-exclusionary’ or a
    baseball game ‘soccer-exclusionary.’ The women’s changing room
    is for women, the men’s is for men, and a baseball game is for
    hitting balls with bats and/or drinking beer and feeling confused
    because you don’t really understand this sport and are only there
    for the drunken yelling and hot dogs.

    The issue at hand and the cause of disagreement between feminists and
    trans activists is ideological: those who advocate gender identity
    ideology (trans activists) subscribe to a fringe religion that
    believes some people are born in the wrong body and that it is
    possible for males to become female by declaring it so, and feminists
    believe in material reality. Tough call!

    VRRWS has been targeted not only with vandalism, but with dead
    animals nailed to their door and stuffed through their mail slot, on
    account of their women-only policy. They operate a transition house
    for women and their children, which aims to protect abused women and
    help them to heal from horrific violence and sexual assault. To most,
    it makes sense that a space for extremely vulnerable women escaping
    male violence would exclude men. For trans activists, it makes sense
    to disembowel a skunk and string it up by its neck — noose-like —
    to hang it on the door where victims of rape and domestic abuse will
    find it and read it as (yet another) violent threat.

    It’s hard to take sides on this one, but local would-be politician,
    Morgane Oger, managed to, tweeting:

    ‘Regrettably but predictably, VRR choosing to ignore
    Canada’s civil rights laws causes blow-back. I empathize VRR
    feel threatened by the predictable response to their conduct. As
    I have previously offered, I am ready to help VRR get out of
    their mess if they wish to.’

    In other words, those bitches deserved it.

    Many progressives like Oger have accused the women involved in
    Vancouver Rape Relief and their supporters of being ‘hateful’.
    Oger also led a (successful) campaign to end a $30,000 City grant the
    organization had been receiving for education purposes, claiming
    their practice of serving women alone and hiring only female
    counselors discriminated against men. Well, to be specific, men who
    announce they are women. During a City hearing to determine the
    continuation of this grant, Oger accused VRRWS of ‘having a history
    of discrimination against transgender women on the basis of their
    gender identity or gender expression.’ This is untrue, as services
    and spaces that are women-only don’t care about a person’s gender
    identity or gender expression. Indeed, feminists in particular are
    mostly thrilled when individuals choose to reject sexist gender
    roles. Many of them prefer pants to skirts and grow their armpit hair
    as long as they please. The point is that rejecting gender roles does
    not actually change one’s sex.

    During and after a Vancouver event which took place in May aimed to
    discuss the issue of gender identity and kids, hundreds of protesters
    accused panelists (myself, in particular) of having ‘blood on [my]
    hands’ and held signs reading, ‘Transphobes Kill’ and
    ‘Support our Trans Sisters or Fuck Off.’ Odd, considering I have
    never threatened anyone, never mind a trans- identified person, and
    was simply wanting to discuss the actual or potential harms of
    attempting to transition children to the opposite sex: preventing
    them from going through puberty, rendering them sterile, subjecting
    them to numerous unnecessary surgeries, altering the course of their
    lives in ways a child could not possibly understand. Also odd,
    considering that it is trans activists who issue direct death threats
    to those they disagree with.

    Feminists don’t hate trans-identified people and they don’t want
    them dead. Despite the fact that trans activists are actively working
    to destroy women’s hard-earned rights and spaces. Despite the fact
    trans activists routinely slander and threaten them, and work to shut
    down and silence their attempts to speak about their concerns.

    Anybody should be able to say anything at all and not be threatened
    with death. But certainly, of all the people who should be protected
    from such terrorizing, it should be women who dedicate their lives to
    helping some of the most downtrodden among us — those with few to
    no resources, who are running for their lives, who have suffered
    immensely, and are simply trying to protect themselves and their
    families.

    Any person who would go so far as to intimidate and threaten women
    who stand up for other women in this particularly disturbing way is
    on the wrong side of politics, never mind history. It is beyond
    unacceptable that the left is not only remaining silent on these
    kinds of attacks, but is continuing to fuel them, by claiming it is
    feminists who are guilty of ‘hate’ and ‘violence,’ not their
    comrades-in-arms.

    https://spectator.us/trans-activism-vandalizing-womens-shelter-vancouv
    er/


    Feminism and Transgender violence and hate against real wwomen....


    Good thing conservative women know their place, right?






    "It would be a much better country if women did
    not vote. That is simply a fact".
    Ann Coulter, May 17, 2003.

    "I think women should be armed but should not vote"
    Ann Coulter, February 26, 2001.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wile@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Fri Aug 30 13:18:06 2019
    XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.transgendered, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh XPost: talk.rape

    Mitchell Holman wrote

    Good thing conservative women know their place, right?

    It's generally on top buttfucking their conservative husbands with a strap on penis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Wile@21:1/5 to Mitchell Holman on Wed Mar 11 21:52:21 2020
    XPost: alt.politics.homosexuality, alt.transgendered, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh XPost: talk.rape

    Mitchell Holman wrote

    Good thing conservative women know their place, right?

    It's generally on top buttfucking their conservative husbands with a strap on penis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)