• Mark Penn: Green New Deal has more in common with Mao's Cultural Revolu

    From Felcher Adam Schiff@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 20 07:25:00 2020
    XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, sac.general, alt.politics.democrats.d
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    The “Green New Deal” is not green at all. If anything it’s a
    raw, red deal. It calls for a government takeover of our wage,
    and of our energy, housing, health care and transportation
    sectors. It has more in common with Mao’s Cultural Revolution
    than it does FDR’s New Deal, which lifted millions out of the
    Great Depression.

    Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced this resolution
    with Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Ed Marky and a bevy of
    supporting congressmen.

    One wonders if anyone actually read it.

    One section says that in the spirit of democracy that only
    people from “frontline and vulnerable communities and workers”
    will “plan, run and administer” all of these massive green deal
    programs.

    Just as Mao’s Cultural Revolution empowered students over their
    parents, so this bill sets up identity politics groups as having
    power over the major sectors of the economy. It even calls for a
    national “mobilization, “as Mao did.

    Referencing historical discrimination, this bill in effect does
    away with one person one vote, or democracy as we know it, since
    in this resolution, redress of the past requires that only these
    designated groups would have a say in running this plan, whose
    administration would in effect be the domestic policy of the
    country.

    Even more puzzling is that six Democratic candidates for
    president have given support to this effort. Most Americans
    oppose even a modest increase in the gasoline tax, let alone
    virtual destruction of the oil, natural gas and coal industries.
    That’s a $136 billion dollar industry employing about 10 million
    people. After mandating the “100 percent” end of these
    industries as part of the mobilization, the resolution calls for
    a guaranteed job for all Americans and economic security even
    for those “unwilling” to work.

    It mandates that every building in America will be upgraded.
    It’s unclear in this legislative framework who would pay for
    incalculable costs of such a program because no one could ever
    possibly pay for it. No tax on the rich would ever generate
    enough to first eliminate our energy industry, including clean
    natural gas, replace it with technologies that are not yet ready
    and then provide a guaranteed job for everyone, with full
    benefits, regardless of employability. Don’t worry, though, “low
    tech” solutions to remove carbon dioxide will be encouraged.

    The demand for justice on the basis of climate change is upside
    down. The energy revolution did not cause the oppression of the
    frontline and vulnerable communities. Quite the opposite, it was
    at the core of the democratization of technology as Thomas
    Edison’s invention of the light bulb was not limited to the few
    but became universal to every household.

    The moderately priced car created by Henry Ford helped create
    the middle class and later provided the near-universal mobility
    that enabled people to live in the suburbs and commute to work.
    While the oil industry was broken up to create greater
    competition, these energy driven inventions were at the center
    of transforming American life for everyone.

    Air travel is out under this deal as well, to be replaced by
    high-speed trains. Yea. Right. Amtrak to California.

    The very premise that America is the carbon fiend that needs to
    mobilize to this degree on its own is faulty as well. Carbon
    emissions from America have been declining, down 2.7 percent in
    2016. Since 2011, carbon emissions from large power plants in
    the U.S. have declined by nearly 20 percent.

    The two most populous countries on earth -- India and China --
    both looking to move more and more millions of people to the
    middle class, are ground zero for the explosion of future carbon
    emissions. We need to develop affordable energy technologies
    that could be deployed to bring these developing countries into
    line.

    This plan is really a nifty piece of marketing to use the
    environment as a Trojan horse to justify socialism in America.
    It is not a serious plan to deal with the global issue of
    climate change in the world. Rather than advance the cause of
    climate change, this legislation could prove more of an easy
    target for Republicans to discredit the Democrats, who just won
    over moderate suburban voters in the last election. While many
    in polls may support something called the “green deal,” few
    Americans will support the details of this legislation once
    examined and explained.

    It’s not the platform of the Democratic Party and it’s up to the
    leadership of the party to back realistic proposals for a better
    future, not bumper stickers.

    Failure to heed this warning could well lead to another surprise
    upset at the polls.

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/mark-penn-green-new-deal-has- more-in-common-with-maos-cultural-revolution-than-fdrs-new-deal
     

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Felcher Adam Schiff@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 20 16:15:19 2020
    XPost: alt.gossip.celebrities, sac.general, alt.politics.democrats.d
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    The “Green New Deal” is not green at all. If anything it’s a
    raw, red deal. It calls for a government takeover of our wage,
    and of our energy, housing, health care and transportation
    sectors. It has more in common with Mao’s Cultural Revolution
    than it does FDR’s New Deal, which lifted millions out of the
    Great Depression.

    Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez announced this resolution
    with Massachusetts Democratic Sen. Ed Marky and a bevy of
    supporting congressmen.

    One wonders if anyone actually read it.

    One section says that in the spirit of democracy that only
    people from “frontline and vulnerable communities and workers”
    will “plan, run and administer” all of these massive green deal
    programs.

    Just as Mao’s Cultural Revolution empowered students over their
    parents, so this bill sets up identity politics groups as having
    power over the major sectors of the economy. It even calls for a
    national “mobilization, “as Mao did.

    Referencing historical discrimination, this bill in effect does
    away with one person one vote, or democracy as we know it, since
    in this resolution, redress of the past requires that only these
    designated groups would have a say in running this plan, whose
    administration would in effect be the domestic policy of the
    country.

    Even more puzzling is that six Democratic candidates for
    president have given support to this effort. Most Americans
    oppose even a modest increase in the gasoline tax, let alone
    virtual destruction of the oil, natural gas and coal industries.
    That’s a $136 billion dollar industry employing about 10 million
    people. After mandating the “100 percent” end of these
    industries as part of the mobilization, the resolution calls for
    a guaranteed job for all Americans and economic security even
    for those “unwilling” to work.

    It mandates that every building in America will be upgraded.
    It’s unclear in this legislative framework who would pay for
    incalculable costs of such a program because no one could ever
    possibly pay for it. No tax on the rich would ever generate
    enough to first eliminate our energy industry, including clean
    natural gas, replace it with technologies that are not yet ready
    and then provide a guaranteed job for everyone, with full
    benefits, regardless of employability. Don’t worry, though, “low
    tech” solutions to remove carbon dioxide will be encouraged.

    The demand for justice on the basis of climate change is upside
    down. The energy revolution did not cause the oppression of the
    frontline and vulnerable communities. Quite the opposite, it was
    at the core of the democratization of technology as Thomas
    Edison’s invention of the light bulb was not limited to the few
    but became universal to every household.

    The moderately priced car created by Henry Ford helped create
    the middle class and later provided the near-universal mobility
    that enabled people to live in the suburbs and commute to work.
    While the oil industry was broken up to create greater
    competition, these energy driven inventions were at the center
    of transforming American life for everyone.

    Air travel is out under this deal as well, to be replaced by
    high-speed trains. Yea. Right. Amtrak to California.

    The very premise that America is the carbon fiend that needs to
    mobilize to this degree on its own is faulty as well. Carbon
    emissions from America have been declining, down 2.7 percent in
    2016. Since 2011, carbon emissions from large power plants in
    the U.S. have declined by nearly 20 percent.

    The two most populous countries on earth -- India and China --
    both looking to move more and more millions of people to the
    middle class, are ground zero for the explosion of future carbon
    emissions. We need to develop affordable energy technologies
    that could be deployed to bring these developing countries into
    line.

    This plan is really a nifty piece of marketing to use the
    environment as a Trojan horse to justify socialism in America.
    It is not a serious plan to deal with the global issue of
    climate change in the world. Rather than advance the cause of
    climate change, this legislation could prove more of an easy
    target for Republicans to discredit the Democrats, who just won
    over moderate suburban voters in the last election. While many
    in polls may support something called the “green deal,” few
    Americans will support the details of this legislation once
    examined and explained.

    It’s not the platform of the Democratic Party and it’s up to the
    leadership of the party to back realistic proposals for a better
    future, not bumper stickers.

    Failure to heed this warning could well lead to another surprise
    upset at the polls.

    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/mark-penn-green-new-deal-has- more-in-common-with-maos-cultural-revolution-than-fdrs-new-deal
     

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)