• Hints for Google Posters V1.18

    From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 22 00:56:01 2015
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 6 00:56:01 2015
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Nov 29 00:56:01 2015
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 13 00:56:01 2015
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 20 00:56:01 2015
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 27 00:56:01 2015
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 3 00:56:01 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 24 00:56:01 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 10 00:56:01 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 17 00:56:01 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 31 00:56:01 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 7 00:56:01 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 14 00:56:02 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 21 00:56:01 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Autoposter@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 28 00:56:01 2016
    XPost: soc.subculture.bondage-bdsm

    Hint: The following text was written for people who are new
    to Usenet and who recently started to post via Google. It
    might also be useful to experienced netizens.

    Dear Google poster,

    nice to see you on Usenet. Obviously you posted using Google.
    groups.google.com is an archive that collects postings from something
    called Usenet. Maybe you didn't yet notice that you have arrived
    in Usenet but you think that you're using a Web forum.

    This is not true. For example, the majority of people who create
    posts and who read posts are not using Google Groups. Google Groups
    is just one of the many interfaces to Usenet. Programs to access
    and post to Usenet are called 'newsreaders'.

    Posting via Google has some drawbacks for you and the other Usenet
    users:

    1. Some readers find that the amount of worthless postings they
    see coming via Google leads them to filter out all Google Groups
    postings altogether.

    One reason is that Google is often used to send spam. Therefore
    Google has limited the number of postings a user can send in total,
    and in a single newsgroup, to some 10 to 20 postings per day.

    2. If a group becomes moderated - meaning that all posts need to
    be approved by a human being before they appear in the group,
    perhaps to ensure that they are not spam - Google does not immediately
    make the change and send messages for moderation. Although currently
    no groups are affected by this, it means that messages to
    newly-moderated groups may get lost.

    3. Google collects postings much slower than other Usenet providers;
    you'll see answers to your postings a couple of minutes later than
    other netizens.

    4. Google can't decode "rot13" encoded postings immediately. As a
    workaround, you can use web services like http://www.rot13.de .

    5. By incorrectly decoding and unfolding subject lines which contain
    non-ASCII (e.g. accented) characters and which were originally
    correctly encoded or folded, Google Groups believes - wrongly -
    that a new subject has been started, and so places the post in a
    new thread.

    Actually, it's so common for non-ASCII characters to be incorrectly
    encoded or for encoded characters to be incorrectly line-wrapped
    that it's safer to abstain from using non-ASCII characters in newly
    chosen subject lines of your own Usenet postings, whether you're
    using Google Groups or an ordinary Usenet newsreader.

    6. If you've put your foot into your mouth and want to retract
    posted article, you normally would do this by "cancelling" your
    article using your newsreader. With Google, you have to use http://groups.google.com/groups/msgs_remove You have to enter the
    e-mail address used in the posting (which must be existing and
    replyable) and its message id or Google URL and swear that it's
    your own posting.

    You're then led through a three-stage procedure.

    Actually, it's easy if you own a "Google Groops" account and are
    logged in, a simple click on the "Remove" link in the "Options" of
    your own postings (same e-mail address) is enough to remove the
    posting. You don't have to swear anything, and the posting vanishes
    right after you confirm that you really want to remove it.

    7. Some sites on Usenet deliberately alter their articles so that
    they will never get sent to Google Groups. You won't be able to
    see these articles, much less reply to them.

    8. Many netizens find it annoying to see a posting which only has
    an e-mail address as the sender. One of the reasons is that when
    you're replying to such a posting, the newsreader will create an
    attribution line like: <sender@host.domain> wrote: which is pretty
    stupid; it sounds as if the e-mail address had written the original
    article.

    You should enter your real name as "nickname". You can only enter
    a "nickname" if you registered as "member" of the group. You can
    register as a member of the group using <http://groups.google.com/group/<group>/subscribe> and change the
    nickname for all groups with <http://groups.google.com/groups/mysubs>.

    9. If you post something really embarrassing that you don't want
    people to find and use against you in the future - or perhaps you're
    just privacy conscious - you can add a header to your posts called "X-no-archive" with the value "yes". This tells well-behaved Usenet
    servers that they should disseminate the article to other servers,
    but not keep it beyond the ordinary life of Usenet articles.
    (Depending on server and group, anywhere between a few days (binary
    groups on busy servers) and months.) Not everybody does obey
    "X-no-archive".

    Unfortunately Google is trying to be both a Usenet server and an
    information archival system, and those two goals conflict. So the
    way that Google implements the "X-no-archive" header is to display
    this text:

    The author of this message requested that it not be archived.
    This message will be removed from Groups in x days (date/time).

    Equally unfortunately, the time that Google keeps a message is not
    the same as the time that Usenet servers keep a message. This may
    lead to messages being available on Usenet - and replied to on
    Usenet - but invisible to Google Groups users.

    Due to this mechanism, a number of articles are missing in Google
    (about seven percent of de.* in 2003/2004 according to <http://www.iicm.edu/thesis/mpirker.pdf> p. 36).

    Additionally, authors can request later that their articles are
    removed from Google (see 6.).

    Also, Google reserves the right to not show articles for legal
    reasons.

    10. Google erases text in between brackets from the subject line
    (including the brackets). If you want to reply to a posting using
    Google, you should click "options" above the article, then "show
    original" and check whether the article was marked with a so-called
    "tag", and manually recreate the original subject line.

    Recommendation:

    In order to be able to use Usenet optimally, you should install a
    news reader. Note that there may already be one installed on your
    computer; e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird and Microsoft Outlook Express
    have (to a differing degree) Usenet news reading and posting
    capabilities. You'll find one that suits you best - and recommendations
    for configuration - by reading the FAQs posted on news.software.readers,
    or maybe asking there.

    Also, you'll need a news server, because it's not possible to access
    Google with a news reader. Maybe your Internet service provider,
    your University or your employer operates one for you. Else you
    can search for commercial or non-commercial offers to the public,
    e.g. consulting the Usenet provider list on or referenced by the
    Big 8 News Service Providers FAQ list <http://www.big-8.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=faqs:news_providers>.

    If you insist to post via the Web, check <http://www.newsoffice.de>.

    A web interace is only partially useful for general news reading,
    because it's slower than a news reading program, and most of the
    displaying and filter options a news reading program has are missing.

    Have fun in Usenet!

    Ignatios Souvatzis, translator from German/Editor.
    Lots of (not only language-related) suggestions by Simon Cozens.

    From the original document
    by Michael Dahms, who in turn thanks for hints by Gunther Schmidt,
    Boris 'pi' Piwinger, Michael Scheer, Thomas Huehn, Steve Tell, Stefan
    Ram, Patrick Schaaf, Marc Haber, Martin Theodor Ludwig, Patrick
    Borer, Armin Ehrbar, Swen Sauerwald, Philip Newton, Matthias Wallner,
    Kari Bonanza, Wolf Ivo Lademann, Thomas Rachel, Karsten Huppert,
    Peter Tobias, Oliver Ding, Michael Heydekamp, Andreas Kohlbach,
    Raimund Nisius, Bernd Gramlich, Joachim Pimiskern, Victor Kafke,
    Kai-Martin Knaak, Ernst Strasser, Sven Paulus, Uwe Premer, Christian
    Janoff, Niels Bock, Matthias Fuhrmann, Martin Schnitkemper, Michael
    Beiss, David Seppi, Andreas Keppler, Frank Kalder, Roman Racine,
    Christoph Schneegans, Thomas Lahn, Marco Schmidt, Ignatios Souvatzis.

    Special thanks to Florian Rehnisch for the basic analysis of the Google
    archive list.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)