• Autonomous Advocacy warns ECHR, COE, OHCHR: we can't tolerate unreasona

    From Yuriy Sheliazhenko@21:1/5 to All on Wed Sep 28 07:03:43 2016
    Open letter to European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), Council of Europe (COE), Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR)

    Autonomous Advocacy is deeply concerned on unreasonable rejection of so-called “clearly inadmissible” applications in European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). According to website www.echr.coe.int, 85% of applications declared “clearly inadmissible”
    by a single judge. Letters of informing about inadmissibility decision, sent to applicants under Rule of Court 52A, contain no reasons or explanations on rejection without further examination. Applicants can’t understand opinion of single judge, with
    what exactly admissibility criteria doesn’t meet their applications. Also, ECHR don’t allow applicants to receive a copy of the inadmissibility decision, to challenge that decision or request any further information about it. We believe that such
    approach clearly violates Article 10 of Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

    We note that ECHR try to excuse violation of human right to fair and public hearing by expressing outrage on fact that many people write to Strasbourg without any legal advice or assistance. Such excuses revealed discrimination of applicants by social
    status, force them to reach support of legal community around ECHR, although legal community may not accept applicant’s vision of law or, in countries with catastrophic social inequality (such as Ukraine), many people can’t receive proper legal
    advice or assistance due to national poverty and oppression, as well as total greed, arrogance, ignorance of lawyers, corrupted by legal community elitism. By the way, some people try to ask ECHR, what safeguards protects ECHR from corruption and
    discriminatory elitism, if more than 8 of 10 applications ECHR rejects in mysterious way of non-transparent procedure, in which a single judge can declare application "clearly inadmissible" without any reasons and explanations and applicant can't even
    request a copy of the decision, nor challenge the inadmissibility decision; no answer received on that question.

    Autonomous Advocacy can't tolerate unreasonable rejection of so-called "clearly inadmissible" applications in ECHR and starting project "Overcoming unreasonable rejection". We call everyone to inform us about unreasonably rejected by ECHR applications
    under Article 34 of the European Convention on Human Rights. We will try to challenge unexplained inadmissibility decisions in all available social institutions of humanity, including law science and public opinion. Autonomous Advocacy will run project "
    Overcoming unreasonable rejection" until ECHR set rule to completely inform every applicant about reasons of inadmissibility decision and provide procedure of reconsidering such decisions taken by mistake.

    Sincerely, Yurii Sheliazhenko, Head of Autonomous Advocacy, Autonomous Advocate, Master of Laws.

    Non-Governmental Civic Organization "Autonomous Advocacy" was founded on August 23, 2016 to implement and protect natural human rights and freedoms in association of called for help independent experienced autonomous advocates and provocateurs who call
    for help (registered under No. 1462771 in Ukrainian Register of civic associations). Short name of Autonomous Advocacy is A=A, the law of identity. Our motto is AD VOCO PRO SUI IURIS, which in Latin means "to call for own right". We realize natural law
    of Provocatio ad populum, which means freedom of speech to demand justice and freedom of association to create fair laws and legal relations.

    A=A in social network:

    http://twitter.com/prosui

    http://www.facebook.com/suilex/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)