• The Biggest Strike in World History? No Thanks, We’re Focusing on the N

    From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 12 08:57:05 2016
    XPost: alt.fan.jai-maharaj, soc.culture.indian, alt.religion.hindu
    XPost: soc.culture.usa, alt.politics

    The Biggest Strike in World History? No Thanks, We’re Focusing on the
    New iPhone

    Trade unions in India representing some 180 million workers staged a
    one-day strike—and there was virtually no coverage by mainstream
    American media.

    By Jim Naureckas / FAIR

    September 9, 2016

    When tens of millions of workers go out on strike in the
    second-largest country in the world—and the third-largest economy in
    the world—resulting in what may be the biggest labor action in world
    history (AlterNet, 9/7/16), you’d think that would merit some kind of
    news coverage, right?

    Not if you’re a decision-maker at a U.S. corporate media outlet,
    apparently.

    A coalition of trade unions in India representing some 180 million
    workers staged a one-day general strike on Friday, September 2, in
    protest of what they called the “anti-worker and anti-people” policies
    of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, an advocate of neoliberal policies
    and increased foreign investment (Democracy Now!, 9/2/16). Assocham,
    India’s chamber of commerce, estimated that the economic impact of the
    strike was $2.4 billion–$2.7 billion (Hindustan Today, 9/3/16).

    And yet there was virtually no coverage of the strike in commercial US
    media, according to searches of the Nexis news database. Not a word on
    ABC, CBS or NBC. No mention on the main cable news networks—CNN, Fox
    and MSNBC—either. (The Intercept‘s Zaid Jilani—9/6/16—noted that there was one mention on CNN International, when “the CEO of the human
    resources consulting firm ManpowerGroup cited the Indian strike as
    part of global concerns about technology suppressing wages.”) Neither
    the PBS NewsHournor NPR touched the story.

    Not a single US newspaper found in the Nexis database—which includes
    most of the major papers, like the New York Times, Washington Post and
    USA Today—reported an original story on the strike. (Associated Press
    had a brief, 289-word report, which ran on the New York Times‘ website
    and was doubtless picked up by other papers.) The Wall Street Journal,
    whose full text isn’t on Nexis, also skipped the Indian strike story.

    That’s an example of the kind of story US corporate media don’t care
    about. What do they care about? Well, Apple is planning to release a
    new version of the iPhone next week. That’s already making news: CBS
    did a segment on its Money Watch program (9/7/16) previewing the
    phone, as did NPR‘s Morning Edition and All Things Considered
    (9/7/16); the product was front-page news in USA Today (9/8/16) and
    the Wall Street Journal(9/8/16), while you had to turn to page A12 in
    the Washington Post (9/7/16) or the first page of the business section
    in the New York Times (9/8/16) to get your future cellphone news.

    A hundred million or more workers striking for their rights hold no
    interest for the news managers in US corporate media. But a new gadget
    from a prominent advertiser? Now, that’s the news that’s fit to print.

    Jim Naureckas is the editor of FAIR.org.

    http://www.alternet.org/media/biggest-strike-history-unreported-mainstream-media
    --
    Steve Hayes
    http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    http://khanya.wordpress.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)