• KT McFarland rips 'complicit' media for ignoring bombshell Durham probe

    From Johnny@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 14 09:00:10 2022
    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
    Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
    the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the
    latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over
    the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
    infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con, they
    were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia.
    I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of
    thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
    the media, they don't want to touch this because they're complicit in
    it. They don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
    to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to peddle
    it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia

    Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's connection with China?

    That laptop has been in the possession of the FBI for two years, with
    no criminal investigation.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Castor@21:1/5 to Johnny on Mon Feb 14 10:06:06 2022
    On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:00:10 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:


    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
    Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
    the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the >latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was >"complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over
    the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
    infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con, they
    were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia.
    I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of >thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
    the media, they don't want to touch this because they're complicit in
    it. They don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
    to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to peddle
    it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia

    Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's >connection with China?

    That laptop has been in the possession of the FBI for two years, with
    no criminal investigation.

    Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter, Joe Biden, or herself? The
    answer to that one is painfully obvious.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to El Castor on Mon Feb 14 14:31:16 2022
    On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:06:06 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:00:10 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:


    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox & >Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
    the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
    the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
    media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
    revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech >company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between
    Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
    they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
    Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
    hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller >investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
    they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called before
    a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story and why
    they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia

    Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's >connection with China?

    That laptop has been in the possession of the FBI for two years, with
    no criminal investigation.

    Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter, Joe Biden, or herself? The
    answer to that one is painfully obvious.

    I know there's no chance of an investigation until after the midterm
    elections.

    Over the last five years I have lost all respect for all democrats.
    They will lie, cheat, steal, and use race to to divide this country to accomplish their goals. What ever they are.

    My advice to the next president would be to fire every known democrat
    that works for the federal government, and replace them with
    conservatives.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Castor@21:1/5 to Johnny on Mon Feb 14 23:47:59 2022
    On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 14:31:16 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:06:06 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:00:10 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:


    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
    Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
    the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
    the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
    media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
    revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech
    company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between
    Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
    they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
    Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
    hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
    investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
    they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called before
    a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story and why
    they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia

    Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's
    connection with China?

    That laptop has been in the possession of the FBI for two years, with
    no criminal investigation.

    Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter, Joe Biden, or herself? The
    answer to that one is painfully obvious.

    I know there's no chance of an investigation until after the midterm >elections.

    Over the last five years I have lost all respect for all democrats.
    They will lie, cheat, steal, and use race to to divide this country to >accomplish their goals. What ever they are.

    The goal of the Left that dominates the Democrat Party these days
    seems to be a socialist economy and a dominant far more powerful
    central government, one that is not bound by the "old fashioned"
    ideals of the drafters of the Constitution. The factor unanticipated
    by both the Left and the Right is the remarkable technological changes
    that will occur over the next 100 to 200 years and beyond. The world
    is evolving at a far faster pace than in all of history. AI, genetic manipulation, shrinking world population, etc -- scary.

    My advice to the next president would be to fire every known democrat
    that works for the federal government, and replace them with
    conservatives.

    Careful. A smarter Democrat than Biden might take you up on that idea,
    in reverse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Josh Rosenbluth@21:1/5 to Johnny on Sat Feb 19 09:26:20 2022
    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
    Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
    the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over
    the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
    infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con, they
    were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia.
    I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
    the media, they don't want to touch this because they're complicit in
    it. They don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
    to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to peddle
    it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia

    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign paid a
    tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers were
    communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
    information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And, the
    tech company had legal access to the data since it provides a service so
    its clients can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But, it does
    not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and
    others falsely launched the investigation into possible Trump ties with
    Russian interference.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to Josh Rosenbluth on Sat Feb 19 12:42:23 2022
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
    the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
    the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
    media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
    revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a
    tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link
    between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
    they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
    Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
    hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
    they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
    before a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story
    and why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign paid
    a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And,
    the tech company had legal access to the data since it provides a
    service so its clients can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But, it
    does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton
    and others falsely launched the investigation into possible Trump
    ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became president is
    a crime.



    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest target is
    Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John Durham, Hillary
    Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only spy on Trump’s
    campaign servers but Trump’s White House servers as well, once Trump
    became president.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Josh Rosenbluth@21:1/5 to Johnny on Sat Feb 19 12:03:10 2022
    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
    Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
    the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
    the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
    media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
    revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a
    tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link
    between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
    they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
    Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
    hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
    investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
    they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
    before a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story
    and why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign paid
    a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers were
    communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
    information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And,
    the tech company had legal access to the data since it provides a
    service so its clients can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But, it
    does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton
    and others falsely launched the investigation into possible Trump
    ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became president is
    a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John Durham, Hillary
    Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only spy on Trump’s
    campaign servers but Trump’s White House servers as well, once Trump
    became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
    alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers, which
    was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal). Whether
    Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took office is not
    clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract continued after
    Trump took office which would we mean the mining remained legal even
    assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Castor@21:1/5 to noway@nowhere.com on Sat Feb 19 12:27:52 2022
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
    Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
    the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
    the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
    media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
    revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a
    tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link
    between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
    they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
    Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
    hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
    investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
    they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
    before a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story
    and why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign paid
    a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers were
    communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
    information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And,
    the tech company had legal access to the data since it provides a
    service so its clients can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But, it
    does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton
    and others falsely launched the investigation into possible Trump
    ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became president is
    a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest target is
    Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John Durham, Hillary
    Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only spy on Trumps
    campaign servers but Trumps White House servers as well, once Trump
    became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
    alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers, which
    was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal). Whether
    Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took office is not
    clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract continued after
    Trump took office which would we mean the mining remained legal even
    assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url

    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to El Castor on Sat Feb 19 14:42:55 2022
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined
    "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
    investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
    mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
    McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit" in
    peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over the
    weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
    infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
    Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the
    con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia,
    Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation,
    cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the
    Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch
    this because they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to
    be called before a grand jury and have to say where they got the
    fake story and why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign
    paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers
    were communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent
    of the information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing
    inside. And, the tech company had legal access to the data since
    it provides a service so its clients can stop contacting spam
    servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But,
    it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey,
    Clinton and others falsely launched the investigation into
    possible Trump ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
    president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
    President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
    target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
    Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only
    spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House servers as
    well, once Trump became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
    alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers,
    which was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal).
    Whether Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took office
    is not clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
    continued after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
    remained legal even assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.

    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments, and
    goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Castor@21:1/5 to Johnny on Sun Feb 20 22:20:50 2022
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined
    "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
    investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
    mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
    McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit" in
    peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over the
    weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
    infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
    Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the
    con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia,
    Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation,
    cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the
    Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch
    this because they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to
    be called before a grand jury and have to say where they got the
    fake story and why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign
    paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers
    were communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent
    of the information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing
    inside. And, the tech company had legal access to the data since
    it provides a service so its clients can stop contacting spam
    servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But,
    it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey,
    Clinton and others falsely launched the investigation into
    possible Trump ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
    president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
    President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
    target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
    Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only
    spy on Trumps campaign servers but Trumps White House servers as
    well, once Trump became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
    alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers,
    which was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal).
    Whether Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took office
    is not clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
    continued after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
    remained legal even assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url >> >

    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.

    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments, and
    goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.

    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
    satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
    Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the voters decide,
    if not.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to El Castor on Mon Feb 21 08:42:39 2022
    On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined
    "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
    investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
    mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
    McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit"
    in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over the
    weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
    infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
    Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the
    con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that did
    Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my
    reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal
    fees with the Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't
    want to touch this because they're complicit in it. They
    don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
    to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to
    peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
    campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if
    Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS
    gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an
    envelope, but nothing inside. And, the tech company had legal
    access to the data since it provides a service so its clients
    can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick.
    But, it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama,
    Comey, Clinton and others falsely launched the investigation
    into possible Trump ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
    president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
    President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
    target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
    Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not
    only spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House
    servers as well, once Trump became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
    alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers,
    which was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal).
    Whether Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took
    office is not clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
    continued after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
    remained legal even assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.

    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments, and
    goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.

    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
    satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
    Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the voters decide,
    if not.

    The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political opponents.

    Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during the
    Russian collusion hoax.

    I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two indictments
    that are known. Many people are getting scared, and are coming forth
    to testify before the federal grand jury.

    In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the people
    indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion investigation that the
    Steele Dossier was worthless, and still used it to get a FISA warrant.

    Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was fake.

    It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being elected,
    and tried for four years to remove him from office.

    What would have happened if Hillary had won the election? Nothing.
    The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the next election to
    try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept a loss.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Castor@21:1/5 to Johnny on Mon Feb 21 13:36:46 2022
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined
    "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
    investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
    mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
    McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit"
    in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over the
    weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
    infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
    Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the
    con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that did
    Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my
    reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal
    fees with the Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't
    want to touch this because they're complicit in it. They
    don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
    to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to
    peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
    campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if
    Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS
    gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an
    envelope, but nothing inside. And, the tech company had legal
    access to the data since it provides a service so its clients
    can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick.
    But, it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama,
    Comey, Clinton and others falsely launched the investigation
    into possible Trump ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
    president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
    President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
    target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
    Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not
    only spy on Trumps campaign servers but Trumps White House
    servers as well, once Trump became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
    alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers,
    which was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal).
    Whether Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took
    office is not clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
    continued after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
    remained legal even assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.

    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments, and
    goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.

    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
    satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
    Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose their
    shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the voters decide,
    if not.

    The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political opponents.

    Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during the >Russian collusion hoax.

    I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two indictments
    that are known. Many people are getting scared, and are coming forth
    to testify before the federal grand jury.

    In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the people >indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion investigation that the
    Steele Dossier was worthless, and still used it to get a FISA warrant.

    Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did win the >election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was fake.

    It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being elected,
    and tried for four years to remove him from office.

    What would have happened if Hillary had won the election? Nothing.
    The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the next election to
    try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept a loss.

    I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
    accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice, but
    I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters began
    to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade the
    Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco. That is
    what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to El Castor on Mon Feb 21 15:47:41 2022
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland
    joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
    investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
    mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
    McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was
    "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
    revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly
    paid a tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to
    fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on
    the con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that
    did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my
    career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of
    dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
    the media, they don't want to touch this because they're
    complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
    before a grand jury and have to say where they got the
    fake story and why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
    campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if
    Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS
    gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an
    envelope, but nothing inside. And, the tech company had
    legal access to the data since it provides a service so its
    clients can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick.
    But, it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that
    Obama, Comey, Clinton and others falsely launched the
    investigation into possible Trump ties with Russian
    interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
    president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
    President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
    target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
    Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not
    only spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House
    servers as well, once Trump became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
    instead alleging that DNS information was mined from White
    House servers, which was a client of the tech firm (and makes
    such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges the mining
    continued after Trump took office is not clear. Additionally,
    it is not clear if the contract continued after Trump took
    office which would we mean the mining remained legal even
    assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.

    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments,
    and goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.


    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
    satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
    Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose
    their shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the
    voters decide, if not.

    The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
    opponents.

    Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during
    the Russian collusion hoax.

    I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two indictments
    that are known. Many people are getting scared, and are coming forth
    to testify before the federal grand jury.

    In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the people >indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion investigation that
    the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still used it to get a FISA
    warrant.

    Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did win
    the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was fake.

    It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being elected,
    and tried for four years to remove him from office.

    What would have happened if Hillary had won the election? Nothing.
    The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the next election
    to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept a loss.

    I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
    accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice, but
    I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters began
    to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade the
    Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco. That is
    what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?

    No I don't agree.

    Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to top
    that wall?

    The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was denied.

    Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.

    I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Castor@21:1/5 to Johnny on Mon Feb 21 22:45:21 2022
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland
    joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
    investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
    mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
    McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was
    "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
    revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly
    paid a tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to
    fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on
    the con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that
    did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my
    career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of
    dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
    the media, they don't want to touch this because they're
    complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
    before a grand jury and have to say where they got the
    fake story and why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
    campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if
    Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS
    gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an
    envelope, but nothing inside. And, the tech company had
    legal access to the data since it provides a service so its
    clients can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick.
    But, it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that
    Obama, Comey, Clinton and others falsely launched the
    investigation into possible Trump ties with Russian
    interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
    president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
    President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
    target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
    Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not
    only spy on Trumps campaign servers but Trumps White House
    servers as well, once Trump became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
    instead alleging that DNS information was mined from White
    House servers, which was a client of the tech firm (and makes
    such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges the mining
    continued after Trump took office is not clear. Additionally,
    it is not clear if the contract continued after Trump took
    office which would we mean the mining remained legal even
    assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.

    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments,
    and goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.


    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
    satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
    Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose
    their shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the
    voters decide, if not.

    The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
    opponents.

    Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during
    the Russian collusion hoax.

    I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two indictments
    that are known. Many people are getting scared, and are coming forth
    to testify before the federal grand jury.

    In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the people
    indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion investigation that
    the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still used it to get a FISA
    warrant.

    Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did win
    the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was fake.

    It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being elected,
    and tried for four years to remove him from office.

    What would have happened if Hillary had won the election? Nothing.
    The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the next election
    to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept a loss.

    I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
    accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice, but
    I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters began
    to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade the
    Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco. That is
    what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?

    No I don't agree.

    Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to top
    that wall?

    The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was denied.

    Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.

    I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.

    Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
    that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
    criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
    again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to El Castor on Tue Feb 22 08:12:39 2022
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:45:21 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland
    joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the
    Durham investigation, accusing the media of being "in
    on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the latest
    developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
    media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative
    after it was revealed over the weekend the Clinton
    campaign allegedly paid a tech company to infiltrate
    Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
    Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in
    on the con, they were all in on it. They were the ones
    that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed
    my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands
    of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
    investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch
    this because they're complicit in it. They don't want
    to have to be called before a grand jury and have to
    say where they got the fake story and why they continue
    to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
    campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see
    if Trump servers were communicating with Russian
    servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the information on
    the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And, the
    tech company had legal access to the data since it
    provides a service so its clients can stop contacting
    spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty
    trick. But, it does not establish a deep-state
    conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and others falsely
    launched the investigation into possible Trump ties with
    Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
    president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump,
    Even as President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the
    latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new
    filing by John Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a
    tech company to not only spy on Trump’s campaign servers
    but Trump’s White House servers as well, once Trump
    became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
    instead alleging that DNS information was mined from White
    House servers, which was a client of the tech firm (and
    makes such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges the mining
    continued after Trump took office is not clear.
    Additionally, it is not clear if the contract continued
    after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
    remained legal even assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.


    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his
    indictments, and goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are
    not.


    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
    satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic
    politicians. Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably
    best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in
    office, or let the voters decide, if not.

    The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
    opponents.

    Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during
    the Russian collusion hoax.

    I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two
    indictments that are known. Many people are getting scared, and
    are coming forth to testify before the federal grand jury.

    In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the
    people indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion
    investigation that the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still
    used it to get a FISA warrant.

    Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did
    win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was
    fake.

    It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being
    elected, and tried for four years to remove him from office.

    What would have happened if Hillary had won the election?
    Nothing. The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the
    next election to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept
    a loss.

    I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
    accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice,
    but I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters
    began to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade
    the Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco.
    That is what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?

    No I don't agree.

    Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to top
    that wall?

    The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was denied.

    Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.

    I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.

    Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
    that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
    criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
    again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.

    I will always believe the election was stolen by mail in voting. Mail
    in voting should not exist for people capable of voting in person.

    Trump would have won that election without mail in voting. To believe
    Biden won that election, you would have to believe that no Republicans
    used mail in voting.

    Any person with common sense would think the mail in vote would be
    similar to the in person voting, but it was way out proportion in favor
    of the Democrats.

    Why was it like that? Was it because the Democrats are so lazy they
    wouldn't take time to vote unless someone came to their door with a
    mail in ballot, or were sent one in the mail without requesting it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Castor@21:1/5 to Johnny on Tue Feb 22 22:29:33 2022
    On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:12:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:45:21 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland
    joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the
    Durham investigation, accusing the media of being "in
    on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the latest
    developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
    media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative
    after it was revealed over the weekend the Clinton
    campaign allegedly paid a tech company to infiltrate
    Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
    Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in
    on the con, they were all in on it. They were the ones
    that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed
    my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands
    of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
    investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch
    this because they're complicit in it. They don't want
    to have to be called before a grand jury and have to
    say where they got the fake story and why they continue
    to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
    campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see
    if Trump servers were communicating with Russian
    servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the information on
    the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And, the
    tech company had legal access to the data since it
    provides a service so its clients can stop contacting
    spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty
    trick. But, it does not establish a deep-state
    conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and others falsely
    launched the investigation into possible Trump ties with
    Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
    president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump,
    Even as President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the
    latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new
    filing by John Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a
    tech company to not only spy on Trumps campaign servers
    but Trumps White House servers as well, once Trump
    became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
    instead alleging that DNS information was mined from White
    House servers, which was a client of the tech firm (and
    makes such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges the mining
    continued after Trump took office is not clear.
    Additionally, it is not clear if the contract continued
    after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
    remained legal even assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.


    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his
    indictments, and goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are
    not.


    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
    satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic
    politicians. Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably
    best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in
    office, or let the voters decide, if not.

    The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
    opponents.

    Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during
    the Russian collusion hoax.

    I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two
    indictments that are known. Many people are getting scared, and
    are coming forth to testify before the federal grand jury.

    In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the
    people indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion
    investigation that the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still
    used it to get a FISA warrant.

    Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did
    win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was
    fake.

    It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being
    elected, and tried for four years to remove him from office.

    What would have happened if Hillary had won the election?
    Nothing. The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the
    next election to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept
    a loss.

    I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
    accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice,
    but I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters
    began to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade
    the Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco.
    That is what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?

    No I don't agree.

    Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to top
    that wall?

    The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was denied.

    Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.

    I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.

    Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
    that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
    criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
    again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.

    I will always believe the election was stolen by mail in voting. Mail
    in voting should not exist for people capable of voting in person.

    Trump would have won that election without mail in voting. To believe
    Biden won that election, you would have to believe that no Republicans
    used mail in voting.

    Any person with common sense would think the mail in vote would be
    similar to the in person voting, but it was way out proportion in favor
    of the Democrats.

    Why was it like that? Was it because the Democrats are so lazy they
    wouldn't take time to vote unless someone came to their door with a
    mail in ballot, or were sent one in the mail without requesting it.

    If the election was stolen Trump should have proved it in court. He
    did not. Lacking proof should he, or Pence, have simply appointed
    Trump president for a second term? Yes or No?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to El Castor on Wed Feb 23 07:57:21 2022
    On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 22:29:33 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:12:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:45:21 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny
    <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T.
    McFarland joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the
    latest in the Durham investigation, accusing the
    media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks
    avoid covering the latest developments. McFarland
    told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit"
    in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed
    over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid
    a tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to
    fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was
    in on the con, they were all in on it. They were the
    ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they
    destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds
    of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the
    Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want
    to touch this because they're complicit in it. They
    don't want to have to be called before a grand jury
    and have to say where they got the fake story and
    why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The
    Clinton campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS
    traffic to see if Trump servers were communicating
    with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
    information on the outside of an envelope, but
    nothing inside. And, the tech company had legal
    access to the data since it provides a service so its
    clients can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty
    trick. But, it does not establish a deep-state
    conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and others
    falsely launched the investigation into possible
    Trump ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump
    became president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump,
    Even as President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the
    latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new
    filing by John Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a
    tech company to not only spy on Trump’s campaign
    servers but Trump’s White House servers as well, once
    Trump became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
    instead alleging that DNS information was mined from
    White House servers, which was a client of the tech firm
    (and makes such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges
    the mining continued after Trump took office is not
    clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
    continued after Trump took office which would we mean
    the mining remained legal even assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.


    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his
    indictments, and goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are
    not.


    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might
    seem satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic
    politicians. Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably
    best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in
    office, or let the voters decide, if not.

    The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
    opponents.

    Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed
    during the Russian collusion hoax.

    I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two
    indictments that are known. Many people are getting scared,
    and are coming forth to testify before the federal grand jury.

    In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the
    people indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion
    investigation that the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still
    used it to get a FISA warrant.

    Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did
    win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew
    was fake.

    It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being
    elected, and tried for four years to remove him from office.

    What would have happened if Hillary had won the election?
    Nothing. The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the
    next election to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't
    accept a loss.

    I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
    accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump
    twice, but I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when
    the rioters began to get out of hand? Where was he when they
    began to invade the Capitol? He appeared to be silent through
    the whole fiasco. That is what I would call malfeasance. Do you
    agree?

    No I don't agree.

    Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to
    top that wall?

    The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was
    denied.

    Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.

    I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.


    Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
    that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
    criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
    again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.

    I will always believe the election was stolen by mail in voting.
    Mail in voting should not exist for people capable of voting in
    person.

    Trump would have won that election without mail in voting. To
    believe Biden won that election, you would have to believe that no >Republicans used mail in voting.

    Any person with common sense would think the mail in vote would be
    similar to the in person voting, but it was way out proportion in
    favor of the Democrats.

    Why was it like that? Was it because the Democrats are so lazy they >wouldn't take time to vote unless someone came to their door with a
    mail in ballot, or were sent one in the mail without requesting it.

    If the election was stolen Trump should have proved it in court. He
    did not. Lacking proof should he, or Pence, have simply appointed
    Trump president for a second term? Yes or No?

    No.

    The mail in ballots won the election for Biden.

    That was the most screwed up election in American history.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From El Castor@21:1/5 to Johnny on Wed Feb 23 12:10:45 2022
    On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:57:21 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 22:29:33 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:12:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:45:21 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
    wrote:
    On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny
    <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
    <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:

    By Fox News Staff
    Published 37 mins ago

    Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T.
    McFarland joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the
    latest in the Durham investigation, accusing the
    media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks
    avoid covering the latest developments. McFarland
    told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit"
    in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed
    over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid
    a tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to
    fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.

    KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was
    in on the con, they were all in on it. They were the
    ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they
    destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds
    of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the
    Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want
    to touch this because they're complicit in it. They
    don't want to have to be called before a grand jury
    and have to say where they got the fake story and
    why they continue to peddle it.

    https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia


    There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The
    Clinton campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS
    traffic to see if Trump servers were communicating
    with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
    information on the outside of an envelope, but
    nothing inside. And, the tech company had legal
    access to the data since it provides a service so its
    clients can stop contacting spam servers.

    Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty
    trick. But, it does not establish a deep-state
    conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and others
    falsely launched the investigation into possible
    Trump ties with Russian interference.

    I believe spying on White House servers after Trump
    became president is a crime.

    WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump,
    Even as President

    https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president

    The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the
    latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new
    filing by John Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a
    tech company to not only spy on Trumps campaign
    servers but Trumps White House servers as well, once
    Trump became president.

    I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
    instead alleging that DNS information was mined from
    White House servers, which was a client of the tech firm
    (and makes such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges
    the mining continued after Trump took office is not
    clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
    continued after Trump took office which would we mean
    the mining remained legal even assuming it continued.

    See here for more information:

    https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url


    It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.


    It's not going to be over until Durham completes his
    indictments, and goes to trial.

    There are many people that should be in prison and they are
    not.


    Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might
    seem satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic
    politicians. Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably
    best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in
    office, or let the voters decide, if not.

    The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
    opponents.

    Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed
    during the Russian collusion hoax.

    I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two
    indictments that are known. Many people are getting scared,
    and are coming forth to testify before the federal grand jury.

    In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the
    people indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion
    investigation that the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still
    used it to get a FISA warrant.

    Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did
    win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew
    was fake.

    It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being
    elected, and tried for four years to remove him from office.

    What would have happened if Hillary had won the election?
    Nothing. The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the
    next election to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't
    accept a loss.

    I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
    accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump
    twice, but I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when
    the rioters began to get out of hand? Where was he when they
    began to invade the Capitol? He appeared to be silent through
    the whole fiasco. That is what I would call malfeasance. Do you
    agree?

    No I don't agree.

    Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to
    top that wall?

    The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was
    denied.

    Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.

    I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.


    Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
    that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
    criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
    again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.

    I will always believe the election was stolen by mail in voting.
    Mail in voting should not exist for people capable of voting in
    person.

    Trump would have won that election without mail in voting. To
    believe Biden won that election, you would have to believe that no
    Republicans used mail in voting.

    Any person with common sense would think the mail in vote would be
    similar to the in person voting, but it was way out proportion in
    favor of the Democrats.

    Why was it like that? Was it because the Democrats are so lazy they
    wouldn't take time to vote unless someone came to their door with a
    mail in ballot, or were sent one in the mail without requesting it.

    If the election was stolen Trump should have proved it in court. He
    did not. Lacking proof should he, or Pence, have simply appointed
    Trump president for a second term? Yes or No?

    No.

    The mail in ballots won the election for Biden.

    That was the most screwed up election in American history.

    I usually vote in person, but for that election I did a mail in.
    Actually prefer it. If there is an issue or individual on the ballot
    that I would like to research further, I have the time and means to do
    it. Mail in or not, the Left will be in big trouble for the midterms.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to El Castor on Sat Feb 26 14:38:41 2022
    On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 12:10:45 -0800
    El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:

    I usually vote in person, but for that election I did a mail in.
    Actually prefer it. If there is an issue or individual on the ballot
    that I would like to research further, I have the time and means to do
    it. Mail in or not, the Left will be in big trouble for the midterms.

    After the midterm elections, when the Republicans take control of the
    House and Senate, I expect to see Biden impeached for obstruction of
    justice for flying illegal immigrants all across the country and
    dropping them off in small communities.

    Those two million illegal immigrants will be very hard to find and
    deport.

    I also expect to see the Republicans take control of Hunter Biden's
    laptop, and investigate Joe Biden's connection with China. It looks to
    me like the connection was criminal, and used to enrich the Biden
    family. Another impeachable offense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)