By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the >latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was >"complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over
the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con, they
were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia.
I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of >thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
the media, they don't want to touch this because they're complicit in
it. They don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to peddle
it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's >connection with China?
That laptop has been in the possession of the FBI for two years, with
no criminal investigation.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:00:10 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox & >Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech >company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between
Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller >investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called before
a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story and why
they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's >connection with China?
That laptop has been in the possession of the FBI for two years, with
no criminal investigation.
Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter, Joe Biden, or herself? The
answer to that one is painfully obvious.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 10:06:06 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:00:10 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech
company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between
Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called before
a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story and why
they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter Biden's laptop, and Joe Biden's
connection with China?
That laptop has been in the possession of the FBI for two years, with
no criminal investigation.
Why isn't Pelosi investigating Hunter, Joe Biden, or herself? The
answer to that one is painfully obvious.
I know there's no chance of an investigation until after the midterm >elections.
Over the last five years I have lost all respect for all democrats.
They will lie, cheat, steal, and use race to to divide this country to >accomplish their goals. What ever they are.
My advice to the next president would be to fire every known democrat
that works for the federal government, and replace them with
conservatives.
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over
the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con, they
were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia.
I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
the media, they don't want to touch this because they're complicit in
it. They don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to peddle
it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a
tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link
between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
before a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story
and why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign paid
a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And,
the tech company had legal access to the data since it provides a
service so its clients can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But, it
does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton
and others falsely launched the investigation into possible Trump
ties with Russian interference.
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a
tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link
between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
before a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story
and why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign paid
a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers were
communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And,
the tech company had legal access to the data since it provides a
service so its clients can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But, it
does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton
and others falsely launched the investigation into possible Trump
ties with Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became president is
a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John Durham, Hillary
Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only spy on Trump’s
campaign servers but Trump’s White House servers as well, once Trump
became president.
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined "Fox &
Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham investigation, accusing
the media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering
the latest developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a
tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link
between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the con,
they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia, Russia,
Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me
hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch this because
they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
before a grand jury and have to say where they got the fake story
and why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign paid
a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers were
communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And,
the tech company had legal access to the data since it provides a
service so its clients can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But, it
does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton
and others falsely launched the investigation into possible Trump
ties with Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became president is
a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest target is
Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John Durham, Hillary
Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only spy on Trump’s
campaign servers but Trump’s White House servers as well, once Trump
became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers, which
was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal). Whether
Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took office is not
clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract continued after
Trump took office which would we mean the mining remained legal even
assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined
"Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit" in
peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over the
weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the
con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia,
Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation,
cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the
Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch
this because they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to
be called before a grand jury and have to say where they got the
fake story and why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign
paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers
were communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent
of the information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing
inside. And, the tech company had legal access to the data since
it provides a service so its clients can stop contacting spam
servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But,
it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey,
Clinton and others falsely launched the investigation into
possible Trump ties with Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only
spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House servers as
well, once Trump became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers,
which was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal).
Whether Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took office
is not clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
continued after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
remained legal even assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined
"Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit" in
peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over the
weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the
con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that did Russia,
Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my reputation,
cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the
Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch
this because they're complicit in it. They don't want to have to
be called before a grand jury and have to say where they got the
fake story and why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton campaign
paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if Trump servers
were communicating with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent
of the information on the outside of an envelope, but nothing
inside. And, the tech company had legal access to the data since
it provides a service so its clients can stop contacting spam
servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick. But,
it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama, Comey,
Clinton and others falsely launched the investigation into
possible Trump ties with Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not only
spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House servers as
well, once Trump became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers,
which was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal).
Whether Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took office
is not clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
continued after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
remained legal even assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url >> >
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments, and
goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined
"Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit"
in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over the
weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the
con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that did
Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my
reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal
fees with the Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't
want to touch this because they're complicit in it. They
don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to
peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if
Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS
gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an
envelope, but nothing inside. And, the tech company had legal
access to the data since it provides a service so its clients
can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick.
But, it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama,
Comey, Clinton and others falsely launched the investigation
into possible Trump ties with Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not
only spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House
servers as well, once Trump became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers,
which was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal).
Whether Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took
office is not clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
continued after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
remained legal even assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments, and
goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.
Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the voters decide,
if not.
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland joined
"Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit"
in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed over the
weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid a tech company to
infiltrate Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on the
con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that did
Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my career, my
reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal
fees with the Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't
want to touch this because they're complicit in it. They
don't want to have to be called before a grand jury and have
to say where they got the fake story and why they continue to
peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if
Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS
gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an
envelope, but nothing inside. And, the tech company had legal
access to the data since it provides a service so its clients
can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick.
But, it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that Obama,
Comey, Clinton and others falsely launched the investigation
into possible Trump ties with Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not
only spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House
servers as well, once Trump became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying, instead
alleging that DNS information was mined from White House servers,
which was a client of the tech firm (and makes such mining legal).
Whether Durham alleges the mining continued after Trump took
office is not clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
continued after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
remained legal even assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments, and
goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.
Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose their
shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the voters decide,
if not.
The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political opponents.
Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during the >Russian collusion hoax.
I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two indictments
that are known. Many people are getting scared, and are coming forth
to testify before the federal grand jury.
In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the people >indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion investigation that the
Steele Dossier was worthless, and still used it to get a FISA warrant.
Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did win the >election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was fake.
It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being elected,
and tried for four years to remove him from office.
What would have happened if Hillary had won the election? Nothing.
The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the next election to
try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept a loss.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland
joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was
"complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly
paid a tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to
fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on
the con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that
did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my
career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of
dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
the media, they don't want to touch this because they're
complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
before a grand jury and have to say where they got the
fake story and why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if
Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS
gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an
envelope, but nothing inside. And, the tech company had
legal access to the data since it provides a service so its
clients can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick.
But, it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that
Obama, Comey, Clinton and others falsely launched the
investigation into possible Trump ties with Russian
interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not
only spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House
servers as well, once Trump became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
instead alleging that DNS information was mined from White
House servers, which was a client of the tech firm (and makes
such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges the mining
continued after Trump took office is not clear. Additionally,
it is not clear if the contract continued after Trump took
office which would we mean the mining remained legal even
assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments,
and goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.
Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose
their shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the
voters decide, if not.
The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
opponents.
Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during
the Russian collusion hoax.
I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two indictments
that are known. Many people are getting scared, and are coming forth
to testify before the federal grand jury.
In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the people >indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion investigation that
the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still used it to get a FISA
warrant.
Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did win
the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was fake.
It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being elected,
and tried for four years to remove him from office.
What would have happened if Hillary had won the election? Nothing.I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the next election
to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept a loss.
accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice, but
I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters began
to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade the
Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco. That is
what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland
joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the Durham
investigation, accusing the media of being "in on it" as
mainstream networks avoid covering the latest developments.
McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the media was
"complicit" in peddling a false narrative after it was
revealed over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly
paid a tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to
fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in on
the con, they were all in on it. They were the ones that
did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed my
career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands of
dollars in legal fees with the Mueller investigation. So
the media, they don't want to touch this because they're
complicit in it. They don't want to have to be called
before a grand jury and have to say where they got the
fake story and why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see if
Trump servers were communicating with Russian servers. DNS
gives the equivalent of the information on the outside of an
envelope, but nothing inside. And, the tech company had
legal access to the data since it provides a service so its
clients can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty trick.
But, it does not establish a deep-state conspiracy that
Obama, Comey, Clinton and others falsely launched the
investigation into possible Trump ties with Russian
interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump, Even as
President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the latest
target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new filing by John
Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a tech company to not
only spy on Trump’s campaign servers but Trump’s White House
servers as well, once Trump became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
instead alleging that DNS information was mined from White
House servers, which was a client of the tech firm (and makes
such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges the mining
continued after Trump took office is not clear. Additionally,
it is not clear if the contract continued after Trump took
office which would we mean the mining remained legal even
assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his indictments,
and goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are not.
Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic politicians.
Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably best to expose
their shenanigans and either impeach if in office, or let the
voters decide, if not.
The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
opponents.
Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during
the Russian collusion hoax.
I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two indictments
that are known. Many people are getting scared, and are coming forth
to testify before the federal grand jury.
In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the people
indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion investigation that
the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still used it to get a FISA
warrant.
Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did win
the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was fake.
It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being elected,
and tried for four years to remove him from office.
What would have happened if Hillary had won the election? Nothing.
The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the next election
to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept a loss.
accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice, but
I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters began
to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade the
Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco. That is
what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?
No I don't agree.
Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to top
that wall?
The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was denied.
Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.
I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland
joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the
Durham investigation, accusing the media of being "in
on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the latest
developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative
after it was revealed over the weekend the Clinton
campaign allegedly paid a tech company to infiltrate
Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in
on the con, they were all in on it. They were the ones
that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed
my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands
of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch
this because they're complicit in it. They don't want
to have to be called before a grand jury and have to
say where they got the fake story and why they continue
to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see
if Trump servers were communicating with Russian
servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the information on
the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And, the
tech company had legal access to the data since it
provides a service so its clients can stop contacting
spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty
trick. But, it does not establish a deep-state
conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and others falsely
launched the investigation into possible Trump ties with
Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump,
Even as President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the
latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new
filing by John Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a
tech company to not only spy on Trump’s campaign servers
but Trump’s White House servers as well, once Trump
became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
instead alleging that DNS information was mined from White
House servers, which was a client of the tech firm (and
makes such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges the mining
continued after Trump took office is not clear.
Additionally, it is not clear if the contract continued
after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
remained legal even assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his
indictments, and goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are
not.
Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic
politicians. Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably
best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in
office, or let the voters decide, if not.
The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
opponents.
Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during
the Russian collusion hoax.
I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two
indictments that are known. Many people are getting scared, and
are coming forth to testify before the federal grand jury.
In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the
people indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion
investigation that the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still
used it to get a FISA warrant.
Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did
win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was
fake.
It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being
elected, and tried for four years to remove him from office.
What would have happened if Hillary had won the election?
Nothing. The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the
next election to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept
a loss.
accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice,
but I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters
began to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade
the Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco.
That is what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?
No I don't agree.
Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to top
that wall?
The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was denied.
Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.
I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.
Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:45:21 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland
joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the latest in the
Durham investigation, accusing the media of being "in
on it" as mainstream networks avoid covering the latest
developments. McFarland told co-host Steve Doocy the
media was "complicit" in peddling a false narrative
after it was revealed over the weekend the Clinton
campaign allegedly paid a tech company to infiltrate
Trump servers to fabricate a link between Trump and
Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was in
on the con, they were all in on it. They were the ones
that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they destroyed
my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds of thousands
of dollars in legal fees with the Mueller
investigation. So the media, they don't want to touch
this because they're complicit in it. They don't want
to have to be called before a grand jury and have to
say where they got the fake story and why they continue
to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The Clinton
campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS traffic to see
if Trump servers were communicating with Russian
servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the information on
the outside of an envelope, but nothing inside. And, the
tech company had legal access to the data since it
provides a service so its clients can stop contacting
spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty
trick. But, it does not establish a deep-state
conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and others falsely
launched the investigation into possible Trump ties with
Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump became
president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump,
Even as President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the
latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new
filing by John Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a
tech company to not only spy on Trump’s campaign servers
but Trump’s White House servers as well, once Trump
became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
instead alleging that DNS information was mined from White
House servers, which was a client of the tech firm (and
makes such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges the mining
continued after Trump took office is not clear.
Additionally, it is not clear if the contract continued
after Trump took office which would we mean the mining
remained legal even assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his
indictments, and goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are
not.
Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might seem
satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic
politicians. Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably
best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in
office, or let the voters decide, if not.
The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
opponents.
Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed during
the Russian collusion hoax.
I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two
indictments that are known. Many people are getting scared, and
are coming forth to testify before the federal grand jury.
In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the
people indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion
investigation that the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still
used it to get a FISA warrant.
Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did
win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew was
fake.
It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being
elected, and tried for four years to remove him from office.
What would have happened if Hillary had won the election?
Nothing. The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the
next election to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't accept
a loss.
accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump twice,
but I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when the rioters
began to get out of hand? Where was he when they began to invade
the Capitol? He appeared to be silent through the whole fiasco.
That is what I would call malfeasance. Do you agree?
No I don't agree.
Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to top
that wall?
The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was denied.
Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.
I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.
Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.
I will always believe the election was stolen by mail in voting. Mail
in voting should not exist for people capable of voting in person.
Trump would have won that election without mail in voting. To believe
Biden won that election, you would have to believe that no Republicans
used mail in voting.
Any person with common sense would think the mail in vote would be
similar to the in person voting, but it was way out proportion in favor
of the Democrats.
Why was it like that? Was it because the Democrats are so lazy they
wouldn't take time to vote unless someone came to their door with a
mail in ballot, or were sent one in the mail without requesting it.
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:12:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:45:21 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny
<johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T.
McFarland joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the
latest in the Durham investigation, accusing the
media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks
avoid covering the latest developments. McFarland
told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit"
in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed
over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid
a tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to
fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was
in on the con, they were all in on it. They were the
ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they
destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds
of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the
Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want
to touch this because they're complicit in it. They
don't want to have to be called before a grand jury
and have to say where they got the fake story and
why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The
Clinton campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS
traffic to see if Trump servers were communicating
with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
information on the outside of an envelope, but
nothing inside. And, the tech company had legal
access to the data since it provides a service so its
clients can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty
trick. But, it does not establish a deep-state
conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and others
falsely launched the investigation into possible
Trump ties with Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump
became president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump,
Even as President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the
latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new
filing by John Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a
tech company to not only spy on Trump’s campaign
servers but Trump’s White House servers as well, once
Trump became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
instead alleging that DNS information was mined from
White House servers, which was a client of the tech firm
(and makes such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges
the mining continued after Trump took office is not
clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
continued after Trump took office which would we mean
the mining remained legal even assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his
indictments, and goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are
not.
Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might
seem satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic
politicians. Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably
best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in
office, or let the voters decide, if not.
The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
opponents.
Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed
during the Russian collusion hoax.
I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two
indictments that are known. Many people are getting scared,
and are coming forth to testify before the federal grand jury.
In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the
people indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion
investigation that the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still
used it to get a FISA warrant.
Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did
win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew
was fake.
It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being
elected, and tried for four years to remove him from office.
What would have happened if Hillary had won the election?
Nothing. The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the
next election to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't
accept a loss.
accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump
twice, but I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when
the rioters began to get out of hand? Where was he when they
began to invade the Capitol? He appeared to be silent through
the whole fiasco. That is what I would call malfeasance. Do you
agree?
No I don't agree.
Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to
top that wall?
The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was
denied.
Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.
I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.
Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.
I will always believe the election was stolen by mail in voting.
Mail in voting should not exist for people capable of voting in
person.
Trump would have won that election without mail in voting. To
believe Biden won that election, you would have to believe that no >Republicans used mail in voting.
Any person with common sense would think the mail in vote would be
similar to the in person voting, but it was way out proportion in
favor of the Democrats.
Why was it like that? Was it because the Democrats are so lazy they >wouldn't take time to vote unless someone came to their door with a
mail in ballot, or were sent one in the mail without requesting it.
If the election was stolen Trump should have proved it in court. He
did not. Lacking proof should he, or Pence, have simply appointed
Trump president for a second term? Yes or No?
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 22:29:33 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 08:12:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 22:45:21 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 15:47:41 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 13:36:46 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2022 08:42:39 -0600, Johnny <johnny@invalid.net>
wrote:
On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 22:20:50 -0800I'm not defending Democrats, but they don't have a corner on
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 14:42:55 -0600, Johnny
<johnny@invalid.net> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:27:52 -0800
El Castor <JustUsChickens@nowhere.com> wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 12:03:10 -0800, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/19/2022 10:42 AM, Johnny wrote:
On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 09:26:20 -0800
Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 2/14/2022 7:00 AM, Johnny wrote:
By Fox News Staff
Published 37 mins ago
Former Deputy National Security Adviser K.T.
McFarland joined "Fox & Friends" to discuss the
latest in the Durham investigation, accusing the
media of being "in on it" as mainstream networks
avoid covering the latest developments. McFarland
told co-host Steve Doocy the media was "complicit"
in peddling a false narrative after it was revealed
over the weekend the Clinton campaign allegedly paid
a tech company to infiltrate Trump servers to
fabricate a link between Trump and Russia.
KT MCFARLAND: Well, because all the other media was
in on the con, they were all in on it. They were the
ones that did Russia, Russia, Russia. I mean, they
destroyed my career, my reputation, cost me hundreds
of thousands of dollars in legal fees with the
Mueller investigation. So the media, they don't want
to touch this because they're complicit in it. They
don't want to have to be called before a grand jury
and have to say where they got the fake story and
why they continue to peddle it.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kt-mcfarland-media-coverage-durham-probe-clinton-trump-russia
There was no infiltration of Trump servers. The
Clinton campaign paid a tech company to mine DNS
traffic to see if Trump servers were communicating
with Russian servers. DNS gives the equivalent of the
information on the outside of an envelope, but
nothing inside. And, the tech company had legal
access to the data since it provides a service so its
clients can stop contacting spam servers.
Using the data in this manner is a disgusting, dirty
trick. But, it does not establish a deep-state
conspiracy that Obama, Comey, Clinton and others
falsely launched the investigation into possible
Trump ties with Russian interference.
I believe spying on White House servers after Trump
became president is a crime.
WORSE Than Watergate? Hillary Caught Spying on Trump,
Even as President
https://www.gopusa.com/worse-than-watergate-hillary-caught-spying-on-trump-even-as-president
The Durham investigation is yielding results, and the
latest target is Hillary Clinton. According to a new
filing by John Durham, Hillary Clinton conspired with a
tech company to not only spy on Trump’s campaign
servers but Trump’s White House servers as well, once
Trump became president.
I just explained above Durham does not allege any spying,
instead alleging that DNS information was mined from
White House servers, which was a client of the tech firm
(and makes such mining legal). Whether Durham alleges
the mining continued after Trump took office is not
clear. Additionally, it is not clear if the contract
continued after Trump took office which would we mean
the mining remained legal even assuming it continued.
See here for more information:
https://thedispatch.com/p/making-sense-of-the-latest-clinton?utm_source=url
It's time to put Hillary and Trump behind us and move on.
It's not going to be over until Durham completes his
indictments, and goes to trial.
There are many people that should be in prison and they are
not.
Just my opinion, but imprisoning political opponents might
seem satisfying, but it's an occupation of banana republic
politicians. Short of jailing outright thieves it's probably
best to expose their shenanigans and either impeach if in
office, or let the voters decide, if not.
The Durham investigation is not about imprisoning political
opponents.
Durham has been trying to find out if crimes were committed
during the Russian collusion hoax.
I seems crimes were committed because he has at least two
indictments that are known. Many people are getting scared,
and are coming forth to testify before the federal grand jury.
In my opinion, former FBI directory Comey should be one of the
people indicted. He knew during the Russian collusion
investigation that the Steele Dossier was worthless, and still
used it to get a FISA warrant.
Don't forget the Strozk-Page insurance policy in case Trump did
win the election. That would be the Steele Dossier they knew
was fake.
It was liberal Democrats that tried to keep Trump from being
elected, and tried for four years to remove him from office.
What would have happened if Hillary had won the election?
Nothing. The Republicans would have accepted it, waited for the
next election to try again. Not the Democrats, they can't
accept a loss.
accusations of crime and/or malfeasance. I voted for Trump
twice, but I am still dismayed by Jan 6. Where was Trump when
the rioters began to get out of hand? Where was he when they
began to invade the Capitol? He appeared to be silent through
the whole fiasco. That is what I would call malfeasance. Do you
agree?
No I don't agree.
Where were the Capitol Police? Why were those people allowed to
top that wall?
The National Guard was requested to be there, the request was
denied.
Who was in charge of security? Nancy Pelosi.
I think it was another setup for the final impeachment of Trump.
Sorry, as a dedicated conservative and Trump voter, I disagree. As
that demonstration grew Trump disappeared, and to top it off he
criticized Pence for certifying the election. Shameful! If he runs
again and fails to apologize for his actions, I will abstain.
I will always believe the election was stolen by mail in voting.
Mail in voting should not exist for people capable of voting in
person.
Trump would have won that election without mail in voting. To
believe Biden won that election, you would have to believe that no
Republicans used mail in voting.
Any person with common sense would think the mail in vote would be
similar to the in person voting, but it was way out proportion in
favor of the Democrats.
Why was it like that? Was it because the Democrats are so lazy they
wouldn't take time to vote unless someone came to their door with a
mail in ballot, or were sent one in the mail without requesting it.
If the election was stolen Trump should have proved it in court. He
did not. Lacking proof should he, or Pence, have simply appointed
Trump president for a second term? Yes or No?
No.
The mail in ballots won the election for Biden.
That was the most screwed up election in American history.
I usually vote in person, but for that election I did a mail in.
Actually prefer it. If there is an issue or individual on the ballot
that I would like to research further, I have the time and means to do
it. Mail in or not, the Left will be in big trouble for the midterms.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 403 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 80:52:18 |
| Calls: | 8,439 |
| Calls today: | 20 |
| Files: | 13,177 |
| Messages: | 5,906,654 |