The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped" http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal" https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America" https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at >military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race >theory.
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists." https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech >>>> in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at >>> military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" -- >>>>> it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is >>>>> such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used >>>>> to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused" >>>>> pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped" >>>>> http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal >>>>>
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech >>>>> in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at >>>> military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race >>>> theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no
business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
Critical Race Theory is an important
instrument of the Left's childhood indoctrination. Parents who object
must be shut up.
"A.G. Merrick Garland Tells FBI To Investigate Parents Who Yell at
School Officials About Critical Race Theory
School boards want some perturbed parents branded domestic
terrorists." ... "On Monday, Garland sent a memo to the federal law enforcement agency directing it to coordinate with the nation's 14,000
school districts." ...
"It's true that some school board meetings have turned raucous, and undoubtedly there are examples of parents overreacting, or even
engaging in harassment. But there's no evidence whatsoever that this represents some great danger necessitating the involvement of the
FBI." https://reason.com/2021/10/06/ag-merrick-garland-fbi-critical-race-theory-parents-schools-domestic-terrorists/
"One of the most important principles of First Amendment jurisprudence
states that the government may not regulate speech solely on the basis
of its content. Public debate would be distorted, and individual
autonomy impaired, if the government were allowed to pick and choose
certain ideas, viewpoints, or types of information to suppress." https://uscivilliberties.org/themes/3645-content-based-regulation-of-speech.html
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment. >>>>>> Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and >>>>>> must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" -- >>>>>> it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is >>>>>> such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used >>>>>> to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused" >>>>>> pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the >>>>>> First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped" >>>>>> http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal >>>>>>
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech >>>>>> in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging. >>>>> And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate >>>>> speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at >>>>> military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress >>>>> hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race >>>>> theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no
business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
While local and state law enforcement agencies are working with public
school officials in several communities to prevent further disruptions
to educational services and school district operations, law enforcement >officials in some jurisdictions need assistance – including help with >monitoring the threat levels.
Critical Race Theory is an important
instrument of the Left's childhood indoctrination. Parents who object
must be shut up.
"A.G. Merrick Garland Tells FBI To Investigate Parents Who Yell at
School Officials About Critical Race Theory
School boards want some perturbed parents branded domestic
terrorists." ... "On Monday, Garland sent a memo to the federal law
enforcement agency directing it to coordinate with the nation's 14,000
school districts." ...
"It's true that some school board meetings have turned raucous, and
undoubtedly there are examples of parents overreacting, or even
engaging in harassment. But there's no evidence whatsoever that this
represents some great danger necessitating the involvement of the
FBI."
https://reason.com/2021/10/06/ag-merrick-garland-fbi-critical-race-theory-parents-schools-domestic-terrorists/
That's a repeat of the same shit debunked in the AP article.
"One of the most important principles of First Amendment jurisprudence
states that the government may not regulate speech solely on the basis
of its content. Public debate would be distorted, and individual
autonomy impaired, if the government were allowed to pick and choose
certain ideas, viewpoints, or types of information to suppress."
https://uscivilliberties.org/themes/3645-content-based-regulation-of-speech.html
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment. >>>>>>> Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and >>>>>>> must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" -- >>>>>>> it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is >>>>>>> such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used >>>>>>> to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused" >>>>>>> pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race >>>>>>> Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the >>>>>>> First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped" >>>>>>> http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal >>>>>>>
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech >>>>>>> in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging. >>>>>> And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate >>>>>> speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only >>>>>> Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at >>>>>> military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress >>>>>> hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race >>>>>> theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board >>>>> meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no
business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out
in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and
uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement
is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and
sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious.
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First
Amendment. Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor
to violence and must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what
exactly is this "Hate" -- it is anything that challenges the
core beliefs of the Left. Hate is such a broad expression, and >>>>>>>> in it's ill defined breadth can be used to define just about
anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused" pronoun to a
parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race Theory. A >>>>>>>> few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be
stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-hum >>>>>>>> an-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-il >>>>>>>> legal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate >>>>>>>> speech in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad- >>>>>>>> case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of
aging. And I have to repeat myself since you always forget:
censoring "hate speech" is a problem on both the left and right. >>>>>>> For example, only Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs
reading "God hates Fags" at military funerals. And bans on
teaching critical race theory suppress hate speech as much as
bans on protesting the teaching of critical race theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech
are happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to
post on the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school
board meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-t >>>>>> ime-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no
business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment
inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out
in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and
uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement
is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and
sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious.
CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the
Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts
to silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being
taught).
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment. >>>>>>>> Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and >>>>>>>> must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" -- >>>>>>>> it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is >>>>>>>> such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used >>>>>>>> to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused" >>>>>>>> pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race >>>>>>>> Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the >>>>>>>> First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped" >>>>>>>> http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal >>>>>>>>
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech >>>>>>>> in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging. >>>>>>> And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate >>>>>>> speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only >>>>>>> Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress >>>>>>> hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race >>>>>>> theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are >>>>>> happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on >>>>>> the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board >>>>>> meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no
business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment
inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out
in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and
uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement
is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and
sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious.
CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the
Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to >silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught).
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment. >>>>>>>>> Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and >>>>>>>>> must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" -- >>>>>>>>> it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is >>>>>>>>> such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used >>>>>>>>> to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused" >>>>>>>>> pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race >>>>>>>>> Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the >>>>>>>>> First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped" >>>>>>>>> http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal >>>>>>>>>
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging. >>>>>>>> And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate >>>>>>>> speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only >>>>>>>> Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress >>>>>>>> hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are >>>>>>> happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on >>>>>>> the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George >>>>>>> Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board >>>>>>> meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no
business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment
inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out
in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and
uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement
is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and
sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious.
CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the
Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to
silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught).
Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic
terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at
school board meetings? Why, indeed?
Why would the NEA have adopted New
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following
-- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few
days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls
for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.*
"It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by
academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of
the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the
item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study
"that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at
the intersections of our society." The implication is that these
critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way
makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the
activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various cultural insanities."" https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From
Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series
of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one
that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools." https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment. >>>>>>>>>> Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and >>>>>>>>>> must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is >>>>>>>>>> such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used >>>>>>>>>> to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race >>>>>>>>>> Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the >>>>>>>>>> First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped" >>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging. >>>>>>>>> And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate >>>>>>>>> speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only >>>>>>>>> Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress >>>>>>>>> hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are >>>>>>>> happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on >>>>>>>> the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in >>>>>>>> schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George >>>>>>>> Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board >>>>>>>> meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no
business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment
inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out
in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and
uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement
is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and
sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious.
CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the
Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to
silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught).
Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic
terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at
school board meetings? Why, indeed?
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught.
Why would the NEA have adopted New
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following
-- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few
days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls
for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.*
"It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by
academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of
the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the
item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study
"that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism,
ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at
the intersections of our society." The implication is that these
critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way
makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the
activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various
cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/
The article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12 >schools is a lie] is basically correct."
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From
Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series
of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one
that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses
and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology >>>>> being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment. >>>>>>>>>>> Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and >>>>>>>>>>> must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race >>>>>>>>>>> Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the >>>>>>>>>>> First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate >>>>>>>>>> speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only >>>>>>>>>> Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are >>>>>>>>> happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on >>>>>>>>> the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in >>>>>>>>> schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George >>>>>>>>> Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board >>>>>>>>> meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no
business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out >>>>> in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and >>>>> uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement >>>>> is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and
sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious.
CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the
Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to >>>> silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught).
Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic
terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at
school board meetings? Why, indeed?
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught.
Why would the NEA have adopted NewThe article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following
-- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few
days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls
for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.*
"It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by
academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of
the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the
item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study
"that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism,
ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at
the intersections of our society." The implication is that these
critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way
makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the
activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various
cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/ >>
schools is a lie] is basically correct."
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From
Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series >>> of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one
that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses
and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
More likely the NEA realized that in view of the recent stink, CRT,
1619, etc were "sensitive" issues that needed to be approached in a
less public manner. Understandable under the circumstances.
There is an interesting organization that promotes "social justice" in teaching. Read all about it here:
https://www.zinnedproject.org
And here ...
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/pledge-to-teach-truth
And then there is this ... https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-pledge-violate-law-crt-hide-evidence
And this ... https://www.dailywire.com/news/here-are-the-thousands-of-teachers-who-say-theyre-willing-to-violate-law-to-keep-pushing-crt
Thank God Joe Biden has brought in the DOJ and FBI to support these
teachers!
Still believe that CRT is a non-existent issue and much ado about
nothing?
On 10/9/2021 12:11 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology >>>>>> being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment. >>>>>>>>>>>> Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and >>>>>>>>>>>> must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race >>>>>>>>>>>> Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the >>>>>>>>>>>> First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only >>>>>>>>>>> Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are >>>>>>>>>> happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on >>>>>>>>>> the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in >>>>>>>>>> schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George >>>>>>>>>> Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board >>>>>>>>>> meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory.
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no >>>>>>>> business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out >>>>>> in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and >>>>>> uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement >>>>>> is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and >>>>>> sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious.
CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the >>>>> Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to >>>>> silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught). >>>>
terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at
school board meetings? Why, indeed?
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught.
Why would the NEA have adopted NewThe article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12 >>> schools is a lie] is basically correct."
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following
-- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few
days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls
for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.*
"It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by
academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of
the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the >>>> item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study
"that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, >>>> ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at
the intersections of our society." The implication is that these
critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way
makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the
activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various
cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/ >>>
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From
Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series
of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one
that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses
and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
More likely the NEA realized that in view of the recent stink, CRT,
1619, etc were "sensitive" issues that needed to be approached in a
less public manner. Understandable under the circumstances.
There is an interesting organization that promotes "social justice" in
teaching. Read all about it here:
https://www.zinnedproject.org
And here ...
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/pledge-to-teach-truth
And then there is this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-pledge-violate-law-crt-hide-evidence >>
And this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/here-are-the-thousands-of-teachers-who-say-theyre-willing-to-violate-law-to-keep-pushing-crt
Thank God Joe Biden has brought in the DOJ and FBI to support these
teachers!
Still believe that CRT is a non-existent issue and much ado about
nothing?
Mostly. There are those on the Left who want to indoctrinate kids. But,
they aren't getting their way. Moreover, there are those on the Right
who have written the laws referred to in your links who want to silence
any mention of CRT. That's also indoctrination.
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:56:23 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/9/2021 12:11 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology >>>>>>> being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment >>>>>>> inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out >>>>>>> in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and >>>>>>> uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement >>>>>>> is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and >>>>>>> sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious.
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race >>>>>>>>>>>>> Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only >>>>>>>>>>>> Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are >>>>>>>>>>> happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on >>>>>>>>>>> the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in >>>>>>>>>>> schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George >>>>>>>>>>> Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory. >>>>>>>>>>
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no >>>>>>>>> business meddling in what should be the domain of local law
enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the >>>>>> Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to >>>>>> silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught). >>>>>
terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at
school board meetings? Why, indeed?
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught.
Why would the NEA have adopted NewThe article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12 >>>> schools is a lie] is basically correct."
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following >>>>> -- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few >>>>> days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls
for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.* >>>>> "It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by
academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of >>>>> the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the >>>>> item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study >>>>> "that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, >>>>> ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at >>>>> the intersections of our society." The implication is that these
critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way
makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the
activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various >>>>> cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/ >>>>
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From >>>>> Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series >>>>> of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one
that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses
and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
More likely the NEA realized that in view of the recent stink, CRT,
1619, etc were "sensitive" issues that needed to be approached in a
less public manner. Understandable under the circumstances.
There is an interesting organization that promotes "social justice" in
teaching. Read all about it here:
https://www.zinnedproject.org
And here ...
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/pledge-to-teach-truth
And then there is this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-pledge-violate-law-crt-hide-evidence
And this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/here-are-the-thousands-of-teachers-who-say-theyre-willing-to-violate-law-to-keep-pushing-crt
Thank God Joe Biden has brought in the DOJ and FBI to support these
teachers!
Still believe that CRT is a non-existent issue and much ado about
nothing?
Mostly. There are those on the Left who want to indoctrinate kids. But,
they aren't getting their way. Moreover, there are those on the Right
who have written the laws referred to in your links who want to silence
any mention of CRT. That's also indoctrination.
Oh? Is silencing Anti-Semitism or silencing Islamophobia also
indoctrination?
So OK for a teacher to instruct K-12 in either one?
On 10/9/2021 4:13 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:56:23 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/9/2021 12:11 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the >>>>>>> Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to >>>>>>> silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught). >>>>>>
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology >>>>>>>> being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment >>>>>>>> inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out >>>>>>>> in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and >>>>>>>> uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement >>>>>>>> is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and >>>>>>>> sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious. >>>>>>>
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal"
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in >>>>>>>>>>>> schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George >>>>>>>>>>>> Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory. >>>>>>>>>>>
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no >>>>>>>>>> business meddling in what should be the domain of local law >>>>>>>>>> enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at
school board meetings? Why, indeed?
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught.
Why would the NEA have adopted New
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following >>>>>> -- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few >>>>>> days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls >>>>>> for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.* >>>>>> "It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by >>>>>> academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of >>>>>> the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the >>>>>> item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study >>>>>> "that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, >>>>>> ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at >>>>>> the intersections of our society." The implication is that these
critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way >>>>>> makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the >>>>>> activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various >>>>>> cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/
The article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12 >>>>> schools is a lie] is basically correct."
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From >>>>>> Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series >>>>>> of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one >>>>>> that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses >>>>> and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
More likely the NEA realized that in view of the recent stink, CRT,
1619, etc were "sensitive" issues that needed to be approached in a
less public manner. Understandable under the circumstances.
There is an interesting organization that promotes "social justice" in >>>> teaching. Read all about it here:
https://www.zinnedproject.org
And here ...
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/pledge-to-teach-truth
And then there is this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-pledge-violate-law-crt-hide-evidence
And this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/here-are-the-thousands-of-teachers-who-say-theyre-willing-to-violate-law-to-keep-pushing-crt
Thank God Joe Biden has brought in the DOJ and FBI to support these
teachers!
Still believe that CRT is a non-existent issue and much ado about
nothing?
Mostly. There are those on the Left who want to indoctrinate kids. But,
they aren't getting their way. Moreover, there are those on the Right
who have written the laws referred to in your links who want to silence
any mention of CRT. That's also indoctrination.
Oh? Is silencing Anti-Semitism or silencing Islamophobia also
indoctrination?
It's indoctrination to silence a theory (i.e., teach it is false) solely >because some believe it is bigoted. On the other hand, some theories can
be taught as being false because they objectively are. I would need
specific examples of anti-Semitic or Islamophobic theories to pass
judgment. I do know that CRT is not objectively false, and so it's >indoctrination to teach it is false.
So OK for a teacher to instruct K-12 in either one?
It's always indoctrination to teach that a theory is true when it is not >objectively the case regardless of whether some believe the theory is >bigoted. Hence, it's indoctrination to teach CRT is true.
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:04:35 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/9/2021 4:13 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:56:23 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/9/2021 12:11 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic >>>>>>> terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at >>>>>>> school board meetings? Why, indeed?
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the >>>>>>>> Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology >>>>>>>>> being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment >>>>>>>>> inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out >>>>>>>>> in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and >>>>>>>>> uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement >>>>>>>>> is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and >>>>>>>>> sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious. >>>>>>>>
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in >>>>>>>>>>>>> schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George >>>>>>>>>>>>> Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory. >>>>>>>>>>>>
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793
That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no >>>>>>>>>>> business meddling in what should be the domain of local law >>>>>>>>>>> enforcement, so why are they?
From the NSBA letter:
silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught). >>>>>>>
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught. >>>>>>
Why would the NEA have adopted New
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following >>>>>>> -- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few >>>>>>> days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls >>>>>>> for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.* >>>>>>> "It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by >>>>>>> academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of >>>>>>> the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the >>>>>>> item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study >>>>>>> "that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, >>>>>>> ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at >>>>>>> the intersections of our society." The implication is that these >>>>>>> critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way >>>>>>> makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the >>>>>>> activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various >>>>>>> cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/
The article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12 >>>>>> schools is a lie] is basically correct."
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From >>>>>>> Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series
of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one >>>>>>> that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses >>>>>> and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
More likely the NEA realized that in view of the recent stink, CRT,
1619, etc were "sensitive" issues that needed to be approached in a
less public manner. Understandable under the circumstances.
There is an interesting organization that promotes "social justice" in >>>>> teaching. Read all about it here:
https://www.zinnedproject.org
And here ...
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/pledge-to-teach-truth
And then there is this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-pledge-violate-law-crt-hide-evidence
And this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/here-are-the-thousands-of-teachers-who-say-theyre-willing-to-violate-law-to-keep-pushing-crt
Thank God Joe Biden has brought in the DOJ and FBI to support these
teachers!
Still believe that CRT is a non-existent issue and much ado about
nothing?
Mostly. There are those on the Left who want to indoctrinate kids. But, >>>> they aren't getting their way. Moreover, there are those on the Right
who have written the laws referred to in your links who want to silence >>>> any mention of CRT. That's also indoctrination.
Oh? Is silencing Anti-Semitism or silencing Islamophobia also
indoctrination?
It's indoctrination to silence a theory (i.e., teach it is false) solely
because some believe it is bigoted. On the other hand, some theories can
be taught as being false because they objectively are. I would need
specific examples of anti-Semitic or Islamophobic theories to pass
judgment. I do know that CRT is not objectively false, and so it's
indoctrination to teach it is false.
So OK for a teacher to instruct K-12 in either one?
It's always indoctrination to teach that a theory is true when it is not
objectively the case regardless of whether some believe the theory is
bigoted. Hence, it's indoctrination to teach CRT is true.
To draw this useless discourse to a close, the following very
insightful link expresses my view of Critical Race Theory. I would
like to believe that my opinion of CRT, and the way society should
deal with it, is guided by logic and reason. I am sure you would
disagree, and there we have it. BTW -- IMHO the proper place to debate
these issue is at the university level and beyond, but certainly NOT
in a K-12 classroom.
"Eight Big Reasons Critical Race Theory Is Terrible for Dealing with
Racism" https://newdiscourses.com/2020/06/reasons-critical-race-theory-terrible-dealing-racism/
On 10/9/2021 11:34 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:04:35 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/9/2021 4:13 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:56:23 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote:
On 10/9/2021 12:11 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic >>>>>>>> terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at >>>>>>>> school board meetings? Why, indeed?
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the >>>>>>>>> Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no >>>>>>>>>>>> business meddling in what should be the domain of local law >>>>>>>>>>>> enforcement, so why are they?
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793 >>>>>>>>>>>>
From the NSBA letter:
being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment >>>>>>>>>> inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out
in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and
uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement >>>>>>>>>> is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and >>>>>>>>>> sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious. >>>>>>>>>
silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught). >>>>>>>>
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught. >>>>>>>
Why would the NEA have adopted New
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following >>>>>>>> -- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few >>>>>>>> days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls >>>>>>>> for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.* >>>>>>>> "It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by >>>>>>>> academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of >>>>>>>> the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the >>>>>>>> item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study >>>>>>>> "that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism, >>>>>>>> ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at >>>>>>>> the intersections of our society." The implication is that these >>>>>>>> critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way >>>>>>>> makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the >>>>>>>> activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various >>>>>>>> cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/
The article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12
schools is a lie] is basically correct."
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From >>>>>>>> Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series >>>>>>>> of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one >>>>>>>> that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses >>>>>>> and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
More likely the NEA realized that in view of the recent stink, CRT, >>>>>> 1619, etc were "sensitive" issues that needed to be approached in a >>>>>> less public manner. Understandable under the circumstances.
There is an interesting organization that promotes "social justice" in >>>>>> teaching. Read all about it here:
https://www.zinnedproject.org
And here ...
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/pledge-to-teach-truth
And then there is this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-pledge-violate-law-crt-hide-evidence
And this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/here-are-the-thousands-of-teachers-who-say-theyre-willing-to-violate-law-to-keep-pushing-crt
Thank God Joe Biden has brought in the DOJ and FBI to support these >>>>>> teachers!
Still believe that CRT is a non-existent issue and much ado about
nothing?
Mostly. There are those on the Left who want to indoctrinate kids. But, >>>>> they aren't getting their way. Moreover, there are those on the Right >>>>> who have written the laws referred to in your links who want to silence >>>>> any mention of CRT. That's also indoctrination.
Oh? Is silencing Anti-Semitism or silencing Islamophobia also
indoctrination?
It's indoctrination to silence a theory (i.e., teach it is false) solely >>> because some believe it is bigoted. On the other hand, some theories can >>> be taught as being false because they objectively are. I would need
specific examples of anti-Semitic or Islamophobic theories to pass
judgment. I do know that CRT is not objectively false, and so it's
indoctrination to teach it is false.
So OK for a teacher to instruct K-12 in either one?
It's always indoctrination to teach that a theory is true when it is not >>> objectively the case regardless of whether some believe the theory is
bigoted. Hence, it's indoctrination to teach CRT is true.
To draw this useless discourse to a close, the following very
insightful link expresses my view of Critical Race Theory. I would
like to believe that my opinion of CRT, and the way society should
deal with it, is guided by logic and reason. I am sure you would
disagree, and there we have it. BTW -- IMHO the proper place to debate
these issue is at the university level and beyond, but certainly NOT
in a K-12 classroom.
"Eight Big Reasons Critical Race Theory Is Terrible for Dealing with
Racism"
https://newdiscourses.com/2020/06/reasons-critical-race-theory-terrible-dealing-racism/
I have no problem with the opinion that CRT is bad (or good). I have a >problem with indoctrinating kids that CRT is bad (or good).
On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 08:13:50 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/9/2021 11:34 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:04:35 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/9/2021 4:13 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:56:23 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>> wrote:
On 10/9/2021 12:11 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no >>>>>>>>>>>>> business meddling in what should be the domain of local law >>>>>>>>>>>>> enforcement, so why are they?
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793 >>>>>>>>>>>>>
From the NSBA letter:
being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment >>>>>>>>>>> inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out
in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and
uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement
is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and >>>>>>>>>>> sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious. >>>>>>>>>>
Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to
silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught).
Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic >>>>>>>>> terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at >>>>>>>>> school board meetings? Why, indeed?
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught. >>>>>>>>
Why would the NEA have adopted New
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following >>>>>>>>> -- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few >>>>>>>>> days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls >>>>>>>>> for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.* >>>>>>>>> "It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by >>>>>>>>> academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of >>>>>>>>> the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the
item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study >>>>>>>>> "that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism,
ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at >>>>>>>>> the intersections of our society." The implication is that these >>>>>>>>> critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way >>>>>>>>> makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the >>>>>>>>> activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various >>>>>>>>> cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/
The article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12
schools is a lie] is basically correct."
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From >>>>>>>>> Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series
of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one >>>>>>>>> that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools." >>>>>>>>> https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses >>>>>>>> and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
More likely the NEA realized that in view of the recent stink, CRT, >>>>>>> 1619, etc were "sensitive" issues that needed to be approached in a >>>>>>> less public manner. Understandable under the circumstances.
There is an interesting organization that promotes "social justice" in >>>>>>> teaching. Read all about it here:
https://www.zinnedproject.org
And here ...
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/pledge-to-teach-truth
And then there is this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-pledge-violate-law-crt-hide-evidence
And this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/here-are-the-thousands-of-teachers-who-say-theyre-willing-to-violate-law-to-keep-pushing-crt
Thank God Joe Biden has brought in the DOJ and FBI to support these >>>>>>> teachers!
Still believe that CRT is a non-existent issue and much ado about >>>>>>> nothing?
Mostly. There are those on the Left who want to indoctrinate kids. But, >>>>>> they aren't getting their way. Moreover, there are those on the Right >>>>>> who have written the laws referred to in your links who want to silence >>>>>> any mention of CRT. That's also indoctrination.
Oh? Is silencing Anti-Semitism or silencing Islamophobia also
indoctrination?
It's indoctrination to silence a theory (i.e., teach it is false) solely >>>> because some believe it is bigoted. On the other hand, some theories can >>>> be taught as being false because they objectively are. I would need
specific examples of anti-Semitic or Islamophobic theories to pass
judgment. I do know that CRT is not objectively false, and so it's
indoctrination to teach it is false.
So OK for a teacher to instruct K-12 in either one?
It's always indoctrination to teach that a theory is true when it is not >>>> objectively the case regardless of whether some believe the theory is
bigoted. Hence, it's indoctrination to teach CRT is true.
To draw this useless discourse to a close, the following very
insightful link expresses my view of Critical Race Theory. I would
like to believe that my opinion of CRT, and the way society should
deal with it, is guided by logic and reason. I am sure you would
disagree, and there we have it. BTW -- IMHO the proper place to debate
these issue is at the university level and beyond, but certainly NOT
in a K-12 classroom.
"Eight Big Reasons Critical Race Theory Is Terrible for Dealing with
Racism"
https://newdiscourses.com/2020/06/reasons-critical-race-theory-terrible-dealing-racism/
I have no problem with the opinion that CRT is bad (or good). I have a
problem with indoctrinating kids that CRT is bad (or good).
So, would you agree that bad or good it does not belong in a K-12
classroom?
On 10/10/2021 11:24 AM, El Castor wrote:
On Sun, 10 Oct 2021 08:13:50 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 10/9/2021 11:34 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 17:04:35 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>> wrote:
On 10/9/2021 4:13 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 14:56:23 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>> wrote:
On 10/9/2021 12:11 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2021 08:31:57 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On 10/8/2021 11:08 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 13:30:22 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 1:22 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 12:14:45 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>CRT is not being taught in K-12. The notion it is was invented by the
wrote:
On 10/8/2021 10:30 AM, El Castor wrote:The NSBA is just another arm of the Left. CRT is a left wing ideology
On Fri, 8 Oct 2021 08:28:00 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 11:32 PM, El Castor wrote:That is of course the cover story. Fact is that the FBI has no >>>>>>>>>>>>>> business meddling in what should be the domain of local law >>>>>>>>>>>>>> enforcement, so why are they?
On Thu, 7 Oct 2021 17:13:56 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com>
wrote:
On 10/7/2021 12:43 PM, El Castor wrote:
The "Woke" Left has always been frustrated by the First Amendment.
Their on-going theme -- Hate speech is a precursor to violence and
must be stopped, or "cancelled"! Well, what exactly is this "Hate" --
it is anything that challenges the core beliefs of the Left. Hate is
such a broad expression, and in it's ill defined breadth can be used
to define just about anything the Left doesn't like, from a "misused"
pronoun to a parent's opposition to the teaching of Critical Race
Theory. A few adjustments to the Supreme Court and we can kiss the
First Amendment goodbye.
"Sexist hate speech is a human rights violation and must be stopped"
http://blog.nohatespeechmovement.org/sexist-hate-speech-is-a-human-rights-violation-and-must-be-stopped/
"Hate Speech Is Offensive And Should Be Illegal" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://www.theodysseyonline.com/hate-speech-offensive-should-illegal
"Is the First Amendment too broad? The case for regulating hate speech
in America"
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/first-amendment-too-broad-case-regulating-hate-speech-america-ncna832246
Etc.
Old links for an old argument. Repeating yourself is a sign of aging.
And I have to repeat myself since you always forget: censoring "hate
speech" is a problem on both the left and right. For example, only
Justice Alito voted not to protect the signs reading "God hates Fags" at
military funerals. And bans on teaching critical race theory suppress
hate speech as much as bans on protesting the teaching of critical race
theory.
I'll plead guilty to aging, but attempts to abridge free speech are
happening in the here and now and are what encouraged me to post on
the subject.
Old links? How about yesterday?
Oct 6 2021 ...
"Liberals were losing the argument over critical race theory in
schools — time to call in the FBI"
"Attorney General Merrick Garland has turned the FBI into George
Orwell's thought police by classifying angry parents at school board
meetings as "domestic terrorists."
https://nypost.com/2021/10/06/liberals-are-losing-crt-in-schools-time-to-call-in-the-fbi/
The FBI is not targeting opponents of critical race theory. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-333765746793 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
From the NSBA letter:
being shamefully used to brainwash children. The First Amendment >>>>>>>>>>>> inconveniently prevents the Left from silencing parents who speak out
in protest, so the Left cooks up this domestic terrorism nonsense and
uses the NSBA to evade the First Amendment. If local law enforcement
is overwhelmed by evil terrorist parents then why aren't police and
sheriffs begging for help? The answer to that should be obvious. >>>>>>>>>>>
Right to stir up folks for political purposes and has led to efforts to
silence speech that promotes CRT (even though it's not being taught).
Not taught? That raises the question of why parents (AKA domestic >>>>>>>>>> terrorists) would protest (and need to be silenced by the FBI) at >>>>>>>>>> school board meetings? Why, indeed?
They have been provoked into falsely believing it is being taught. >>>>>>>>>
Why would the NEA have adopted New
Business Item 39 at it's July 2021 meeting? Please read the following
-- it is hair raising!
"At its yearly annual meeting, conducted virtually over the past few >>>>>>>>>> days, the NEA adopted New Business Item 39, which essentially calls >>>>>>>>>> for the organization to defend the teaching of critical race theory.*
"It is reasonable and appropriate for curriculum to be informed by >>>>>>>>>> academic frameworks for understanding and interpreting the impact of >>>>>>>>>> the past on current society, including critical race theory," says the
item.
Consistent with its defense of CRT, the NEA will also provide a study
"that critiques empire, white supremacy, anti-Blackness,
anti-Indigeneity, racism, patriarchy, cisheteropatriarchy, capitalism,
ableism, anthropocentrism, and other forms of power and oppression at
the intersections of our society." The implication is that these >>>>>>>>>> critiques are aspects of critical race theory, which in a weird way >>>>>>>>>> makes this an example of the activist left basically accepting the >>>>>>>>>> activist right's new working definition of CRT as "all of the various
cultural insanities.""
https://reason.com/2021/07/06/critical-race-theory-nea-taught-in-schools/
The article accurately concluded "this accusation [CRT is taught in K-12
schools is a lie] is basically correct."
BTW -- The day after Reason published the above ...
"Largest Teachers’ Union Quietly Removes Pro-CRT Agenda Items From >>>>>>>>>> Website"
"The nation’s largest teachers’ union has quietly taken down a series
of adopted and proposed resolutions from its website, including one >>>>>>>>>> that calls for the organization to defend the teaching of
Marxism-rooted critical race theory (CRT) in public schools." >>>>>>>>>> https://www.theepochtimes.com/largest-teachers-union-quietly-removes-pro-crt-agenda-items-from-website_3890683.html
Bingo! Through the smallest of persuasion, the NEA came to its senses >>>>>>>>> and backed down. What the NEA did is a tempest in a teapot.
More likely the NEA realized that in view of the recent stink, CRT, >>>>>>>> 1619, etc were "sensitive" issues that needed to be approached in a >>>>>>>> less public manner. Understandable under the circumstances.
There is an interesting organization that promotes "social justice" in >>>>>>>> teaching. Read all about it here:
https://www.zinnedproject.org
And here ...
https://www.zinnedproject.org/news/pledge-to-teach-truth
And then there is this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/teachers-pledge-violate-law-crt-hide-evidence
And this ...
https://www.dailywire.com/news/here-are-the-thousands-of-teachers-who-say-theyre-willing-to-violate-law-to-keep-pushing-crt
Thank God Joe Biden has brought in the DOJ and FBI to support these >>>>>>>> teachers!
Still believe that CRT is a non-existent issue and much ado about >>>>>>>> nothing?
Mostly. There are those on the Left who want to indoctrinate kids. But, >>>>>>> they aren't getting their way. Moreover, there are those on the Right >>>>>>> who have written the laws referred to in your links who want to silence >>>>>>> any mention of CRT. That's also indoctrination.
Oh? Is silencing Anti-Semitism or silencing Islamophobia also
indoctrination?
It's indoctrination to silence a theory (i.e., teach it is false) solely >>>>> because some believe it is bigoted. On the other hand, some theories can >>>>> be taught as being false because they objectively are. I would need
specific examples of anti-Semitic or Islamophobic theories to pass
judgment. I do know that CRT is not objectively false, and so it's
indoctrination to teach it is false.
So OK for a teacher to instruct K-12 in either one?
It's always indoctrination to teach that a theory is true when it is not >>>>> objectively the case regardless of whether some believe the theory is >>>>> bigoted. Hence, it's indoctrination to teach CRT is true.
To draw this useless discourse to a close, the following very
insightful link expresses my view of Critical Race Theory. I would
like to believe that my opinion of CRT, and the way society should
deal with it, is guided by logic and reason. I am sure you would
disagree, and there we have it. BTW -- IMHO the proper place to debate >>>> these issue is at the university level and beyond, but certainly NOT
in a K-12 classroom.
"Eight Big Reasons Critical Race Theory Is Terrible for Dealing with
Racism"
https://newdiscourses.com/2020/06/reasons-critical-race-theory-terrible-dealing-racism/
I have no problem with the opinion that CRT is bad (or good). I have a
problem with indoctrinating kids that CRT is bad (or good).
So, would you agree that bad or good it does not belong in a K-12
classroom?
It does not belong if it is taught as either being true or false. It's >plausible as a topic of debate in high school.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 399 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 65:29:29 |
| Calls: | 8,355 |
| Calls today: | 15 |
| Files: | 13,159 |
| Messages: | 5,893,958 |
| Posted today: | 1 |