"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated
his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president”
by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority
with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from
the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”" https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated
his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president”
by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority
with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from
the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as
commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated
his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president” >>> by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority
with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from >>> the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as
commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
Hmmm.
* Violated Constitutional Oath
* Overstepped Presidential Authority
* Failed To Act Responsibly As Commander In Chief
I suspect many issues can be decided by either impeachment or the
voters.
On 9/22/2021 8:58 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated
his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president” >>>> by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority
with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from
the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as
commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
Hmmm.
* Violated Constitutional Oath
... by releasing thousands of migrants who entered illegally without a
date to appear in court for immigration. But, that's a policy choice
based on Biden's interpretation of the law which no court has said is >illegal.
* Overstepped Presidential Authority
... with his second eviction moratorium order despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court. But, that was a policy choice based on
Biden's interpretation of the law which no court had precluded (warnings
from procedural rulings don't count). The Court has subsequently said
the second order is illegal and Biden withdrew it.
* Failed To Act Responsibly As Commander In Chief
... with regard to the withdrawal of United State forces from
Afghanistan. But, that was an incompetently carried out policy choice
which is not impeachable.
I suspect many issues can be decided by either impeachment or the
voters.
Our democracy is screwed if they can be decided by impeachment.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:02:54 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 8:58 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated >>>>> his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president” >>>>> by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority
with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning >>>>> from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from >>>>> the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as
commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
Hmmm.
* Violated Constitutional Oath
... by releasing thousands of migrants who entered illegally without a
date to appear in court for immigration. But, that's a policy choice
based on Biden's interpretation of the law which no court has said is
illegal.
* Overstepped Presidential Authority
... with his second eviction moratorium order despite the clear warning >>from the U.S. Supreme Court. But, that was a policy choice based on
Biden's interpretation of the law which no court had precluded (warnings >>from procedural rulings don't count). The Court has subsequently said
the second order is illegal and Biden withdrew it.
* Failed To Act Responsibly As Commander In Chief
... with regard to the withdrawal of United State forces from
Afghanistan. But, that was an incompetently carried out policy choice
which is not impeachable.
I suspect many issues can be decided by either impeachment or the
voters.
Our democracy is screwed if they can be decided by impeachment.
Oh well, not to worry, if Biden was impeached, found guilty by the
Senate, and removed from office on the aforementioned grounds, his impeachment would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and overturned. Right?
On 9/23/2021 11:40 AM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:02:54 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 8:58 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated >>>>>> his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president” >>>>>> by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority >>>>>> with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning >>>>>> from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from >>>>>> the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as
commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
Hmmm.
* Violated Constitutional Oath
... by releasing thousands of migrants who entered illegally without a
date to appear in court for immigration. But, that's a policy choice
based on Biden's interpretation of the law which no court has said is
illegal.
* Overstepped Presidential Authority
... with his second eviction moratorium order despite the clear warning >>>from the U.S. Supreme Court. But, that was a policy choice based on
Biden's interpretation of the law which no court had precluded (warnings >>>from procedural rulings don't count). The Court has subsequently said
the second order is illegal and Biden withdrew it.
* Failed To Act Responsibly As Commander In Chief
... with regard to the withdrawal of United State forces from
Afghanistan. But, that was an incompetently carried out policy choice
which is not impeachable.
I suspect many issues can be decided by either impeachment or the
voters.
Our democracy is screwed if they can be decided by impeachment.
Oh well, not to worry, if Biden was impeached, found guilty by the
Senate, and removed from office on the aforementioned grounds, his
impeachment would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and
overturned. Right?
Of course not.
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:34:36 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/23/2021 11:40 AM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:02:54 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 8:58 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against >>>>>>> Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated >>>>>>> his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president”
by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States >>>>>>> illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority >>>>>>> with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning >>>>>>> from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from
the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as >>>>>>> commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States >>>>>>> forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
Hmmm.
* Violated Constitutional Oath
... by releasing thousands of migrants who entered illegally without a >>>> date to appear in court for immigration. But, that's a policy choice
based on Biden's interpretation of the law which no court has said is
illegal.
* Overstepped Presidential Authority
... with his second eviction moratorium order despite the clear warning >>> >from the U.S. Supreme Court. But, that was a policy choice based on
Biden's interpretation of the law which no court had precluded (warnings >>> >from procedural rulings don't count). The Court has subsequently said
the second order is illegal and Biden withdrew it.
* Failed To Act Responsibly As Commander In Chief
... with regard to the withdrawal of United State forces from
Afghanistan. But, that was an incompetently carried out policy choice
which is not impeachable.
I suspect many issues can be decided by either impeachment or the
voters.
Our democracy is screwed if they can be decided by impeachment.
Oh well, not to worry, if Biden was impeached, found guilty by the
Senate, and removed from office on the aforementioned grounds, his
impeachment would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and
overturned. Right?
Of course not.
Oh? Then, like it or not, it looks like policy differences CAN be
settled by impeachment, rather than elections. (-8
On 9/24/2021 8:14 AM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:34:36 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/23/2021 11:40 AM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:02:54 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 8:58 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against >>>>>>>> Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated >>>>>>>> his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president” >>>>>>>> by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States >>>>>>>> illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority >>>>>>>> with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning >>>>>>>> from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from >>>>>>>> the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as >>>>>>>> commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States >>>>>>>> forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not >>>>>>> impeachment.
Hmmm.
* Violated Constitutional Oath
... by releasing thousands of migrants who entered illegally without a >>>>> date to appear in court for immigration. But, that's a policy choice >>>>> based on Biden's interpretation of the law which no court has said is >>>>> illegal.
* Overstepped Presidential Authority
... with his second eviction moratorium order despite the clear warning >>>> >from the U.S. Supreme Court. But, that was a policy choice based on
Biden's interpretation of the law which no court had precluded (warnings >>>> >from procedural rulings don't count). The Court has subsequently said >>>>> the second order is illegal and Biden withdrew it.
* Failed To Act Responsibly As Commander In Chief
... with regard to the withdrawal of United State forces from
Afghanistan. But, that was an incompetently carried out policy choice >>>>> which is not impeachable.
I suspect many issues can be decided by either impeachment or the
voters.
Our democracy is screwed if they can be decided by impeachment.
Oh well, not to worry, if Biden was impeached, found guilty by the
Senate, and removed from office on the aforementioned grounds, his
impeachment would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and
overturned. Right?
Of course not.
Oh? Then, like it or not, it looks like policy differences CAN be
settled by impeachment, rather than elections. (-8
Of course they can be, but our democracy is screwed if they are.
On Fri, 24 Sep 2021 12:51:52 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/24/2021 8:14 AM, El Castor wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sep 2021 17:34:36 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/23/2021 11:40 AM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 22:02:54 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 8:58 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against >>>>>>>>> Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated
his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president”
by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States >>>>>>>>> illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.” >>>>>>>>> The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority >>>>>>>>> with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from
the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as >>>>>>>>> commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States >>>>>>>>> forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not >>>>>>>> impeachment.
Hmmm.
* Violated Constitutional Oath
... by releasing thousands of migrants who entered illegally without a >>>>>> date to appear in court for immigration. But, that's a policy choice >>>>>> based on Biden's interpretation of the law which no court has said is >>>>>> illegal.
* Overstepped Presidential Authority
... with his second eviction moratorium order despite the clear warning >>>>> >from the U.S. Supreme Court. But, that was a policy choice based on >>>>>> Biden's interpretation of the law which no court had precluded (warnings >>>>> >from procedural rulings don't count). The Court has subsequently said >>>>>> the second order is illegal and Biden withdrew it.
* Failed To Act Responsibly As Commander In Chief
... with regard to the withdrawal of United State forces from
Afghanistan. But, that was an incompetently carried out policy choice >>>>>> which is not impeachable.
I suspect many issues can be decided by either impeachment or the >>>>>>> voters.
Our democracy is screwed if they can be decided by impeachment.
Oh well, not to worry, if Biden was impeached, found guilty by the
Senate, and removed from office on the aforementioned grounds, his
impeachment would be ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court, and >>>>> overturned. Right?
Of course not.
Oh? Then, like it or not, it looks like policy differences CAN be
settled by impeachment, rather than elections. (-8
Of course they can be, but our democracy is screwed if they are.
Then amend the Constitution.
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated
his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president”
by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority
with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from
the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as
commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated
his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president” >>> by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority
with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from >>> the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as
commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
I'll give it to you on the eviction moratorium, but his failure to
secure the border and pathetic screw-up in Afghanistan are in my
opinion examples of unacceptable incompetence. Incompetence in the
execution of his duties seems to me to be ample reason to remove him
from office. That said ...
* This is clearly just a political exercise and critique by
Republicans of Biden's failure to adequately exercise the duties of
his office --- with no hope of making it out of the House prior to the
next mid-term.
* If it did somehow succeed, Harris would be president, which would no
doubt delight most Democrats.
For those reasons my reaction to the whole thing is a big yawn.
On 9/24/2021 4:47 PM, El Castor wrote:
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 17:58:01 -0700, Josh Rosenbluth
<noway@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 9/22/2021 4:12 PM, El Castor wrote:
"Four House Republicans introduce articles of impeachment against
Biden"
''According to the Examiner, the first count says Mr. Biden “violated
his constitutional oath to faithfully execute the office of president” >>>> by releasing “thousands of migrants who entered the United States
illegally without a date to appear in court for immigration.”
The second count says Mr. Biden overstepped presidential authority
with his second eviction-moratorium order “despite the clear warning
from the U.S. Supreme Court” and “with no legislative directive from
the U.S. Congress.”
The third article says Mr. Biden “failed to act responsibly as
commander-in-chief with regard to the withdrawal of United States
forces from Afghanistan.”"
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/sep/21/joe-biden-articles-impeachment-introduced-four-hou/
These are policy differences which are decided by elections, not
impeachment.
I'll give it to you on the eviction moratorium, but his failure to
secure the border and pathetic screw-up in Afghanistan are in my
opinion examples of unacceptable incompetence. Incompetence in the
execution of his duties seems to me to be ample reason to remove him
from office. That said ...
* This is clearly just a political exercise and critique by
Republicans of Biden's failure to adequately exercise the duties of
his office --- with no hope of making it out of the House prior to the
next mid-term.
* If it did somehow succeed, Harris would be president, which would no
doubt delight most Democrats.
For those reasons my reaction to the whole thing is a big yawn.
I'll give you that impeachment for incompetence does not screw our
democracy precisely because very likely the VP shares the same policy
agenda.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 218:50:07 |
| Calls: | 6,621 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 12,171 |
| Messages: | 5,317,787 |