• How much health insurers pay for almost everything is about to go publi

    From Leroy N. Soetoro@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 5 21:08:26 2022
    XPost: alt.business.insurance, sac.politics, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/07/01/1108653439/how-much- health-insurers-pay-for-almost-everything-is-about-to-go-public

    Consumers, employers and just about everyone else interested in health
    care prices will soon get an unprecedented look at what insurers pay for
    care, perhaps helping answer a question that has long dogged those who buy insurance: Are we getting the best deal we can?

    Starting July 1, health insurers and self-insured employers must post on websites just about every price they've negotiated with providers for
    health care services, item by item. About the only exclusion is the prices
    paid for prescription drugs, except those administered in hospitals or
    doctors' offices.

    The federally required data release could affect future prices or even how employers contract for health care. Many will see for the first time how
    well their insurers are doing compared with others.

    The new rules are far broader than those that went into effect last year requiring hospitals to post their negotiated rates for the public to see.
    Now insurers must post the amounts paid for "every physician in network,
    every hospital, every surgery center, every nursing facility," said
    Jeffrey Leibach, a partner at the consulting firm Guidehouse.

    "When you start doing the math, you're talking trillions of records," he
    said. The fines the federal government could impose for noncompliance are
    also heftier than the penalties that hospitals face.

    Federal officials learned from the hospital experience and gave insurers
    more direction on what was expected, said Leibach. Insurers or self-
    insured employers could be fined as much as $100 a day for each violation
    and each affected enrollee if they fail to provide the data.

    "Get your calculator out: All of a sudden you are in the millions pretty
    fast," Leibach said.

    Determined consumers, especially those with high-deductible health plans,
    may try to dig in right away and use the data to try comparing what they
    will have to pay at different hospitals, clinics, or doctor offices for specific services.

    But each database's enormous size may mean that most people "will find it
    very hard to use the data in a nuanced way," said Katherine Baicker, dean
    of the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy.

    At least at first.

    Entrepreneurs are expected to quickly translate the information into more user-friendly formats so it can be incorporated into new or existing
    services that estimate costs for patients. And starting Jan. 1, the rules require insurers to provide online tools that will help people get upfront
    cost estimates for about 500 so-called "shoppable" services, meaning
    medical care they can schedule ahead of time.

    Once those things happen, "you'll at least have the options in front of
    you," said Chris Severn, CEO of Turquoise Health, an online company that
    has posted price information made available under the rules for hospitals, although many hospitals have yet to comply.

    With the addition of the insurers' data, sites like his will be able to
    drill down further into cost variation from one place to another or among insurers.

    "If you're going to get an X-ray, you will be able to see that you can do
    it for $250 at this hospital, $75 at the imaging center down the road, or
    your specialist can do it in office for $25," he said.

    Everyone will know everyone else's business: for example, how much
    insurers Aetna and Humana pay the same surgery center for a knee

    The requirements stem from the Affordable Care Act and a 2019 executive
    order by then-President Donald Trump.

    "These plans are supposed to be acting on behalf of employers in
    negotiating good rates, and the little insight we have on that shows it
    has not happened," said Elizabeth Mitchell, president and CEO of the
    Purchaser Business Group on Health, an affiliation of employers who offer job-based health benefits to workers. "I do believe the dynamics are going
    to change."

    Other observers are more circumspect.

    "Maybe at best this will reduce the wide variance of prices out there,"
    said Zack Cooper, director of health policy at the Yale University
    Institution for Social and Policy Studies. "But it won't be unleashing a consumer revolution."

    Still, the biggest value of the July data release may well be to shed
    light on how successful insurers have been at negotiating prices. It comes
    on the heels of research that has shown tremendous variation in what is
    paid for health care. A recent study by the Rand Corp., for example, shows
    that employers that offer job-based insurance plans paid, on average, 224%
    more than Medicare for the same services.

    Tens of thousands of employers who buy insurance coverage for their
    workers will get this more-complete pricing picture and may not like
    what they see.

    "What we're learning from the hospital data is that insurers are really
    bad at negotiating," said Gerard Anderson, a professor in the department
    of health policy at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health,
    citing research that found that negotiated rates for hospital care can be higher than what the facilities accept from patients who are not using insurance and are paying cash.

    That could add to the frustration that Mitchell and others say employers
    have with the current health insurance system. More might try to contract
    with providers directly, only using insurance companies for claims

    Other employers may bring their insurers back to the bargaining table.

    "For the first time, an employer will be able to go to an insurance
    company and say, 'You have not negotiated a good-enough deal, and we know
    that because we can see the same provider has negotiated a better deal
    with another company,'" said James Gelfand, president of the ERISA
    Industry Committee, a trade group of self-insured employers.

    If that happens, he added, "patients will be able to save money."

    That's not necessarily a given, however.

    Because this kind of public release of pricing data hasn't been tried
    widely in health care before, how it will affect future spending remains uncertain. If insurers are pushed back to the bargaining table or
    providers see where they stand relative to their peers, prices could drop. However, some providers could raise their prices if they see they are
    charging less than their peers.

    "Downward pressure may not be a given," said Kelley Schultz, vice
    president of commercial policy for AHIP, the industry's trade lobby.

    Baicker, of the University of Chicago, said that even after the data is
    out, rates will continue to be heavily influenced by local conditions,
    such as the size of an insurer or employer providers often give bigger discounts, for example, to the insurers or self-insured employers that can
    send them the most patients. The number of hospitals in a region also
    matters if an area has only one, for instance, that usually means the facility can demand higher rates.

    Another unknown: Will insurers meet the deadline and provide usable data?

    Schultz, at AHIP, said the industry is well on the way, partly because the original deadline was extended by six months. She expects insurers to do
    better than the hospital industry. "We saw a lot of hospitals that just
    decided not to post files or make them difficult to find," she said.

    So far, more than 300 noncompliant hospitals have received warning letters
    from the government. But they could face $300-a-day fines for failing to comply, which is less than what insurers potentially face, although the
    federal government has recently upped the ante to up to $5,500 a day for
    the largest facilities.

    Even after the pricing data is public, "I don't think things will change overnight," said Leibach. "Patients are still going to make care decisions based on their doctors and referrals, a lot of reasons other than price."

    KHN (Kaiser Health News) is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues. It is an editorially independent operating program of KFF (Kaiser Family Foundation).

    https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2022/07/01/1108653439/how-much- health-insurers-pay-for-almost-everything-is-about-to-go-public

    "LOCKDOWN", left-wing COVID fearmongering. 95% of COVID infections
    recover with no after effects.

    No collusion - Special Counsel Robert Swan Mueller III, March 2019.
    Officially made Nancy Pelosi a two-time impeachment loser.

    Donald J. Trump, cheated out of a second term by fraudulent "mail-in"
    ballots. Report voter fraud: sf.nancy@mail.house.gov

    Thank you for cleaning up the disaster of the 2008-2017 Obama / Biden
    fiasco, President Trump.

    Under Barack Obama's leadership, the United States of America became the
    The World According To Garp. Obama sold out heterosexuals for Hollywood
    queer liberal democrat donors.

    President Trump boosted the economy, reduced illegal invasions, appointed dozens of judges and three SCOTUS justices.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)