• Texas Gov. Abbott mulls challenge to Supreme Court ruling requiring sch

    From Johnny@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 7 16:36:13 2022
    By Adam Shaw
    Published May 7, 2022

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says the state is considering a challenge to a
    1982 Supreme Court decision that required public schools to teach
    illegal immigrant children as Texas and other border states face the
    prospect of a massive migrant surge.

    Cut!

    He told host Joe "Pags" Pagliarulo the number of migrants crossing the
    border was creating challenges for schools as well, given there are
    people coming in from over 150 countries who speak a multitude of
    languages.

    "It’s not just Spanish that teachers have to deal with with these kids,
    it's multiple other languages. And so the challenge on our public
    schools is extraordinary," he said.

    He then suggested that Texas will challenge Plyler v. Doe, a 1982 case
    that resulted in a 5-4 decision to strike down a Texas law that sought
    to deny public schooling to any student not "legally admitted" into the country.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-gov-abbott-supreme-court-case-public-school-illegal-immigrants

    I think it will be overturned.

    Part of the court's decision was that Texas couldn't show educating
    illegal immigrants would place any extra demand on its educational
    resources. It is very obvious it places more demand on the education
    system, and harms children born here, by taking up the time of the
    teacher coping with a foreign language.

    There would be no problem educating a small number of foreigners, but
    the numbers are in the millions, and have been increasing since 1982.

    I don't think the equal protection clause would apply, because the word
    person refers to citizens.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Josh Rosenbluth@21:1/5 to Johnny on Sun May 8 09:47:13 2022
    On 5/7/2022 2:36 PM, Johnny wrote:

    By Adam Shaw
    Published May 7, 2022

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says the state is considering a challenge to a
    1982 Supreme Court decision that required public schools to teach
    illegal immigrant children as Texas and other border states face the
    prospect of a massive migrant surge.

    Cut!

    He told host Joe "Pags" Pagliarulo the number of migrants crossing the
    border was creating challenges for schools as well, given there are
    people coming in from over 150 countries who speak a multitude of
    languages.

    "It’s not just Spanish that teachers have to deal with with these kids, it's multiple other languages. And so the challenge on our public
    schools is extraordinary," he said.

    He then suggested that Texas will challenge Plyler v. Doe, a 1982 case
    that resulted in a 5-4 decision to strike down a Texas law that sought
    to deny public schooling to any student not "legally admitted" into the country.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-gov-abbott-supreme-court-case-public-school-illegal-immigrants

    I think it will be overturned.

    Part of the court's decision was that Texas couldn't show educating
    illegal immigrants would place any extra demand on its educational
    resources. It is very obvious it places more demand on the education
    system, and harms children born here, by taking up the time of the
    teacher coping with a foreign language.

    There would be no problem educating a small number of foreigners, but
    the numbers are in the millions, and have been increasing since 1982.

    I don't think the equal protection clause would apply, because the word person refers to citizens.

    You have a funny dictionary. Moreover, the 14th Amendment explicitly
    uses citizens in the privileges and immunities clause. It makes no sense
    that "persons" would then be limited citizens.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Johnny@21:1/5 to Josh Rosenbluth on Sun May 8 12:14:06 2022
    On Sun, 8 May 2022 09:47:13 -0700
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 5/7/2022 2:36 PM, Johnny wrote:

    By Adam Shaw
    Published May 7, 2022

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says the state is considering a challenge to
    a 1982 Supreme Court decision that required public schools to teach
    illegal immigrant children as Texas and other border states face the prospect of a massive migrant surge.

    Cut!

    He told host Joe "Pags" Pagliarulo the number of migrants crossing
    the border was creating challenges for schools as well, given there
    are people coming in from over 150 countries who speak a multitude
    of languages.

    "It’s not just Spanish that teachers have to deal with with these
    kids, it's multiple other languages. And so the challenge on our
    public schools is extraordinary," he said.

    He then suggested that Texas will challenge Plyler v. Doe, a 1982
    case that resulted in a 5-4 decision to strike down a Texas law
    that sought to deny public schooling to any student not "legally
    admitted" into the country.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-gov-abbott-supreme-court-case-public-school-illegal-immigrants

    I think it will be overturned.

    Part of the court's decision was that Texas couldn't show educating
    illegal immigrants would place any extra demand on its educational resources. It is very obvious it places more demand on the
    education system, and harms children born here, by taking up the
    time of the teacher coping with a foreign language.

    There would be no problem educating a small number of foreigners,
    but the numbers are in the millions, and have been increasing since
    1982.

    I don't think the equal protection clause would apply, because the
    word person refers to citizens.

    You have a funny dictionary. Moreover, the 14th Amendment explicitly
    uses citizens in the privileges and immunities clause. It makes no
    sense that "persons" would then be limited citizens.

    It says all persons born or naturalized in the US are citizens. Then it
    says no person, meaning one citizen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Josh Rosenbluth@21:1/5 to Johnny on Sun May 8 12:13:34 2022
    On 5/8/2022 10:14 AM, Johnny wrote:
    On Sun, 8 May 2022 09:47:13 -0700
    Josh Rosenbluth <noway@nowhere.com> wrote:

    On 5/7/2022 2:36 PM, Johnny wrote:

    By Adam Shaw
    Published May 7, 2022

    Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says the state is considering a challenge to
    a 1982 Supreme Court decision that required public schools to teach
    illegal immigrant children as Texas and other border states face the
    prospect of a massive migrant surge.

    Cut!

    He told host Joe "Pags" Pagliarulo the number of migrants crossing
    the border was creating challenges for schools as well, given there
    are people coming in from over 150 countries who speak a multitude
    of languages.

    "It’s not just Spanish that teachers have to deal with with these
    kids, it's multiple other languages. And so the challenge on our
    public schools is extraordinary," he said.

    He then suggested that Texas will challenge Plyler v. Doe, a 1982
    case that resulted in a 5-4 decision to strike down a Texas law
    that sought to deny public schooling to any student not "legally
    admitted" into the country.

    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/texas-gov-abbott-supreme-court-case-public-school-illegal-immigrants

    I think it will be overturned.

    Part of the court's decision was that Texas couldn't show educating
    illegal immigrants would place any extra demand on its educational
    resources. It is very obvious it places more demand on the
    education system, and harms children born here, by taking up the
    time of the teacher coping with a foreign language.

    There would be no problem educating a small number of foreigners,
    but the numbers are in the millions, and have been increasing since
    1982.

    I don't think the equal protection clause would apply, because the
    word person refers to citizens.

    You have a funny dictionary. Moreover, the 14th Amendment explicitly
    uses citizens in the privileges and immunities clause. It makes no
    sense that "persons" would then be limited citizens.

    It says all persons born or naturalized in the US are citizens.

    OK.

    Then it
    says no person, meaning one citizen.

    It says "any person"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)