• Re: Will General Milley's woke troops fight the Russians or will they s

    From Kamala munches on Jill Biden@21:1/5 to pyotr filipivich on Sat Apr 9 00:26:03 2022
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.global-warming
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    In article <uamv0h1q452a52qlpgj9eflbl110deg64j@4ax.com>
    pyotr filipivich <phamp@mindspring.com> wrote:

    Let the Record show that Portland Sedition
    <portland_sedition@yahoo.com> on or about Thu, 17 Feb 2022 22:13:42
    -0000 (UTC) did write, type or otherwise cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
    On 17 Feb 2022, pyotr filipivich <phamp@mindspring.com> posted some >news:lset0h5tdvt2ovseq1l2qhlhjdlj7pjtb3@4ax.com:

    Let the Record show that pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> on or about
    Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:19:00 -0000 (UTC) did write, type or otherwise
    cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
    On 2022-02-17, C Hoffos <choffos@yahoo.com> wrote:
    That's a legitimate question since Milley has already stated that he >>>> does not answer to the Commander in Chief of the United States of
    America.

    General Milley has made it quite clear that his allegiance is to
    communist authorities.

    Seeing as Milley admitted he is in contact with our adversaries, >>>treason BTW, he's probably working with the Russians on a false flag >>>operation as we speak.

    I doubt he's that competent. The DoD is more concerned with
    Diversity, Inclusion, Equity than war fighting. We're going to lose a
    major war.

    Won't be the first time. Democrats are mouth-runners, not fighters.

    Yes, but I'm not talking about losing Afghanistan, or even
    Vietnam. I'm talking about a war where we lose battle groups, air
    wings, divisions, US Civilians _in the CONUS_ to a near-peer
    adversary.

    Our current military is in worse shape than the US Army 1942,
    despite having all the neat toys.

    Electing Obama and accepting faggots in your Army isn't a
    deterrent.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kamala munches on Jill Biden@21:1/5 to pyotr filipivich on Sat Apr 9 00:36:12 2022
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.atheism, alt.global-warming
    XPost: talk.politics.guns

    In article <uamv0h1q452a52qlpgj9eflbl110deg64j@4ax.com>
    pyotr filipivich <phamp@mindspring.com> wrote:

    Let the Record show that Portland Sedition
    <portland_sedition@yahoo.com> on or about Thu, 17 Feb 2022 22:13:42
    -0000 (UTC) did write, type or otherwise cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
    On 17 Feb 2022, pyotr filipivich <phamp@mindspring.com> posted some >news:lset0h5tdvt2ovseq1l2qhlhjdlj7pjtb3@4ax.com:

    Let the Record show that pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> on or about
    Thu, 17 Feb 2022 13:19:00 -0000 (UTC) did write, type or otherwise
    cause to appear in talk.politics.guns the following:
    On 2022-02-17, C Hoffos <choffos@yahoo.com> wrote:
    That's a legitimate question since Milley has already stated that he >>>> does not answer to the Commander in Chief of the United States of
    America.

    General Milley has made it quite clear that his allegiance is to
    communist authorities.

    Seeing as Milley admitted he is in contact with our adversaries, >>>treason BTW, he's probably working with the Russians on a false flag >>>operation as we speak.

    I doubt he's that competent. The DoD is more concerned with
    Diversity, Inclusion, Equity than war fighting. We're going to lose a
    major war.

    Won't be the first time. Democrats are mouth-runners, not fighters.

    Yes, but I'm not talking about losing Afghanistan, or even
    Vietnam. I'm talking about a war where we lose battle groups, air
    wings, divisions, US Civilians _in the CONUS_ to a near-peer
    adversary.

    Our current military is in worse shape than the US Army 1942,
    despite having all the neat toys.

    Electing Obama and accepting faggots in your Army isn't a
    deterrent.
     

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)