Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is >advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable
people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found
in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition
rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know
the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a >"convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that
show the higher percentage?
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is >advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable >people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found
in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition
rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know
the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a >"convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that
show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is >>> advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable
people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found
in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition
rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know
the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a >>> "convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that
show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em
or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
On 8/15/21 11:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts byTERF is "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". A cis woman who follows
Checkmate.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the
following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is >>>> advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable
people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found >>>> in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition
rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know
the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a >>>> "convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that
show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em
or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
their transphobic ideology and doesn't even know that.
On 8/15/21 11:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is >>> advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable
people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found >>> in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition
rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know
the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a >>> "convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that
show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em
or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
TERF is "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". A cis woman who follows
their transphobic ideology and doesn't even know that.
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by Checkmate.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:37:00 +0000, Scientific had the audacity to say the following:
On 8/15/21 11:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts byTERF is "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". A cis woman who follows
Checkmate.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the
following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is >>>>> advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable >>>>> people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found >>>>> in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition
rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know >>>>> the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a >>>>> "convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that >>>>> show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em >>> or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
their transphobic ideology and doesn't even know that.
It would take an entirely new dictionary just to catalog all the little
boxes you "woke" liberals keep churning out. It becomes more confusing, pointless and exclusionary every day.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:37:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
On 8/15/21 11:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts byTERF is "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". A cis woman who follows
Checkmate.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the
following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is >>>>> advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable >>>>> people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found >>>>> in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition
rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know >>>>> the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a >>>>> "convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that >>>>> show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em >>> or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
their transphobic ideology and doesn't even know that.
Sounds mentally challenged to me.
On 8/16/21 1:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:37:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>Yes, all the admins of r/detrans are mentally challenged. I'm exhausted
wrote:
On 8/15/21 11:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>> Checkmate.TERF is "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". A cis woman who follows
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>>> following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is >>>>>> advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable >>>>>> people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found >>>>>> in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition >>>>>> rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know >>>>>> the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a >>>>>> "convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that >>>>>> show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em >>>> or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
their transphobic ideology and doesn't even know that.
Sounds mentally challenged to me.
how they allow this subreddit to be a one big transphobic shitshow.
Instead of listening to science, you have to agree with the leaders of
this cult or you will get banned.
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:34:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
On 8/16/21 1:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:37:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>Yes, all the admins of r/detrans are mentally challenged. I'm exhausted
wrote:
On 8/15/21 11:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>> Checkmate.TERF is "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". A cis woman who follows >>>> their transphobic ideology and doesn't even know that.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>>>> following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is
advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology.
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable >>>>>>> people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found >>>>>>> in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition >>>>>>> rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know >>>>>>> the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a
"convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that >>>>>>> show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em >>>>> or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
Sounds mentally challenged to me.
how they allow this subreddit to be a one big transphobic shitshow.
Instead of listening to science, you have to agree with the leaders of
this cult or you will get banned.
Then why do you go there? No one here is planning on it.
On 8/16/21 5:54 PM, Skeeter wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:34:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>Maybe I'm a trans woman and I'm reading this stuff to harm myself
wrote:
On 8/16/21 1:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:37:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>Yes, all the admins of r/detrans are mentally challenged. I'm exhausted
wrote:
On 8/15/21 11:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>> Checkmate.TERF is "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". A cis woman who follows >>>>> their transphobic ideology and doesn't even know that.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>>>>> following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth> >>>>>>> wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is
advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology. >>>>>>>>
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable >>>>>>>> people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found >>>>>>>> in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition >>>>>>>> rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know >>>>>>>> the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a
"convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that >>>>>>>> show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em >>>>>> or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
Sounds mentally challenged to me.
how they allow this subreddit to be a one big transphobic shitshow.
Instead of listening to science, you have to agree with the leaders of
this cult or you will get banned.
Then why do you go there? No one here is planning on it.
mentally and to be mad at.
Basically saying, there is nothing interesting if you're not a >detransitioner. You have legit detransitioners here but also transphobes
and their useful idiots who will try to exploit them.
On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 08:28:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>
wrote:
On 8/16/21 5:54 PM, Skeeter wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 16:34:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>Maybe I'm a trans woman and I'm reading this stuff to harm myself
wrote:
On 8/16/21 1:10 PM, Skeeter wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2021 09:37:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth>Yes, all the admins of r/detrans are mentally challenged. I'm exhausted >>>> how they allow this subreddit to be a one big transphobic shitshow.
wrote:
On 8/15/21 11:19 PM, Checkmate wrote:
Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by >>>>>>> Checkmate.TERF is "trans-exclusionary radical feminist". A cis woman who follows >>>>>> their transphobic ideology and doesn't even know that.
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 15:06:51 -0600, Skeeter had the audacity to say the >>>>>>> following:
On Sun, 15 Aug 2021 20:42:00 +0000, Scientific <science@is.truth> >>>>>>>> wrote:
Would really they? Scientists have done a lot of research and science is
advancing. TERFs claim that it is biased to fit their ideology. >>>>>>>>>
If there was truly a conspiracy to convince to transition vulnerable >>>>>>>>> people, what benefit would we get? There is obviously more money found
in cis people rather than 1% of trans one.
And why is detransition support so poor? It is because detransition >>>>>>>>> rates vary between 1-5% according to differing studies. We don't know >>>>>>>>> the exact figure because it's so rare. TERFs claim it is because it is a
"convenient statistic". If it is, then why there are no studies that >>>>>>>>> show the higher percentage?
was this supposed to be something
Something 'bout gender queers, but I couldn't tell if he/she was for 'em
or agin' 'em, and I don't know what a TERF is.
Sounds mentally challenged to me.
Instead of listening to science, you have to agree with the leaders of >>>> this cult or you will get banned.
Then why do you go there? No one here is planning on it.
mentally and to be mad at.
Basically saying, there is nothing interesting if you're not a
detransitioner. You have legit detransitioners here but also transphobes
and their useful idiots who will try to exploit them.
You are about to meet one of these freaks. He's in my KF now.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 293 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 232:20:02 |
| Calls: | 6,624 |
| Files: | 12,171 |
| Messages: | 5,319,537 |