• When the accused is a lesbian: a #MeToo story's lessons on tuna fish, g

    From Deplorable Redneck@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 23 08:00:33 2018
    XPost: school.teachers, ny.syr, alt.politics.obama
    XPost: soc.women

    Sexually charged emails. Allegations of unwanted kissing and
    touching. A letter in which powerful people leap to the defense
    of the accused.

    As Zoe Greenberg points out at the New York Times, the story
    sounds a lot like those we’ve been hearing since the current
    #MeToo movement began. But the players are different: In this
    case, the accused is feminist scholar Avital Ronell, and the
    person reporting harassment is a male former graduate student,
    Nimrod Reitman.

    Reitman, now a visiting fellow at Harvard studying the drawings
    of Sigmund Freud, says Ronell, a professor of German and
    comparative literature at New York University, subjected him to
    sexual harassment, sexual assault, and stalking while she was
    his academic adviser. In May, a Title IX investigation found her
    responsible for harassment, though not the other charges, and
    she’s been suspended. Now a group of scholars, including
    renowned gender theorist Judith Butler, have written a letter
    arguing that she is the victim of a “malicious campaign” by
    Reitman.

    Ronell is not the only woman to be accused of sexual misconduct
    since the rise of #MeToo last fall. While male perpetrators can
    enjoy special protection from consequences by virtue of their
    gender, reports of female sexual harassers are a reminder that
    people of all genders are capable of abusing their power.

    Ronell’s case has all the hallmarks of a #MeToo story
    Though Reitman filed his Title IX claim before the rise of
    #MeToo, and says he was not inspired by the movement, his report
    has much in common with the stories that survivors — many of
    them women — have been telling since last fall.

    Ronell’s behavior started in 2012, Reitman says, when she
    invited him to stay with her in Paris. There, he says she asked
    him to read to her while she took a nap, then pressed herself
    against him, put his hands on her breasts, and kissed him. The
    next day, he says he told her, “what happened yesterday was not
    O.K. You’re my adviser.” But the advances continued, with
    groping, unwanted kissing, and emails calling him “my most
    adored one” and “cock-er spaniel.”

    Reitman says he put up with this behavior because Ronell had
    power over him as his adviser, Greenberg reports. He also says
    that when he did complain to Ronell about her harassment, she
    retaliated by sabotaging his job prospects. Graduate students
    can be especially vulnerable to harassment by their advisers,
    who often wield enormous control over the direction of their
    careers.

    Ronell’s response to the allegations also echoes those of other
    powerful people — many of them men — accused as part of #MeToo.
    She has asked why Reitman didn’t speak up if he was
    uncomfortable, and argued that he was just upset because of his
    intellectual inferiority: “His main dilemma was the incoherency
    in his writing, and lack of a recognizable argument,” she said
    in an interview that was part of the Title IX process.

    Ronell also says her emails to Reitman were welcome at the time.
    Noting that Reitman is gay and she is queer, she told the Times
    the two shared “a penchant for florid and campy communications
    arising from our common academic backgrounds and sensibilities.”

    Finally, the letter written in Ronell’s defense is reminiscent
    of those written on behalf of men accused of sexual misconduct,
    from Al Franken to Junot Díaz. The signatories — including
    Butler, philosopher Slavoj Zizek, and literary theorist Gayatri
    Chakravorty Spivak — acknowledge that they have not actually
    been able to read the confidential documentation of the Title IX
    case. Nonetheless, they write:

    we deplore the damage that this legal proceeding causes her, and
    seek to register in clear terms our objection to any judgment
    against her. We hold that the allegations against her do not
    constitute actual evidence, but rather support the view that
    malicious intention has animated and sustained this legal
    nightmare.

    Women can abuse their power too
    Ronell is one of a few women publicly accused of sexual
    misconduct since the rise of #MeToo last October. Cristina
    García, a California state Assembly member, is the subject of
    multiple reports of groping or unwanted advances. In May, an
    investigation found that “the most egregious allegations could
    not be substantiated,” according to the Los Angeles Times, but
    Garcia has been removed from all legislative committees and has
    issued an apology. Andrea Ramsey, a former congressional
    candidate from Kentucky, dropped out of her race in December
    after the Kansas City Star asked her about allegations that she
    had harassed a male employee (she said the allegations were
    false). And Timothy Heller, a female singer, said in December
    that singer-songwriter Melanie Martinez had raped her.

    Men — especially wealthy, white men in positions of power — can
    enjoy protections that make it easier to get away with sexual
    misconduct. Harassment can flourish in male-dominated
    environments; as sociologist Frank Dobbin has noted, the
    presence of women throughout a workplace hierarchy appears to
    help protect other women from harassment. And since men are, on
    average, much richer than women, they’re more likely to be able
    to buy their way out of harassment allegations using
    nondisclosure agreements and other legal techniques. But that
    doesn’t mean men are the only ones who commit harassment.

    Nor are feminists incapable of committing sexual misconduct — or
    of defending those accused. Several of the men accused of abuse
    or sexual misconduct in the current #MeToo era, like Díaz,
    Franken, and former New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman,
    have been public supporters of women’s rights. And while it may
    be doubly disturbing for some to see Judith Butler, whose 1990
    book Gender Trouble had an enormous influence on feminist
    thought, defending someone accused of sexual misconduct, recall
    that several celebrities who have voiced support for #MeToo or
    Time’s Up also signed a 2009 petition in support of Roman
    Polanski, who was convicted of unlawful sex with a minor (though
    at least one, Natalie Portman, has since apologized).

    Survivors’ testimony as part of #MeToo has exposed the ways that
    harassers abuse their power, taking advantage of situations in
    which their victims can’t report for fear of damage to their
    careers. While it’s still more common for men in American
    workplaces to have power over women, the reverse, of course,
    also occurs. And while the #MeToo movement needs to take on
    gender inequality, it also needs to acknowledge that in
    America’s precarious and hierarchical work culture, employees
    often have few options if their superiors mistreat them — and
    this can make anyone who needs a paycheck vulnerable to
    harassment, regardless of gender.

    Fire the mentally ill bitch. Any heterosexual would be fired
    and on the street already.

    https://www.vox.com/2018/8/14/17688144/nyu-me-too-movement- sexual-harassment-avital-ronell
     

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)