I am thinking that soc.history.what-if is still a functional usenet group. This is a test to make sure.
I am thinking that soc.history.what-if is still a functional usenet group.
This is a test to make sure.
I am thinking that soc.history.what-if is still a functional usenet
group. This is a test to make sure.
Byker wrote:
I am thinking that soc.history.what-if is still a functional usenet group.
Good heavens, no.
This is a test to make sure.
Apparently Google have "deleted" it.
Perhaps with the Microsoft morons unable to fill it with their idiot noise, >the content and tone will improve.
On 1/1/2020 1:00 PM, Troll wrote:
I am thinking that soc.history.what-if is still a functional usenet
group. This is a test to make sure.
As pointed out in a.h.w-i, it _is._ But it's only accessible via actual Usenet servers and actual non-web clients, which means that it's more a
niche thing now than it would have been in 1981 or 82.
I'd suspect there are literally NO lurkers, which means not much of a
base to get ideas from or bounce solutions off.
As pointed out in a.h.w-i, it _is._ But it's only accessible via
actual Usenet servers and actual non-web clients, which means that
it's more a niche thing now than it would have been in 1981 or 82.
I'd suspect there are literally NO lurkers, which means not much of
a base to get ideas from or bounce solutions off.
Troll wrote:
I am thinking that soc.history.what-if is still a functional usenet
group. This is a test to make sure.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 68:37:50 |
Calls: | 6,655 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,332,040 |
Posted today: | 1 |