• Earlier V-1 Guided Missiles In WWII

    From Byker@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 19 12:23:46 2019
    XPost: alt.history.what-if, uk.politics.misc, alt.history

    "Ed Stasiak" wrote in message news:411712e1-8f3a-4b08-84fe-3bccfefed26c@googlegroups.com...

    From:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb

    “Unlike the V-2, the V-1 was a cost-effective weapon for the Germans as it forced the Allies to spend heavily on defensive measures and divert
    bombers from other targets. More than 25% of Combined Bomber Offensive's bombs in July and August 1944 were used against V-weapon sites, often ineffectively.[15] In early December 1944, American General Clayton
    Bissell wrote a paper that argued strongly in favour of the V-1 when
    compared with conventional bombers.[49]

    Wright Field technical personnel reverse-engineered the V-1 from the
    remains of one that had failed to detonate in Britain. The result was the creation of the JB-2 Loon. General Hap Arnold of the United States Army
    Air Forces was concerned that this weapon could be built of steel and
    wood, in 2000 man-hours and approximate cost of US$600 (in 1943).[51] To
    put this figure in perspective, a Boeing B-29 Superfortress cost about
    1000 times more, and still about 100 times more when taking into account
    its 10 times higher payload (20,000lb compared to 850kg for V-1)– payload, which cost has to be added (while it is included in V-1 cost)– with the additional drawback of requiring (and putting in danger) 11 flying crew members (which generally are considered to cost far more than the aircraft itself, with costs of recruiting, training, housing, feeding, pensions and pay, equipment, etc.).”

    Correct. For the cost of a motorcycle, you could deliver 2,000 lbs. of HE to London. For cost-per-ton-of-explosive-delivered, nothing came even close...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SolomonW@21:1/5 to Byker on Fri Dec 20 20:58:27 2019
    XPost: alt.history.what-if, uk.politics.misc, alt.history

    On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:23:46 -0600, Byker wrote:

    "Ed Stasiak" wrote in message news:411712e1-8f3a-4b08-84fe-3bccfefed26c@googlegroups.com...

    From:
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V-1_flying_bomb

    “Unlike the V-2, the V-1 was a cost-effective weapon for the Germans as it >> forced the Allies to spend heavily on defensive measures and divert
    bombers from other targets. More than 25% of Combined Bomber Offensive's
    bombs in July and August 1944 were used against V-weapon sites, often
    ineffectively.[15] In early December 1944, American General Clayton
    Bissell wrote a paper that argued strongly in favour of the V-1 when
    compared with conventional bombers.[49]

    Wright Field technical personnel reverse-engineered the V-1 from the
    remains of one that had failed to detonate in Britain. The result was the
    creation of the JB-2 Loon. General Hap Arnold of the United States Army
    Air Forces was concerned that this weapon could be built of steel and
    wood, in 2000 man-hours and approximate cost of US$600 (in 1943).[51] To
    put this figure in perspective, a Boeing B-29 Superfortress cost about
    1000 times more, and still about 100 times more when taking into account
    its 10 times higher payload (20,000lb compared to 850kg for V-1)– payload, >> which cost has to be added (while it is included in V-1 cost)– with the
    additional drawback of requiring (and putting in danger) 11 flying crew
    members (which generally are considered to cost far more than the aircraft >> itself, with costs of recruiting, training, housing, feeding, pensions and >> pay, equipment, etc.).”

    Correct. For the cost of a motorcycle, you could deliver 2,000 lbs. of HE to London. For cost-per-ton-of-explosive-delivered, nothing came even close...

    It was one of the most cost/effective weapons of ww2.


    https://www.wikiwand.com/en/V-1_flying_bomb

    check the assessment out for the Blitz (12 months) vs V-1 flying bombs (2¾ months)

    So we are talking of a Blitz that is at least five times bigger than the
    OTL and it would last October 1944. I would think a lot more.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)