Is there any number?
--
oiram
Is there any number?
Is there any number?
Is there any number?
"Mario" <mario@mario.mario.invalid> wrote in message
In the same time period production for the USN was 191,359,000
rounds of 40mm and 4,153,639,000 rounds of 20mm. At the other
end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.
Do the rounds fired in training count?
Note apart from live ammunition there were millions of practice and
drill rounds made.
Is there any number?
At the other end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.
"Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:
At the other end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.
That's _very_ interesting.
The U.S. had a total of 114 16-inch barrels,
not counting any coast artillery, only barrels
mounted on the three COLORADO-class BBs, the
two WASHINGTONs, the four SOUTH DAKOTAs, and
the four IOWAs.
So that would be over 1,000 rounds per barrel,
even allowing for a substantial number left
over at the end of the war.
If bombarding to
support land troops, they would be much closer and using smaller
charges.
wear of between 2.2 and 10.8 mm.
Is there any number?
On 2016-10-07 9:12 AM, Rich Rostrom wrote:
"Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:
At the other end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.
That's _very_ interesting.
The U.S. had a total of 114 16-inch barrels,
not counting any coast artillery, only barrels
mounted on the three COLORADO-class BBs, the
two WASHINGTONs, the four SOUTH DAKOTAs, and
the four IOWAs.
So that would be over 1,000 rounds per barrel,
even allowing for a substantial number left
over at the end of the war.
I hate to throw a monkey wrench into things, but you would have to factor barrel life into the equations. From what I found online, the barrel life
of a 16" gun was 395 rounds when using AP. Wiki says 2860 with target
rounds. It has been a long time since I trained in this stuff but with
field artillery the barrel life was measured in full charges. Those guns
had a range just over 23 miles, so when engaging long range targets they would be using full charges. If bombarding to support land troops, they would be much closer and using smaller charges.
I did not bother looking up the number of times those barrels were
replaced or relined. The navy would have some tricky planning to get
their crews trained in life fire exercises and have enough life left in their guns. They would want them to be well enough practiced to be able
to hit a target on the horizon, but not wear out the barrels so much they would be diminished and incapable of sustaining fire in combat.
USAAF 1945 Statistical Digest... totals come to
7,285,000 rounds of 0.30 inch machine gun
448,732,000 rounds of 0.50 inch machine gun
Total 457,749,236 rounds including rockets.
63,239 rockets
Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:
USAAF 1945 Statistical Digest... totals come to
63,239 rockets
That's lower than I would have expected, considering
the number of fighter-bombers assigned to ground
attack in Europe and the popularity of rockets for
that work.
The USAAF in the European theatre did not start to use
rockets until after D-Day, hence why at Mortain the RAF
rocket firing Typhoons were used against the German
armoured forces...
. . . Within a decade after the war most of the Commonwealth countries modernized, switching to semiautomatic rifles in the NATO standard 7.62mm.
There was still some .303 ammunition in hand. Our unit, having weapons
tech training, had a couple old Bren guns in the armory and we used to
take them to the ranges once in a while. That was in the late 60s. My
father commanded an air cadet squadron in the 70s and 80s and they were
still able to get some of that old .303.
"Dave Smith" <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in message
WW2 Lee-Enfields seem still used by the Canadian "Arctic Patrol,"
a civilian volunteer force formed in the Cold War. Winchester
still sells .303 ammunition. Lee-Enfields were a common hunting
rifle in Canada in the 1960s perhaps because all WW2 servicemen
had basic rifle training with this weapon.
"Dave Smith" <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:oTxJz.33195$nC2.1378@fx27.iad...
. . . Within a decade after the war most of the Commonwealth countries modernized, switching to semiautomatic rifles in the NATO standard 7.62mm.
There was still some .303 ammunition in hand. Our unit, having weapons
tech training, had a couple old Bren guns in the armory and we used to
take them to the ranges once in a while. That was in the late 60s. My father commanded an air cadet squadron in the 70s and 80s and they were still able to get some of that old .303.
WW2 Lee-Enfields seem still used by the Canadian "Arctic Patrol,"
a civilian volunteer force formed in the Cold War. Winchester
still sells .303 ammunition. Lee-Enfields were a common hunting
rifle in Canada in the 1960s perhaps because all WW2 servicemen
had basic rifle training with this weapon.
--
Don Phillipson
Carlsbad Springs
(Ottawa, Canada)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 185 |
Nodes: | 16 (1 / 15) |
Uptime: | 03:28:21 |
Calls: | 3,676 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 11,149 |
Messages: | 3,447,258 |