• How many rounds were fired?

    From Mario@21:1/5 to All on Mon Oct 3 17:19:57 2016
    Is there any number?


    --
    oiram

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Duwop@21:1/5 to Mario on Tue Oct 4 00:10:03 2016
    On Monday, October 3, 2016 at 2:19:59 PM UTC-7, Mario wrote:
    Is there any number?


    --
    oiram

    Yes, any number of rounds were fired.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Phillipson@21:1/5 to Mario on Tue Oct 4 08:05:08 2016
    "Mario" <mario@mario.mario.invalid> wrote in message news:nsui1h$67g$1@gioia.aioe.org...

    Is there any number?

    First examined by US Army historian S.L.A. Marshall
    in Men Against Fire: The Problem of Battle Command (1947).
    His methods were later criticized (cf. Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.L.A._Marshall
    --
    Don Phillipson
    Carlsbad Springs
    (Ottawa, Canada)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JL McClellan@21:1/5 to Mario on Tue Oct 4 16:34:54 2016
    Mario wrote:

    Is there any number?



    Short answer==No

    First, define "rounds."
    Small arms, of course (rifle, pistol, submachine gun)
    Machine guns? Light (rifle caliber)? Heavy?
    Cannon (for most purposes, 20-mm and up)? Only fixed rounds, or projectile + propellant? (would include large-caliber naval guns, some siege weapons) Barrage rockets?
    Mortar rounds?
    How about aerial bombs?

    I saw a number some years ago of some 14,000 small-arms rounds per casualty. Multiplying that by casualty count sets a lower bound for small-arms.

    In areas with fairly static fronts (eg, Italy in the Winter War) it was not uncommon for troops to build underground habitations from spent artillery cartridges. That's a lot of artillery.

    Any of several landings involved expenditure of tens of thousands of rounds
    of naval artillery.

    Production numbers, if they were available, would set a reasonable upper
    limit, as not all rounds produced were expended, but numbers from Japan and
    the Soviets are not available. And not all of the players were US, UK, USSR
    and the Axis.

    If you were to start doing serious research on this question (doubtful from
    the presentation, but who knows?) you will find a rabbit hole that it is
    easy to fall down and get lost in.

    --
    JL "Larry"McClellan
    resident pygalge
    legendsintheirowntime.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoffrey Sinclair@21:1/5 to Mario on Thu Oct 6 09:10:33 2016
    "Mario" <mario@mario.mario.invalid> wrote in message news:nsui1h$67g$1@gioia.aioe.org...
    Is there any number?

    There are probably studies but I do not know of anyone totalling
    the reported ammunition expenditures.

    The US War Production Board puts US small arms ammunition
    production July 1940 to August 1945 inclusive as 41,746,000,000
    rounds.

    In the same time period production for the USN was 191,359,000
    rounds of 40mm and 4,153,639,000 rounds of 20mm. At the other
    end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.

    Do the rounds fired in training count?

    Note apart from live ammunition there were millions of practice and
    drill rounds made.

    Geoffrey Sinclair
    Remove the nb for email.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Smith@21:1/5 to Geoffrey Sinclair on Thu Oct 6 16:06:31 2016
    On 2016-10-06 9:10 AM, Geoffrey Sinclair wrote:
    "Mario" <mario@mario.mario.invalid> wrote in message


    In the same time period production for the USN was 191,359,000
    rounds of 40mm and 4,153,639,000 rounds of 20mm. At the other
    end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.

    Do the rounds fired in training count?

    Note apart from live ammunition there were millions of practice and
    drill rounds made.


    There were a lot of people who went through basic training and rifle
    shooting who never fired a shot in combat. A lot of ammunition was lost.
    Some of it was lost on transit when transport ships were sunk. Some of
    it was lost in combat and/or abandoned when positions were overrun,
    maybe even detonated to prevent it from falling into enemy hands. Then
    when the war was over it there was a lot of it leftover.

    Some of it may have been sold off in army surplus stores or was sold or
    given to other governments for their military. The British and
    Commonwealth countries had used a number of .303 small arms. The
    Lee-Enfield, the Bren gun and a number of fighter and bomber aircraft
    used machine guns in that caliber. Within a decade after the war most
    of the Commonwealth countries modernized, switching to semiautomatic
    rifles in the NATO standard 7.62mm.

    There was still some .303 ammunition in hand. Our unit, having weapons
    tech training, had a couple old Bren guns in the armory and we used to
    take them to the ranges once in a while. That was in the late 60s. My
    father commanded an air cadet squadron in the 70s and 80s and they were
    still able to get some of that old .303.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich Rostrom@21:1/5 to Mario on Tue Oct 4 14:21:25 2016
    Mario <mario@mario.mario.invalid> wrote:

    Is there any number?

    By who, at what?

    Enormous numbers of rounds were fired by anti-aircraft machine guns
    (including aircraft guns - I compiled some numbers indicating
    that the majority of of U.S. .50 caliber machine guns were fitted
    to aircraft.)

    There were also lots of rounds expended in training. Many soldiers
    fired more rounds in training than in combat.
    --
    The real Velvet Revolution - and the would-be hijacker.

    http://originalvelvetrevolution.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich Rostrom@21:1/5 to Geoffrey Sinclair on Fri Oct 7 09:12:16 2016
    "Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    At the other end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.

    That's _very_ interesting.

    The U.S. had a total of 114 16-inch barrels,
    not counting any coast artillery, only barrels
    mounted on the three COLORADO-class BBs, the
    two WASHINGTONs, the four SOUTH DAKOTAs, and
    the four IOWAs.

    So that would be over 1,000 rounds per barrel,
    even allowing for a substantial number left
    over at the end of the war.
    --
    The real Velvet Revolution - and the would-be hijacker.

    http://originalvelvetrevolution.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Smith@21:1/5 to Rich Rostrom on Fri Oct 7 12:01:04 2016
    On 2016-10-07 9:12 AM, Rich Rostrom wrote:
    "Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    At the other end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.

    That's _very_ interesting.

    The U.S. had a total of 114 16-inch barrels,
    not counting any coast artillery, only barrels
    mounted on the three COLORADO-class BBs, the
    two WASHINGTONs, the four SOUTH DAKOTAs, and
    the four IOWAs.

    So that would be over 1,000 rounds per barrel,
    even allowing for a substantial number left
    over at the end of the war.


    I hate to throw a monkey wrench into things, but you would have to
    factor barrel life into the equations. From what I found online, the
    barrel life of a 16" gun was 395 rounds when using AP. Wiki says 2860
    with target rounds. It has been a long time since I trained in this
    stuff but with field artillery the barrel life was measured in full
    charges. Those guns had a range just over 23 miles, so when engaging
    long range targets they would be using full charges. If bombarding to
    support land troops, they would be much closer and using smaller charges.

    I did not bother looking up the number of times those barrels were
    replaced or relined. The navy would have some tricky planning to get
    their crews trained in life fire exercises and have enough life left in
    their guns. They would want them to be well enough practiced to be able
    to hit a target on the horizon, but not wear out the barrels so much
    they would be diminished and incapable of sustaining fire in combat.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kenneth Young@21:1/5 to Dave Smith on Fri Oct 7 13:32:30 2016
    In article <NkPJz.32900$6D2.13526@fx08.iad>, adavid.smith@sympatico.ca
    (Dave Smith) wrote:

    If bombarding to
    support land troops, they would be much closer and using smaller
    charges.

    They would also be firing HE which was considerably lighter than AP and
    used smaller charges to get the same ballistics. Barrel life was measured
    in effective full charges and IIRC USN practice was to reline a gun when
    firing its regulation ammo stowage would push it over limits. A lot of
    ships could fit a smaller gun in the main gun bore so fire control could
    be practised without affecting gun life.

    The only ship I remember firing enough rounds to need barrel changes was Warspite which was one of the main bombardment ships at Normandy.

    I find it hard to believe there are any figures on small arm rounds
    expended though there may be records of how many were manufactured. Given cyclic rates of fire ranging from 300 to 1500 it all depends on practical rates. The only example I can come up with is from WW1 when 10 Vickers
    HMG fired over 1 million rounds in 24 hours. This was a special case
    where the idea was to stop all movement in a given area and the barrels
    were changed after 10,000 rounds.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Dallman@21:1/5 to Geoffrey Sinclair on Sun Oct 9 11:59:01 2016
    In article <Eb-dndOZvI0C02fKnZ2dnUU7-Y_NnZ2d@westnet.com.au>, gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au (Geoffrey Sinclair) wrote:

    wear of between 2.2 and 10.8 mm.

    Just in case anyone was worrying, that wear figure isn't an increase in
    the bore diameter of the gun. It's the amount the start of the rifling
    has been eroded, measured along the barrel, from the chamber towards the muzzle.

    John

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoffrey Sinclair@21:1/5 to Mario on Mon Oct 10 10:34:00 2016
    "Mario" <mario@mario.mario.invalid> wrote in message news:nsui1h$67g$1@gioia.aioe.org...
    Is there any number?

    USAAF 1945 Statistical Digest, table 149, rounds of
    ammunition expended overseas January 1942 to
    August 1945. Total 459,750,000. The figures are
    given in units of thousands of rounds.

    Tables 150 to 157 then give a more detailed
    breakdown by theatre. Those totals come to

    7,285,000 rounds of 0.30 inch machine gun
    448,732,000 rounds of 0.50 inch machine gun
    3,515,000 rounds of 20 mm cannon
    123,000 rounds of 37 mm cannon
    31,000 rounds of 75 mm cannon
    63,239 rockets

    Total 457,749,236 rounds including rockets.

    Geoffrey Sinclair
    Remove the nb for email.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoffrey Sinclair@21:1/5 to Dave Smith on Sun Oct 9 11:49:52 2016
    "Dave Smith" <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:NkPJz.32900$6D2.13526@fx08.iad...
    On 2016-10-07 9:12 AM, Rich Rostrom wrote:
    "Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    At the other end there were 123,984 rounds of 16 inch.

    That's _very_ interesting.

    The U.S. had a total of 114 16-inch barrels,
    not counting any coast artillery, only barrels
    mounted on the three COLORADO-class BBs, the
    two WASHINGTONs, the four SOUTH DAKOTAs, and
    the four IOWAs.

    So that would be over 1,000 rounds per barrel,
    even allowing for a substantial number left
    over at the end of the war.

    I hate to throw a monkey wrench into things, but you would have to factor barrel life into the equations. From what I found online, the barrel life
    of a 16" gun was 395 rounds when using AP. Wiki says 2860 with target
    rounds. It has been a long time since I trained in this stuff but with
    field artillery the barrel life was measured in full charges. Those guns
    had a range just over 23 miles, so when engaging long range targets they would be using full charges. If bombarding to support land troops, they would be much closer and using smaller charges.

    Yes, it is clear most USN 16 inch gun ammunition was not fired during
    WWII and probably thereafter. With maybe 200 or so guns built.

    If you can look up Naval Weapons of WWII by John Campbell, all
    the technical details in one place. The USN chrome plated its
    barrels producing a useful increase in life.

    There were 4 versions of the USN 16 inch gun around in WWII.

    The 45 calibre fitted to the three Maryland class. Life 395 full
    charge (EFC) rounds, 36,000 yards with 2,240 pound APC
    shell at 30 degrees 40 minutes elevation, using 556 pounds of
    propellant, so 24 guns plus prototypes and spares. Weight 105
    tons including breech mechanism.

    The 50 calibre meant for the next generation of ships cancelled
    by the Washington treaty, 71 built, 44 being built when the order
    was cancelled in February 1922. Some used for shore batteries.
    Life maybe 200 full charge rounds, 45,100 yards with 2,240
    pound APC shell at 46 degrees elevation using 556 pounds of
    propellant as coast defence, weight 128.15 tons including breech
    mechanism.

    With the ability to use 832 pounds of propellant maximum range is
    put at 49,140 yards at 48 degrees elevation, lifetime maybe 150
    rounds, weight 152.05 tons including breech mechanism.

    The 45 calibre gun for the 35,000 ton battleships. Life 395 full
    charge rounds, 36,900 yards with 2,700 pound APC shell at 45
    degrees elevation, using 540 pounds of propellant, so 54 guns
    plus prototypes and spares. Weight 85.85 tons including solid
    breech without mechanism. Maximum range with 1,900 pound
    HC round 40,180 yards at 45 degrees elevation.

    The 50 calibre run for the Iowa (and Montana) class. Life 290 full
    charge rounds, 42,345 yards with 2,700 pound APC shell at 45
    degrees elevation, using 655 pounds of propellant, so over 36
    guns made. Weight 106.8 tons without breech mechanism.
    Maximum range with 1,900 pound HC round 41,604 yards at 45
    degrees elevation.

    According to the War Production Board 17 triple 16 inch 50 calibre
    gun and mount assemblies were delivered to ships side, which I
    take to mean 51 guns, between November 1942 and July 1945.
    There were 21 such 16 inch 45 calibre assemblies, which would
    mean 63 guns between October 1940 to December 1944. Note
    while it is possible other 45 calibre guns were built before the War
    Production Board start date of July 1940, North Carolina was
    launched on 13 June and Washington on 1 June 1940 and guns
    were fitted after launch. Given crane precision limits the mounts
    were lowered near to the ship then the incoming tide used to raise
    the ship for the final mating.

    Ammunition production was 33,014 2,700 pound AP from 1940 to
    May 1945, 4,909 2,240 pound AP from July 1942 to April 1945
    and 86,061 1,900 pound HC from January 1943 to August 1945.
    Shore bombardment anyone? A further 16,528 1,900 pound,
    4,935 2,240 pound and 6,565 2,700 pound rounds were reworked
    from December 1944 to August 1945.

    I did not bother looking up the number of times those barrels were
    replaced or relined. The navy would have some tricky planning to get
    their crews trained in life fire exercises and have enough life left in their guns. They would want them to be well enough practiced to be able
    to hit a target on the horizon, but not wear out the barrels so much they would be diminished and incapable of sustaining fire in combat.

    Yes, essentially pre radar a thorough set of training exercises could
    force the need for relining, with radar ranges could be more accurately
    found.

    The book mentioned as an interesting table for the 16 inch guns on
    board HMS Rodney during the Bismarck action. The gun itself had
    a lifetime of 250 full charge rounds, numbers 1, 12, 14, 16, 21, 23,
    25, 26 and 28 were on board. As of 4 May 1941 the 9 guns had a
    use of between 17 and 4/16 (as in 4 sixteenths) and 129 and 8/16
    EFC rounds and wear of between 2.2 and 10.8 mm. Rounds per
    gun fired 4 to 30 May ranged from 22 to 52, raising use to between
    57 and 10/16 and 168 and 2/16 EFC, wear to between 6.4 and
    11.3 mm. The fraction ratings shows the use of part charges for
    things like training, all the shells fired during the above period were
    full charge.

    Geoffrey Sinclair
    Remove the nb for email.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich Rostrom@21:1/5 to Geoffrey Sinclair" on Mon Oct 10 17:30:10 2016
    Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    USAAF 1945 Statistical Digest... totals come to

    7,285,000 rounds of 0.30 inch machine gun
    448,732,000 rounds of 0.50 inch machine gun

    Total 457,749,236 rounds including rockets.

    IOW, 98% .50 caliber. Which is to be expected, as the
    USAAF standardized on the .50 cal as its aircraft MG.
    But to see that high a proportion is a bit surprising.

    63,239 rockets

    That's lower than I would have expected, considering
    the number of fighter-bombers assigned to ground
    attack in Europe and the popularity of rockets for
    that work.
    --
    The real Velvet Revolution - and the would-be hijacker.

    http://originalvelvetrevolution.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Geoffrey Sinclair@21:1/5 to All on Tue Oct 11 11:04:25 2016
    "Rich Rostrom" <rrostrom@comcast.net> wrote in message news:rrostrom-0B5357.16271410102016@news.eternal-september.org...
    Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    USAAF 1945 Statistical Digest... totals come to

    63,239 rockets

    That's lower than I would have expected, considering
    the number of fighter-bombers assigned to ground
    attack in Europe and the popularity of rockets for
    that work.

    The USAAF in the European theatre did not start to use
    rockets until after D-Day, hence why at Mortain the RAF
    rocket firing Typhoons were used against the German
    armoured forces while the USAAF attacked the rear
    areas and ensured the Luftwaffe would not interfere.

    Rockets fired, ETO, 1944 2,436 in 1945 14,634
    MTO 1944 8,815, in 1945 28,032
    Pacific Ocean Areas, 1944 1,648, in 1945 2,485
    Far East Air Forces in 1945 1,060.
    China India Burma, 1943 69, in 1944 1,993, in 1945 2,068

    Alaskan units and 20th Air Force did not use rockets.

    The 9th Air Force reports from October 1943 to May 1945
    its P-47s fired 13,783 rockets and jettisoned another 344,
    its P-61 units fired 373 rockets and jettisoned 2. Only
    some of the fighter groups were equipped with rockets.

    Also apart from firing over 64,000,000 rounds of 0.50 inch
    another 5.3 million rounds was lost by 9th AF units.

    Geoffrey Sinclair
    Remove the nb for email.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rich Rostrom@21:1/5 to Geoffrey Sinclair on Tue Oct 11 15:23:23 2016
    "Geoffrey Sinclair" <gsinclairnb@froggy.com.au> wrote:

    The USAAF in the European theatre did not start to use
    rockets until after D-Day, hence why at Mortain the RAF
    rocket firing Typhoons were used against the German
    armoured forces...

    I had wondered about that; the rockets at
    Mortain are famous... BTW that was almost
    two months after D-Day, so the delay in
    USAAF usage was even longer than that.

    If in the course of these splendid excavations,
    figures for rocket usage by the RAF turn up, they
    might be substantially higher.
    --
    The real Velvet Revolution - and the would-be hijacker.

    http://originalvelvetrevolution.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don Phillipson@21:1/5 to Dave Smith on Tue Oct 11 15:11:06 2016
    "Dave Smith" <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:oTxJz.33195$nC2.1378@fx27.iad...

    . . . Within a decade after the war most of the Commonwealth countries modernized, switching to semiautomatic rifles in the NATO standard 7.62mm.

    There was still some .303 ammunition in hand. Our unit, having weapons
    tech training, had a couple old Bren guns in the armory and we used to
    take them to the ranges once in a while. That was in the late 60s. My
    father commanded an air cadet squadron in the 70s and 80s and they were
    still able to get some of that old .303.

    WW2 Lee-Enfields seem still used by the Canadian "Arctic Patrol,"
    a civilian volunteer force formed in the Cold War. Winchester
    still sells .303 ammunition. Lee-Enfields were a common hunting
    rifle in Canada in the 1960s perhaps because all WW2 servicemen
    had basic rifle training with this weapon.
    --
    Don Phillipson
    Carlsbad Springs
    (Ottawa, Canada)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Smith@21:1/5 to Don Phillipson on Tue Oct 11 23:12:02 2016
    On 2016-10-11 3:11 PM, Don Phillipson wrote:
    "Dave Smith" <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in message

    WW2 Lee-Enfields seem still used by the Canadian "Arctic Patrol,"
    a civilian volunteer force formed in the Cold War. Winchester
    still sells .303 ammunition. Lee-Enfields were a common hunting
    rifle in Canada in the 1960s perhaps because all WW2 servicemen
    had basic rifle training with this weapon.

    They are still commonly used. I have seen them for sale in several gun
    shops lately and frequently see them at the gun range. I have one.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Schuler@21:1/5 to Don Phillipson on Fri Oct 14 10:24:21 2016
    On Tuesday, October 11, 2016 at 3:11:08 PM UTC-4, Don Phillipson wrote:
    "Dave Smith" <adavid.smith@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:oTxJz.33195$nC2.1378@fx27.iad...

    . . . Within a decade after the war most of the Commonwealth countries modernized, switching to semiautomatic rifles in the NATO standard 7.62mm.

    There was still some .303 ammunition in hand. Our unit, having weapons
    tech training, had a couple old Bren guns in the armory and we used to
    take them to the ranges once in a while. That was in the late 60s. My father commanded an air cadet squadron in the 70s and 80s and they were still able to get some of that old .303.

    WW2 Lee-Enfields seem still used by the Canadian "Arctic Patrol,"
    a civilian volunteer force formed in the Cold War. Winchester
    still sells .303 ammunition. Lee-Enfields were a common hunting
    rifle in Canada in the 1960s perhaps because all WW2 servicemen
    had basic rifle training with this weapon.
    --
    Don Phillipson
    Carlsbad Springs
    (Ottawa, Canada)

    The Arctic Rangers just selected a new rifle, which is entering
    service - a modified Sako T3 CTR. Replacement has started and will
    be completed by 2019.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)